1. Generic immunosuppressants.
- Author
-
Medeiros M, Lumini J, Stern N, Castañeda-Hernández G, and Filler G
- Subjects
- Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, Cyclosporine standards, Cyclosporine therapeutic use, Drug Substitution standards, Drugs, Generic pharmacokinetics, Drugs, Generic standards, Graft Rejection immunology, Humans, Immunosuppression Therapy standards, Immunosuppressive Agents pharmacokinetics, Immunosuppressive Agents standards, Mycophenolic Acid pharmacokinetics, Mycophenolic Acid standards, Mycophenolic Acid therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, Tacrolimus standards, Tacrolimus therapeutic use, Therapeutic Equivalency, Treatment Outcome, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration standards, Drugs, Generic therapeutic use, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Immunosuppression Therapy methods, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Organ Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Immunosuppressive drugs for solid organ transplantation are critical dose drugs with a narrow therapeutic index. Many of the most commonly used innovator drugs are off patent and have been replicated by generic counterparts, often at substantial cost-savings to the patient. However, serious adverse events caused by the transition from innovator to generic medications, specifically in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients, have questioned these autosubstitutions. The purpose of this review is to summarize the criteria set forth by the regulatory bodies, and to examine how major immunosuppressive drugs conform to these recommendations. Regulatory bodies have established inconsistent criteria to demonstrate bioequivalence between innovator and generic medications, causing approved generic variations to have varying levels of equivalence with the innovator drugs. In order to minimize the risk for under-immunosuppression, the following recommendations have been concluded. Brand prescribing of cyclosporine and tacrolimus are recommended due to evidence of adverse events after conversion to generic formulations and differences in dissolution parameters. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) shows better bioequivalence between innovator and generic formulations, however caution should be advised when switching between formulations. The institution of 'innovator only' policies may be appropriate at this time in order to minimize the risk of under-immunosuppressing patients until the evidence of more stringent bioequivalence has been established.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF