Search

Reinforcing bars in structural concrete are typically designed to carry axial forces. Nevertheless, due to their bending stiffness, the bars can also carry transverse forces, that are associated with the localized bending mechanism (dowel action) resulting from the relative displacements (or slip) wherever a crack interface or a discontinuity interface (between two concrete parts cast at different times) intercept the bar. Such localized bending induces stress concentrations in both the bars and the concrete. The relative displacement can occur at interfaces either perpendicular to the bar or inclined with respect to its axis. Thanks to steel ductility, the bending stresses in the bars due to dowel action do not impair the sectional capacity at the ultimate limit state. Fatigue verifications, however, require an accurate evaluation of these stresses under imposed transverse displacements or shear forces. As well known, dowel action can be described by means of the traditional unidimensional Winkler's model (beam on an elastic foundation), where the bearing stiffness of the concrete embedment is typically introduced through a couple of parameters, namely the bar diameter and the concrete strength in compression. The actual behavior of a dowel, however, is definitely more complex and for such a reason, improvements are needed for the Winkler's model to introduce other parameters typical of actual structures. Hence, a new formulation is introduced in this study for the bearing stiffness, that is calibrated based on mechanical considerations and measurements with optical fibers. The proposed formulation also accounts for the following parameters: angle between the crack and the bar, concrete‐cover thickness, number of load cycles and the softening effect caused by the local secondary cracks radiating from bar ribs during the pull‐out process. The predictions of the model—implemented with the proposed bearing stiffness—fit fairly well the test results under both monotonic and cyclic loads, in terms of shear force–transverse displacement response and peak stress in the reinforcing bars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estimating the stress of reinforcing bars and its variations in service conditions can be useful to determine the reserve capacity of structures or to assess the risk of fatigue in the reinforcement. This paper investigates the use crack width measurements to estimate the stress in the bars. In existing structures, crack width formulations can be used to estimate the stress in the reinforcement from crack width measurements, profiting from additional information that can be measured in‐situ, such as the crack spacing. Recent experimental results show that the values of the mean bond stress typically considered in code formulations overestimate the actual bond stresses activated in cracked concrete specimens. This paper presents the results of an experimental program consisting of reinforced concrete ties and beams instrumented with Digital Image Correlation and fiber optical measurements. The results confirm the differences with typically assumed bond stresses. A formulation to estimate the bond stresses in service conditions is derived from the results of the numerical integration of a previously developed local bond–slip relationship. Their pertinence for the estimation of the stress in the reinforcement from the measured crack width is evaluated with satisfactory results for monotonic loading and for the maximum force in cyclic tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the dimensioning and assessment of structures, it is common practice to compare action effects with sectional resistances. Extensive studies have been performed to quantify the model uncertainty on the resistance side. However, for statically indeterminate systems, the model uncertainty in the calculation of action effects has not been properly investigated yet. The aim of this article is to contribute in quantifying the model uncertainty in action effects and load bearing capacity calculations for reinforced concrete structures, accounting for the type of mechanical model used and for various failure modes. To collect a sufficient amount of data and perform statistical analyses, the experimental response of statically indeterminate systems is obtained with a simple and effective technique which allows using experimental results available in literature. Finally, on the basis of a parametric analysis and case studies, practical implications are discussed and recommendations are given concerning the implementation in the partial safety factor format. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In typical reinforced concrete design, reinforcement is designed to carry axial forces, but it can also resist transversal forces by dowel action. This is usually neglected for simplicity's sake in the design phase, but it can be accounted for either explicitly in mechanical models or implicitly in empirical relationships. Furthermore, there are cases where the connection between various concrete elements explicitly depends on dowel action, as for example, in connections between precast elements or between two concrete parts cast at different times. On the other side, dowel action can have a negative impact on the fatigue resistance of reinforcing bars subjected to cyclic loading, because of the local stress concentrations near interfaces due to relative movements, either in sliding or in opening of cracks not perpendicular to the bar. For the assessment of the remaining capacity of existing structures, improved models of the behavior are needed, including realistic models of the behavior of concrete, steel and their interfaces. The aim of the present paper is to provide a contribution to a better understanding of dowel action by two test series. The first series focused on the behavior of the dowel: the concrete specimens with the embedded bars were placed in a custom‐made test setup and subjected to monotonic or low stress‐level cyclic actions with a longitudinal and a transversal crack opening component, up to developing the full plastic capacity of the dowel and rupture at the peak of catenary action. The measurement system included tracking the displacement field at the surface of the concrete and the strains in the dowel by optical fibers glued on its surface. The latter measurements allow to derive the internal forces in the reinforcing bar and deformed shape of the bar as well as the contact pressure between the bar and the surrounding concrete. The results show a strong dependency on the test variables: diameter of the bar, imposed crack kinematics and angle between the bar and the crack. The second test series looked more closely at the behavior of concrete underneath the bar, in the presence of a point load introduced at various locations into concrete through a reinforcing bar. A comparison of the test results with existing models shows a general good agreement and some aspects that deserve to be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]