22 results on '"Musche, M."'
Search Results
2. Effects of Natura 2000 on nontarget bird and butterfly species based on citizen science data
- Author
-
Pellissier, V., Schmucki, R., Pe'er, G., Aunins, A., Brereton, T.M., Brotons, L., Carnicer, J., Chodkiewicz, T., Chylarecki, P., del Moral, J.C., Escandell, V., Evans, D M, Foppen, R.P.B., Harpke, A., Heliölä, J., Herrando, S., Kuussaari, M., Kühn, E., Lehikoinen, A., Lindström, Å., Moshøj, C.M., Musche, M., Noble, D., Oliver, T.H., Reif, J., Richard, D., Roy, D.B., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., Teufelbauer, N., Touroult, J., Trautmann, S., van Strien, A.J., van Swaay, C.A.M., Turnhout, C.A.M. van, Vermouzek, Z., Voříšek, P., Jiguet, F., Julliard, R., Pellissier, V., Schmucki, R., Pe'er, G., Aunins, A., Brereton, T.M., Brotons, L., Carnicer, J., Chodkiewicz, T., Chylarecki, P., del Moral, J.C., Escandell, V., Evans, D M, Foppen, R.P.B., Harpke, A., Heliölä, J., Herrando, S., Kuussaari, M., Kühn, E., Lehikoinen, A., Lindström, Å., Moshøj, C.M., Musche, M., Noble, D., Oliver, T.H., Reif, J., Richard, D., Roy, D.B., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., Teufelbauer, N., Touroult, J., Trautmann, S., van Strien, A.J., van Swaay, C.A.M., Turnhout, C.A.M. van, Vermouzek, Z., Voříšek, P., Jiguet, F., and Julliard, R.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 216802.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), The European Union's Natura 2000 (N2000), is one of the largest international networks of protected areas. One of its aims is to secure the status of a pre-determined set of (targeted) bird and butterfly species. However, also non-target species may benefit from N2000. We evaluated how the terrestrial component of this network relates to the abundance of non-targeted, more common bird and butterfly species using data from long-term volunteer-based monitoring programs in 9,602 sites for birds and 2,001 sites for butterflies. In almost half of the 155 bird species assessed, and particularly among woodland specialists, abundance increased with the proportion of N2000 sites in the landscape. The corresponding positive relationship was found for 27 of the 104 butterfly species, although most of these species were generalists. These positive relationships disappeared for most of the species when land-cover covariates were taken into account, hinting that land-cover is a primary factor defining the positive effects of the N2000 network. The increase in abundance with N2000 was correlated with the specialization index for bird species, but not for butterfly species. Although the N2000 network supports higher abundance of a large spectrum of species, the low number of specialist butterfly species showing a positive association stresses the need to implement management plan improving the quality of habitats of N2000 areas potentially harboring openland butterfly specialists. For a better understanding of the processes involved, we advocate for a standardized collection of data on N2000 sites. Article impact statement: Across Europe the abundance of a majority of nontarget birds and a quarter of nontarget butterflies increased with Natura 2000 coverage. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
- Published
- 2020
3. Butterfly indicators 1990-2018. Technical report
- Author
-
