Search

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a subtype of BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasm. Its characteristic features include clonal myeloproliferation, dysregulation of kinase signaling pathway, abnormal release of cytokines leading to fibrosis in the bone marrow, osteosclerosis, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Approximately 20% of deaths occur because of disease progression, but death may also result occur because of cardiovascular complications or as a consequence of either infection or bleeding. The only and curative option for PMF is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT); however, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is highly effective in reducing constitutional symptoms and spleen volume, and has been found to improve survival. Ruxolitinib decreases the activity of type I T-helper cells, leading to decreased release of cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, interferon-γ, and production of IL-12, which can be a risk factor for opportunistic infections. In this report, we describe three cases of tuberculosis reactivation shortly after initiation of ruxolitinib therapy followed by a literature review.

BACKGROUND Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL) is an aggressive and rare entity that comprises about 1-2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This entity carries many challenges that start at the diagnosis, as most patients present with non-specific symptoms affecting different systems. As a result, the optimal approach, reaching the accurate diagnosis, and delivering needed treatment are delayed. Furthermore, it is not surprising that the initial set of biopsies are non-diagnostic given the heavy inflammatory background and scarcity of malignant cells in the early course of the disease. Other challenges include delivering the optimal curative therapy, as there is no such therapeutic option available yet. Although stem cell transplantation (SCT) can be considered a curative option, some patients have comorbidities and are not eligible for this option, and some other patients have relapse despite this aggressive approach, as was seen in our case. CASE REPORT We present an interesting case of AITL with florid leukemic infiltration at the time of relapse. We included a description of the patient's symptoms, diagnostic challenges, and clinical course, and provided therapy with demonstrative peripheral blood and flow cytometry images. Interestingly, there are very few reports in the literature that described leukemic infiltration of this entity. CONCLUSIONS Acknowledging the rarity of this aggressive lymphoma combined with all the challenges that face the involved health care workers, publishing this elaborative case report adds some insight and knowledge and helps improve our understanding of this entity.

Background: The coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) caused by SARS Coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is a potentially lethal infection. Cancer patients, and specifically hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are severely immunocompromised and may be at a higher risk of a complicated course with this infection. We aimed to study the COVID-19 outcomes and severity in post HCT patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed post-HCT patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 15, 2020, and December 1, 2020 at 10 transplant centers across the Middle East. Results: We identified 91 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection across 10 transplant centers. 52 patients were post allo-HCT while the remaining 39 patients were post auto-HCT. The median time from transplant was 14.9 months. Mortality rate was 4.4%. Hospital admission rate was 53%. ICU admission rate was 14%. Mechanical ventilation rate was 10%. Oxygen supplementation rate was 18%. Time from HCT to COVID-19 > 6 months was associated with lower admission rates and lower rates of the “severity” composite endpoint. Antibody responses was seen 67% of evaluable patients. Conclusion: In this series of HCT recipients, we report overall favorable clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 and provide preliminary insights into the clinical course of this disease in this specific population. Funding Statement: None Declaration of Interests: None. Ethics Approval Statement: The hospitals’ Institutional Review Board approved the study.

Background Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is associated with a high fatality rate (34%), which is higher in the presence of co-morbidities. The aim of the current study was to assess the clinical course and the outcome in hematological or oncological malignancy cases, diagnosed with MERS-CoV. Methods This is a case series of hematological /oncological cases, diagnosed with MERS-CoV, in a tertiary care setting in 2015. The cases were identified based on the World Health Organization (WHO) MERS-CoV case definition. The demographic, clinical, and outcome data were retrieved from the patients’ medical charts and electronic health records. Results In total, nine hematological or oncological cases were identified, diagnosed with MERS-CoV. The baseline malignant condition was hematological malignancy in seven patients, as well as colon cancer and osteosarcoma in one patient each. Six (67%) patients were male. The median age was 65 years (range 16–80 years). Co-morbidities included chronic kidney disease (n = 3.33%), diabetes mellitus (n = 3.33%), and hypertension (n = 2.22%). The presenting symptoms were shortness of breath (n = 6.66%), fever (n = 5.55%), cough (n = 2.22%), and diarrhea (n = 2.22%). Chest x-rays indicated bilateral infiltrates in 6 patients (66%). The PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test was repeated in six patients to confirm the diagnosis. The mortality rate was 100%, and the median time to death was 26 days (range 15–77 days). Conclusion MERS-CoV infection in this small cohort of hematology or oncology patients has a 100% mortality rate, regardless of the status of the underlying disease. The confirmation of the diagnosis may require repeated testing. Additional studies are required to verify the findings and to elucidate the disease pathogenesis in cancer patients.

