1. Impact of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Dose in Pre-Surgical Implant Analysis
- Author
-
Sandra David-Tchouda, Thomas Fortin, Nabil El Sahili, Ibrahim Nasseh, Antoine Berberi, and Sophie Thoret
- Subjects
Orthodontics ,Cone beam computed tomography ,business.industry ,Image quality ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cone-beam computed tomography ,030206 dentistry ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Implant placement ,Implant-placement planning ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surgical implant ,Posterior mandibular implant ,Maxilla ,Dentistry ,medicine ,Hemi Maxillary segments (HM) ,Implant ,Radiation dose alteration ,business ,General Dentistry ,Reliability (statistics) ,Reduction (orthopedic surgery) - Abstract
Objectives: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) produces vital information required for the accurate and prudent placement of dental implants. Lack of standardization between CBCT machines may result in unsafe patient exposure to harmful radiation; higher doses are not necessarily associated with improved image quality. Aim: The study aimed to assess the influence of low- and high-dose milliamperage settings on CBCT images for objective and subjective implant planning. Methods: Two dry skulls (4 hemi-maxillary segments of the maxilla and 4 hemi-maxillary segments of the mandible) were scanned under low (2 mA) and high (6.3 mA) dosage settings using a CBCT (Carestream CS 9300). Cross-sectional slices of both image qualities were evaluated by five expert clinicians, for image quality for implant planning and objective bone measurements. Results: There were no significant differences in bone measurements taken on high or low dose images (p > 0.05). In qualitative image assessments, assessment and image quality for almost all observers were independent of each other. For planning posterior mandibular implant placement, increased dosage improved concordance and kappa values between low and high dose images. Conclusion: Reduction in milliamperage did not affect diagnostic image quality for objective bone measurements and produced sufficient intra-rater reliability for qualitative assessment; therefore dose reduction can be achieved without compromising diagnostic decision- making.
- Published
- 2018