In this study, multiple linear regression (MLR) and the generalized additive model (GAM) approaches were used to build statistical models for 6 hr nowcasts of road surface temperature (RST) in the northeast of Vienna, Austria. GAMs were more suitable for historical analysis, particularly for decomposing the terms to identify the different influences of the meteorological covariates on RST. By contrast, for RST nowcasting, the simpler and more robust MLR models are recommended, with better applicability for real‐time operational runs. In MLR models, the forecasted air temperature was the most prominent predictor, followed by the measured RST. In independent testing, the MLR models showed better prediction skill, with daily root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) around 1°C. In accordance with the linear correlativity, the MLR models were built with more predictors for daytime than at night but still generated a larger RMSE at midday. Furthermore, the MLR models could reproduce the correct diurnal variation and could forecast RST below freezing point better than above 0°C. Four case studies, i.e. snowy, cold front, cloudy and sunny, were diagnosed in detail. The predicted RSTs were close to the measurements and depicted the trend well, including the persistent and rapid cooling (warming) and correct diurnal variation. In independent testing, the models showed better prediction skill, with daily root‐mean‐square error around 1°C. The multiple linear regression (MLR) models could reproduce the correct diurnal variation and could forecast road surface temperature (RST) below freezing point better than that above 0°C. Four case studies, i.e. snowy, cold front, cloudy and sunny, were diagnosed in detail. The predicted RSTs were close to the measurements and depicted the trend well, including persistent and rapid cooling (warming) and correct diurnal variation. The percentage of predictive errors from MLR UP prediction in winter 2015, averaged over three sites for (a) 01 hr, (b) 02 hr, (c) 03 hr, (d) 04 hr, (e) 05 hr and (f) 06 hr, were calculated and shown. The mean correlation co‐efficient (mcc) is shown at the top of each plot. The percentages for the interval ± 1 and ± 2°C are plotted as lines with circles and squares, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]