Objectives Cytokine release syndrome with elevated interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels is associated with multiorgan damage and death in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our objective was to perform a living systematic review of the literature concerning the efficacy and toxicity of the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients. Methods Data sources were Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus up, preprint servers and Google up to October 8, 2020. Study eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies at low or moderate risk of bias. Participants were hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Interventions included tocilizumab versus placebo or standard of care. We pooled crude risk ratios (RRs) of RCTs and adjusted RRs from cohorts, separately. We evaluated inconsistency between studies with I2. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Results Of 1156 citations, 24 studies were eligible (five RCTs and 19 cohorts). Five RCTs at low risk of bias, with 1325 patients, examined the effect of tocilizumab on short-term mortality; pooled RR was 1.09 (95%CI 0.80–1.49, I2 = 0%). Four RCTs with 771 patients examined the effect of tocilizumab on risk of mechanical ventilation; pooled RR was 0.71 (95%CI 0.52–0.96, I2 = 0%), with a corresponding number needed to treat of 17 (95%CI 9–100). Among 18 cohorts at moderate risk of bias with 9850 patients, the pooled adjusted RR for mortality was 0.58 (95%CI 0.51–0.66, I2 = 2.5%). This association was observed over all degrees of COVID-19 severity. Data from the RCTs did not show a higher risk of infections or adverse events with tocilizumab: pooled RR 0.63 (95%CI 0.38–1.06, five RCTs) and 0.83 (95%CI 0.55–1.24, five RCTs), respectively. Conclusions Cumulative moderate-certainty evidence shows that tocilizumab reduces the risk of mechanical ventilation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. While RCTs showed that tocilizumab did not reduce short-term mortality, low-certainty evidence from cohort studies suggests an association between tocilizumab and lower mortality. We did not observe a higher risk of infections or adverse events with tocilizumab use. This review will continuously evaluate the role of tocilizumab in COVID-19 treatment.

Non-myeloablative haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) from matched related donors (MRD) has been increasingly utilized in sickle cell disease (SCD). A total of 122 patients received 300 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI), alemtuzumab, unmanipulated filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood HPC and sirolimus. The median follow-up was four years; median age at HPCT was 29 years. Median neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred on day 22 and 19 respectively; 41 patients required no platelet transfusions. Overall and sickle-free survival at one and five years were 93% and 85% respectively. Age, sex, pre-HPCT sickle complications, ferritin and infused HPC numbers were similar between graft failure and engrafted patients. Mean donor myeloid chimaerism at one and five years post HPCT were 84% and 88%, and CD3 was 48% and 53% respectively. Two patients developed grade 1 and 2 skin graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with no chronic GVHD. Median days of recipients taking immunosuppression were 489; 83% of engrafted patients have discontinued immunosuppression. Haemoglobin, haemolytic parameters and hepatic iron levels improved post HPCT. Pulmonary function testing, hepatic histology and neurovascular imaging remained stable, suggesting cessation of further sickle-related injury. Fourteen patients had children. In this largest group of adult SCD patients, this regimen was highly efficacious, well-tolerated despite compromised organ functions pre HPCT, and without clinically significant GVHD.

Context: Blood donation is an essential lifesaving procedure. There is a continuous effort to supply the high demand in hospitals. Aims: To assess the current status, knowledge, and attitudes of female health care students in King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) regarding blood donation. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study was done with students in the female campus of KSAU-HS in Riyadh. Methods and Material: The sample was categorized based on the college and year of study. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed during the first semester of the 2018–2019 academic year to an estimated 20%–25% of students per batch. Statistical analysis used: Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results: A total of 302 students completed the questionnaire with a median age of 21 years and a range of 18–30 years. Only 14.6% of the sample previously donated blood, with half of this group donating more than once. Just less than half (48.7%, n = 147) have been exposed previously to a university campaign related to blood donation. The majority (74.5%, n = 225) knew their blood type, small proportions (16.6%, n = 50) and (10.9%, n = 33) reported knowing family members or friends requiring blood products. More than half (57.6%) of the students admitted not having sufficient knowledge regarding blood donation, and the majority (75.1%) were not aware of the quantity of blood collected during a donation. Two-thirds, 31.4% and 32.1% agree and strongly agree, respectively, that blood donation is a duty that every individual should perform. Just more than half (53%) of the students strongly agreed that they are motivated to donate blood on moral or religious grounds. Conclusion: The proportion of prior blood donation in the sample was low. This is due, in part, to inadequate knowledge about the donation process. Given that many students felt motivated to donate, it is possible that raising awareness through educational interventions could increase donations in female health care students.