Van Swaay, C.A.M., Dennis, E.B., Schmucki, R., Sevilleja, C.G., Aghababyan, K., Astrom, S., Balalaikins, M., Bonelli, S., Botham, M., Bourn, N., Brereton, T., Cancela, J.P., Carlisle, B., Collins, S., Dopagne, C., Dziekanska, I., Escobes, R., Faltynek Fric, Z., Feldman, R., Fernandez-Garcia, J.M., Fontaine, B., Goloshchapova, S., Gracianteparaluceta, A., Harpke, A., Harrower, C., Heliola, J., Khanamirian, G., Kolev, Z., Komac, B., Krenn, H., Kuhn, E., Lang, A., Leopold, P., Lysaght, L., Maes, D., McGowan, D., Mestdagh, X., Middlebrook, I., Monasterio, Y., Monteiro, E., Munguira, M.L., Musche, M., Ounap, E., Ozden, O., Paramo, F., Pavlicko, A., Petterson, L.B., Piqueray, J., Prokofev, I., Rakosy, L., Roth, T., Rudisser, J., Sasic, M., Settele, J., Sielezniew, M., Stefanescu, C., Svitra, G., Szabadfalvi, A., Teixeira, S.M., Tiitsaar, A., Tzirkalli, E., Verovnik, R., Warren, M.S., Wynhoff, I., Roy, D.B., Van Swaay, C.A.M., Dennis, E.B., Schmucki, R., Sevilleja, C.G., Aghababyan, K., Astrom, S., Balalaikins, M., Bonelli, S., Botham, M., Bourn, N., Brereton, T., Cancela, J.P., Carlisle, B., Collins, S., Dopagne, C., Dziekanska, I., Escobes, R., Faltynek Fric, Z., Feldman, R., Fernandez-Garcia, J.M., Fontaine, B., Goloshchapova, S., Gracianteparaluceta, A., Harpke, A., Harrower, C., Heliola, J., Khanamirian, G., Kolev, Z., Komac, B., Krenn, H., Kuhn, E., Lang, A., Leopold, P., Lysaght, L., Maes, D., McGowan, D., Mestdagh, X., Middlebrook, I., Monasterio, Y., Monteiro, E., Munguira, M.L., Musche, M., Ounap, E., Ozden, O., Paramo, F., Pavlicko, A., Petterson, L.B., Piqueray, J., Prokofev, I., Rakosy, L., Roth, T., Rudisser, J., Sasic, M., Settele, J., Sielezniew, M., Stefanescu, C., Svitra, G., Szabadfalvi, A., Teixeira, S.M., Tiitsaar, A., Tzirkalli, E., Verovnik, R., Warren, M.S., Wynhoff, I., and Roy, D.B.
- Abstract
There is mounting evidence of widespread declines in the diversity and abundance of insects from across the globe (Sanchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys 2019, Seibold et al. 2019, van Klink et al. 2020, Wagner 2020). This gives a stark warning for the perilous state of biodiversity (Diaz et al. 2019), and demonstrates that addressing the gap in knowledge of the status of insects is vital (Cardoso et al. 2020, Samways et al. 2020). Insects are estimated to comprise more than half of all described species and are a dominant component of biodiversity in most ecosystems (Bar-On et al. 2018). Insects also provide a crucial role in the functioning of ecosystems. They are not only related to the supply of many ecosystem services such as pollination, biological control, soil fertility regulation and diverse cultural ecosystem services but also to disservices such as damage to crops and spread of diseases to livestock and humans (Gutierrez-Arellano and Mulligan 2018, Noriega et al. 2018). There is a pressing need to assess the status of insects to set and evaluate conservation targets. At the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) meeting in Nagoya (Japan), the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 was adopted. It proposed five goals and 20 "Aichi" biodiversity targets. In line with this plan, a new EU biodiversity strategy was adopted by the European Commission in May 2011. This strategy provided a framework for the EU to meet its biodiversity targets and global commitments as a party to the CBD. The Headline Target in the existing EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020 is to halt the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, and restore them, in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss. Under Target 3A the EU is committed to increasing the contribution of agriculture to biodiversity recovery. Further, the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 includes the development of a coherent framework for monitori
- Published
- 2020
4. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins
- Author
-
Thomas, C. D., Bodsworth, E. J., Wilson, R. J., Simmons, A. D., Davies, Z. G., Musche, M., and Conradt, L.
- Subjects
Environmental issues ,Science and technology ,Zoology and wildlife conservation - Abstract
Author(s): C. D. Thomas (corresponding author) [1]; E. J. Bodsworth [1]; R. J. Wilson [1]; A. D. Simmons [1]; Z. G. Davies [1]; M. Musche [1, 2]; L. Conradt [1] [...]
