Search

Background: Smoking cessation programs started as late as 4 weeks before surgery reduce perioperative morbidity and death, yet outpatient clinic interventions are rarely provided. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a tobacco treatment protocol designed for an outpatient surgical setting. Methods: We completed a pre-post feasibility study of the implementation of a systematic, evidence-based tobacco treatment protocol in an outpatient colorectal surgery clinic. Outcomes included smoking prevalence, pre- and postimplementation smoker identification and intervention rates, recruitment, retention, smoking cessation and provider satisfaction. Results: Preimplementation, 15.5% of 116 surveyed patients were smokers. Fewer than 10% of surveyed patients reported being asked about smoking, and none were offered any cessation intervention. Over a 16-month postimplementation period, 1198 patients were seen on 2103 visits. Of these, 950 (79.3%) patients were asked smoking status on first visit and 1030 (86.0%) were asked on at least 1 visit. Of 169 identified smokers, 99 (58.6%) were referred to follow-up support using an opt-out approach. At 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, intention-to-quit rates among 78 enrolled patients were 24.4%, 22.9% and 19.2%, respectively. Postimplementation staff surveys reported that the protocol was easy to use, that staff would use it again and that it had positive patient responses. Conclusion: Implementation of our smoking cessation protocol in an outpatient surgical clinic was found to be feasible and used minimal clinic resources. This protocol could lead to increases in identification and documentation of smoking status, delivery of smoking cessation interventions and rates of smoking reduction and cessation. Contexte : Les programmes d'abandon du tabagisme entamés jusqu'à 4 semaines avant une opération réduisent la morbidité et la mortalité périopératoires, mais les cliniques externes n'en proposent que rarement. L'étude visait à évaluer s'il est faisable d'appliquer un protocole de traitement du tabagisme pensé pour les milieux de soins chirurgicaux extrahospitaliers. Méthodes : Nous avons réalisé une étude de faisabilité pré- et postexpérimentale sur l'application d'un protocole de traitement systématique fondé sur des données probantes à une clinique externe de chirurgie colorectale. Les résultats à l'étude étaient les suivants : prévalence du tabagisme, identification des fumeurs et taux d'intervention avant et après la mise en place du protocole, recrutement, rétention, abandon du tabagisme et satisfaction des fournisseurs. Résultats : Au départ, 15,5 % des 116 patients sondés fumaient. Moins de 10% des répondants avaient été questionnés sur leur statut tabagique, et aucun ne s'était vu proposer un programme d'abandon. Au cours des 16 mois suivant la mise en place du protocole, 1198 patients ont été rencontrés dans le cadre de 2103 consultations. Parmi eux, 950 (79,3%) ont été interrogés sur leur statut tabagique à la première rencontre, et 1030 (86%) l'ont été au moins 1 fois. Des 169 fumeurs identifiés, 99 (58,6%) ont été orientés vers un programme de soutien selon une approche de consentement présumé. Après 1 mois, 24,4% des 78 patients participants étaient déterminés à arrêter de fumer; 22,9% l'étaient toujours après 3 mois, et 19,2% après 6 mois. Les sondages menés a posteriori auprès du personnel indiquent que le protocole est facile à utiliser, que les employés s'en serviraient de nouveau, et que les patients l'ont accueilli favorablement. Conclusion : Il a été possible de mettre en place notre protocole d'abandon du tabagisme à une clinique externe de chirurgie, et ce en employant un minimum de ressources cliniques. Le protocole pourrait permettre de connaître et de consigner davantage de statuts tabagiques, d'orienter un plus grand nombre de fumeurs vers les programmes d'abandon et d'accroître les taux de réduction et d'abandon du tabagisme., Despite decreased smoking rates in recent decades, smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in Canada. (1) In 2017, 15% of Canadians older than age 15, roughly [...]

Abstract Background The Ottawa Model of Smoking Cessation (OMSC) is a hospital-based smoking cessation program that is expanding across Canada. While the short-term effectiveness of hospital cessation programs has been documented, less is known about long-term sustainability. The purpose of this exploratory study was to understand how hospitals using the OMSC were addressing sustainability and determine if there were critical factors or issues that should be addressed as the program expanded. Methods Six hospitals that differed on OMSC program activities (identify and document smokers, advise quitting, provide medication, and offer follow-up) were intentionally selected, and two key informants per hospital were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Key informants were asked to reflect on the initial decision to implement the OMSC, the current implementation process, and perceived sustainability of the program. Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts was conducted and themes related to problem definition, stakeholder influence, and program features emerged. Results Sustainability was operationalized as higher performance of OMSC activities than at baseline. Factors identified in the literature as important for sustainability, such as program design, differences in implementation, organizational characteristics, and the community environment did not explain differences in program sustainability. Instead, key informants identified factors that reflected the interaction between how the health problem was defined by stakeholders, how priorities and concerns were addressed, features of the program itself, and fit within the hospital context and resources as being influential to the sustainability of the program. Conclusions Applying a sustainability model to a hospital smoking cessation program allowed for an examination of how decisions made during implementation may impact sustainability. Examining these factors during implementation may provide insight into issues affecting program sustainability, and foster development of a sustainability plan. Based on this study, we suggest that sustainability plans should focus on enhancing interactions between the health problem, program features, and stakeholder influence.