PURPOSE Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a marker for checkpoint inhibitor use in the management of solid tumors, especially in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study was aimed at determining the patterns of PD-L1 expression and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) immunostains in patients with NSCLC in the Arab population. METHODS Archival tumor tissue from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC were obtained and stained for PD-L1 with antibody 22C3, using immunohistochemistry staining and giving the tumor proportion score (TPS) as a percentage from 0%-100% of stained tumor cells. Tumors were categorized into negative expressers (TPS < 1%), low positive (TPS, 1%-49%), and high positive (TPS, 50%-100%). Correlation of expression with clinical and pathologic features, including CD8-positive (CD8+) lymphocyte density, was also analyzed. RESULTS Two hundred patients with NSCLC were included in the study from 6 centers in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Median age was 65 years (28-93 years), and the majority were men (75%) with stage 4 NSCLC (64%). The TPS was high in 37 patients (18%), low in 60 patients (30%), and negative in 103 patients (52%). In a univariate analysis, the following were significant predictors of any PD-L1 expression (> 1%): male sex, being Saudi national patients, high expression of CD8+, and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of CD8+ cells (≥ 2+) was significant, with an odds ratio of 4.4 (95% CI, 1.5 to 12.9; P = .003) CONCLUSION PD-L1 expression in our population is similar to the published literature and correlated with the density of CD8+ cells. Validation of the predictive value of this marker in our population and identifying easier and reliable methods to test for it are warranted.

Background Hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with cytarabine and methotrexate (hyper-CVAD) is a commonly used regimen in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). Adult patients fit for pediatric-inspired protocols have an excellent outcome with chemotherapy alone. However, it is unclear whether patients receiving hyper-CVAD should undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as postremission therapy. Our aim was to examine the role of HCT at first complete remission (CR1) in adult ALL/LBL after hyper-CVAD. Patients and Methods Adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL/LBL receiving frontline hyper-CVAD from 2008 to 2018 were identified and records retrospectively extracted. Results A total of 85 patients were identified and included for further analysis. The median (range) age was 23 (14-68) years, and 56 (66%) were male. A total of 24 (28%) had adverse cytogenetics, and 48 (56%) had at least one risk factor. All patients received hyper-CVAD as induction; induction failure was seen in 10 (12%). A total of 38 patients continued the hyper-CVAD course, while the remaining 47 received HCT in CR1. Three-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival for the entire cohort were 51.4% and 61.6%, respectively. Median follow-up of alive patients was 39.9 (3.8-123.8) months. At multivariable analysis for EFS, induction failure was associated with worse outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-13.7; P = .003), whereas HCT in CR1 improved outcome (HR, 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.97; P = .044). Furthermore, HCT in CR1 was the only prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.3; 95% CI 0.11-0.85; P = .023). Conclusion HCT at CR1 resulted in a favorable EFS and overall survival in ALL/LBL patients after hyper-CVAD frontline therapy. Given that hyper-CVAD is a widely used protocol for adult patients, further examination of this observation is warranted.

Limited data exist regarding the prevalence and outcome of medication nonadherence in the adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) population. The objective of this cross-sectional survey study is to determine the prevalence of medication nonadherence to immunosuppressant and nonimmunosuppressant medications in adult recipients of allo-HSCT. An electronic survey using previously validated medication adherence scales was distributed between December 2014 and April 2015 to 200 adult patients with at least 3 months of follow-up after allo-HSCT. Immunosuppressant serum drug levels and prescription refill records were retrospectively collected to assess correlation with survey responses. In the entire cohort, 51% of subjects (n = 102) reported nonadherence to nonimmunosuppressant medications (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.07% to 57.93%) on the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Of the 153 patients taking oral immunosuppressant medications at the time of the survey, 58 (37.9%) reported nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy (95% CI, 30.22% to 45.6%), as measured by the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale. Younger age and distress were associated with medication nonadherence. Nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy was associated with mild chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD), and a similar trend was observed for moderate cGVHD. Medication nonadherence was found to be highly prevalent for both immunosuppressant and nonimmunosuppressant medications in adult allo-HSCT recipient, and further study to identify interventions to improve adherence in these patients is warranted.

