Search

Healthcare workers (HCW) have high occupational risk for hepatitis B and Uzbekistan held two HCW vaccination campaigns in 2015 and 2022. Hepatitis B antibody testing (anti-HBs) after Hepatitis B (HepB) vaccination is recommended by the U.S. CDC and WHO for HCW, but Uzbekistan does not have such a policy. In 2023, we randomly selected HCW from the campaign registries. Participants who agreed were interviewed at their workplaces. Vaccination doses were self-reported. Testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Total hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and anti-HBs were concurrently performed. We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess factors associated with anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL. Of 334 participants, 205 were vaccinated in 2015 and 129 in 2022. Median age was 40 years (interquartile range 35-49 years), and 87% were female. Most (71%) reported having completed the three doses, 21% two doses and 7% one dose. Testing revealed that 5% had an active HBV infection, 4% had a resolved infection, and 91% had detectable vaccine-derived antibodies. Among those ( n  = 303), 71% had anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL. For those who reported receiving 1, 2, and 3 doses, protective titers were 59%, 70%, and 72%, respectively. Protective titers were lower for HCW that worked in clinics versus hospitals (aPR = 0.92, CI: 0.87-0.98, p  = .01) adjusting for age, dose number and presence of chronic conditions. Strategies to improve completion of the 3-dose series and policies for post-vaccination immunity testing 1-2 months after completion of the 3-dose HepB series could help identify workers who may require revaccination or are currently infected.