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Effects of Natura 2000 on nontarget bird and butterfly species based on citizen science data
- Author
-
Pellissier, V., primary, Schmucki, R., additional, Pe'er, G., additional, Aunins, A., additional, Brereton, T. M., additional, Brotons, L., additional, Carnicer, J., additional, Chodkiewicz, T., additional, Chylarecki, P., additional, del Moral, J. C., additional, Escandell, V., additional, Evans, D., additional, Foppen, R., additional, Harpke, A., additional, Heliölä, J., additional, Herrando, S., additional, Kuussaari, M., additional, Kühn, E., additional, Lehikoinen, A., additional, Lindström, Å., additional, Moshøj, C. M., additional, Musche, M., additional, Noble, D., additional, Oliver, T. H., additional, Reif, J., additional, Richard, D., additional, Roy, D. B., additional, Schweiger, O., additional, Settele, J., additional, Stefanescu, C., additional, Teufelbauer, N., additional, Touroult, J., additional, Trautmann, S., additional, Strien, A. J., additional, Swaay, C. A. M., additional, Turnhout, C., additional, Vermouzek, Z., additional, Voříšek, P., additional, Jiguet, F., additional, and Julliard, R., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The EU Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species: 1990-2017. Technical report
- Author
-
Van Swaay, C.A.M., Dennis, E.B., Schmucki, R., Sevilleja, C., Balalaikins, M., Botham, M., Bourn, N., Brereton, T., Cancela, J.P., Carlisle, B., Chambers, P., Collins, S., Dopagne, C., Escobes, R., Feldman, R., Fernandez-Garcia, J.M., Fontaine, B., Gracianteparaluceta, A., Harrower, C., Harpke, A., Heliola, J., Komac, B., Kuhn, E., Lang, A., Maes, D., Mestdagh, X., Middlebrook, I., Monasterio, Y., Munguira, M.L., Murray, T.E., Musche, M., Ounap, E., Paramo, F., Petterson, L.B., Piqueray, J., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., Svitra, G., Tiitsaar, A., Verovnik, R., Warren, M.S., Wynhoff, I., Roy, D.B., Van Swaay, C.A.M., Dennis, E.B., Schmucki, R., Sevilleja, C., Balalaikins, M., Botham, M., Bourn, N., Brereton, T., Cancela, J.P., Carlisle, B., Chambers, P., Collins, S., Dopagne, C., Escobes, R., Feldman, R., Fernandez-Garcia, J.M., Fontaine, B., Gracianteparaluceta, A., Harrower, C., Harpke, A., Heliola, J., Komac, B., Kuhn, E., Lang, A., Maes, D., Mestdagh, X., Middlebrook, I., Monasterio, Y., Munguira, M.L., Murray, T.E., Musche, M., Ounap, E., Paramo, F., Petterson, L.B., Piqueray, J., Settele, J., Stefanescu, C., Svitra, G., Tiitsaar, A., Verovnik, R., Warren, M.S., Wynhoff, I., and Roy, D.B.
- Abstract
The EU Grassland Butterfly Indicator is one of the indicators of the status of biodiversity in the European Union. It is an abundance indicator based on data recording the population trends of seventeen butterfly species in 16 (see below) EU countries. This report presents the seventh version of this indicator now covering 28 years. At the Convention on Biological Diversity meeting in Nagoya (Japan) the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011– 2020 was adopted. It proposed five goals and 20 “Aichi” biodiversity targets. In line with this plan a new EU biodiversity strategy was adopted by the European Commission in May 2011. This provided a framework for the EU to meet its own biodiversity objectives and its global commitments as a party to the CBD. The Headline Target is to halt the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, and restore them, in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss. Under Target 3A the EU is committed to increase the contribution of agriculture to biodiversity recovery. Europe now has one year left to intensify action to achieve this. The EU biodiversity strategy includes the development of a coherent framework for monitoring, assessing and reporting on progress in implementing actions. Such a framework is needed to link existing biodiversity data and knowledge systems with the strategy, to help assess achievement of the goals and to streamline EU and global monitoring, reporting and review obligations. Some of the EU biodiversity indicators provide specific measurements and trends on genetic, species and ecosystem/landscape diversity, but many have a more indirect link to biodiversity. Very few have been established specifically to assess biodiversity. The status indicators on species only cover birds, bats and butterflies, since these are the only taxa/species groups for which harmonized European monitoring data are available (EEA, 2012). For the EU Grass
- Published
- 2019
7. Research questions to facilitate the future development of European long-term ecosystem research infrastructures: A horizon scanning exercise
- Author
-
Musche, M., Adamescu, M., Angelstam, P., Bacher, S., Bäck, J., Buss, H.L., Duffy, C., Flaim, G., Gaillardet, J., Giannakis, G.V., Haase, P., Halada, L., Kissling, W. Daniel, Lundin, L., Matteucci, G., Meesenburg, H., Monteith, D., Nikolaidis, N.P., Pipan, T., Pyšek, Petr, Rowe, E.C., Roy, D.B., Sier, A., Tappeiner, U., Vilà, Montserrat, White, T., Zobel, M., Klotz, S., Musche, M., Adamescu, M., Angelstam, P., Bacher, S., Bäck, J., Buss, H.L., Duffy, C., Flaim, G., Gaillardet, J., Giannakis, G.V., Haase, P., Halada, L., Kissling, W. Daniel, Lundin, L., Matteucci, G., Meesenburg, H., Monteith, D., Nikolaidis, N.P., Pipan, T., Pyšek, Petr, Rowe, E.C., Roy, D.B., Sier, A., Tappeiner, U., Vilà, Montserrat, White, T., Zobel, M., and Klotz, S.
- Abstract
Distributed environmental research infrastructures are important to support assessments of the effects of global change on landscapes, ecosystems and society. These infrastructures need to provide continuity to address long-term change, yet be flexible enough to respond to rapid societal and technological developments that modify research priorities. We used a horizon scanning exercise to identify and prioritize emerging research questions for the future development of ecosystem and socio-ecological research infrastructures in Europe. Twenty research questions covered topics related to (i) ecosystem structures and processes, (ii) the impacts of anthropogenic drivers on ecosystems, (iii) ecosystem services and socio-ecological systems and (iv), methods and research infrastructures. Several key priorities for the development of research infrastructures emerged. Addressing complex environmental issues requires the adoption of a whole-system approach, achieved through integration of biotic, abiotic and socio-economic measurements. Interoperability among different research infrastructures needs to be improved by developing standard measurements, harmonizing methods, and establishing capacities and tools for data integration, processing, storage and analysis. Future research infrastructures should support a range of methodological approaches including observation, experiments and modelling. They should also have flexibility to respond to new requirements, for example by adjusting the spatio-temporal design of measurements. When new methods are introduced, compatibility with important long-term data series must be ensured. Finally, indicators, tools, and transdisciplinary approaches to identify, quantify and value ecosystem services across spatial scales and domains need to be advanced.
- Published
- 2019
8. European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges
- Author
-
Mills, S.C., Oliver, T.H., Bradbury, R.B., Gregory, R.D., Brereton, T., Kühn, E., Kuussaari, M., Musche, M., Roy, D.B., Schmucki, R., Stefanescu, C., van Swaay, C., and Evans, K.L.
- Abstract
Aim: The aim was to assess the sensitivity of butterfly population dynamics to variation in weather conditions across their geographical ranges, relative to sensitivity to density dependence, and determine whether sensitivity is greater towards latitudinal range margins. Location: Europe. Time period: 1980–2014. Major taxa studied: Butterflies. Methods: We use long-term (35 years) butterfly monitoring data from > 900 sites, ranging from Finland to Spain, grouping sites into 2° latitudinal bands. For 12 univoltine butterfly species with sufficient data from at least four bands, we construct population growth rate models that include density dependence, temperature and precipitation during distinct life-cycle periods, defined to accommodate regional variation in phenology. We use partial R 2 values as indicators of butterfly population dynamics' sensitivity to weather and density dependence, and assess how these vary with latitudinal position within a species' distribution. Results: Population growth rates appear uniformly sensitive to density dependence across species' geographical distributions, and sensitivity to density dependence is typically greater than sensitivity to weather. Sensitivity to weather is greatest towards range edges, with symmetry in northern and southern parts of the range. This pattern is not driven by variation in the magnitude of weather variability across the range, topographic heterogeneity, latitudinal range extent or phylogeny. Significant weather variables in population growth rate models appear evenly distributed across the life cycle and across temperature and precipitation, with substantial intraspecific variation across the geographical ranges in the associations between population dynamics and specific weather variables. Main conclusions: Range-edge populations appear more sensitive to changes in weather than those nearer the centre of species' distributions, but density dependence does not exhibit this pattern. Precipitation is as important as temperature in driving butterfly population dynamics. Intraspecific variation in the form and strength of sensitivity to weather suggests that there may be important geographical variation in populations' responses to climate change.
- Published
- 2017
9. The impact of climate change on butterfly communities 1990-2009
- Author
-
Swaay, C. A. M., Harpke, A., Strien, A., Fontaine, B., Stefanescu, C., Roy, D., Dirk Maes, Kuhn, E., Õunap, E., Regan, E. C., Švitra, G., Heliölä, J., Settele, J., Musche, M., Warren, M. S., Plattner, M., Kuussaari, M., Cornish, N., Schweiger, O., Feldmann, R., Julliard, R., Verovnik, R., Roth, T., Brereton, T., and Devictor, V.