Objective: To test whether a practice-level intervention to promote the systematic identification, treatment, and follow-up of smokers (the Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation [OMSC]) would improve long-term abstinence rates among smoker-patients with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes receiving care from diabetes education programs in Ontario, Canada.Research Design and Methods: The Tobacco Intervention in Diabetes Education study was a matched-pair, cluster-randomized clinical trial. Within each pair, sites were randomly allocated to either an OMSC intervention (n = 7) or a wait-list control (WLC) condition (n = 7). Diabetes education programs in the OMSC group introduced standardized processes to identify smokers and routinely provided smoking cessation interventions and follow-up. Smokers in the OMSC group received counseling, a discount card to partially cover the cost of smoking cessation medication, and follow-up telephone calls over a 6-month period. Diabetes education programs in the WLC condition were offered the OMSC intervention after a 1-year waiting period. Smokers in the WLC group received usual care for smoking cessation from their diabetes educator. The primary end point was carbon monoxide (CO)-confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence from smoking at 6-month follow-up.Results: A total of 313 smokers (OMSC group n = 199, WLC group n = 114) with diabetes or prediabetes were enrolled. The CO-confirmed abstinence rate at 6 months was 11.1% in the OMSC group versus 2.6% in the WLC group (odds ratio 3.73 [95% CI 1.20, 11.58]; P = 0.02).Conclusions: Implementation of the OMSC in diabetes education programs resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements in long-term abstinence among smokers with diabetes or prediabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We report on the effectiveness of the Ottawa Model for Smoking Cessation (OMSC), a multicomponent knowledge translation intervention, in increasing the rate at which primary care providers delivered smoking cessation interventions using the 3 A's model-Ask, Advise, and Act, and examine clinic-, provider-and patient-level determinants of 3 A's delivery.Methods: We examined the effect of the knowledge translation intervention in 32 primary care practices in Ontario, Canada, by assessing a cross-sectional sample of patients before the implementation of the OMSC and a second cross-sectional sample following implementation. We used 3-level modeling (clinic, clinician, patient) to examine the main effects and predictors of 3 A's delivery.Results: Four hundred eighty-one primary care clinicians and more than 3,500 tobacco users contributed data to the evaluation. Rates of delivery of the 3 A's increased significantly following program implementation (Ask: 55.3% vs 71.3%, P <.001; Advise: 45.5% vs 63.6%, P <.001; Act: 35.4% vs 54.4%, P <.001). The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for the delivery of 3 A's between the pre- and post-assessments were AOR = 1.94; (95% CI, 1.61-2.34) for Ask, AOR = 1.92; (95% CI, 1.60-2.29) for Advise, and AOR = 2.03; (95% CI, 1.71-2.42) for Act. The quality of program implementation and the reason for clinic visit were associated with increased rates of 3 A's delivery.Conclusions: Implementation of the OMSC was associated with increased rates of smoking cessation treatment delivery. High quality implementation of the OMSC program was associated with increased rates of 3 A's delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Women with previous pregnancy-related cardiovascular risk indicators, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), have an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although CVD screening and preventive care beginning in the early postpartum period are recommended, certain barriers limit access to such services. We plan to conduct a scoping review of the literature to explore and summarise evidence on the barriers and facilitators of postpartum CVD preventive services in women with a history of GDM and HDP., Methods and Analysis: This scoping review will be conducted in line with the Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting a systematic scoping review and will follow the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and the Coordinating Centre at the Institute of Education guidelines. The review results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will search the following databases: Medline, Embase and CINAHL. We will conduct grey literature searches for registered dissertations and theses. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be kept broad. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English or French that investigated and reported percieved barriers or facilitators to postpartum CVD screening and preventive care among women with previous GDM and HDP will be included. Individual, interpersonal, organizational, and system level factors will be reported. Qualitative findings will be summarised narratively, and quantitative findings will be absorbed within the themes using the multisource synthesis method., Ethics and Dissemination: This review represents one objective of a larger project that was reviewed by the Ottawa Health Sciences Network Research Ethics Board (QI-184). We will disseminate knowledge emanating from this review through open-access publication, presentation/public forums on women's cardiovascular health, women's CVD prevention forums and social media. We will also present the findings of this review at the annual meeting of the Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)