Search

The effects of the recombinant chemokine human RANTES (hRANTES) on the release of glutamate from human neocortex glutamatergic nerve endings were investigated. hRANTES facilitated the spontaneous release of d [³H]D-aspartate ([³H]D-ASP) by binding Pertussis toxin-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), whose activation caused Ca2+ mobilization from inositol trisphosphate-sensitive stores and cytosolic tyrosine kinase-mediated phosphorylations. Facilitation of release switched to inhibition when the effects of hRANTES on the 12mMK+-evoked [³H]D-ASP exocytosis were studied. Inhibition of exocytosis relied on activation of Pertussis toxin-sensitive GPCRs negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase. Both hRANTES effects were prevented by met-RANTES, an antagonist at the chemokine receptors (CCRs) of the CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5 subtypes. Interestingly,humanneocortex glutamatergic nerve endings seem to possess all three receptor subtypes. Blockade of CCR1 and CCR5 by antibodies against the extracellular domain of CCRs prevented both the hRANTES effect on [ 3H]D-ASP release, whereas blockade of CCR3 prevented inhibition, but not facilitation, of release. The effects ofRANTESon the spontaneous and the evoked release of [³H]D-ASP were also observed in experiments with mouse cortical synaptosomes, which may therefore represent an appropriate animal model to study RANTES-induced effects on neurotransmission. It is concluded that glutamate transmission can be modulated in opposite directions by RANTES acting at distinct CCR receptor subtypes coupled to different transduction pathways, consistent with the multiple and sometimes contrasting effects of the chemokine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1)-associated dementia (HAD) represents a common complication of HIV-1 infection. Antiretroviral therapy has diminished its incidence, but it is insufficient to eradicate the problem. HAD depends on the presence of the virus in central nervous system (CNS), but the molecular mechanisms involved are not completely understood. It is widely accepted that proteins shed by the virus, such as the envelope glycoprotein gp120 and the nonstructural viral protein Tat, may themselves cause alterations to CNS. By one side, viral proteins are toxic to neurons because of their ability (1) to act as excitotoxins and (2) to evoke the release of endogenous neurotoxins and/or proinflammatory cytokines. By the other side, evidences are emerging that viral components can alter neuronal functions either by modifying the release of neurotransmitters or by influencing the functions of classical receptors controlling central neurotransmission. We here review some results concerning the effects of Tat on cholinergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission in human and rat cortex. The protein can induce the release of acetylcholine from both human and rat cortical cholinergic nerve terminals in a specie-specific manner. In human cholinergic terminals, Tat-mediated releasing effect depends on activation of receptors belonging to I group of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), while in rat terminals Tat-induced effect involves the activation of a so far unknown receptor. The protein, unable on its own to release noradrenaline from human and rat cortical noradrenergic nerve endings, potentiates the release of amine induced by presynaptic NMDA receptors. Also in this case, Tat effect involves activation of a receptor belonging to the group I mGluRs, in particular of the mGluR1 subtype. The finding that group I mGluRs may represent a preferential target of the protein in CNS may be relevant to the proposal of new therapeutic approaches for the cure of HAD.