- Subjects
biodiversity policy ,Europe ,Climate ,butterflies (Lepidoptera) ,biometry ,B280-animal-ecology - Published
- 2010
10. Ecosystem services from agriculture
- Author
-
Grant, F., Harrison, J., Sykes, P., Skourtos, M., Rounsevell, M., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Settele, J., Musche, M., Anton, C., Watt, A., Porter, John Roy, Sigsgaard, Lene, Grant, F., Harrison, J., Sykes, P., Skourtos, M., Rounsevell, M., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Settele, J., Musche, M., Anton, C., Watt, A., Porter, John Roy, and Sigsgaard, Lene
- Published
- 2008
11. Climate change adaptation and mitigation: Synergisms, antagonisms and trade-offs for biodiversity
- Author
-
Berry, Pam, primary, Paterson, J, additional, Cabeza, M, additional, Dubuis, A, additional, Guisan, A, additional, Jaattela, L, additional, Kuhn, I, additional, Musche, M, additional, Piper, J, additional, and Wilson, E, additional
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins
- Author
-
Thomas, Chris D., Bodsworth, E.J., Wilson, Robert J., Simmons, A.D., Davies, Zoe G., Musche, M., Conradt, L., Thomas, Chris D., Bodsworth, E.J., Wilson, Robert J., Simmons, A.D., Davies, Zoe G., Musche, M., and Conradt, L.
- Abstract
Many animals are regarded as relatively sedentary and specialized in marginal parts of their geographical distributions. They are expected to be slow at colonizing new habitats. Despite this, the cool margins of many species' distributions have expanded rapidly in association with recent climate warming3±10. We examined four insect species that have expanded their geographicalranges in Britain over the past 20 years. Here we report that two butterfly species have increased the variety of habitat types that they can colonize, and that two bush cricket species show increased fractions of longer-winged (dispersive) individuals in recently founded populations. Both ecological and evolutionary processes are probably responsible for these changes. Increased habitat breadth and dispersal tendencies have resulted in about 3- to 15-fold increases in expansion rates, allowing these insects to cross habitat disjunctions that would have represented major or complete barriers to dispersal before the expansions started. The emergence of dispersive phenotypes will increase the speed at which species invade new environments, and probably underlies the responses of many species to both past and future climate change.
- Published
- 2001
13. Eco-evolutionary processes shaping floral nectar sugar composition.
- Author
-
Liu Y, Dunker S, Durka W, Dominik C, Heuschele JM, Honchar H, Hoffmann P, Musche M, Paxton RJ, Settele J, and Schweiger O
- Subjects
- Sugars metabolism, Sugars analysis, Animals, Insecta physiology, Sucrose metabolism, Europe, Magnoliopsida physiology, Magnoliopsida metabolism, Climate Change, Plant Nectar metabolism, Plant Nectar chemistry, Pollination physiology, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Flowers metabolism, Flowers physiology
- Abstract
Floral nectar sugar composition is assumed to reflect the nutritional demands and foraging behaviour of pollinators, but the relative contributions of evolutionary and abiotic factors to nectar sugar composition remain largely unknown across the angiosperms. We compiled a comprehensive dataset on nectar sugar composition for 414 insect-pollinated plant species across central Europe, along with phylogeny, paleoclimate, flower morphology, and pollinator dietary demands, to disentangle their relative effects. We found that phylogeny was strongly related with nectar sucrose content, which increased with the phylogenetic age of plant families, but even more strongly with historic global surface temperature. Nectar sugar composition was also defined by floral morphology, though it was not related to our functional measure of pollinator dietary demands. However, specialist pollinators of current plant-pollinator networks predominantly visited plant species with sucrose-rich nectar. Our results suggest that both physiological mechanisms related to plant water balance and evolutionary effects related to paleoclimatic changes have shaped floral nectar sugar composition during the radiation and specialisation of plants and pollinators. As a consequence, the high velocity of current climate change may affect plant-pollinator interaction networks due to a conflicting combination of immediate physiological responses and phylogenetic conservatism., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Livestock density affects species richness and community composition of butterflies: A nationwide study.
