Search

Male circumcision is a protective HIV prevention strategy. However, uncircumcised Zambian men are reluctant to undergo voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). Tailored interventions are necessary to stimulate the uptake of early infant male circumcision (EIMC) and VMMC in Zambia. This feasibility study presents the formative process of utilising the PRECEDE framework in the development of a family-centred EIMC/VMMC intervention, Like Father Like Son, and its application in an existing VMMC intervention, Spear & Shield. We found that fear of the pain associated with EIMC procedures, foreskin disposal, beliefs in children's autonomy and rights, and men's dominance in health decision-making were factors affecting EIMC uptake. Perceived benefits for infants included improved hygiene, protection from HIV infection, and faster recovery. Reinforcing factors included female partners and fathers' MC status. The availability and access to EIMC services and information, skill and experience of health workers, and engagement and belief in traditional circumcision practices were factors enabling EIMC uptake. These individual, interpersonal, and structural factors positively and negatively influencing EIMC uptake in the Zambian clinic context were integrated into the intervention for expecting parents. Feedback from community advisory boards suggested the process was effective in developing a culturally tailored and acceptable EIMC/VMMC promotion intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abbreviations Introduction Despite advances in HIV prevention of mother?to?child transmission (PMTCT) in sub?Saharan Africa (SSA), pregnant and postpartum women face a high risk of HIV acquisition from infected male partners [...], : Introduction: HIV testing male partners of pregnant and postpartum women can lead to improved health outcomes for women, partners and infants. However, in sub?Saharan Africa, few male partners get HIV tested during their partner's pregnancy in spite of several promising approaches to increase partner testing uptake. We assessed stakeholders? views and preferences of partner notification, home?based testing and secondary distribution of self?test kits to understand whether offering choices for partner HIV testing may increase acceptability. Methods: Interviewers conducted semi?structured interviews with HIV?negative (N = 39) and HIV?positive (N = 41) pregnant/postpartum women, male partners of HIV?negative (N = 14) and HIV?positive (N = 14) pregnant/postpartum women, healthcare workers (N = 19) and policymakers (N = 16) in Malawi and Zambia. Interviews covered views of each partner testing approach and preferred approaches; healthcare workers were also asked about perceptions of a choice?based approach. Interviews were transcribed, translated and analysed to compare perspectives across country and participant types. Results: Most participants within each stakeholder group considered all three partner testing strategies acceptable. Relationship conflict was discussed as a potential adverse consequence for each approach. For partner notification, additional barriers included women losing letters, being fearful to give partners letters, being unable to read and men refusing to come to the clinic. For home?based testing, additional barriers included lack of privacy or confidentiality and fear of experiencing community?level HIV stigma. For HIV self?test kits, additional barriers included lack of counselling, false results and poor linkage to care. Preferred male partner testing options varied. Participants preferred partner notification due to their respect for clinical authority, home?based testing due to their desire to prioritize convenience and clinical authority, and self?test kits due to their desire to prioritize confidentiality. Less than half of couples interviewed selected the same preferred male partner testing option as their partner. Most healthcare workers felt the choice?based approach would be acceptable and feasible, but noted implementation challenges in personnel, resources or space. Conclusions: Most stakeholders considered different approaches to partner HIV testing to be acceptable, but concerns were raised about each. A choice?based approach may allow women to select their preferred method of partner testing; however, implementation challenges need to be addressed.

