Search

Psoriasis is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder that is associated with substantial physical and psychosocial comorbidity. Although biologic agents have offered transformative therapeutic advantages to those unresponsive to traditional treatments, data from recent literature indicate significant undertreatment of certain populations, highlighting potential barriers to access. This review aims to comprehensively elucidate barriers to biological therapy, addressing a recognized gap in the current literature. A search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to investigate the obstacles and disparities that prevent access to biologic treatments in biologic‐naïve psoriatic patients. Emergent themes were then systematically categorized into five primary domains: patient‐level, prescriber‐level, medicine‐level, organizational‐, and external environment‐level factors. Our results demonstrate pronounced barriers and disparities encompassing increased age, race, socioeconomic status, rural location, cost and insurance, and insufficient knowledge that may hinder access to biologic treatments among psoriatic patients. Further research on how these barriers can be effectively addressed is needed to optimize treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by pruritic, scaly, erythematous lesions. Its incidence varies but is estimated to be approximately 20% in children and between 7 and 14% in adults, with variation amongst countries. It is a multifactorial condition, with a complex interplay between genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. Research into the inflammatory response has identified new therapeutic targets that work to reduce inflammation and subsequently reduce flares. This study explores existing therapeutic agents for atopic dermatitis as well as newer therapies such as biologics and small molecules, drawing upon each agent's mechanism of action, relevant landmark clinical trials, efficacy, and safety profile. Current therapies include emollients, corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, and methotrexate. Biologics described include dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, and rocatinlimab. Small molecules inhibitors include Janus kinase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily V member 1 antagonist, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hand‐foot‐mouth disease (HFMD) is a common childhood infectious disease. Atypical skin findings of HFMD, often associated with coxsackievirus A6 (CVA6), were first reported in 2008, with increasing reports worldwide since. Atypical lesions of HFMD often involve sites beyond the palms and soles and tend to have unusual, polymorphic morphology. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on clinical features and outcomes of pediatric HFMD with atypical cutaneous manifestations. Results: Eighty‐five studies were included, representing 1359 cases with mean age 2.4 years and a male predominance of 61%. The most reported morphologies were vesicles (53%), papules (49%), and bullae (36%). Other morphologies included eczema herpeticum‐like (19%), purpuric/petechial (7%), and Gianotti Crosti‐like (4%). Common atypical sites included the arms and/or legs (47%), face (45%), and trunk (27%). CVA6 was identified in 63% of cases. Symptoms resolved in a mean of 10 days. Overall, 16% of cases received treatment, most commonly with acyclovir, intravenous antibiotics, or topical steroids. The most common complications were nail changes (21%) and desquamation (4%) which occurred a mean of 3 and 2 weeks after symptoms, respectively. Conclusion: Due to unusual morphologies resembling other conditions, HFMD with atypical cutaneous findings may be misdiagnosed, leading to inappropriate and unnecessary investigations, hospitalization, and treatment. Greater awareness of atypical presentations of HFMD is warranted to improve patient care and counseling on infection control precautions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Clinical photography is essential in dermatology. However, a comprehensive literature review of photography in dermatology is lacking. This scoping review aims to summarize the literature regarding photography practices in dermatology, photography of skin of color, patient preferences, and medical‐legal considerations. A search was conducted utilizing Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Evidence Based Medicine databases in accordance with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. In total, 33 studies were summarized. Clinical photography is commonly used in biopsy site marking, assessment, diagnosis, disease monitoring, evaluation of treatment response, medical education, research, seeking advice from colleagues, and teledermatology. Although dermatologic photography remains devoid of skin of color representation, photographic considerations for darker skin are available. Most patients support medical photography, with a preference for clinical photographs to be taken by their own physicians, and for use of clinic/hospital‐owned cameras over personal devices. Pertinent medical‐legal issues include concerns around privacy, personal device use, and documentation of consent. Photography in dermatology is continuously evolving with broader applications. Improved practices and innovations will benefit individuals of various skin tones. Management of consent and privacy must be upheld to sustain the increasing ease of image capture and sharing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the complications associated with body piercings, particularly cutaneous and mucosal piercings. Topics include the prevalence of body piercing, common complications such as infections and tissue damage, and the importance of hygiene in piercing salons to prevent these complications.

Introduction: Cutaneous melanoma accounts for more than 70% of all skin cancer deaths. Follow-up surveillance is an integral part of melanoma patient care, to facilitate early detection of recurrences and subsequent primary melanomas. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of recently published melanoma surveillance guidelines from regional and national melanoma working groups. Methods: A systematic search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and Embase was conducted in September 2022 and was limited to publications from 2010 or later. Results: A total of 1047 articles were retrieved, and after abstract and full text review, 26 articles from 19 different organizations met inclusion criteria. Life-long annual skin surveillance with a physician was recommended by 53% (9/17) of guidelines. Routine laboratory investigations were recommended by 7/19 guidelines. Regional lymph node ultrasound was recommended by 9/16 guidelines, most often in stage IB or higher, and was optional in 7/16 for patients who met specific criteria. Surveillance with PET-CT or CT and MRI was recommended by 15 and 11 guidelines, respectively, most commonly in stage IIC or higher, with a variable frequency and total duration. Five out of 9 guidelines indicated a preference for skin surveillance to be completed with a dermatologist. Conclusion: Guidelines were highly variable for many aspects of melanoma surveillance, which may be partly attributed to regional differences in healthcare workforce distribution and availability of imaging technologies. Further high-level studies are recommended to provide more evidence on the most effective clinical and imaging follow-up surveillance protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]