Search

Multiple primary malignancies are no longer rare in clinical practice. The incidence of multiple primary malignant neoplasms is the consequence of progress in oncological treatment and diagnostic methods, as well as the higher overall survival rate and life expectancy rate. We present a case of a patient who synchronously developed four malignancies: cervical cancer, breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and an olfactory groove meningioma. This case proves that the diagnosis of the cervical cancer does not exclude the occurrence of other malignancies. It also emphasizes the fact that every case of uterine cervical cancer with atypical clinical presentation should be thoroughly analyzed to avoid diagnostic mistakes, which in turn may worsen the prognosis.

The increasing incidence of obesity in Poland and its relation to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is resulting in the increasing necessity of treating obese women. Treatment of an overweight patient with EEC may impede not only the surgical procedures but also radiotherapy, especially external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The problems arise both during treatment planning and when delivering each fraction due to the difficulty of positioning such a patient - it implies the danger of underdosing targets and overdosing organs at risk. Willingness to use dynamic techniques in radiation oncology has increased for patients with EEC, even those who are obese. During EBRT careful daily verification is necessary for both safety and treatment accuracy. The most accurate method of verification is cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with soft tissue assessment, although it is time consuming and often requires a radiation oncologist. In order to improve the quality of such treatment, the authors present the practical aspects of planning and treatment itself by means of dynamic techniques in EBRT. The authors indicate the advantages and disadvantages of different types of on-board imaging (OBI) verification images. Considering the scanty amount of literature in this field, it is necessary to conduct further research in order to highlight proper planning and treatment of obese endometrial cancer patients. The review of the literature shows that all centres that wish to use EBRT for gynaecological tumours should develop their own protocols on qualification, planning the treatment and methods of verifying the patients' positioning.

Objectives: To assess the relationship between selected clinical and pathological factors and disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in endometrioid endometrial cancer patients., Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 262 patients aged 37-86 (6.0 +/- 9.0) was performed. Selected clinical and pathological data were correlated with DFS and OS., Results: Follow-up was 8-123 months (64.9 +/- 27.1). In 4 patients (1.5%) clinical progression was diagnosed during the treatment. In 43 patients (16.4%) relapse was diagnosed 2-61 months (23.9 +/- 15.7) after commencing treatment. DFS and OS were 82.1% and 81.3% respectively. In univariate analysis worse DFS was related to older patients (p = 0.007) and non-radical surgery (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis worse DFS was related to older patients (HR = 1.058; 95% CI = 1.024-1.093; p < 0.001), younger at menopause (HR = 0.910; 95% CI = 0.851-0.973; p = 0.006), with higher staging (HR = 2.639; 95% CI = 1.968-3.539; p < 0.001) operated non-radically (HR = 0.220; 95% CI = 0.096-0.504; p < 0.001). In univariate analysis worse OS was connected with older patients (p = 0.018), diabetes type II (p = 0.019) and non-radical surgery (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis worse OS was related to younger age at menopause (HR = 0.932; 95% CI = 0.873-0.996; p = 0.039), diabetes type II (HR = 2.372; 95% CI = 1.260-4.466; p = 0.008), higher staging (HR = 2.053; 95% CI = 1.482-2.845; p < 0.001), and non-radical surgery (HR = 0.240; 95% CI = 0.091-0.636; p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Relapsed endometrial cancer developed in 90.7% during four years after commencing treatment. In 79.1% of these patients distant metastases were present. Most significant prognostic factors were radicality of surgery age of patients and staging. The presence of diabetes type II and early menopause were connected with worse prognosis.