- Author
-
Kasiske T, Dauber J, Harpke A, Klimek S, Kühn E, Settele J, and Musche M
- Abstract
Extensively managed grasslands are globally recognized for their high biodiversity value. Over the past century, a continuous loss and degradation of grassland habitats has been observed across Europe that is mainly attributable to agricultural intensification and land abandonment. Particularly insects have suffered from the loss of grassland habitats due to land-use change and the decrease in habitat quality, either due to an increase in livestock density, higher mowing frequency, and an increase in nitrogen fertilization, or by abandonment. However, only a few studies have used nationwide datasets to analyse the effects of land cover and land-use intensity on insects. It further remains largely unexplored how these effects are modulated by species traits, i.e. habitat specialisation and mobility. Using nationwide butterfly data originating from the German Butterfly Monitoring Scheme, we investigated the effect of three indicators related to land cover and agricultural land-use intensity on species richness as well as trait composition of butterfly communities. Based on agricultural census data at the municipality scale, we calculated the share of permanent grasslands (measure of habitat availability), the total livestock density (proxy for organic fertilization) and the livestock density of domestic herbivores (proxy for management intensity in grasslands) within a 2 km buffer surrounding each butterfly transect. To analyse the relationships between butterflies and indicators of land cover and land-use intensity, we applied generalised linear mixed effect models. We found a negative relationship between butterfly species richness and the livestock density of domestic herbivores. Further, the ratio of butterfly generalist to specialist species shifted towards generalists and the size of butterflies increased with higher herbivore livestock density, indicating a shift in communities towards mobile habitat generalists. Our results are in accordance with previous studies carried out across smaller geographic extents, highlighting the importance of low herbivore livestock densities to halt the loss of pollinating insects and safeguard biodiversity and associated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. We here demonstrate that indicators based on livestock distribution data at the municipality scale can provide insights into processes and spatial diversity patterns of butterflies at the national level. Further, we highlight potentials and limitations of using agricultural census data to quantify and assess effects of land cover and land-use intensity on butterflies, and make recommendations for further research needs., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. A new comprehensive trait database of European and Maghreb butterflies, Papilionoidea.
- Author
-
Middleton-Welling J, Dapporto L, García-Barros E, Wiemers M, Nowicki P, Plazio E, Bonelli S, Zaccagno M, Šašić M, Liparova J, Schweiger O, Harpke A, Musche M, Settele J, Schmucki R, and Shreeve T
- Subjects
- Africa, Northern, Animals, Biological Evolution, Conservation of Natural Resources, Databases, Factual, Ecology, Europe, Phylogeny, Butterflies classification
- Abstract
Trait-based analyses explaining the different responses of species and communities to environmental changes are increasing in frequency. European butterflies are an indicator group that responds rapidly to environmental changes with extensive citizen science contributions to documenting changes of abundance and distribution. Species traits have been used to explain long- and short-term responses to climate, land-use and vegetation changes. Studies are often characterised by limited trait sets being used, with risks that the relative roles of different traits are not fully explored. Butterfly trait information is dispersed amongst various sources and descriptions sometimes differ between sources. We have therefore drawn together multiple information sets to provide a comprehensive trait database covering 542 taxa and 25 traits described by 217 variables and sub-states of the butterflies of Europe and Maghreb (northwest Africa) which should serve for improved trait-based ecological, conservation-related, phylogeographic and evolutionary studies of this group of insects. We provide this data in two forms; the basic data and as processed continuous and multinomial data, to enhance its potential usage.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Research questions to facilitate the future development of European long-term ecosystem research infrastructures: A horizon scanning exercise.
- Author
-
Musche M, Adamescu M, Angelstam P, Bacher S, Bäck J, Buss HL, Duffy C, Flaim G, Gaillardet J, Giannakis GV, Haase P, Halada L, Kissling WD, Lundin L, Matteucci G, Meesenburg H, Monteith D, Nikolaidis NP, Pipan T, Pyšek P, Rowe EC, Roy DB, Sier A, Tappeiner U, Vilà M, White T, Zobel M, and Klotz S
- Subjects
- Europe, Ecology, Ecosystem
- Abstract
Distributed environmental research infrastructures are important to support assessments of the effects of global change on landscapes, ecosystems and society. These infrastructures need to provide continuity to address long-term change, yet be flexible enough to respond to rapid societal and technological developments that modify research priorities. We used a horizon scanning exercise to identify and prioritize emerging research questions for the future development of ecosystem and socio-ecological research infrastructures in Europe. Twenty research questions covered topics related to (i) ecosystem structures and processes, (ii) the impacts of anthropogenic drivers on ecosystems, (iii) ecosystem services and socio-ecological systems and (iv), methods and research infrastructures. Several key priorities for the development of research infrastructures emerged. Addressing complex environmental issues requires the adoption of a whole-system approach, achieved through integration of biotic, abiotic and socio-economic measurements. Interoperability among different research infrastructures needs to be improved by developing standard measurements, harmonizing methods, and establishing capacities and tools for data integration, processing, storage and analysis. Future research infrastructures should support a range of methodological approaches including observation, experiments and modelling. They should also have flexibility to respond to new requirements, for example by adjusting the spatio-temporal design of measurements. When new methods are introduced, compatibility with important long-term data series must be ensured. Finally, indicators, tools, and transdisciplinary approaches to identify, quantify and value ecosystem services across spatial scales and domains need to be advanced., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Patterns of host use by brood parasitic Maculinea butterflies across Europe.
