Search

This retrospective matched cohort study investigated the protective effects of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) against pneumonia mortality and all-cause mortality in Japanese adults aged ≥65 years. We analyzed claims data, vaccination records, and death certificate records between October 2016 and December 2019 from 55 509 PPSV23-vaccinated individuals and 55 509 unvaccinated individuals. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of PPSV23 vaccination for mortality. The results showed that PPSV23 vaccination was significantly associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.52; P <.001) but not pneumonia mortality (adjusted HR, 0.70; P =.374). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have shown a possible association between statin use and a decreased risk of dementia, but the association has not been sufficiently established, especially in the super-aging society of Japan. Objective: This study aimed to determine the association between statin use and the risk of dementia among Japanese participants aged> =65 years old. Methods: Data from the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence (LIFE) Study were utilized, including medical and long-term care (LTC) claim data from 17 municipalities between April 2014 and December 2020. A nested case-control study was conducted with one case matched to five controls based on age, sex, municipality, and year of cohort entry. We used a conditional logistic regression model to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: This study included 57,302 cases and 283,525 controls, with 59.7% of the participants being woman. After adjusting for potential confounders, statin use was associated with a lower risk of dementia (OR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.68–0.73) and Alzheimer's disease (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.63–0.69). Compared with non-users, the ORs of dementia were as follows: 1.42 (1.34–1.50) for 1–30 total standardized daily dose (TSDD), 0.91 (0.85–0.98) for 31–90 TSDD, 0.63 (0.58–0.69) for 91–180 TSDD, and 0.33 (0.31–0.36) for >180 TSDD in dose-analysis. Conclusions: Statin use is associated with a reduced risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease among older Japanese adults. A low cumulative statin dose is associated with an increased risk of dementia, whereas a high cumulative statin dose is a protective factor against dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The association between care needs level (CNL) at hospitalisation and postdischarge outcomes in older patients with acute heart failure (aHF) has been insufficiently investigated. Methods This population-based cohort study was conducted using health insurance claims and CNL data of the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence study. Patients aged ≥65 years, discharged after hospitalisation for aHF between April 2014 and March 2022, were identified. CNLs at hospitalisation were classified as no care needs (NCN), support level (SL) and CNL1, CNL2–3 and CNL4–5 based on total estimated daily care time as defined by national standard criteria, and varied on an ordinal scale between SL&CNL1 (low level) to CNL4–5 (fully dependent). The primary outcomes were changes in CNL and death 1 year after discharge, assessed by CNL at hospitalisation using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Of the 17 724 patients included, 7540 (42.5%), 4818 (27.2%), 3267 (18.4%) and 2099 (11.8%) had NCN, SL&CNL1, CNL2–3 and CNL4–5, respectively, at hospitalisation. One year after discharge, 4808 (27.1%), 3243 (18.3%), 2968 (16.7%), 2505 (14.1%) and 4200 (23.7%) patients had NCN, SL&CNL1, CNL2–3, CNL4–5 and death, respectively. Almost all patients' CNLs worsened after discharge. Compared to patients with NCN at hospitalisation, patients with SL&CNL1, CNL2–3 and CNL4–5 had an increased risk of all-cause death 1 year after discharge (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.19 [1.09–1.31], 1.88 [1.71–2.06] and 2.56 [2.31–2.84], respectively). Conclusions Older patients with aHF and high CNL at hospitalisation had a high risk of all-cause mortality in the year following discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have investigated post‐extraction bleeding in patients on antithrombotic therapy, but most included a small sample size. Objective: This study aimed to analyse post‐extraction bleeding in patients on antithrombotic therapy using data from a large database. Materials and Methods: Claims data of National Health Insurance and Late‐Stage Elderly Healthcare System enrollees who underwent tooth extraction between October 2014 and March 2019 (n = 107 767) in a large multiregional cohort study (Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence study) were included. Antithrombotic therapy was determined based on the drug codes used at the time of tooth extraction (classified into six groups: no antithrombotic, single antiplatelet, dual antiplatelet, Direct Oral Anticoagulant, warfarin and combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies). The outcome was defined as the presence of "post‐extraction bleeding" as a receipt disease name in the same month as tooth extraction. To examine the association between antithrombotic therapy and post‐extraction bleeding in detail, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with post‐extraction bleeding as the objective variable; each antithrombotic therapy as the explanatory variable; and age, sex and comorbidities as adjustment variables. Results: Antithrombotic therapy was administered in 14 343 patients (13.3%), and post‐extraction bleeding was observed in 419 patients (0.4%). The rate of post‐extraction bleeding was significantly lower in the no antithrombotic therapy and single antiplatelet groups than that in the other groups (odds ratio: 2.00–9.02). Conclusion: The frequency of post‐extraction bleeding is high in patients on anticoagulation or dual antithrombotic therapy. Therefore, careful preparation before extraction is necessary in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines have been implemented worldwide since the booster vaccination campaigns of autumn of 2022, but little is known about their effectiveness. Thus, this study holistically evaluated the effectiveness of bivalent vaccines against infection in older adults in Japan. Methods: We adopted the test-negative design using COVID-19 test data of individuals, aged ≥ 65 years, residing in three municipalities in Japan, who underwent tests in medical institutions between October 1 and December 30, 2022. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds of testing positive according to vaccination status. Vaccine effectiveness was defined as (1 − odds ratio) × 100%. Results: A total of 3,908 positive and 16,090 negative results were included in the analyses. Receiving a bivalent dose in addition to ≥ 2 monovalent doses was 33.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.8, 44.3%) more effective than receiving no vaccination, and 18.2% (95% CI: 9.4, 26.0%) more effective than receiving ≥ 2 monovalent doses but not receiving a bivalent vaccination. In addition, the effectiveness peaked at 14–20 days after administration and then gradually declined over time. Furthermore, a bivalent booster dose provided 18.6% (95% CI: 9.9, 26.5%) additional protection among those vaccinated with ≥ 2 monovalent doses, in the absence of a previous infection history. However, we did not find sufficient evidence of effectiveness of bivalent vaccines among previously infected older adults. Conclusions: Bivalent vaccines are effective against COVID-19 infections among older adults without a history of infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Seasonal influenza vaccination might be considered an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) countermeasure because it can reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use for acute respiratory infection by mitigating the burden of such diseases. Objectives To examine the association between seasonal influenza vaccination and antimicrobial use (AMU) in Japan at the community level and to examine the impact of influenza vaccination on the frequency of unnecessary antimicrobial prescription for upper respiratory infection. Methods For patients who visited any healthcare facility in one of the 23 wards of Tokyo, Japan, due to upper respiratory infection and who were aged 65 years or older, we extracted data from the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety (VENUS) study database, which includes all claims data and vaccination records from the 2015–16 to 2020–21 seasons. We used the average treatment effect (ATE) with 1:1 propensity score matching to examine the association of vaccination status with frequency of antibiotic prescription, frequency of healthcare facility consultation, risk of admission and risk of death in the follow-up period of the same season (from 1 January to 31 March). Results In total, 244 642 people were enrolled. Matched data included 101 734 people in each of the unvaccinated and vaccinated groups. The ATE of vaccination was −0.004 (95% CI −0.006 to −0.002) for the frequency of antibiotic prescription, −0.005 (−0.007 to −0.004) for the frequency of healthcare facility consultation, −0.001 (−0.002 to −0.001) for the risk of admission and 0.00 (0.00 to 0.00) for the risk of death. Conclusions Our results suggest that seasonal influenza vaccination is associated with lower frequencies of unnecessary antibiotic prescription and of healthcare facility consultation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Several studies have investigated that anticholinergic drugs cause cognitive impairment. However, the risk of dementia associated with anticholinergics has not been extensively investigated in the super‐aging society of Japan. We conducted this study to assess the association between anticholinergic drugs and the risk of dementia in older adults in Japan. Methods: This nested case‐control study used data from the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence Study, which includes claim data in Japan from 2014 to 2020. We included 66,478 cases of diagnosed dementia and 328,919 matched controls aged ≥65 years, matched by age, sex, municipality, and cohort entry year. Primary exposure was the total cumulative anticholinergic drugs prescribed from cohort entry date to event date or matched index date, which was the total standardized daily doses for each patient, calculated by adding the total dose of different types of anticholinergic drugs in each prescription, divided by the World Health Organization‐defined daily dose values. Odds ratios for dementia associated with cumulative exposure to anticholinergic drugs were calculated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for confounding variables. Results: The mean (standard deviation) age at index date was 84.3 (6.9), and the percentage of women was 62.1%. From cohort entry date to event date or matched index date, 18.8% of the case patients and 13.7% of the controls were prescribed at least one anticholinergic drug. In the multivariable‐adjusted model, individuals with anticholinergic drugs prescribed had significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with dementia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50 [95% confidence interval, 1.47–1.54]). Among specific types of anticholinergic drugs, a significant increase in risk was observed with the use of antidepressants, antiparkinsonian drugs, antipsychotics, and bladder antimuscarinics in a fully multivariable‐adjusted model. Conclusions: Several types of anticholinergic drugs used by older adults in Japan are associated with an increased risk of dementia. These findings suggest that the underlying risks should be considered alongside the benefits of prescribing anticholinergic drugs to this population. Key points: The risk of dementia associated with anticholinergics has not been extensively investigated in the super‐aging society of Japan.This nested case‐control study found a statistically significant association between anticholinergic drug use and the risk of dementia, especially for antipsychotics, antiparkinsonian agents, antidepressants, and bladder antimuscarinics, after adjusting for confounding variables.The prescription of specific types of anticholinergic drugs to older adults should be made with caution due to the associated risk of dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.5 became prevalent in July 2022 in Japan. Bivalent messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were approved as booster doses for individuals who received the primary series or booster dose by monovalent vaccines. