Search

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized by both candidates and employers in the recruitment context. However, with this comes numerous ethical concerns, particularly related to the lack of transparency in these "black-box" models. Although previous studies have sought to increase the transparency of these models by investigating the personality traits of LLMs, many of the previous studies have provided them with personality assessments to complete. On the other hand, this study seeks to obtain a better understanding of such models by examining their output variations based on different input prompts. Specifically, we use a novel elicitation approach using prompts derived from common interview questions, as well as prompts designed to elicit particular Big Five personality traits to examine whether the models were susceptible to trait-activation like humans are, to measure their personality based on the language used in their outputs. To do so, we repeatedly prompted multiple LMs with different parameter sizes, including Llama-2, Falcon, Mistral, Bloom, GPT, OPT, and XLNet (base and fine tuned versions) and examined their personality using classifiers trained on the myPersonality dataset. Our results reveal that, generally, all LLMs demonstrate high openness and low extraversion. However, whereas LMs with fewer parameters exhibit similar behaviour in personality traits, newer and LMs with more parameters exhibit a broader range of personality traits, with increased agreeableness, emotional stability, and openness. Furthermore, a greater number of parameters is positively associated with openness and conscientiousness. Moreover, fine-tuned models exhibit minor modulations in their personality traits, contingent on the dataset. Implications and directions for future research are discussed., Comment: Manuscript submitted to ACM Facct. Authors One and Two contributed equally to this work

Vision Transformers (ViTs) have successfully been applied to image classification problems where large annotated datasets are available. On the other hand, when fewer annotations are available, such as in biomedical applications, image augmentation techniques like introducing image variations or combinations have been proposed. However, regarding ViT patch sampling, less has been explored outside grid-based strategies. In this work, we propose Random Vision Transformer Tokens (RaViTT), a random patch sampling strategy that can be incorporated into existing ViTs. We experimentally evaluated RaViTT for image classification, comparing it with a baseline ViT and state-of-the-art (SOTA) augmentation techniques in 4 datasets, including ImageNet-1k and CIFAR-100. Results show that RaViTT increases the accuracy of the baseline in all datasets and outperforms the SOTA augmentation techniques in 3 out of 4 datasets by a significant margin +1.23% to +4.32%. Interestingly, RaViTT accuracy improvements can be achieved even with fewer tokens, thus reducing the computational load of any ViT model for a given accuracy value., Comment: 9 pages, 6 figures

Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology have brought about a plethora of new challenges in terms of governance and regulation. AI systems are being integrated into various industries and sectors, creating a demand from decision-makers to possess a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the capabilities and limitations of these systems. One critical aspect of this demand is the ability to explain the results of machine learning models, which is crucial to promoting transparency and trust in AI systems, as well as fundamental in helping machine learning models to be trained ethically. In this paper, we present novel metrics to quantify the degree of which AI model predictions can be easily explainable by its features. Our metrics summarize different aspects of explainability into scalars, providing a more comprehensive understanding of model predictions and facilitating communication between decision-makers and stakeholders, thereby increasing the overall transparency and accountability of AI systems.

Recent advancements in GANs and diffusion models have enabled the creation of high-resolution, hyper-realistic images. However, these models may misrepresent certain social groups and present bias. Understanding bias in these models remains an important research question, especially for tasks that support critical decision-making and could affect minorities. The contribution of this work is a novel analysis covering architectures and embedding spaces for fine-grained understanding of bias over three approaches: generators, attribute modifier, and post-processing bias mitigators. This work shows that generators suffer from bias across all social groups with attribute preferences such as between 75%-85% for whiteness and 60%-80% for the female gender (for all trained CelebA models) and low probabilities of generating children and older men. Modifier and mitigators work as post-processor and change the generator performance. For instance, attribute channel perturbation strategies modify the embedding spaces. We quantify the influence of this change on group fairness by measuring the impact on image quality and group features. Specifically, we use the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID), the Face Matching Error and the Self-Similarity score. For Interfacegan, we analyze one and two attribute channel perturbations and examine the effect on the fairness distribution and the quality of the image. Finally, we analyzed the post-processing bias mitigators, which are the fastest and most computationally efficient way to mitigate bias. We find that these mitigation techniques show similar results on KL divergence and FID score, however, self-similarity scores show a different feature concentration on the new groups of the data distribution. The weaknesses and ongoing challenges described in this work must be considered in the pursuit of creating fair and unbiased face generation models.

Cosmography has been referred to as a solution to the inverse scattering problem, which is reasonable since it allows us to calculate cosmological bounds from data samplers by performing an expansion of the cosmological observables around present time. Nevertheless, this approach is not properly an inverse scattering solution since the method only circumvents the problem to fit the equation of state (EoS) parameters (model-dependent) by replacing it with their fit of its cosmographic parameters (with a polynomial series-dependence). Therefore, can we construct a new cosmography approach where the cosmodynamical parameters can be fitted and then employ them to analyse the kinematics via its generic cosmographic parameters? By all means, without experimenting the problem of truncation of the series that all cosmography proposals in the literature argue. In this work we present a generic EoS depending solely on the form of $f_i(z)$ and its derivative is found, where this function can be any polynomial (mimicking a dark energy-like term) that allow the dynamics of a specific cosmological density. We test our generic EoS with standard cosmological models and with polynomials proposals as Pad\'e and Chebyshev approximants. Interesting enough, a Pad\'e (2,2) approximant has been considered inside a $f(z)$CDM-like model showing a transition in $z=1$. Also, we found that this is not assured since models with these characteristics have degeneracy and truncation problems that experiment a divergence at this redshift limit. To explore our results, also we present a new supernovae sample trained via a deep learning tool called Recurrent-Bayesian (RNN+BNN) network that can solve problems as overfitting at lower redshifts and increase the density of data points in this region, which can help to discern between cosmographies at 2-$\sigma$ of precision., Comment: 31 pages, 17 figures, 20 tables. Accepted by JCAP