Search

Your search keyword '"Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora"' showing total 10 results
Start Over Author "Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora"
10 results on '"Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora"'

1. P02-16 Implementation of a program based on adapted physical activity and recommendations for second cancers prevention for adolescents and young adults with cancer: PREVAPAJA study

Author

Mongondry, Rodolf, primary, Perol, Olivia, additional, Marec-Berard, Perrine, additional, Delrieu, Lidia, additional, Febvey-Combes, Olivia, additional, Lion, Axel, additional, Marvalin, Serge, additional, Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora, additional, Fervers, Béatrice, additional, Boyle, Helen, additional, and Carretier, Julien, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Implementation of a Prevention Program Based on Adapted Physical Activity and Recommendations for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: PREVAPAJA Study.

Author

Marec-Bérard, Perrine, Delrieu, Lidia, Febvey-Combes, Olivia, Mongondry, Rodolf, Pérol, Olivia, Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora, Boyle, Helen, Fervers, Béatrice, and Carretier, Julien

Subjects
TUMOR prevention, SEDENTARY lifestyles, ANTHROPOMETRY, INTERVIEWING, PATIENT satisfaction, PHYSICAL activity, CANCER patients, HUMAN services programs, PHYSIOLOGICAL adaptation, T-test (Statistics), QUESTIONNAIRES, QUALITY of life, CANCER fatigue, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC factors, DATA analysis software
Abstract

Purpose: In Europe, 20,000 Adolescent and Young Adults (AYAs) aged 15–25 years are diagnosed with cancer annually. Although prognosis is good, AYA cancer survivors are at greater risk of second primary cancers, cardiovascular disease, and various long-term effects. Benefits of physical activity (PA) in AYAs reported in current studies remain difficult to generalize; none has been performed in France. This single-arm intervention study tested the feasibility of combining hospital-based supervised and home-based unsupervised physical activity sessions (PAS) and providing cancer prevention recommendations for AYAs. Methods: The AYAs attended PAS concomitant to treatment and participated in one face-to-face prevention interview. PA (international physical activity questionnaire), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), sedentarity, anthropometrics, quality of life (QoL), and fatigue were assessed at baseline (T1) and end of intervention (T2). PA, satisfaction and cancer prevention behaviors were assessed 1 year after baseline (T3). Results: Fifty-nine AYAs (mean 19 years) participated in the study. Acceptability and attrition were 80% and 12%, respectively. Between T1 and T2, 6MWD and global QoL improved (p < 0.001), and fatigue decreased (p = 0.003). Total PA improved and sitting time decreased (p < 0.001) overall (T1–T3). Assessment at T3 showed interindividual differences in how participants considered risk factors (e.g., more attention to PA, UV exposures, nutrition). Conclusion: Combined supervised and unsupervised home-based PAS in AYAs undergoing cancer treatment is acceptable and feasible. The program contributes to maintaining and improving physical fitness and QoL, while reducing fatigue and other cancer and treatment symptoms. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Eliciting patients’ preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: development and validation of a bedside decision‐making instrument in a French Regional Cancer Centre

Author

Carrère, Marie‐Odile, Moumjid‐Ferdjaoui, Nora, Charavel, Marie, and Brémond, Alain

Subjects
Original Articles
Abstract

In developed countries, the physician-patient relationship is moving from a paternalistic model to new decision-making models that take patient preferences into account. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to develop a Decision Board (DB) and to test its acceptability in a French Regional Cancer Centre regarding the decision on whether or not to use chemotherapy after surgery in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. This paper presents the development process for this instrument and reports the pretesting phase, as well as the corresponding results. METHODS: A working group was created with oncologists, psychologists and economists. Following the first phase, i.e. the development process, a first version of the instrument was presented to health professionals. Their feedback led to important modifications of the instrument. The DB was then presented to experienced patients, which resulted in slight changes. The second phase consisted of pretesting the comprehension, internal and across-time consistency of the DB on healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The DB was pretested in a group of 40 healthy volunteers. Eighteen respondents chose chemotherapy and 22 chose not to have chemotherapy. Comprehension rates were very high (/=87.5%). Internal consistency was assessed considering option attitudes based on outcomes and option attitudes based on process. Women shifted their choices in a predictable way. Across-time consistency was appraised using the test-retest method with Visual Analog Scales. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.97. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION: Due to cultural differences, the DB developed in our French Cancer Centre is quite different from the DBs previously developed elsewhere. Our instrument showed good comprehension and consistency properties, which are corroborated by the DB literature. Whether our DB is acceptable for patients with breast cancer must still be tested. Patients' reactions will tell us which type of decision-making model is at work. Further research is needed in order to explore the shared decision-making process and clarify the concept.

Published
2000

6. Core Competencies for Shared Decision Making Training Programs: Insights From an International, Interdisciplinary Working Group

Author

Légaré, France, primary, Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora, additional, Drolet, Renée, additional, Stacey, Dawn, additional, Härter, Martin, additional, Bastian, Hilda, additional, Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique, additional, Borduas, Francine, additional, Charles, Cathy, additional, Coulter, Angela, additional, Desroches, Sophie, additional, Friedrich, Gwendolyn, additional, Gafni, Amiram, additional, Graham, Ian D., additional, Labrecque, Michel, additional, LeBlanc, Annie, additional, Légaré, Jean, additional, Politi, Mary, additional, Sargeant, Joan, additional, and Thomson, Richard, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Shared decision-making in question.

Author

Marie Charavel, Alain Bremond, Jodi F. Johnson, Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Nora, Mignotte, Herve, and Carrere, Marie Odile

Subjects
GROUP decision making, PHYSICIAN-patient relations, PATIENT education, HEALTH promotion, METHODOLOGY, CHOICE (Psychology)
Abstract

Over recent years, communication within the physician–patient relationship has been profoundly changing. New modes of conveying diagnostic and therapeutic information influence the way in which decisions regarding treatment are made. We propose a critical review of the various theoretical models as presented in the literature, from the paternalistic to the shared decision model, in order to reveal conceptual ambiguities and their related methodological problems. This analysis leads to a project for clarifying these problems through a research protocol based on shared decision-making. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2001
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results