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of bivalent vaccines in Japanese adults aged ≥65 years. Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study using data collected from January 2019 to February 2023 in Japan. We included individuals aged ≥65 years in a municipality who received the first or second booster dose of monovalent mRNA vaccines. We estimated the effectiveness of the second or third booster dose of bivalent mRNA vaccines during the Omicron BA.5–predominant period (July–December 2022), compared with ≥90 days after the booster dose of monovalent vaccines. We used a Cox proportional hazard regression model with vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate. Results A total of 81 977 individuals aged ≥65 years (mean [standard deviation] age, 78.3 [7.4] years; 33 487 male [40.8%]) were included in the study cohort. Among them, 57 396 were vaccinated with the second or third dose of bivalent vaccines (BA.1 or BA.4/5). The effectiveness against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was estimated to be 57.9% (95% confidence interval, 52.7%–62.5%) for ≥14 days after the second or third bivalent booster dose, compared with 90 days after the first or second monovalent booster dose. Conclusions The study showed that the bivalent mRNA vaccines as the second and third doses would provide protection against COVID-19 among adults ≥65 years in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study was performed to assess the increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ) associated with mRNA vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019. Methods This population-based cohort study was conducted in 4 municipalities in Japan. Individuals covered under public health insurance systems without a history of HZ were followed from October 1, 2020 to November 30, 2021. Incidence rates of HZ within 28 days of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination were compared. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a Poisson regression model, including vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate. Subgroup analyses by sex, age, and municipality were also conducted. Results A total of 339 548 individuals (median age, 74 years) were identified. During follow up, 296 242 individuals (87.2%) completed the primary series, among whom 289 213 and 7019 individuals received homologous BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively. The adjusted IRRs of the first and second BNT162b2 vaccinations were 1.05 (95% CI, 0.84–1.32) and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.90–1.32), respectively. No cases of HZ were observed after mRNA-1273 vaccination. In subgroup analysis, the adjusted IRR of the second BNT162b2 vaccination was 2.94 (95% CI, 1.41–6.13) in individuals aged <50 years old. Conclusions No increased risk of HZ was found after BNT162b2 vaccination in the overall study population. However, an increased risk was observed in the younger subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An increased risk of fracture has been reported in older adults taking hypnotics. However, few studies have reported the comparative safety of hypnotics with different mechanisms of action. We examined the risk of fracture in older adults initiating suvorexant compared to those initiating Z‐drugs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a claims database within a longevity improvement and fair evidence (LIFE) study in Japan (1.5 million beneficiaries). People aged ≥65 years were included in this study. Exposure was defined as the initiation of either suvorexant or Z‐drugs (eszopiclone, zolpidem, or zopiclone). The evaluated outcomes were hip fracture and all‐cause fracture requiring hospitalization. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding and followed the incidence of the outcome for three different periods: 30, 90, and 365 days. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the weighted population to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Sensitivity analyses were performed with narrowed outcome definitions and inverse probability of censoring weights. Results: We identified 16,148 suvorexant new users and 54,327 Z‐drugs new users. During the 30‐day follow‐up, 21 (16.6 events per 1000 person‐years) and 53 hip fractures (12.2 events per 1000 person‐years) were identified among suvorexant and Z‐drugs new users, respectively (HR: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58–1.76). The analysis for all‐cause fracture showed an HR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78–1.36). Extended follow‐up (90 and 365 days) showed similar results for both outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results except for an increased risk of all‐cause fracture requiring surgery (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.87–2.29) during the 30‐day follow‐up. Conclusions: This is the first study to show that suvorexant has a generally comparable risk of fracture as compared to Z‐drugs. Further research is needed to investigate the potential short‐term increased risk of all‐cause fracture requiring surgery among suvorexant initiators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]