There is a lack of large comparative study on the outcomes of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) and fludarabine/melphalan (FM) regimens. Adult AML patients from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who received first RIC allo-transplant between 2001 and 2015 were studied. Patients were excluded if they received cord blood or identical twin transplant, total body irradiation in conditioning, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with in vitro T-cell depletion. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were leukemia-free survival (LFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and GVHD. Multivariate survival model was used with adjustment for patient, leukemia, and transplant-related factors. A total of 622 patients received FM and 791 received FB RIC. Compared with FB, the FM group had fewer transplant in complete remission (CR), fewer matched sibling donors, and less usage of anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. More patients in the FM group received marrow grafts and had transplantation before 2005. OS was significantly lower within the first 3 months posttransplant in the FM group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82, P < .001), but was marginally superior beyond 3 months (HR = 0.87, P = .05). LFS was better with FM compared with FB (HR = 0.89, P = .05). NRM was significantly increased in the FM group during the first 3 months of posttransplant (HR = 3.85, P < .001). Long-term relapse was lower with FM (HR = 0.65, P < .001). Analysis restricted to patients with CR showed comparable results. In conclusion, compared with FB, the FM RIC showed a marginally superior long-term OS and LFS and a lower relapse rate. A lower OS early posttransplant within 3 months was largely the result of a higher early NRM.

Background Multiple myeloma has witnessed significant advances due to the approval of many novel agents. However, in spite of all these new developments, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease with inevitable relapse in the majority of patients. Venetoclax is a selective antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor that induces cell death in multiple myeloma cells, particularly in those harboring t(11,14)(q13;q32). We report two cases of patients with multiple myeloma with t(11,14)(q13;q32) who were treated with venetoclax/carfilzomib/dexamethasone with rapid initial response; however, the response was short-lived. Cases presentation Patient 1 was a 50-year-old Saudi man with International Staging System stage III kappa light chain multiple myeloma with normal karyotype diagnosed in May 2013. He received bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone treatment and underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Three years later, he presented with disease progression and received multiple lines of chemotherapy, including carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone. Venetoclax/carfilzomib/dexamethasone was started after acquiring t(11,14)(q13;q32) 5 years into his disease course. He achieved complete remission, with disease progression after cycle 6. Patient 2 was a 48-year-old Saudi man with International Staging System stage III immunoglobulin G kappa multiple myeloma with t(11,14)(q13;q32) diagnosed in May 2017. He received bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone treatment and underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Eighteen months later, he had disease progression, and he received multiple lines of chemotherapy, including carfilzomib/dexamethasone. He was shifted to venetoclax/carfilzomib/dexamethasone in April 2019 and had an initial clinical response; two months later, he progressed to plasma cell leukemia with rapid deterioration to multiorgan failure. Conclusions Acquired t(11;14)(q13;q32) is unreported in the multiple myeloma literature. In the era of targeted therapy, it is essential to repeat the cytogenetic and multiple myeloma fluorescence in situ hybridization panel with each disease progression. Multiple myeloma remains a challenging hematological malignancy despite advances in personalized/precision medicine.

Systemic mastocytosis with an associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN) is a rare diagnosis commonly associated with myeloid disorders. Herein, we describe the case of a 53-year-old female diagnosed with systemic mastocytosis (SM) in conjunction with renal light chain amyloidosis (AL) and smoldering myeloma. Although cytokines such as IL-6 may play a role in the proliferation of plasma cells, delays in the diagnosis of SM and paucity of relevant studies cast uncertainty on whether the associated disease is secondary to the mast cells or etiologically independent. To our knowledge, this is the first case of confirmed renal AL disease in conjunction with SM. We review and summarize the available literature describing SM in association with plasma cell disorders.

Recent advancements in cancer care, coupled with early detection and an aging population have resulted in significant growth of cancer survivors. Long term follow up of such survivors is essential given the heightened risk for development of late effects such as secondary neoplasms, cardiovascular disease or psychosocial dysfunction among others. As more patients with hematologic malignancies are cured or managed over protracted periods of time, awareness of such issues is paramount for the practicing clinicians for optimal patient management. In this review, we describe the genesis of the field of cancer survivorship, and then it's gentle metamorphosis into multiple sub-fields currently by presenting literature relevant to late effects commonly seen in Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic leukemia and multiple myeloma. We will discuss the strengths and pitfalls of the existing models of survivorship care in hematologic malignancies and conclude with expert perspective on how to move the field forward.

