Search

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is the second most common subtype of uterine mesenchymal cancer, after leiomyosarcoma, and oncogenic fusion proteins are found in many ESS. Our previous studies demonstrated transforming properties and diagnostic relevance of the fusion oncoprotein YWHAE–NUTM2 in high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) and showed that cyclin D1 is a diagnostic biomarker in these HG-ESS. However, YWHAE–NUTM2 mechanisms of oncogenesis and roles in cyclin D1 expression have not been characterized. In the current studies, we show YWHAE-NUTM2 complexes with both BRAF/RAF1 and YAP/TAZ in HG-ESS. These interactions are functionally relevant because YWHAE-NUTM2 knockdown in HG-ESS and other models inhibits RAF/MEK/MAPK phosphorylation, cyclin D1 expression, and cell proliferation. Further, cyclin D1 knockdown in HG-ESS dephosphorylates RB1 and inhibits proliferation. In keeping with these findings, we show that MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors have anti-proliferative effects in HG-ESS, and combinations of these inhibitors have synergistic activity. These findings establish that YWHAE-NUTM2 regulates cyclin D1 expression and cell proliferation by dysregulating RAF/MEK/MAPK and Hippo/YAP-TAZ signaling pathways. Recent studies demonstrate Hippo/YAP-TAZ pathway aberrations in many sarcomas, but this is among the first studies to demonstrate a well-defined oncogenic mechanism as the cause of Hippo pathway dysregulation.

Purpose: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin of the digestive tract. A yet more challenging resistance mechanism involves transition from oncogenic KIT to a new imatinib-insensitive oncogenic driver, heralded by loss of KIT expression. Our recent studies have shown that inhibition of cyclin D1 and Hippo signaling, which are overexpressed in KIT-independent GIST, is accompanied by anti-proliferative and apoptosis-promoting effects. PRKCQ, JUN, and the Hippo/YAP pathway coordinately regulate GIST cyclin D1 expression. Thus, targeting of these pathways could be effective therapeutically for these now untreatable tumors.Methods: Targeting cyclin D1 expression of small molecular drugs was screened by a cell monolayer growth and western blotting. The biologic mechanisms of bortezomib to KIT-independent GISTs were assessed by immunoblotting, qRT-PCR, cell viability, colony growth, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis, migration and invasiveness.Results: In the initial small molecular inhibitor screening in KIT-independent GIST62, we found that bortezomib-mediated inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery showed anti-proliferative effects of KIT-independent GIST cells via downregulation of cyclin D1 and induction of p53 and p21. Treatment with proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, led to downregulation of cyclin D1 and YAP/TAZ and an increase in the cleaved PARP expression in three KIT-independent GIST cell lines (GIST48B, GIST54, and GIST226). Additionally, it induced p53 and p21 expression in GIST48B and GIST54, increased apoptosis, and led to cell cycle G1/G2-phase arrest, decreased cell viability, colony formation, as well as migration and invasiveness in all GIST cell lines.Conclusion: Although our findings are early proof-of-principle, there are signs of a potential effective treatment for KIT-independent GISTs, the data highlight that targeting of cyclin D1 and Hippo/YAP by bortezomib warrants evaluation as a novel therapeutic strategy in KIT-independent GISTs.

// Bin Li 1, 2, 3 , Guangsen Zhang 2 , Cui Li 1 , Ruijuan Li 2 , Jingchen Lu 3 , Zhengxi He 3 , Quan Wang 3 , Zhenzi Peng 1 , Jun Wang 1 , Yeping Dong 1 , Chunfang Zhang 1 , Jie Qiong Tan 4 , Nacef Bahri 5 , Yuexiang Wang 5, 6 and Chaojun Duan 1 1 Medical Research Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China 2 Division of Hematology, Institute of Molecular Hematology, The Second Xiang Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China 3 Division of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China 4 State Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China 5 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 6 The Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China Correspondence to: Chaojun Duan, email: duancjxy@126.com Keywords: Lyn, CEL Received: October 04, 2015 Accepted: July 26, 2016 Published: August 19, 2016 ABSTRACT The Fip1-like1 (FIP1L1)–platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) (F/P) oncogene can cause chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL), but requires IL-5 cytokine participation. In this study, we investigate the mechanism of F/P in collaboration with IL-5 in CEL. The results showed that Lyn, a key effector in the IL-5-motivated eosinophil production, is extensively activated in F/P-positive CEL cells. Lyn can associate and phosphorylate IL-5 receptor α (IL-5RA) in F/P-positive cells. Moreover, the activation of Lyn and IL-5R kinase were strengthened when the cells were stimulated by IL-5. Lyn inhibition in F/P-positive CEL cells attenuated cellular proliferation, induced apoptosis, and blocked cell migration and major basic protein (MBP) release. We identified the FIP1L1-PDGFRA/JAK2/Lyn/Akt complex in the F/P-expressing cells which can be disrupted by dual inhibition of JAK2 and Lyn, repressing cell proliferation in both EOL-1(F/P-positive human eosinophilic cell line) and imatinib-resistance (IR) cells. Altogether, our data demonstrate that Lyn is a vital downstream kinase activated by F/P converged with IL-5 signals in CEL cells. Lyn activate and expand IL-5RA intracellular signaling through FIP1L1-PDGFRA/JAK2/Lyn/Akt network complex, provoking eosinophils proliferation and exaggerated activation manifested as CEL.

