Search

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed by the majority of clinically significant prostate adenocarcinomas, and patients with target-positive disease can easily be identified by PSMA PET imaging. Promising results with PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy have already been obtained in early-phase studies using various combinations of targeting molecules and radiolabels. Definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in combination with standard-of-care has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, whose disease had progressed after or during at least one taxane regimen and at least one novel androgen-axis drug. Preliminary data suggest that 177Lu-PSMA-radioligand therapy (RLT) also has high potential in additional clinical situations. Hence, the radiopharmaceuticals [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T are currently being evaluated in ongoing phase 3 trials. The purpose of this guideline is to assist nuclear medicine personnel, to select patients with highest potential to benefit from 177Lu-PSMA-RLT, to perform the procedure in accordance with current best practice, and to prepare for possible side effects and their clinical management. We also provide expert advice, to identify those clinical situations which may justify the off-label use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or other emerging ligands on an individual patient basis.

Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.

Purpose: To investigate in a feasibility study the combination of [18F]FDG whole-body (WB) positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR), including an integrated breast MR within a single protocol for locoregional and distant staging in breast cancer patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with breast cancer diagnoses according to conventional imaging modalities (full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and ultrasound (US)) were prospectively included. All patients underwent [18F]FDG WB PET-MR, including an integrated dedicated breast MR (prone position) and WB PET-MR (supine position) protocol. Results of [18F]FDG WB PET-MR, including integrated breast MR, versus conventional imaging modalities were compared. Results: From April 2021–April 2022, 28 patients were included. On conventional imaging, cT1-2 breast cancer was present in 22 (FFDM) and 23 (US) out of 28 patients. With regard to clinical nodal status, eight patients were considered cN0, eighteen cN1 (1-3 suspicious lymph nodes), and two patients were cN2 (four suspicious axillary lymph nodes/internal mammary lymph node metastasis). [18F]FDG WB PET-MR, including an integrated breast MR protocol, upstaged clinical tumor status in two patients and clinical nodal status in nine patients according to both [18F]FDG WB PET-MR and breast MR findings. In addition, distant metastases were detected in three patients (liver/bone), and another patient was diagnosed with a synchronous primary tumor (lung cancer). Conclusion: [18F]FDG WB PET-MR, including an integrated breast MR within a single protocol in breast cancer patients, is feasible and provides a promising new approach in breast cancer patients with regard to locoregional and distant staging. Critical relevance statement: [18F]FDG whole-body PET-MR, including an integrated breast MR protocol, is feasible and allows locoregional and distant staging within a single imaging exam in breast cancer patients. Key Points: [18F]FDG PET-MR allows the combination of breast MR and whole-body staging. Therefore, a single protocol of whole-body [18F]FDG PET-MR, including an integrated breast MRI, is investigated. [18F]FDG PET-MR, including an integrated breast MR is feasible and can be considered in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The distance traveled by the positron before annihilation with an electron, the so‐called positron range, negatively effects the positron emission tomography (PET) image quality for radionuclides emitting high‐energy positrons such as Gallium‐68 (68Ga). Purpose: In this study, the effect of a tissue‐independent positron range correction for Gallium‐68 (68Ga‐PRC) was investigated based on phantom measurements. The effect of the 68Ga‐PRC was also explored in four patients. Methods: The positron range distribution profile of 68Ga in water was generated via Monte Carlo simulation. That profile was mapped to a spatially invariant 3D convolution kernel which was incorporated in the OSEM and Q.Clear reconstruction algorithms to perform the 68Ga‐PRC. In addition, each reconstruction method included point spread function (PSF) modeling and time‐of‐flight information. For both Fluorine‐18 (18F) and 68Ga, the NEMA IQ phantom was filled with a sphere‐to‐background ratio of 10:1 and scanned with the GE Discovery MI 5R PET/CT system. Standard non‐positron range correction (PRC) reconstructions were performed for both radionuclides, while also PRC reconstructions were performed for 68Ga. Reconstructions parameters (OSEM: number of updates, Q.Clear: beta value) were adapted to achieve similar noise levels between the corresponding reconstructions. The effect of 68Ga‐PRC was assessed for both OSEM and Q.Clear reconstructions and compared to non‐PRC reconstructions for 68Ga and 18F in terms of image contrast, noise, recovery coefficient (RC), and spatial resolution. For the clinical validation, 68Ga‐labeled prostate‐specific membrane antigen (68Ga‐PSMA) and 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET scans were included of two patients each. For each PET scan, patients were injected with 1.5 MBq/kg of 68Ga‐PSMA or 68Ga‐DOTATOC and the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was calculated and compared to the non‐PRC reconstructions. Results: For OSEM reconstructions, including the 68Ga‐PRC improved the RC by 9.4% (3.7%–19.3%) and spatial resolution by 21.7% (4.6 mm vs. 3.6 mm) for similar noise levels. For Q.Clear reconstructions, 