Search

Background: Sciatica or more commonly sciatic nerve pain is characterized by low back pain that radiates down towards knee or below knee, paresthesia associated with tingling or numbness and weakness of muscles of foot and leg. Most important cause of sciatica is herniated disc which cause nerve root entrapment. Other causes may include lumbar stenosis or spinal tumors. The goal of the study is to determine the effects of graston instrument technique soft tissue mobilization in patients with sciatic nerve entrapment. Methods: Patients were recruited and allocated randomly in two groups. Group A (Lumbar traction with neural mobilization) and Group B (Graston technique along with lumbar traction and neural. 4 weeks of intervention were given to both groups. Results: The 4 weeks treatment session resulted in a significant improvement in pain reduction and improved MODI in patients of group B (Graston technique along with lumbar traction and neural mobilization), which was not more apparent in the group A (lumbar traction with neural mobilization manipulation group). Graston technique along with lumbar traction and neural mobilization was found to be more effective than lumbar traction and neural mobilization alone. Conclusion: This study concluded that Graston technique together with neural mobilization and lumbar traction was successful in alleviating pain and impairment in patients with sciatic nerve entrapment. Together with neural mobilization and lumbar traction, the Graston technique considered more superior to neural mobilization along with lumbar traction alone in terms of the aforementioned outcome measures dependent on means.

Background: Pregnancy is the period during which a fetus develops inside the uterus or womb of a female. Low back pain is common during pregnancy, and it can have serious effects on physical, mental, emotional health during daily activities of living. Job routine commitments in working women may have impact on the level of low back pain during. Objective: To compare the low back pain in working and non-working pregnant females. Methodology: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The data was collected through validated Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and numeric pain rating scale from 121 pregnant females, 25 working and 96 non-working females, between the ages of 20 to 40 years with having low back pain working or non-working from Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore from October 2020 to March 2021 using non-probability convenience sampling. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software. Result: The mean age of the study is 27.91. Independent t-test showed statistically non-significant difference between back pain of working (n=25, M=5.76, SD=0.413) and non-working (n=95, M=5.78, SD=.186) females, t(120)=.080, p=.936. the 95% confidence interval was -.0798 to 0.865. so, it failed to reject the null hypothesis. Also, there was no statistically significant difference between disability of working (n=25, M=12.68, SD=.8.112) and non-working (n=95, M=15.27, SD=8.350) females. t(120)=-1.390, p=.167. the 95% confidence interval was -6.282 to 1.100. so, it failed to reject the null hypothesis Conclusion: The findings of study concluded that both working and non-working females have a statistically non-significant, equal level of pain and disability due to low back pain during pregnancy. Keywords: Pregnancy, Low Back Pain, Working Women, Non-Working Women, Housewife, Female Job