Search

Objective: To determine whether selective aortic arch perfusion (SAAP) using serial infusions of oxygenated perflubron emulsion combined with aortic epinephrine (AoE) administration is more effective than conventional therapy in treating cardiac arrest., Methods: An experimental cardiac arrest model (10 min ventricular fibrillation and 2 min CPR) was used with 12 mixed-breed canines, randomized into 2 groups: control (n = 6), CPR and IV epinephrine, 0.01 mg/kg, at 12 min and then every 3 min; or AoE-SAAP (n = 6), CPR and aortic epinephrine, 0.01 mg/kg, at 12 min and then every 3 min, and serial SAAP with oxygenated 60% weight/volume (w/v) perflubron emulsion as follows: 300 mL over 30 sec at 12 min as continuous SAAP without CPR; 150 mL over 20-30 sec at 15 min and 18 min as pulsed diastolic SAAP during CPR., Results: AoE-SAAP resulted in increased coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) compared with control. CPR-diastolic (release phase) CPP during pulsed diastolic SAAP was similar to or greater in magnitude than the CPP generated during the initial SAAP infusion without CPR. ROSC for control was 0/6 and for AoE-SAAP was 4/6 (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Time from initiation of CPR to ROSC with a sustained systolic aortic pressure > 60 mm Hg was 8.0 +/- 1.2 min in the 4 resuscitated AoE-SAAP animals., Conclusion: The combination of AoE with SAAP infusions of oxygenated perflubron emulsion was more effective than conventional resuscitation therapy. Pulsed diastolic SAAP is a promising method for performing SAAP.

Study Objective: To determine if delivery of epinephrine to the peripheral arterial system by an aortic arch catheter is more effective than central venous epinephrine administration during cardiac resuscitation., Design: Randomized, nonblinded, controlled trial., Type of Participants: Sixteen mongrel canines (25 to 31 kg)., Interventions: Animals had aortic arch pressure, and right atrial pressure, superior vena cava infusion, and descending aortic arch infusion catheters placed using fluoroscopy. After ten minutes of ventricular fibrillation, three DC countershocks were delivered over one minute. If unsuccessful, CPR at 120 compressions per minute was begun, and at 60 seconds of CPR, epinephrine (1 mg/50 mL normal saline) was administered either through the superior vena cava or the aortic arch catheter followed by one more minute of CPR. Defibrillation then was attempted and, if unsuccessful, further resuscitative efforts followed advanced cardiac life support guidelines, except route and dose of epinephrine remained the same., Measurements and Main Results: Aortic arch pressure, right atrial pressure, and coronary perfusion pressure (diastolic aortic arch pressure minus diastolic right atrial pressure) were recorded continuously. Aortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure increased more rapidly and to a greater magnitude with aortic arch-epinephrine than superior vena cava-epinephrine. Coronary perfusion pressure doubled by ten seconds in seven of eight in the aortic arch-epinephrine group versus none in the superior vena cava-epinephrine group. Aortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure increases consistently plateaued within 60 seconds after aortic arch-epinephrine but not after superior vena cava-epinephrine. Return of spontaneous circulation was faster (P < .05) in the aortic arch-epinephrine group. Maximal coronary perfusion pressure after epinephrine correlated with the coronary perfusion pressure immediately before epinephrine administration in both groups, but more strongly in the aortic arch-epinephrine group (P = .0001)., Conclusion: For an equivalent dose of epinephrine, aortic arch administration produces a more rapid response and more rapid peak effect than central venous administration. The combination of aortic arch-epinephrine administration and aortic pressure monitoring may be useful when initial standard resuscitative measures have not been successful.

Study Objectives: To demonstrate the technique of selective aortic arch perfusion during cardiac arrest and to observe the hemodynamic effects of volume infusion and aortic epinephrine administration., Design: Sequential series, nonrandomized, noncontrolled., Type of Participants: Fourteen mongrel dogs weighing 21 to 36 kg., Interventions: Animals had midaortic arch pressure, right atrial pressure, and descending aortic arch balloon occlusion catheters placed. After ten minutes of ventricular fibrillation, balloon inflation and aortic arch infusions were initiated as follows: group 1 (six), 30 mL/kg/min of 0.9% NaCl for two minutes; group 2 (four), 30 mL/kg/min of oxygenated lactated Ringer's with 2 mg/L epinephrine for two minutes, followed by CPR; and group 3 (four), 20 mL/kg/min of oxygenated perfluorochemicals with 4 mg/L epinephrine for one minute, then CPR., Measurements and Main Results: Midaortic arch pressure, right atrial pressure, and coronary perfusion pressure each rose significantly in all groups. Midaortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure increases were greater in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1. In groups 1 and 2, right atrial pressure increases at end-selective aortic arch perfusion were excessive as midaortic arch pressure and right atrial pressure increased linearly and similarly after 20 to 30 seconds. In groups 2 and 3, CPR-diastolic midaortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure after selective aortic arch perfusion were good and similar to midaortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure at end-selective aortic arch perfusion., Conclusion: Selective aortic arch perfusion is technically feasible, but excessive right atrial pressure increases limit maximal infusion rates and volumes. Selective aortic arch perfusion infusates with epinephrine produce greater midaortic arch pressure and coronary perfusion pressure during infusion than infusate without epinephrine. Controlled studies are needed to determine if selective aortic arch perfusion improves resuscitation outcome.

A life-support skills course designed to facilitate competent decision making during emergency care situations has been developed for third-year medical students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine. The objective of the one-week course is to combine the knowledge acquired in the basic sciences with the performance skills required in the clinical setting. This is achieved through the use of a variety of instructional strategies, including lectures, reading periods, and laboratory exercises. A scientific approach to the teaching of life-support skills is incorporated, educational objectives are defined, methods of achieving the educational objectives are provided, and an evaluation system is used to determine the effectiveness of teaching. After successful completion of the training program, the student is better able to deliver competent emergency medical care.