Retamales J, Daneri-Navarro A, Artagaveytia N, Alves da Quinta D, Abdelhay E, Podhajcer OL, Velázquez C, Giunta D, Crocamo S, Garibay-Escobar A, Del Toro-Arreola A, Rodriguez R, Aghazarian M, Alcoba E, Alonso I, Binato R, Bravo AI, Canton-Romero J, Carraro DM, Castro M, Castro-Cervantes J, Cataldi S, Camejo N, Cortes-Sanabria L, Flores-Marquez M, Laviña G, Musetti E, Caserta B, Cerda M, Colombo A, Delgadillo-Cristerna R, Dreyer Breitenbach M, Fernandez E, Fernandez J, Franco-Topete R, Gabay C, Gaete F, Gamboa J, García-Gaeta R, Gomez Del Toro M, Gonzalez-Ramirez LP, Guerrero M, Herrera-Miramontes M, Lopez-Vasquez A, Maldonado S, Morán-Mendoza A, Morgan-Villela G, Nagai MA, Navarro-Ruiz N, Oceguera-Villanueva A, Ortiz MA, Quintero J, Quintero-Ramos A, Ramirez-Rosales G, Ramos-Ramirez M, Chiquitelli Marques MM, Rivera Claisse E, Rodriguez-Gonzalez D, Romero-Gomez A, Rosales C, Salas-Gonzalez E, Sanchotena V, Segovia L, Silva-García AA, Valenzuela-Antelo O, Venegas-Godinez L, Zagame L, Gomez J, Llera AS, and Müller B
Purpose: Breast cancer mortality rates in Latin America (LA) are higher than those in the United States, possibly because of advanced disease presentation, health care disparities, or unfavorable molecular subtypes. The Latin American Cancer Research Network was established to address these challenges and to promote collaborative clinical research. The Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of LA participants with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC)., Patients and Methods: The MPBCS enrolled 1,449 participants from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Uruguay. Through harmonized procedures and quality assurance measures, this study evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, and survival outcomes according to residual cancer burden (RCB) and the type of surgery., Results: Overall, 711 and 480 participants in the primary surgery and neoadjuvant arms, respectively, completed the 5-year follow-up period. Overall survival was independently associated with RCB (worse survival for RCBIII-adjusted hazard ratio, 8.19, P < .001, and RCBII [adjusted hazard ratio, 3.69, P < .008] compared with RCB0 [pathologic complete response or pCR]) and type of surgery (worse survival in mastectomy than in breast-conserving surgery [BCS], adjusted hazard ratio, 2.97, P = .001). The hormone receptor-negative-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive group had the highest proportion of pCR (48.9%). The analysis of the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative breast module revealed high compliance with pathologic standards but lower adherence to treatment administration standards. Notably, compliance with trastuzumab administration varied widely among countries (33.3%-88.7%)., Conclusion: In LABC, we demonstrated the survival benefit of BCS and the prognostic effect of the response to available neoadjuvant treatments despite an important variability in access to key treatments. The MPBCS represents a significant step forward in understanding the real-world implementation of oncologic procedures in LA.