- Author
-
Tartally A, Thomas JA, Anton C, Balletto E, Barbero F, Bonelli S, Bräu M, Casacci LP, Csősz S, Czekes Z, Dolek M, Dziekańska I, Elmes G, Fürst MA, Glinka U, Hochberg ME, Höttinger H, Hula V, Maes D, Munguira ML, Musche M, Nielsen PS, Nowicki P, Oliveira PS, Peregovits L, Ritter S, Schlick-Steiner BC, Settele J, Sielezniew M, Simcox DJ, Stankiewicz AM, Steiner FM, Švitra G, Ugelvig LV, Van Dyck H, Varga Z, Witek M, Woyciechowski M, Wynhoff I, and Nash DR
- Subjects
- Animals, Europe, Species Specificity, Ants parasitology, Biological Coevolution, Butterflies physiology, Host-Parasite Interactions, Nesting Behavior, Symbiosis
- Abstract
The range of hosts exploited by a parasite is determined by several factors, including host availability, infectivity and exploitability. Each of these can be the target of natural selection on both host and parasite, which will determine the local outcome of interactions, and potentially lead to coevolution. However, geographical variation in host use and specificity has rarely been investigated. Maculinea (= Phengaris) butterflies are brood parasites of Myrmica ants that are patchily distributed across the Palæarctic and have been studied extensively in Europe. Here, we review the published records of ant host use by the European Maculinea species, as well as providing new host ant records for more than 100 sites across Europe. This comprehensive survey demonstrates that while all but one of the Myrmica species found on Maculinea sites have been recorded as hosts, the most common is often disproportionately highly exploited. Host sharing and host switching are both relatively common, but there is evidence of specialization at many sites, which varies among Maculinea species. We show that most Maculinea display the features expected for coevolution to occur in a geographic mosaic, which has probably allowed these rare butterflies to persist in Europe. This article is part of the theme issue 'The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern'.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity.
- Author
-
Haase P, Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Burkhard B, Frenzel M, Geijzendorffer IR, Häuser C, Klotz S, Kühn I, McDowell WH, Mirtl M, Müller F, Musche M, Penner J, Zacharias S, and Schmeller DS
- Subjects
- Decision Making, Environmental Monitoring statistics & numerical data, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Environmental Monitoring methods, Environmental Policy
- Abstract
Global change effects on biodiversity and human wellbeing call for improved long-term environmental data as a basis for science, policy and decision making, including increased interoperability, multifunctionality, and harmonization. Based on the example of two global initiatives, the International Long-Term Ecological Research (ILTER) network and the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), we propose merging the frameworks behind these initiatives, namely ecosystem integrity and essential biodiversity variables, to serve as an improved guideline for future site-based long-term research and monitoring in terrestrial, freshwater and coastal ecosystems. We derive a list of specific recommendations of what and how to measure at a monitoring site and call for an integration of sites into co-located site networks across individual monitoring initiatives, and centered on ecosystems. This facilitates the generation of linked comprehensive ecosystem monitoring data, supports synergies in the use of costly infrastructures, fosters cross-initiative research and provides a template for collaboration beyond the ILTER and GEO BON communities., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Do drivers of biodiversity change differ in importance across marine and terrestrial systems - Or is it just different research communities' perspectives?
