Search

Background and Objective: While significant sensation recovery improvements in neurotized breasts following reconstruction have been reported, sensation testing methods and surgical techniques have been widely variable. This narrative review aims to summarize available literature on current neurotization practices and sensory recovery outcomes in patients undergoing innervated breast reconstruction., Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed Medline, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted to identify all studies reporting outcomes of neurotization in breast reconstruction surgeries. Data analyzed included operative times, neurotization techniques, sensory outcomes, and methods as well as patient reported outcomes., Key Content and Findings: Despite the heterogeneity of various studies reviewed, all forms of neurotization achieved earlier and superior sensory recovery throughout the reconstructed breast skin compared to non-innervated breasts. In absence of randomized controlled trials or high-quality comparative studies, further evidence is required to objectively confirm this technique offers better sensory recovery., Conclusions: Neurotization at the time of breast reconstruction may lead to improved sensation and patient reported outcomes delineating improved quality of life compared to non-innervated breasts. Future studies need to standardize the way that breast sensation is measured and determine pre-operative variables leading to expected changes in final sensation recovery to help manage surgical outcome expectations of both the surgeon and the patient., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-504/coif). The series “Breast Reconstruction” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. O.J.M. served as the unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Annals of Translational Medicine from July 2022 to June 2024. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To develop an efficacious and efficient method for treating chronic wounds using "nanosheet" that improves the survival and localization of transplanted cells without prior seeding to optimally derive the regenerative potentials of uncultured stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells. Approach: We propose a method whereby the wound is covered by uncultured SVF cells using the nanosheet [porous poly(d, l,-lactic acid)] (PDLLA) films) designed to hold cells in a single-cell layer. A chronic wound model was created on 12-month-old db/db mice by inflecting a full-thickness skin excision on their dorsum and was subsequently given either no treatment or a treatment with SVF cells alone (with Tegaderm dressing), nanosheet alone, or nanosheet with SVF cells. Results: The placement of the nanosheet improved the grafted cell retention rate at day 10 timepoint by 5 folds, and the wound area was the smallest in the wounds treated with SVF cells plus nanosheet in comparison to the other groups. Collagen deposition and epidermal growth factor were significantly higher in the wound beds treated with SVF cells with the nanosheet, offering some mechanistic insights. Innovation: Porous poly(d, l,-lactic acid acid) (PDLLA) films or "nanosheet" printed on the nanoscale (1-100 nm in thickness) as a cellular scaffold for cytotherapy for the treatment of chronic wounds. Conclusion: The use of the nanosheet is an effective way to improve the transplanted SVF cell retention and accelerate the overall wound closure.