Search

Technological advances on a transnational scale have had a considerable impact on all levels of Indonesian society. One of the technological advances is the existence of gadgets. Not only positive effects, but they also bring negative impacts. Furthermore, the existence of gadgets continues to grow with more transactions being carried out. Unfortunately, this can be a dispute. The purpose of this research is to propose the problems of Indonesian International Civil Law which have not regulated and provided guarantees to protect transnational e-Commerce interests and their solutions. The method used in this research is normative with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are the existence of Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), Money Supply Law (UUUP), and International Civil Law (HPI) of Indonesia have not provided a clear guarantee of protection related to the choice of law in transnational scale e-commerce contracts. Besides, they also have not been able to accommodate the interests of consumers. One of the solutions offered is concretizing the principle of the recipient country. It is a rule that allows end-users to apply the Consumer Protection Law of their country. This principle is excluded from consumer transactions. This also does not apply .e-commerce contracts. This principle is taken from the Rome and Brussels Convention which is incorporated into the Directive, namely the Law for the EEC community (Europe Union). To provide legal guarantees for consumers, thus the interests’s of consumers can be protected.

Al-Qur'an and of Hadist represent guidance of public or made hold , according to Islam about levying of land for the sake of the public. In al qu'ran, expressed that Allah bestow big grant from above to human being by creating earth, natural resources and water which consist in in it to the human being to be used human being to be able to take care of the continuity of its life and so that human being devote to Allah of SWT, to family and to society. By its, land e xistence has to be utilized to its of prosperity of society as arranged in Section 33 sentence (3) UUD 1945.

Making a policy (regelgeving) is one of the functions of government. The fact that all citizens are always in contact with the public policy issued by governments, particularly concerning public interest. The development of the concept of state right to control the land started from the constitution which is then poured in the Agraria Law. Tenure by the State is not only done by the central government, but also by the local government through a process of devolution of authority in line with the spirit of regional autonomy laws. However, with the issuance of Government Regulation No. 38 of 2007, the fact that majority of the state's power in land still held by the central government on behalf of the state. This realitiy shows that the governenment failed to establish a decentralized system in the land sector.

The importance of land certificate as legal protection for land owners invites the attention of policy makers in this country. The policy which is issued by the government is to issue mass certifying program on land based on the Decree of Ministry of internal affair Number 189 year 1981 0n Agrarian National Operation Project (PRONA) implementing by National Defence Board as its duty. Basically, the program is implemented annually through some steps and processes, preparation, coordination/determination of Land Rights, right registration, certificate issuance and delivery of certificates. Obstacles which are faced by the District Land Office or City in implementing the program are in particular aspects such as society as the member of the program, the staff and financial aspect of the program itself. Pentingnya sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik tanah mengundang perhatian para pemilik kebijakan di negeri ini. Kebijakan yang di keluarkan pemerintah salah satunya dengan mengeluarkan program pensertipikatan tanah secara massal berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 189 Tahun 1981 tentang Proyek Operasi Nasional Agraria (PRONA) yang pelaksananya Badan Pertanahan Nasional sebagaimana tugasnya. Pada dasarnya pelaksanaan Program Prona dilakukan secara rutin tiap tahun melalui tahapan atau proses, persiapan, koordinasi/penetapan peserta PRONA, penyuluhan, pengukuran, pengumpulan data, pengumuman, penetapan Hak Atas Tanah, pembukuan hak, penerbitan sertipikat, dan penyerahan sertifikat. Kendala-Kendala yang dihadapi oleh Kantor Pertanahan kabupaten atau Kota dalam mengimplementasikan program PRONA adalah terjadi dibeberapa aspek yaitu: aspek masyarakat peserta PRONA

Since the reformation era, the government made the revolution in government administration to develop Indonesia. One of the revolutions is the issuance of Law no. 32 of 2004 on Regional Government; the authority of land is one of the law components. Previously, the authority of land is centered in the central government. Conversely, through the Article 10 paragraph (3) of Law No. 32 of 2004 on regional autonomy, the authority of the land sector should be submitted to the local government for its more understanding about the land nowadays. The transfer of authority is one of development step in Law aspect in Indonesia. Sejak era reformasi bergulir, pemerintah melakukan revolusi dibidang administrasi pemerintahan guna memajukan Negara Indonesia. Salah satu revolusi yang terjadi adalah dengan dikeluarkannya Undang-undang No. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, antara lain dibidang pertanahan. Semula kewenangan bidang pertanahan ini urusannya berada di pemerintah pusat. Namun di era reformasi ini melalui Pasal 10 ayat (3) UU No. 32 tahun 2004 tentang otonomi daerah, kewenangan bidang pertanahan sudah seharusnya diserahkan kepada pemerintah daerah yang lebih mengetahui kondisi pertanahan tersebut. Pengalihan kewenangan tersebut merupakan salah satu bentuk dari langkah pembangunan di bidang hukum di Indonesia.