Traumatized lipomas with degenerative change may demonstrate histopathologic features that mimic atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT). Previously reported series of ALT involving the oral cavity preceded routine use of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry. Our aim is to evaluate MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemical expression in adipocytic tumors arising in this site, in conjunction with the histiocytic marker PU.1, to determine whether MDM2 and CDK4 impacts classification. 17 cases originally diagnosed as ALT were retrieved and immunohistochemical studies for MDM2, CDK4 and PU.1 were performed. FISH analysis for MDM2 amplification was performed in select cases. For this study group, the male:female ratio was 9:8 and the median age was 62 (range 41–88). All 17 cases presented as well- or predominantly well-circumscribed proliferations of variably sized, mature adipocytes exhibiting uni- or multi-vacuolation with occasional scalloped nuclei and mild nuclear atypia. Variable amounts of fibrous stroma with focal myxoid change and bland spindle cells were identified in 14/17 cases. Lipoblasts or atypical hyperchromatic stromal cells were not identified in any cases. 14 of 17 cases were negative for MDM2 and CDK4 in tumor cells and 11 of these 14 showed weak nuclear positivity for MDM2 in histiocytes. 3 of 17 cases showed weak, multifocal immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 and CDK4. PU.1 highlighted histiocytes in all 17 cases. FISH analysis for MDM2 amplification was negative in all 3 cases with weak MDM2/CDK4 expression. All cases were reclassified as lipoma with degenerative changes. ALT, in all likelihood, is less common than previously thought in this anatomic location and best diagnosed with ancillary studies. MDM2 expression in histiocytes is best interpreted in conjunction with CDK4 immunohistochemistry and confirmatory FISH for MDM2 amplification.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an aggressive PDGFB-dependent cutaneous sarcoma characterized by infiltrative growth and frequent local recurrences. Some DFSP progress to a higher-grade fibrosarcomatous form, with rapid growth and increased risk of metastasis. Imatinib provides clinical benefit in approximately 50% of patients with unresectable or metastatic DFSP. However, efficacious medical therapies have not been developed for imatinib-resistant DFSP. We established a model of imatinib-resistant DFSP and evaluated CDK4/6 inhibition as a genomically credentialed targeted therapy. DFSP105, an imatinib-resistant human cell line, was established from a fibrosarcomatous DFSP (FS-DFSP), and was studied by SNP arrays and sequencing to identify targetable genomic alterations. Findings were validated in vitro and in vivo, and confirmed in a series including 12 DFSP and 6 FS-DFSP. SNP analysis of DFSP105 revealed a homozygous deletion encompassing CDKN2A and CDKN2B. The resultant p16 loss implicated CDK4/6 as a potential therapeutic target in DFSP. We further demonstrated CDKN2A homozygous deletion in 1 of 12 conventional DFSP and 2 of 6 FS-DFSP, whereas p16 expression was lost in 4 of 18 DFSP. In vitro treatment of DFSP105 with two structurally distinct selective CDK4/6 inhibitors, PD-0332991 and LEE011, led to inhibition of RB1 phosphorylation and inhibition of proliferation (GI50 160 nmol/L and 276 nmol/L, respectively). In vivo treatment of DFSP105 with PD-0332991 (150 mg/kg) inhibited xenograft growth in mice, in comparison with imatinib-treated or -untreated tumors. In conclusion, CDKN2A deletion can contribute to DFSP progression. CDK4/6 inhibition is a preclinically effective treatment against p16-negative, imatinib-resistant FS-DFSP, and should be evaluated as a therapeutic strategy in patients with unresectable or metastatic imatinib-resistant DFSP. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(6); 1346–53. ©2015 AACR.