Background: From June 13-16, 2022, a regional epidemiological department in Kazakhstan reported an increase in acute gastroenteritis cases among people who consumed food from a wedding at a restaurant. An investigation was initiated to determine factors associated with acute intestinal infection and prevent further illness., Methods: The investigation team conducted a retrospective cohort study among people who consumed event food. Participants were classified as a case if they were acutely ill with diarrhea, vomiting, fever, vomiting, or weakness from June 13-18. We interviewed people to collect information on demographics, symptoms, and food exposures at the event. We calculated food-specific attack rates and estimated adjusted relative risks (aRR) using multivariable Poisson regression, which was adjusted for sex, age, and foods consumed. Patient stool and gastric lavage samples, leftover food, and restaurant environmental samples were collected for bacterial culture and chemical analysis., Results: Of the 138 participants, 66 became ill; the attack rate was 48%. The most reported symptoms were diarrhea (92%), abdominal pain (91%), and fever (89%). Symptom onset occurred between 6 h and 4 days after the event (median = 1 day). Overall, 50 (76%) cases were hospitalized; no deaths were reported. In bivariable analysis, a greater proportion of cases than non-cases ate honey cake (89% vs. 13%, p < 0.01), and 45% of cases ate leftovers compared with 11% of non-cases (p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, honey cake was the only risk factor associated with illness (aRR = 7.8, 95% confidence interval = 3.5-20.1, p < 0.01). Honey cakes, which use raw eggs in cream layers, had been stored at room temperature for three days before the event. Salmonella enterica serovar Enteriditis (S. Enteritidis) was isolated from all patient stool samples (49/49, 100%) and honey cake samples (2/2, 100%). Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 92% (35/38) of patient gastric lavage samples., Conclusion: S. Enteritidis was this outbreak's most probable etiological agent based on clinical manifestations and isolation from participant and honey cake samples. The improper storage of cakes containing raw eggs was a key contributing factor. Leftover event food was discarded, and the restaurant was closed for disinfection. Future outbreaks could be prevented by increased food safety awareness., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This outbreak investigation was conducted by residents of the Central Asia Field Epidemiology Training Program under a legally authorized mandate from the Ministry of Health of Kazakhstan. This activity was reviewed by the CDC Institutional Review Board, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy (CGH-WIDB-7/29/22-96394).1 All participants gave written informed consent. Parents or legal guardians gave consent to provide information about their children under the age of 18. Children under 18 years of age were not interviewed; instead, information about children was obtained from parents or legal guardians. Conducted under the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: In Tajikistan, where there are about 8,000 cases annually, many new cases are being diagnosed with severe disease, indicating a delay in receiving care. We aimed to estimate the proportion with delayed care and the main factors contributing to delayed care., Methods: Using a retrospective cohort design, we conducted a study that included all people aged over 15 years who were newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB in Dushanbe from 2019 to 2021. We defined 'patient delay' as > 14 days from TB symptom onset to the first provider visit and 'provider delay' as > 3 days from the first visit to treatment initiation. Data was abstracted from medical records and participants were interviewed in-person. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Of 472 participants, 49% were male, 65% had lung tissue cavitation, 33% had drug resistant TB, 11% had diabetes, 4% had HIV, and. Reported cases dropped from 196 in 2019 to 109 in 2020 and increased to 167 in 2021. The proportion of people experiencing patient delays was 82%, 72%, and 90% per year, respectively. The proportion of provider delays was 44%, 41% and 29% per year. Patient delay was associated with year (aRR: 1.09 [CI:1.02-1.18] in 2021 vs. 2019), age (aRR:0.91 [0.82-0.99] for 40-59-year-olds vs. 15-39-year-olds), having HIV (aRR:1.22 [1.08-1.38]), having blood in sputum (aRR:1.19 [1.10-1.28]), chest pain (aRR:1.32 [1.14-1.54]), having at least two structural barriers vs. none (aRR:1.52 [1.28-1.80]), having one of the following barriers: long wait lines (aRR:1.36 [1.03-1.80]), feeling that healthcare services were expensive (aRR:1.54 [1.28-1.85]), or having no time or too much work (aRR:1.54 [1.29-1.84]). Provider delay was associated with year (aRR: 0.67 [0.51-0.89] in 2021 vs. 2019), patients having to pay for X-ray services (aRR: 1.59 [1.22-2.07]) and lacking direct-observed-therapy (DOTS) in facility (aRR: 1.61 [1.03-2.52])., Conclusions: Patient delay was high before the COVID-19 pandemic and increased in 2021, while provider delay decreased during this time. Addressing structural barriers to healthcare services, such as increased DOTS facilities, expanded hours, and zero fees, may decrease delays., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Our study was conducted in accordance the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for the study was received from the local ethical commission of the Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Kazakhstan (No. 6 (129), 05/25/2022) and the Ministry of Health of Tajikistan. This activity was reviewed by the CDC and was determined to be non-research and conducted consistently with applicable U.S. federal law and CDC policy (45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. § 552a; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Clinical trial number: not applicable. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, oral consent was obtained for participants interviewed virtually and written consent for those interviewed in-person. Written informed consent was obtained from parents of participants ages 15–17 years old who also provided verbal assent for participation. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: A sharp increase in reported brucellosis incidence was observed in northwestern Tajikistan (from 1.0/100,000 people in January-May 2022 to 32.7/100,000 in January-May 2023). Most (82%) cases were from the same remote mountainous village (population = 10,712). The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for brucellosis infection and mitigate disease risk., Methods: Using a case-control design, we conducted face-to-face interviews and collected blood samples during May-June 2023. Fifty-seven cases and 114 controls were recruited. Cases were the first person in a household diagnosed with brucellosis during February-June 2023 with positive serum agglutination test and antibody titers ≥1/160 from blood samples. Two controls were selected for each case (neighbors from different households matched by age and sex). Controls testing positive were excluded and replaced. We conducted conditional multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Among the 87 brucellosis patients reported, 57 (66%) agreed to participate and didn't have secondary cases in the household. Of the 57 cases, 68% were 15-44 years old, and 44% were male. Cases peaked in May 2023. Common symptoms were joint pain (95%), fever (84%), weakness (72%), and night sweats (65%). Of selected controls, 13% tested positive and were excluded. All cases and 94% of controls owned livestock (mostly cattle, sheep, or goats); no animals had not been vaccinated in the past 5 years. Brucellosis was associated with consumption of both homemade kaymak (clotted cream) and home-raised meat compared with neither (AOR: 59 [95%CI: 4.3-798], p  < 0.01), home-raised meat but not kaymak compared with neither (AOR: 54 [4.0-731], p  < 0.01), and involvement in animal slaughter compared with no involvement (AOR: 36 [2.8-461], p  < 0.01)., Conclusion: Contact with unvaccinated livestock or consumption of their products was a key contributor to this outbreak in a remote village of Tajikistan. With 13% of controls testing positive, true incidence was likely greater than reported. Following our investigation, a brucellosis awareness education campaign and animal vaccination campaigns were carried out in the region and only one case was reported in September 2023., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Qurbonov, Silemonshoeva, Horth, Tilloeva, Yusufi and Nabirova.)