The developmental program of the government creates delicate issues concerning the proper allocation of land. While the government program of welfare necessitates the availability of land to build housings, roads, factories and business centers, the plight of society displaced from their land should not be overlooked. Liberalist approach on managing land proves to bring more problem than solution to the society at large. Through the strong capital and wide network in executive and legislative bodies, the liberalist proponents manage to seize huge amounts of land at the expense of the original owners, mostly villagers who lack of apprehension about the price of land. The vague regulation concerning land also contributes to the handover of huge acres of land from the villagers to the capital owners. Without government intervention on the land market, it is worried that the process of land acquisition by the capital owner will run out of control.Program pembangunan pemerintah memunculkan masalah seputar penguasaan tanah. Sementara di sisi lain program pemerintah untuk kesejahteraan membutuhkan ketersediaan tanah untuk membangun perumahan, jalan, pabrik pusat -pusat bisnis. Persoalan berat kepemilikan tanah yang dihadapi masyarakat harus mendapat perhatian.Pendekatan kelompok liberal terhadap pengaturan penguasaan tanah menimbulkan banyak persoalan bagi masyarakat secara luas. dengan menggunakan modal yang besar dan jaringan yang kuat di lembaga eksekutif dan legislatif, pendukung kelompok liberal mengambil alih kepemilikan tanah secara besar-besaran terutama dari penduduk desa yang tidak mengetahui harga tanah yang semestinya. Peraturan yang masih belum jelas berkaitan dengan tanah juga menyebabkan pindah kepemilikan dari petani ke pemilik modal. Tanpa intervensi dan kontrol dari pemerintah terhadap pemasaran tanah, dikhawatirkan persoalan penguasaan tanah oleh pemilik modal akan lepas kontrol.Keywords: Liberalisasi Ekonomi, Penguasaan Tanah, Hak Milik

The problem of capital punishment in Indonesia as a country which has Pancasila philosophy is still a discussion which caused many different views until now. This problem arises because it is considered to be "violating" human rights, it is seen from the history of punishment that the death penalty was born together with the birth of man on the face of the earth, with the legal culture of "retalism" like wolves eating wolves, in which the criminal is based on the theory of absolute revenge (absolute theory) .The death penalty in terms of Islamic religion (Shari'at Islam) death is a penalty stipulated by Shari'a Islam with the decree of Allah SWT which can not be inviolable by anybody.Only what we need to learn in this case is the terms of its implementation so as not to easily impose the judgment of the law. means that according to Islamic views, the death penalty is merupaka n criminal offenses that are formally required to be held. The death penalty that is done according to the correct Islamic religious provisions is not: contrary to the philosophy of the State, is not: contrary to the elements of Belief in God Almighty, because Islamic sha'at is a Shari'ah based on Belief in the One Supreme. Masalah hukuman pidana mati di Indonesia sebagai suatu negara yang mempunyai falsafah Pancasila, masih merupakan suatu pembicaraan yang banyak menimbulkan berbagai perbedaan pandangan sampai sekarang Permasalahan ini muncul karena dianggap "melanggar'' hak asasi manusia. Ditinjau dari sejarah pemidanaan, bahwa hukuman mati lahir bersamasama dengan lahirnya manusia di muka bumi ini, dengan budaya hukum "retalisme" bagaikan serigala memakan serigala. Mada masa itu berlaku pidana berdasarkan pada teori pembalasan mutlak (teori absolut). Hukuman mati ditinjau dari segi agama Islam (Syari'at Islam) sudah jelas bahwa hukuman mati itu adalah pidana yang ditetapkan oleh Syari' at Islam dengan dekrit Allah Swt yang sama sekali tidak boleh diganggu gugat oleh siapapun juga. Hanya yang perlu kita pelajari dalam hal ini adalah syarat-syarat pelaksanaannya agar tidak dengan mudah menjatuhkan putusan hukum itu. Hal ini berarti bahwa menurut tinjauan agama Islam, maka hukuman mati itu adalah merupakan pidana yang secara resmi perlu diadakan. Hukuman mati yang dilakukan menurut ketentuan-ketentuan agama Islam yang benar adalah tidak: bertentang dengan falsafah Negara, tidak: berlawanan pula dengan unsur-unsur Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa, karena syai'at Islam mempakan syari'at yang berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.

Setiap produk peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah dikeluarkan atau disahkan, seharus ditaati oleh masyarakat Indonesia baik secara individual maupun secara kelompok. Agar sctiap peraturan yang dikeluarkan tersebut di taati oleh masyarakat maka harus memenuhi beberapa syarat, yaitu: peraturan yang akan dan/atau dibuat itu harus benar-benar mengakomudasi apa yang di inginkan oleh masyarakat yang beragam budaya tersebut. Akan tetapi hal-hal yang diakomodasi itupun harus yang tidak mengganggu perkembangan masyarakat, bangsa dan negara. Setelah dikeluarkan atau disahkan peraturan tersebut, agar dapat berjalan dengan baik dalam arti dipatuhi oleh masyarakat luas, harus dilengkapi dengan penegak hukum yang proporsional dan benar-benar mempunyai jiwa penegak sehingga peraturan yang dijalani dapat terlaksana secara konsekuen dan akan tercapai keadilan, baik menurut peraturan itu sendiri maupun menurut masyarakat