1. Lack of dopamine D4 receptor affinity contributes to the procognitive effect of lurasidone
- Author
-
Mutsuo Taiji, Takeo Ishiyama, Masaru Ikejiri, Takeshi Murai, Kazuhito Ikeda, and Tomokazu Nakako
- Subjects
Male ,Agonist ,Pyridines ,medicine.drug_class ,Dopamine Agents ,Isoindoles ,Pharmacology ,Lurasidone Hydrochloride ,Behavioral Neuroscience ,Cognition ,Dopamine ,medicine ,Animals ,Pyrroles ,Receptor ,Clozapine ,Lurasidone ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,Receptors, Dopamine D4 ,Antagonist ,Callithrix ,medicine.disease ,Thiazoles ,Pyrimidines ,Monoamine neurotransmitter ,Schizophrenia ,Mental Recall ,Conditioning, Operant ,Female ,Psychology ,Antipsychotic Agents ,Protein Binding ,medicine.drug - Abstract
We previously demonstrated among several antipsychotics exhibiting potent dopamine D 2 receptor antagonism that only lurasidone, (1R,2S,3R,4S)- N -[(1R,2R)-2-[4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)-1-piperazinylmethyl]-1-cyclohexylmethyl]-2,3-bicyclo[2.2.1] heptanedicarboximide hydrochloride, improved performance in the object retrieval detour (ORD) task by marmosets. The mechanisms by which only lurasidone causes enhancements in cognitive function have not yet been established; however, most antipsychotics, except for lurasidone, have been shown to exhibit potent antagonistic activity against the dopamine D 4 receptor. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of the dopamine D 4 receptor on executive function with the selective agonist, Ro10-5824 and antagonist, L-745,870, and elucidate a possible mechanism for the procognitive effect of lurasidone. The effects of these drugs were evaluated in naive marmosets using the ORD task. Changes in the success rate during the difficult trial in the task were used to assess the cognitive effect of the drugs. Ro10-5824 (0.3–3 mg/kg) increased the success rate in the difficult trial, potentiated the effect of lurasidone, and reversed the cognitive impairment induced by clozapine. Interestingly, the co-administration of L-745,870 with lurasidone decreased the success rate in the difficult trial, whereas the single administration of L-745,870 had no effect. These results suggest that activation of the dopamine D 4 receptor may improve executive function, whereas concomitant blockade of dopamine D 4 and D 2 receptors may have the opposite effect. In addition to the other unique binding profiles of other monoamine receptors, the lack of affinity for the dopamine D 4 receptor by lurasidone could also contribute, at least partly, to its cognitive-enhancing effect.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF