Search

Motion drive algorithms are a set of filters designed to simulate realistic motion and are an integral part of contemporary vehicle simulators. This paper presents the design of a novel intelligent interval type 2 fuzzy adaptive motion drive algorithm for an off-road uphill vehicle simulator. The off-road, uphill vehicle simulator is used to train and assess the driver's behavior under varying operational and environmental conditions in mountainous terrain. The proposed algorithm is the first of its kind to be proposed for off-road uphill vehicle simulators, and it offers numerous benefits over other motion drive algorithms. The proposed algorithm enables the simulator to adapt to changes in the uphill road surface, vehicle weight distribution, and other factors that influence off-road driving in mountainous terrain. The proposed algorithm simulates driving on hilly terrain more realistically than existing algorithms, allowing drivers to learn and practice in a safe and controlled environment. Additionally, the proposed algorithm overcomes limitations present in existing algorithms. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated via test drives and compared to the performance of the conventional motion drive algorithm. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is more effective than the conventional motion drive algorithm for the ground vehicle simulator. The pitch and roll responses demonstrate that the proposed algorithm has enabled the driver to experience abrupt changes in terrain while maintaining the driver's safety. The surge response demonstrated that the proposed MDA handled the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle very effectively. In addition, the results demonstrated that the proposed algorithm resulted in a smoother drive, prevented false motion cues, and offered a more immersive and realistic driving experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A paired comparison experiment using 23 subjects was run on the VIRTTEX driving simulator to compare a lane position based motion drive algorithm (MDA) with a classical MDA for a highway speed, lane change manoeuvre. Two different tuning states of the lane position algorithm and four different tuning states for the classical algorithm were tested. The subjective fidelity of the six different motion cases was compared with each other and a Bradley-Terry model was fit to find the fidelity merit of each case. In addition, the driving performance of the subjects for six motion cases was recorded and compared. The motion-tuning cases were selected such that the trade-off in motion quality between overall motion scaling and motion shape distortion (shape-error), as well as the trade-off between lateral specific force and roll-rate motion errors, could be studied. It was found that when the overall scaling is the same, drivers perform better with the lane position algorithm than with the the classical algorithm. A well-tuned, manoeuvre-specific, classical MDA, however, did achieve a subjective fidelity level on a par with the lane position MDA. A generically tuned classical MDA, however, has a significantly reduced fidelity and driving performance when compared with a lane position algorithm with the same scale factor. A strong trade-off between motion shape-errors and overall motion scaling was found. A small increase in motion cue shape-error, combined with an increase in the scale factor from 0.3 to 0.5, led to improved performance and increased subjective fidelity. The results of the experiment also suggest that simulator motion can be improved by reducing the angular-rate shape-error at the expense of the specific force shape-error (while keeping the total normalised shape-error constant). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]