Background: Clinical practice guidelines were continually changing during the COVID-19 pandemic to reflect the best available evidence for a novel virus. In Kazakhstan, the national clinical guidelines for COVID-19 patient care were regularly modified and it was not known if and to what extent these guidelines were being followed in practice., Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of data collected from an observational study among people hospitalized with COVID-19 in a large infectious disease hospital in Almaty in four cross-sections of increased COVID-19 incidence: T1 (1 June-30 August 2020); T2 (1 October-31 December 2020); T3 (1 April-31 May 2021); and T4 (1 July-26 October 2021). Modifications to the national COVID-19 treatment guidelines were identified and clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. We assessed frequency of antibiotic, glucocorticoid, anticoagulant, and antiviral administered in each period and determined if these aligned with national clinical guidelines. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare practices across periods., Results: Six modifications were made to national COVID-19 treatment guidelines during this study. Of 1,146 people hospitalized with COVID-19, 14% were in T1, 14% in T2, 22% in T3, and 50% in T4. Anticoagulant treatment was administered to 87% (range: 56%-95%), antibiotic treatment to 60% (range: 58%-64%), glucocorticoid to 55% (range: 43%-64%) and antiviral therapy 15% (range: 7%-22%). Majority of treatments were not aligned with national guidelines, including 98% of anticoagulant use, 95% of antibiotic use, 56% of glucocorticoid use, and 56% of antiviral use. There were no significant changes in practice following changes in guidelines for antibiotic use (64% in T1 to 58% in T2, p  = 0.30). There was significant increase in use of anticoagulant (84% in T2 vs. 95% in T3, p  < 0.01), glucocorticoid (43% in T2 vs. 64% in T3, p  < 0.01), and antiviral treatment (7% in T3 vs. 15% in T4, p  < 0.01) after guidelines updates., Conclusion: The majority of treatments administered to people hospitalized with COVID-19 in four periods of high incidence in Almaty were not aligned with updated clinical guidelines. Antibiotic misuse was markedly high throughout. Increased awareness and training on clinical practice guidelines as updates are released may help improve adoption of evidence-based practices., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Gazezova, Nabirova, Detmar, Smagul, Kasabekova, Zikriyarova and Horth.)

Introduction: Vaccination is a critical public health intervention, and vaccine hesitancy is a major threat. Globally, confidence in COVID-19 vaccines has been low, and rates of routine immunizations decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because healthcare providers are a trusted source of information on vaccination in Kazakhstan, it was vital to understand their knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to both routine and COVID-19 vaccines., Methods: From March to April 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional study among the healthcare providers responsible for vaccination in 54 primary care facilities in three cities in Kazakhstan. All consenting providers anonymously completed structured online questionnaires at their place of work. A provider was classified as having COVID-19 vaccine confidence if they planned to get a COVID-19 vaccine, believed that COVID-19 vaccines are important to protect their community and either believed the vaccine was important to protect themselves or believed that getting a vaccine was safer than getting COVID-19. Statistical analysis included chi-square, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and Poisson regression., Results: Of 1,461 providers, 30% had COVID-19 vaccine confidence, 40% did not, and 30% would refuse vaccination. Participants were mostly female (92%) and ≤ 35 years old (57%). Additionally, 65% were nurses, 25% were family physicians, and 10% were pediatricians. Adequate KAP for routine vaccines was low (22, 17, and 32%, respectively). Adequate knowledge was highest among pediatricians (42%) and family physicians (28%) and lowest among nurses (17%). Misconceptions about vaccines were high; 54% believed that influenza vaccines cause flu, and 57% believed that there is a scientifically proven association between vaccination and autism and multiple sclerosis. About half (45%) of the practitioners felt confident answering patient vaccine-related concerns. In adjusted models, COVID-19 vaccine confidence was positively associated with adequate knowledge of vaccines (prevalence ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.4) and adequate attitudes related to routine vaccines (3.1, 2.7-3.6)., Conclusion: Our study uncovers critical areas for interventions to improve KAP related to routine immunizations and COVID-19 vaccine confidence among providers in Kazakhstan. The complex relationship between KAP of routine vaccines and COVID-19 vaccine confidence underscores the importance of addressing vaccine hesitancy more broadly and not focusing solely on COVID-19., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Nabirova, Horth, Kassabekova, Henderson, Yesmagambetova, Alaverdyan, Nuorti and Smagul.)