Graft vs host disease impacts overall survival post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma

Background Diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients is critical to co-manage their underlying disease and infection appropriately. Our study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of screening patients with cancer for COVID-19 infection. Methods All oncology patients receiving care at Department of Oncology at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh were screened using the acute respiratory infection (ARI) survey. Nasopharyngeal and throat swap for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was performed on patients who have high ARI score (i.e. ≥ 4), or any patient requiring elective/emergency hospitalization, undergoing a procedure as well as screening asymptomatic patients receiving chemotherapy between April 1st and July 30, 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Descriptive and inferential analyses were done and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated considering the COVID-19 PCR as the gold standard. Results During the study period, a total of 473 patients were included with a median age was 56 years (14- 104), 51% were female, 73% had solid tumors, and 66% received treatment within the last 3 months. These patients underwent 688 PCR tests along with ARI survey screening. Testing was done in the outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department setting in 41%, 40% and 19% of the patients, respectively. Majority of tests were screening of asymptomatic patients and only 23% were tested for suspected infections with ARI ≥ 4. A total of 54 patients (8%) had positive PCR for COVID-19 infection. The prevalence of infection varied from month to month ranging from 1.09% in April up to 19.70% in June and correlated with the average daily and active case load at a national level. The diagnostic yield of the ARI score also correlated with infection burden nationally. The PPV and NPV of the ARI as a screening tool was 18.24% (0-31.8) and 95.6% (86.36-98.86%) with the PPN fluctuating considerably in parallel with the prevalence of COVID-19 result. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of the ARI were 55.77% (0-70.59) and 79.4 (69.19-92), respectively. Conclusion The yield of screening asymptomatic patients with cancer varies based on the community burden of COVID-19 infection. As universal screening can cause delays to patient care, it should be tailored based on the individual patient risks and infection burden in the region.

Histiocytic disorders are an exceptionally rare group of diseases with diverse manifestations and a paucity of approved treatments, thereby leading to various challenges in their diagnosis and management. With the discovery of novel molecular targets and the incorporation of targeted agents in the management of various adult histiocytic disorders, their management has become increasingly complex. In an attempt to improve the understanding of the clinical features and management of common adult histiocytic disorders (Langerhans cell histiocytosis, Erdheim-Chester disease, Rosai-Dorfman disease, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis), we created this document based on existing literature and expert opinion.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogenous disease with a variable prognosis. The International Prognostic Index (IPI), revised-IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network-IPI (NCCN-IPI) have been developed and validated to predict prognosis in DLBCL. However, patients from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region were under-represented in such scores, and it is unclear whether ethnic background contributes to different disease biology or response to therapy. Following due Institutional Board Review approval, DLBCL patients diagnosed from January 2010 until December 2015 from the MENA region were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 122 were identified and further analyzed. There were 74 males (61%), and the median age at diagnosis for the cohort was 64 years (range: 18-98 years), with a median follow-up duration of 32.9 months (range: 0.2-123.7 months). Estimates of three-year progression-free survival found a significant difference among risk groups using all three prognostic models but were more discriminating among the groups using NCCN-IPI and R-IPI vs. IPI (p = 0.019 and 0.014 vs. 0.039, respectively). For overall survival estimates at three years, the NCCN-IPI was the best model compared to R-IPI and IPI (p = 0.0013 vs. 0.05 and 0.04, respectively). In conclusion, we validated that the IPI and its subsequent iterations were predictive of outcome in DLBCL patients from the MENA region; however, the NCCN-IPI appeared the most prognostic. These results warrant further confirmation.