This study sought to explore and contextualise the man's role in antenatal services, and the barriers and strategies for engaging men in prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). We conducted 143 interviews with pregnant and breastfeeding women, male partners, health workers and policy makers in Malawi and Zambia. We employed thematic and critical discourse analysis using the hegemonic masculinity perspective. We found that men's roles in PMTCT reflected hegemonic masculinities. As breadwinners, men supported their partners with material and financial resources. As decision makers, men were involved in decision making on the health of their partners. As social protectors, men supported their partners in accessing and adhering to antenatal care, HIV treatment and care. Barriers and challenges to male involvement in antenatal care were often the result of conflict between the clinic operating hours and men's working hours, the perception of antenatal care services as female spaces, and men's fear of HIV testing. Proposed strategies to increase male engagement in PMTCT included sensitising men about HIV and pregnancy; engaging leaders and employers, providing services outside working hours, and providing incentives. We conclude that men's role and participation in PMTCT services are an extension and adaptation of hegemonic masculinities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immunization is one of the most successful public health initiatives. The World Health Organization in 2017 estimated that immunization averts about 2 to 3 million deaths every year. About 29,000 children worldwide under the age of five die every day, mainly from vaccine-preventable diseases. Uptake of vaccines with multiple doses up to the last dose has been a problem. Incomplete immunization against diseases leads to the reappearance of childhood vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) and consequently high infant mortality. The paper explored the reasons for incomplete of child immunization schedule in Lusaka district, Zambia. Methods: The study employed a concurrent mixed method design where both quantitative and qualitative methods were used. This particular paper focuses on the results from the qualitative component where Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were conducted with mothers and community health workers. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: The study found that mothers were generally aware of vaccines and knew the benefits of the vaccines. The reasons for incomplete child immunisation include the mothers' negative perceptions such as the fear of side effects of the vaccines, mothers' unwillingness to bring the child for immunisation. Bad treatment of mothers by health workers and various social factors such as the mother having to attend to social engagements like funerals and weddings also contributed to incomplete child immunisation. Economic factors included a lack of transport money and mothers having to attend work are additional reasons for incomplete child immunization. Conclusion: The reasons for incomplete child immunisation revealed by this study reflect complex individual, interpersonal, health systems, and social cultural contexts within which mothers live in their daily lives. There is need for more comprehensive and multi sectoral approach to improve the completion of immunisation schedules in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Community engagement is crucial for controlling disease outbreak and mitigating natural and industrial disasters. The COVID-19 pandemic has reconfirmed the need to elevate community engagement to build equity, trust and sustained action in future health promotion preparedness strategies. Using the health promotion strategy of strengthening community action enhances the opportunity for better outcomes. There is, therefore, a need to improve our understanding of community engagement practices during crises, scale-up good community engagement initiatives, and improve and sustain people-centered approaches to emergency responses. This paper presents five case studies from the United States, Singapore, Sierra Leone, Kenya and South Africa that demonstrate the potential strengths that can be nurtured to build resilience in local communities to help mitigate the impact of disasters and emergencies. The case studies highlight the importance of co-developing relevant education and communication strategies, amplifying the role of community leaders, empowering community members to achieve shared goals, assessing and adapting to changing contexts, pre-planning and readiness for future emergencies and acknowledgement of historic context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Racism is a public health crisis. Black communities (including Africans, the African diaspora and people of African descent) experience worse health outcomes as demonstrated by almost any measure of health and wellbeing—e.g. life expectancy; disease prevalence; maternal mortality rates. While health promotion has its foundation in promoting equity and social justice, it is clear that however well-intended, we are not affecting meaningful change for Black communities quickly enough. Through this article, we outline the intersection of social determinants of health and anti-Black racism. We describe how in the first 8 months of 2020 Black communities around the globe have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19, while also having to respond to new instances of police brutality. We assert that the time has come for health promotion to stop neutralizing the specific needs of Black communities into unspoken 'good intentions'. Instead, we offer some concrete ways for the field to become outspoken, intentional and honest in acknowledging what it will take to radically shift how we promote health and wellbeing for Black people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Zambia has one of the highest cervical cancer rates in the world. This paper explores the acceptability of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine administered in girls (9–13 years) in Zambia. A qualitative case study was conducted in two schools in Lusaka district, which participated in the pilot for the Human Papillomavirus vaccine rollout. The study revealed that community level health systems factors such as knowledge levels about the vaccine, sexual morality concerns, conflicting views from parents on the vaccine, rumours that the vaccine contained cervical cancer and that it causes infertility in girls, previous bad experience with other vaccines, religious beliefs such as belief that God protects against illness, the nature of the school environment as well as faith in doctors shaped the uptake of the vaccine. Furthermore, formal health system factors such as availability of health workers and nature of collaboration between the Ministries of Health and Education influenced acceptability of the vaccine among the girls. Strengthening collaboration between community and formal health systems can play a vital role in supporting uptake of vaccines at community level as factors that hinder uptake of the vaccines emanate from both the community and health sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]