Background: In February 2021 Kazakhstan began offering COVID-19 vaccines to adults. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections raised concerns about real-world vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to evaluate effectiveness of four vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis among adults in Almaty using aggregated vaccination data and individual-level breakthrough COVID-19 cases (≥14 days from 2nd dose) using national surveillance data. We ran time-adjusted Cox-proportional-hazards model with sensitivity analysis accounting for varying entry into vaccinated cohort to assess vaccine effectiveness for each vaccine (measured as 1-adjusted hazard ratios) using the unvaccinated population as reference ( N  = 565,390). We separately calculated daily cumulative hazards for COVID-19 breakthrough among vaccinated persons by age and vaccination month., Results: From February 22 to September 1, 2021, in Almaty, 747,558 (57%) adults were fully vaccinated (received 2 doses), and 108,324 COVID-19 cases (11,472 breakthrough) were registered. Vaccine effectiveness against infection was 79% [sensitivity estimates (SE): 74%-82%] for QazVac, 77% (SE: 71%-81%) for Sputnik V, 71% (SE: 69%-72%) for Hayat-Vax, and 70% (SE: 65%-72%) for CoronaVac. Among vaccinated persons, the 90-day follow-up cumulative hazard for breakthrough infection was 2.2%. Cumulative hazard was 2.9% among people aged ≥60 years versus 1.9% among persons aged 18-39 years ( p  < 0.001), and 1.2% for people vaccinated in February-May versus 3.3% in June-August (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates high effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infection in Almaty similar to other observational studies. Higher cumulative hazard of breakthrough among people ≥60 years of age and during variant surges warrants targeted booster vaccination campaigns., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Nabirova, Horth, Smagul, Nukenova, Yesmagambetova, Singer, Henderson and Tsoy.)

We conducted an outbreak investigation from June 3 to 15th in a rural village in northern Kazakhstan, after surveillance showed an increase in gastroenteritis. Cases were residents who presented for medical treatment for diarrhea, fever (>37.5 °C), vomiting, or weakness from May 14 to June 15, 2021. Controls were residents matched by age ±2 years at a ratio of two controls for every case. Cases and controls were interviewed using structured questionnaires. We abstracted clinical data from medical records. We mapped cases and assessed risk for disease using conditional multivariable logistic regression. We identified 154 cases of acute gastroenteritis (attack rate of ~26 per 1,000 inhabitants). Symptoms were diarrhea, fever, vomiting, weakness, and decreased appetite. Among cases that participated (n = 107), 74% reported having drank unboiled tap water vs 18% of controls (n = 219). This was the only risk factor associated with disease (adjusted odds ratio: 18; 95% CI 9-35). Drinking water from a dispenser or carbonated drinks was protective. The city has two water supply networks; cases were clustered (107 cases in 79 households) in one. The investigation found that monitoring of quality and safety of water according to national regulations had not been conducted since 2018. No fatalities occurred, and no associated cases were reported after our investigation. Results suggest that untreated tap water was the probable source of the outbreak. The water supply had been cleaned and disinfected twice by the facility 2 days before our investigation began. Recommendations were made for regular monitoring of water supply facilities with rapid public notification when issues are detected to reduce likelihood of future drinking water associated outbreaks., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

From March to May 2020, 1306 oilfield workers in Kazakhstan tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a case-control study to assess factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The cases were PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2 during June-September 2020. Controls lived at the same camp and were randomly selected from the workers who were PCR-negative for SARS-CoV-2. Data was collected telephonically by interviewing the oil workers. The study had 296 cases and 536 controls with 627 (75%) men, and 527 (63%) were below 40 years of age. Individual factors were the main drivers of transmission, with little contribution by environmental factors. Of the twenty individual factors, rare hand sanitizer use, travel before shift work, and social interactions outside of work increased SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Of the twenty-two environmental factors, only working in air-conditioned spaces was associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Communication messages may enhance workers' individual responsibility and responsibility for the safety of others to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Tuberculosis patients "resistant to isoniazid and susceptible to rifampicin (Hr-TB)" remain neglected, despite a high burden and poor outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 6 month regimen consisting of levofloxacin, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (LRZE) to treat Hr-TB. In contrast, Uzbekistan uses a 9 month regimen (LRZE plus a second-line injectable in the first 3 months). We aimed to assess the treatment outcomes of this novel regimen among Hr-TB patients treated in two regions of Uzbekistan (Fergana and Bukhara) in 2017-2018. We conducted a cohort study involving secondary analysis of routine surveillance data. Of 132 Hr-TB patients, 105 (80%) were successfully treated. Death was the predominant unsuccessful outcome (13, 10%) followed by "treatment failure" (10, 8%) and "lost to follow-up" (4, 2%). High treatment success is an indicator of the potential effectiveness of the novel regimen and adds to the limited global evidence on this issue. However, the sample size was small and there was no comparison group. Since the study was conducted in two regions of Uzbekistan only, the findings have limited generalizability. We recommend future research using an adequate sample size and an appropriate study design (randomized controlled trial or prospective cohort with a control group receiving the WHO-recommended regimen).