68Ga‐PRC modeling improved the RC by 6.7% (2.8%–10.5%) and spatial resolution by 15.3% (5.9 mm vs. 5.0 mm) while obtaining similar noise levels. In the patient data, the use of 68Ga‐PRC enhanced the CNR by 13.2%. Conclusions: Including 68Ga‐PRC in the PET reconstruction enhanced the image quality of 68Ga PET data compared to the standard non‐PRC reconstructions for similar noise levels. Limited patient results also supported this improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Identifying the cause of recurrent or persisting pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is essential for establishing optimal treatment. In this study, we evaluate patients after PLIF surgery by 18F-fluoride PET/CT scans and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A total of 36 PLIF patients were included. Sixty minutes after intravenous injection of 18F-fluoride, PET/CT scanning was performed. Bone graft ingrowth, subsidence, screw loosening and damage of facet joints were scored by quantifying the level of bone metabolism of the vertebral endplates in the disc spaces, around screws and around the facet joints on the PET scans. Results: In contrast to asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients showed abnormal PET values around pedicle screws and/or facet joints and at the lower endplates of the disc spaces, identifying a possible source of pain. On CT, no significant differences between these two groups were found. Conclusion: The PET/CT findings appeared to correlate better with symptoms on PROMs compared to CT findings alone. When interpreting 18F-fluoride PET/CT findings after PLIF surgery, one should realize bone metabolism in the disc spaces of the operated segments and around pedicle screws or facet joint changes during follow-up, reflecting natural recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The treatment with 177Lutetium PSMA (177Lu-PSMA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has recently been approved by the FDA and EMA. Since treatment success is highly variable between patients, the prediction of treatment response and identification of short- and long-term survivors after treatment could help tailor mCRPC diagnosis and treatment accordingly. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of radiomic parameters extracted from pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET images for the prediction of treatment response. Methods: A total of 45 mCRPC patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 from two university hospital centers were retrospectively reviewed for this study. Radiomic features were extracted from the volumetric segmentations of metastases in the bone. A random forest model was trained and validated to predict treatment response based on age and conventionally used PET parameters, radiomic features and combinations thereof. Further, overall survival was predicted by using the identified radiomic signature and compared to a Cox regression model based on age and PET parameters. Results: The machine learning model based on a combined radiomic signature of three features and patient age achieved an AUC of 0.82 in 5-fold cross-validation and outperformed models based on age and PET parameters or radiomic features (AUC, 0.75 and 0.76, respectively). A Cox regression model based on this radiomic signature showed the best performance to predict overall survival (C-index, 0.67). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that a machine learning model to predict response to 177Lu-PSMA treatment based on a combination of radiomics and patient age outperforms a model based on age and PET parameters. Moreover, the identified radiomic signature based on pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET images might be able to identify patients with an improved outcome and serve as a supportive tool in clinical decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: PET/MRI systems are being installed world-wide for the staging of cancer. As this combines MRI and PET in one system, the application of these systems offers a one-stop-shop for staging in Oncology. However, one of the pitfalls of these systems is that the MRI of the PET/MRI systems is not very adequate for detecting lung nodules. In this study, we show that the most relevant long-nodules suspected of metastasis can be detected with PET; it remains questionable if missing the indeterminate lung nodules are of clinical relevance. Hybrid PET-MRI systems are being used more frequently. One of the drawbacks of PET-MRI imaging is its inferiority in detecting lung nodules, so it is often combined with a computed tomography (CT) of the chest. However, chest CT often detects additional, indeterminate lung nodules. The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity of detecting metastatic versus indeterminate nodules with PET-MRI compared to chest CT. A total of 328 patients were included. All patients had a PET/MRI whole-body scan for (re)staging of cancer combined with an unenhanced chest CT performed at our center between 2014 and 2020. Patients had at least a two-year follow-up. Six percent of the patients had lung metastases at initial staging. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-MRI for detecting lung metastases were 85% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of indeterminate lung nodules on chest CT was 30%. The sensitivity of PET-MRI to detect indeterminate lung nodules was poor (23.0%). The average size of the indeterminate lung nodules detected on PET-MRI was 7 ± 4 mm, and the missed indeterminate nodules on PET-MRI were 4 ± 1 mm (p < 0.001). The detection of metastatic lung nodules is fairly good with PET-MRI, whereas the sensitivity of PET-MRI for detecting indeterminate lung nodules is size-dependent. This may be an advantage, limiting unnecessary follow-up of small, indeterminate lung nodules while adequately detecting metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]