- Author
-
Knapp S, Schweiger O, Kraberg A, Asmus H, Asmus R, Brey T, Frickenhaus S, Gutt J, Kühn I, Liess M, Musche M, Pörtner HO, Seppelt R, Klotz S, and Krause G
- Subjects
- Carbon Dioxide analysis, Marine Biology, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Ecology
- Abstract
Cross-system studies on the response of different ecosystems to global change will support our understanding of ecological changes. Synoptic views on the planet's two main realms, the marine and terrestrial, however, are rare, owing to the development of rather disparate research communities. We combined questionnaires and a literature review to investigate how the importance of anthropogenic drivers of biodiversity change differs among marine and terrestrial systems and whether differences perceived by marine vs. terrestrial researchers are reflected by the scientific literature. This included asking marine and terrestrial researchers to rate the relevance of different drivers of global change for either marine or terrestrial biodiversity. Land use and the associated loss of natural habitats were rated as most important in the terrestrial realm, while the exploitation of the sea by fishing was rated as most important in the marine realm. The relevance of chemicals, climate change and the increasing atmospheric concentration of CO
2 were rated differently for marine and terrestrial biodiversity respectively. Yet, our literature review provided less evidence for such differences leading to the conclusion that while the history of the use of land and sea differs, impacts of global change are likely to become increasingly similar., (Copyright © 2016 Office national des forêts. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Singing the blues: from experimental biology to conservation application.
- Author
-
Settele J, Barbero F, Musche M, Thomas JA, and Schönrogge K
- Subjects
- Acoustics, Animals, Ants parasitology, Biological Evolution, Public Opinion, Animal Communication, Butterflies physiology, Conservation of Natural Resources
- Abstract
Chemical communication plays a major role in the organisation of ant societies, and is mimicked to near perfection by certain large blue (Maculinea) butterflies that parasitise Myrmica ant colonies. The recent discovery of differentiated acoustical communication between different castes of ants, and the fact that this too is mimicked by the butterflies, adds a new component of coevolutionary complexity to a fascinating multitrophic system of endangered species, and it could inspire new ways to engage the public in their conservation.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Population structure of a large blue butterfly and its specialist parasitoid in a fragmented landscape.
- Author
-
Anton C, Zeisset I, Musche M, Durka W, Boomsma JJ, and Settele J
- Subjects
- Alleles, Animal Migration, Animals, Butterflies genetics, Butterflies parasitology, Computer Simulation, Environment, Genetic Variation, Host-Parasite Interactions, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Social Isolation, Wasps genetics, Butterflies physiology, Wasps physiology
- Abstract
Habitat fragmentation may interrupt trophic interactions if herbivores and their specific parasitoids respond differently to decreasing connectivity of populations. Theoretical models predict that species at higher trophic levels are more negatively affected by isolation than lower trophic level species. By combining ecological data with genetic information from microsatellite markers we tested this hypothesis on the butterfly Maculinea nausithous and its specialist hymenopteran parasitoid Neotypus melanocephalus. We assessed the susceptibility of both species to habitat fragmentation by measuring population density, rate of parasitism, overall genetic differentiation (theta(ST)) and allelic richness in a large metapopulation. We also simulated the dynamics of genetic differentiation among local populations to asses the relative effects of migration rate, population size, and haplodiploid (parasitoid) and diploid (host) inheritance on metapopulation persistence. We show that parasitism by N. melanocephalus is less frequent at larger distances to the nearest neighbouring population of M. nausithous hosts, but that host density itself is not affected by isolation. Allelic richness was independent of isolation, but the mean genetic differentiation among local parasitoid populations increased with the distance between these populations. Overall, genetic differentiation in the parasitoid wasp was much greater than in the butterfly host and our simulations indicate that this difference is due to a combination of haplodiploidy and small local population sizes. Our results thus support the hypothesis that Neotypus parasitoid wasps are more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than their Maculinea butterfly hosts.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Functional richness of local hoverfly communities (Diptera, Syrphidae) in response to land use across temperate Europe.
- Author
-
Schweiger O, Musche M, Bailey D, Billeter R, Diekötter T, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Liira J, Maelfait JP, Speelmans M, and Dziock F
- Abstract
Environmental change is not likely to act on biodiversity in a random manner, but rather according to species traits that affect assembly processes, thus, having potentially serious consequences on ecological functions. We investigated the effects of anthropogenic land use on functional richness of local hoverfly communities of 24 agricultural landscapes across temperate Europe. A multivariate ordination separated seven functional groups based on resource use, niche characteristics and response type. Intensive land use reduced functional richness, but each functional group responded in a unique way. Species richness of generalist groups was nearly unaffected. Local habitat quality mainly affected specialist groups, while land use affected intermediate groups of rather common species. We infer that high species richness within functional groups alone is no guarantee for maintaining functional richness. Thus, it is not species richness per se that improves insurance of functional diversity against environmental pressures but the degree of dissimilarity within each functional group.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.