KIT, PDGFRA, NF1 and SDH mutations are alternate initiating events, fostering hyperplasia in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), and additional genetic alterations are required for progression to malignancy. The most frequent secondary alteration, demonstrated in ∼70% of GISTs, is chromosome 14q deletion. Here we report hemizygous or homozygous inactivating mutations of the chromosome 14q MAX gene in 16 of 76 GISTs (21%). We find MAX mutations in 17% and 50% of sporadic and NF1-syndromic GISTs, respectively, and we find loss of MAX protein expression in 48% and 90% of sporadic and NF1-syndromic GISTs, respectively, and in three of eight micro-GISTs, which are early GISTs. MAX genomic inactivation is associated with p16 silencing in the absence of p16 coding sequence deletion and MAX induction restores p16 expression and inhibits GIST proliferation. Hence, MAX inactivation is a common event in GIST progression, fostering cell cycle activity in early GISTs., In gastrointestinal stromal tumours early mutations in known genes are frequently followed by chromosome 14q deletion. Here the authors find mutations resulting in loss of MAX protein expression conserved between primary tumours and metastases in the same patients, suggesting that MAX mutation is an early event.

Introduction: We previously demonstrated that dystrophin inactivation results from genomic DMD 5-end deletions in advanced GIST and leiomyosarcoma, fostering migration, invasion, anchorage independence, and invadopodia formation. Hence, dystrophin inactivation, the most common cause of muscular dystrophy, is also a tumorigenic mechanism in sarcoma. CDKN2A/CDKN2B inactivation is an early event in peripheral nerve sheath tumor (PNST) progression, associated with progression from neurofibroma (NF) to atypical NF. PRC2 inactivation is a later event during progression of some MPNST. Additional biologic markers are needed to distinguish NF from low-grade MPNST. In the present study, we identify and characterize dystrophin dysregulation at an early phase in PNST progression. Methods: Dystrophin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in FFPE sections using the DYS1 monoclonal antibody. DYS1 and other dystrophin monoclonals were used in immunoblotting (IB) studies of snap-frozen PNST. Genomic analyses were performed by targeted gene capture and sequencing (Haloplex custom panel of 812 cancer-associated genes) and Cytoscan HD SNPs. Dystrophin restorations were performed in MPNST cultures using Dp116 (puromycin resistance) and Dp427 (neomycin resistance), either singly or in combination. Results: Dystrophin IHC against TMAs containing common subtypes of benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors showed that most soft-tissue tumor subtypes lacked detectable dystrophin expression whereas 18 of 19 schwannomas expressed dystrophin strongly and diffusely, at levels comparable to that in non-neoplastic skeletal muscle. Dystrophin was also expressed strongly in the neoplastic Schwann-cell component of neurofibromas (NF), whereas dystrophin expression was absent or weak in each of 17 MPNST. IB studies in a separate series of snap-frozen specimens showed that the dystrophin expressed strongly in schwannomas (classic histology = 4; cellular = 6) was coexpression of 427kDa (so-called myogenic) and 116kDa Schwann-cell specific isoforms. IB studies in snap-frozen MPNST showed loss of dystrophin 116kDa and 427kDa expression in 16 cases, retained expression in 1 case, and retained expression of 427kDa only, in 1 case. Genomic surveys demonstrated intragenic DMD deletions or inactivating mutations in 4 of 11 MPNST. Each of 3 NF transitioning to MPNST had strong dystrophin expression in the NF component but not in the associated MPNST. Conjoined restoration of 116kDa and 427kDa dystrophin isoforms (but not restoration of the 116kDa isoform, on its own) inhibited MPNST migration. IHC and IB studies (in progress) suggest that PNST dystrophin inactivation occurs concurrent with or subsequent to CDKN2A/CDKN2B inactivation during transition from NF to low-grade MPNST, and prior to PRC2 inactivation. Conclusions: We show that Dp116 and Dp427 dystrophin isoforms have tumor-suppressor properties in PNST. Extinction of these isoforms occurs in most MPNST, and in laboratory models is associated with increased cell migration. Dystrophin inactivation coincides with transition from NF to low-grade MPNST; therefore, dystrophin IHC might be useful in diagnostic distinction between atypical NF and MPNST. Citation Format: Inga-Marie Schaefer*, Armelle Dufresne*, Nacef Bahri, Marije A. J. de Rooij, Stacy M. Yanofsky, Yuexiang Wang, Chandrajit P. Raut, Laurence H. Baker, Adrian Marino-Enriquez, Matt van de Rijn, Jonathan A. Fletcher. Dystrophin is a tumor suppressor in peripheral nerve sheath tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference on Advances in Sarcomas: From Basic Science to Clinical Translation; May 16-19, 2017; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B16.