As per national guidelines in Uzbekistan, all presumptive tuberculosis patients should be tested using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosing tuberculosis. There is no published evidence how well this is being implemented. In this paper, we report on the Xpert coverage among presumptive tuberculosis patients in 2018 and 2019, factors associated with non-testing and delays involved. Analysis of national aggregate data indicated that Xpert testing increased from 24% in 2018 to 46% in 2019, with variation among the regions: 21% in Tashkent region to 100% in Karakalpakstan. In a cohort (January-March 2019) constituted of 40 randomly selected health facilities in Tashkent city and Bukhara region, there were 1940 patients of whom 832 (43%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 41-45%) were not Xpert-tested. Non-testing was significantly higher in Bukhara region (73%) compared to Tashkent city (28%). In multivariable analysis, patient's age, distance between primary health centre (PHC) and Xpert laboratory, diagnostic capacity and site of PHC were associated with non-testing. The median (interquartile range) duration from date of initial visit to PHC to receiving results was 1 (1-2) day in Tashkent city compared to 3 (1-6) days in Bukhara region ( p -value < 0.001). While there is commendable progress, universal access to Xpert testing is not a reality yet.

Introduction: Ukraine has gaps in Tuberculosis (TB) service coverage, especially in key populations (KPs). We compared effectiveness of three different strategies for active TB detection among KPs and their linkage to TB treatment during three time periods., Methodology: The KPs included people who inject drugs (PWID), sex workers (SW), men who have sex with men (MSM) and groups at-risk of TB (ex-prisoners, Roma and homeless). The active case finding included decentralized symptom screening and specimen collection (2014, strategy-1), decentralized screening with patient referred for specimen collection (2015-2017, strategy-2) and strategy-2 plus GeneXpert (2018, strategy-3)., Results: In total 680,760 KPs were screened, of whom 68% were PWID. TB case detection per 100,000 populations was 1,191 in strategy-1, 302 in strategy-2, and 235 in strategy-3. The number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one case was respectively 84, 332, and 425. TB detection was highest among homeless (range: 1,839-2,297 per 100,000 population). The lowest detection was among the MSM and SW. Between 2014 and 2018, 82-94% of all diagnosed TB patients in KPs started TB treatment., Conclusions: The active case finding in KPs increased detection of TB cases in Ukraine, and the majority of diagnosed KPs initiated TB treatment. Centralization of diagnosis reduced the effectiveness of TB screening. Each region in Ukraine should assess the composition and the needs of KPs which will allow for adoption of specific strategies to detect TB among KPs with high TB prevalence., Competing Interests: No Conflict of Interest is declared, (Copyright (c) 2019 Natalia Kamenska, Dilyara Nabirova, Karapet Davtyan, Hayk Davtyan, Rony Zachariah, Garry Aslanyan.)

Introduction: We assessed the influence of a result-based financing (RBF) model, which included incentives for Primary Healthcare facilities on TB treatment outcomes., Methodology: We compared TB patients > 17 years and their treatment outcomes among those who did and did not benefit from RBF-model in 14 districts of Odeska oblast, Ukraine in 2017. Log-binomial regression was used to examine factors associated with being included in RBF-model., Results: Of 2,269 reported TB patients, 308 (14%) were included in RBF-model. Most patients in the RBF-model were from rural areas 229 (74%), unemployed 218 (71%), and HIV-infected 131 (43%). Individuals from urban areas (Adjusted risk ratio, ARR =0.9, 95% Confidence Interval, CI:0.89-0.94), having drug-resistant TB (ARR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.18-0.45), and relapse TB (ARR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.40-0.83) were less likely to be included in RBF-model. Favorable outcomes in new/relapse cases with RBF-model was 89% compared with 41% (p < 0.001) without RBF. Similarly, for other retreatment this was 83% versus 40% (p < 0.001). Failures in the no-RBF group was 29% for new and relapse cases while for other retreatment cases, it was 26% (significantly higher than in the RBF-model)., Conclusion: RBF-model is effective in achieving high levels of favorable TB treatment outcomes. Almost three-in-ten TB patients in non-RBF category failed TB treatment despite having drug-susceptible TB. Efforts are now needed to include it within ongoing public health reforms and assess the feasibility of scaling-up this intervention through implementation research and dedicated funding., Competing Interests: No Conflict of Interest is declared, (Copyright (c) 2019 Evgenia Geliukh, Dilyara Nabirova, Karapet Davtyan, Svetlana Yesypenko, Rony Zachariah.)