Background: Refractoriness to platelet transfusion is an understudied phenomenon in critically ill patients. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of platelet refractoriness among patients in a tertiary-care intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: A retrospective cohort study included all patients (age >14 years) who were admitted to a tertiary-care medical-surgical ICU between 2011 and 2016 and received ≥2 platelet transfusions during their ICU stay. We calculated platelet increment (PI) and corrected count increment (CCI). Results: A total of 267 patients were enrolled in the study, collectively receiving 1357 transfusions with a median of 3 (interquartile range: 2-6) transfusions per patient. The median pretransfusion platelet count was 31.0 x109/L (interquartile range: 16.0, 50.0) with a median PI of 6 x109/L (interquartile range: -5, 24). The prevalence of platelet transfusion refractoriness was 54.8% based on PI and 57.0% based on CCI. The two methods had excellent concordance in diagnosing refractoriness (kappa coefficient: 0.939). Refractoriness was more common in patients admitted by Hepatology, Liver Transplant, and Hematology services (69.7%, 69.2%, and 55.6%, respectively). On multivariable logistic regression, younger age was the only significant predictor of refractoriness (odds ratio per year increment: 0.975, 95% CI: 0.951-0.999). Finally, refractoriness was associated with increased length of stay in the ICU (p=0.02), but not with mortality.Conclusions: We demonstrated excellent concordance between PI and CCI for the diagnosis of platelet transfusion refractoriness. Platelet transfusion refractoriness was highly (>50%) prevalent in critically ill patients. However, it was not associated with increased mortality.

Preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was shown to decrease the incidence of CMV disease. However, the optimal PET threshold is elusive.To examine the efficacy of PET initiation at a viral threshold of 1000 copies/mL (1560 IU/mL) in a patient population with high prevalence of CMV seropositive status.A single center retrospective review of patients that underwent allogeneic SCT was done.A total of 195 allogeneic SCT recipients were included with median follow up of 18.1 (0.7-95.6) months. A total of 178 (91 %) of patients had a positive CMV PCR with median days to initial reactivation post SCT of 17 (1-1187); 129 patients had peak CMV titer1000 copies/mL (low titer) whereas the remaining 49 patients had a peak titer ≥ 1000 copies/mL (high titer). 120 (93 %) of patients with low titers cleared spontaneously with median time to clearance of 40 days (4-188). One patient in the high titer group developed CMV disease. At multivariable analysis; age at SCT HR 1.02 (1.004-1.04; 0.017), malignant vs. benign condition HR 9.4 (2.47-61; 0.0005) and cGVHD HR 0.37 (0.2-0.65; 0.0005) were significant for OS.CMV reactivation post SCT was very common in patients with high prevalence of seropositive status. A PET threshold of 1000 copies/mL (1560 IU/mL) appears desirable as it was associated with spontaneous clearance in over 90 % of patients while minimizing treatment related toxicity. Validation of these observations is warranted.

The prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. Among 180 patients, the median age was 53 (14-88) years. The overall 2-year disease free survival (DFS) was 28.6% (+/- 3.4), 47.7% (+/- 6.6%) for ≤ 40, 23.6% (+/- 5.8%) for 41–60 and 11.7% (+/- 4.2%) for ≥61 (p< 0.0001). The overall 2-year survival (OS) was 45.3% (+/- 3.8%), 78.6% (+/- 5.5%) for ≤40, 43.5% (+/- 6.9%) for 41–60 and 15.8% (+/- 4.8%) for ≥61 (p< 0.0001). Induction outcome of ≥61 was best in high dose chemotherapy (HDC) group (p < 0.0001). Only those ≤40 had durable DFS and OS. HDC appears to improve the outcome of older AML patients.

Background Hypomethylating agents (HMA), azacitidine, and decitabine are frequently used in the management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there are no clinical trials that have directly compared these agents. We conducted a systematic review and indirectly compared the efficacy of azacitidine to decitabine in MDS. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) through June 28, 2018, without language or time restrictions. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers, and differences were resolved by consensus. The fixed effect model and adjusted indirect comparison methods were used to pool relative risks (RR) of major outcomes of interest (mortality, response rate, quality of life, hematologic improvement, hospitalization, leukemia transformation, transfusion independence). Results Only four trials met the eligibility criteria. Two trials compared azacitidine to the best supportive care (BSC) and included 549 patients, and the other two compared decitabine to BSC and included 403 patients. The risk of bias was unclear overall. Compared to BSC, azacitidine was significantly associated with lower mortality (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.94, I 2 = 89%) whereas decitabine did not significantly reduce mortality (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77–1.00, I 2 = 53%). Both drugs were associated with higher partial and complete response compared to BSC. Indirect comparisons were not statistically significant for all the studied outcomes, except for complete response where azacitidine was less likely to induce complete response compared to decitabine (RR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.01–0.86, very low-certainty evidence). Conclusions Azacitidine and decitabine are both associated with improved outcomes compared to BSC. The available indirect evidence comparing the two agents warrants very low certainty and cannot reliably confirm the superiority of either agent. Head-to-head trials are needed. In the meantime, the choice of agent should be driven by patient preferences, adverse effects, drug availability, and cost.