Search

Purpose: To assess, in a multicenter setting, safety, technical results, and restenosis rate of the Palmaz stent for treatment of atherosclerotic ostial renal artery stenosis.Methods: Ten centers enrolled 106 patients (120 treated renal artery stenoses) in the study. Patient selection was based on unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (residual stenosis >/= 20%) performed for treatment of ostial stenosis >/= 50%, in patients with hypertension and/or impaired renal function. Safety was assessed by means of the complication rate, and technical results by the number of successful stent placements and occurrence of restenosis (>50%) at intraarterial angiographic follow-up.Results: Stent placement was successful (n = 112) or partially successful (n = 5) in 117 (98%) arteries. Complications occurred in 19 procedures; seven were of serious clinical significance. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 89 of 117 (76%) cases, at a mean of 8 months (range 2. 5-18 months). Fifteen stents (16.9%) showed restenosis (at a mean of 8.5 months), of which 10 were successfully redilated.Conclusion: Renal artery stenting has a high technical success rate, a complication rate comparable to percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty, and a low rate of restenosis at 8 months angiographic follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Balloon-expandable, intraluminal stenting of the iliac arteries with the Palmaz stent was the subject of a multicenter study for 4 years. A total of 486 patients underwent 587 procedures. Four hundred and five patients had unilateral and 81 had bilateral iliac stent placements. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 48 months (mean 13.3 +/- 11 months). Sustained clinical benefit of the treated patients was obtained in 90.9% at 1 year, 84.1% at 2 years, and 68.6% at 43 months. Angiographic patency rate was 92%. Diabetes mellitus and poor runoff had significant negative influence on the clinical outcome. The 10% incidence of procedural complications was not altered by operator experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To describe the initial pilot phase of the 2009 Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality (SASM), which includes outcomes and difficulties that arose during any interventional radiology (IR) procedure performed on patients in this audit over an 18 month period., Materials and Methods: Approximately 40 consultant interventional radiologists from all units in Scotland elected to participate in the audit. Each response was then peer reviewed after anonymisation of the patient and institution. If a relevant ACON (area for consideration or area of concern) was generated, this was checked by one of the other reviewers before communication with the original reporting radiologist and colleagues. There was then a right of reply by the reporting unit before formal documentation was sent out., Results: Initial results were analysed after 18 months period, during which time 95 forms relating to deaths of surgical inpatients were sent to interventional radiologists identified as having been involved in an IR procedure at some time during the patient's admission. Seventy-one forms had been returned by July 2010, of which 46 had gone through the entire SASM process. From these, 10 ACONs were attributed. Anonymised case vignettes and reports from these were used as educational tools., Conclusion: Involvement with SASM is a useful process. Significant safety issues and learning points were identified in the pilot. The majority of ACONs identified by the audit were in patients who had undergone percutaneous biliary interventions., (Copyright © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate the availability of out-of-hours (OOH) interventional radiology (IR) services in Scotland and discuss implications for service redesign., Materials and Methods: Data were gathered via a survey conducted by telephone/e-mail interview. The setting was hospitals in Scotland with acute medical and/or surgical beds. The interviewees were consultant interventional radiologists representing each of the 14 geographical Health Boards in Scotland., Results: Three of the 14 geographical Health Boards provided a formal, prospectively planned OOH IR service in at least one hospital. Fourteen of the 34 acute hospitals provided an in-hours IR service, which includes endovascular haemorrhage control. Eight of the 34 acute hospitals had formal, prospectively planned on-call IR arrangements, 12 had an ad-hoc service, and 20 transferred patients to other facilities. Thirty-eight of the 223 consultant radiologists in Scotland were able to perform endovascular haemorrhage control procedures: only 18 of these 38 (47%) were included in on-call rotas. A further 42 radiologists were able to perform nephrostomy and a further 61 were able to perform abscess drainage. Eighty-two radiologists did not perform any interventional procedures., Conclusions: The provision of OOH IR services in Scotland is limited and available resources, both skills and equipment, are being underutilized. These data will be used to inform a process of OOH IR service redesign in Scotland., (Copyright © 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the long-term results of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) with surgery for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids., Design: Pragmatic, open, multicentre, randomised trial., Setting: Twenty-seven participating UK secondary care centres., Sample: Women aged ≥18 years with symptomatic fibroids who were considered to justify surgical treatment., Methods: In total, 157 women were randomised (in a 2:1 ratio): 106 to UAE and 51 to surgery (hysterectomy 42; myomectomy nine)., Main Outcome Measures: Quality of life at 5 years, as assessed by the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36). Secondary measures included complications, adverse events and the need for further intervention., Results: There were no significant differences between groups in any of the eight components of the SF-36 scores at 5 years (minimum P = 0.45). Symptom score reduction and patient satisfaction with either treatment was very high, with no group difference. Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups (19% embolization and 25% surgery; P = 0.40). The 5-year intervention rate for treatment failure or complications was 32% (UAE arm) and 4% (surgery arm), respectively. The initial cost benefit of UAE over surgery at 12 months was substantially reduced because of subsequent interventions, with treatments being cost neutral at 5 years., Conclusions: We have found that UAE is a satisfactory alternative to surgery for fibroids. The less invasive nature of UAE needs to be balanced against the need for re-intervention in almost a third of patients. The choice should lie with the informed patient., (© 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.)

The creation of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt via a transjugular approach (TIPS) is an interventional radiological procedure used to treat the complications of portal hypertension. TIPS insertion is principally indicated to prevent or arrest variceal bleeding when medical or endoscopic treatments fail, and in the management refractory ascites. This review discusses the development and execution of the technique, with focus on its clinical efficacy. Patient selection, imaging surveillance, revision techniques, and complications are also discussed.

Purpose: To describe a technique for common iliac artery (CIA) access during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair when unfavorable angulation between the CIA and the delivery sheath precludes direct arterial access., Technique: After retroperitoneal exposure of the CIA, a puncture site is chosen inferolateral to the surgical incision, and an 18-G trocar/cannula is advanced in alignment with the CIA through the anterior abdominal wall or skin of the upper thigh into the retroperitoneal space. Serial dilatation is performed over a guidewire placed through the cannula to create the subcutaneous tract. The trocar/cannula is replaced over the wire, and the CIA is punctured under direct vision. The guidewire is then advanced into the proximal aorta. A CIA arteriotomy is performed and the delivery system introduced over the guidewire through the tunnel into the iliac artery., Conclusions: Retroperitoneal exposure of the CIA with tunneled transabdominal wall delivery of the stent-graft avoids both external iliac artery injury and creation of a temporary access conduit in patients with iliac tortuosity and/or occlusive disease.

We report the case of a 72-year-old gentleman with mesenteric angina who was successfully treated with stenting of a coeliac artery stenosis using a Palmaz stent, and review the therapeutic options in the management of mesenteric angina.

Purpose: To demonstrate that proximal esophageal stenoses and tracheoesophageal fistulas can be adequately palliated with use of metallic stents without significant foreign-body sensation., Materials and Methods: Between June 1994 and March 1999, 22 patients with lesions within 3 cm of the cricopharyngeus were treated by placement of metallic stents. The series was reviewed retrospectively. Twenty patients had surgically unresectable malignant lesions, two patients had benign disease. Ten patients had associated tracheoesophageal fistulas. In all, the upper limit of the stent was between C5 vertebral body inferior endplate and the T2 vertebral body superior endplate. The case-notes were reviewed until patient death (range, 6-198 days), or to date in the two surviving patients with benign disease., Results: Immediate technical success was 93% (27 of 29). Dysphagia scores improved from a median of 3 to 2 after stent placement. Eighteen of 22 (82%) patients reported no foreign-body sensation. There have been no cases of proximal migration, periprocedural perforation, or deaths. The two patients with benign disease experienced significant complications., Conclusion: Lesions in proximity to the cricopharyngeus can be successfully palliated without significant foreign-body sensation in the majority of patients with use of metallic stents. The authors urge caution in placing stents in patients with benign disease.

Purpose: To compare the technical success and immediate and long-term outcomes of tunneled central venous catheters placed in comparative cohorts via the subclavian vein (SCV) and the internal jugular vein (IJV) routes., Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational single-center study of consecutive procedures. Between November 1993 and June 1995, 99 catheters were placed via the SCV and between December 1997 and July 1998, 109 catheters were placed via the IJV. Procedural data were recorded in both cohorts by completion of a proforma by the primary operator., Results: Follow-up data were available in 96% of the SCV and 87% of the IJV cohorts. The average procedure time was significantly shorter in the IJV group and technical success was 100% versus 97% in the SCV group, but this did not reach statistical significance. The procedure-related pneumothorax rate and the rate of symptomatic venous thrombosis were significantly lower in the IJV cohort (P = .023, P = .015). Fewer catheters were removed prematurely due to sepsis in the IJV group (P = .043)., Conclusions: The IJV route is associated with comparable technical success, and lower major procedural complication and venous thrombosis rates, with fewer catheters removed prematurely. The right IJV approach with ultrasound guidance is recommended as the route of choice for the placement of tunneled central venous catheters.

Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of renal artery stents in the solitary functioning kidney of patients who have impaired renal function as a result of atherosclerotic renovascular disease by assessing primary patency, renal function outcome, and complication rates during a mean follow-up period of 15 months., Materials and Methods: The Palmaz stent was placed in the arteries of 21 patients with solitary functioning kidneys. All patients had impaired renal function (creatinine level >150 micromol/l), and four patients were undergoing renal dialysis. Indications for stenting were recoil after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 12), arterial dissection after angioplasty (n = 2), restenosis after angioplasty (n = 1), and as the primary intervention (n = 6). Follow-up angiography was performed in 16 patients (76%)., Results: Initial technical success was achieved in all patients (residual stenosis, <5%). At follow-up (range, 6-25 months), renal function had returned to normal in five patients (24%), improved in four patients (19%), stabilized in six patients (29%), and deteriorated in six patients (29%). Dialysis has been discontinued in all four dialysis patients. Major complications occurred in four patients (19%), including one death within 30 days of stenting. No significant restenoses were seen on follow-up angiography., Conclusion: Placement of renal artery stents in the solitary kidney led to benefits in 70% of patients treated, including improved renal function in nine patients (43%) and stabilization in six patients (29%). In this high-risk group of patients, we advocate renal artery stenting as a relatively safe procedure to salvage the solitary kidney.

A prospective study comparing colour Doppler ultrasound (US) with the 'gold standard' of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of renal transplant artery stenosis was performed. Both the intrarenal vessels and the transplant renal artery were examined by Doppler US. Diagnostic arteriography was performed only if, on Doppler, the peak systolic velocity in the transplant renal artery exceeded 1.5 ms-1. Of 109 patients, the transplant artery could not be visualized using colour Doppler US in three, and these were omitted from statistical analysis. Of the remaining 106 patients, 31 had a peak systolic velocity greater than 1.5 ms-1 in the transplant renal artery and were referred for DSA. Of the multiple renal Doppler indices recorded, the peak systolic velocity in the transplant artery was the best discriminating measurement for the detection of renal artery stenosis. A peak systolic velocity of > or = 2.5 ms-1 in the transplant renal artery had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% for the detection of renal artery stenosis ( > 50% diameter reduction). Although a significant difference in Pulsatility Index, Resistive Index, Acceleration Index and Acceleration Time was recorded from the intrarenal vessels in the angiographically normal and stenosed groups with Doppler, these measurements were less useful as discriminating diagnostic tests. In conclusion, the peak systolic velocity in the transplant renal artery is the most sensitive Doppler criterion for renal artery stenosis and is sensitive and specific enough to be used as a screening test. The intrarenal acceleration time and index should not be used in isolation.

The role of the radiologist in 'out of hours' radiology was prospectively studied in a single Scottish Health Board for a continuous 6 month period. Six hundred and sixty seven procedures were performed by radiologists. Computed tomography (CT) (274, 41%), ultrasound scans (190, 28.5%) and vascular/interventional procedures (60, 9%) were the most frequently performed procedures. Trauma accounted for 139 (24%) of all 'out of hours' work and overall 365 (54.7%) procedures yielded an abnormality. The workload varied widely between hospitals from two procedures per 100 beds to 137 procedures per 100 beds. Similarly the input from individual radiologists was very variable. A registrar was present for 227 (34%) procedures, a senior registrar for 360 (54%) and a consultant for 138 (20%) (there being two radiologists present for 8.7% of procedures). 'Consultant only' radiology departments offering a full radiological service may expect a substantial 'out of hours' commitment.

In 124 patients admitted with suspected acute deep venous thrombosis, the screening value of a new thermographic scanner, DeVeTherm, was evaluated using conventional venography as a reference. The sensitivity of the scanner was calculated at 92% and the specificity at 25%. The predictive value of positive temperature profiles was 0.48, and that of negative temperature profiles, 0.82. On the basis of these results neither the accuracy nor the potential savings justify using temperature profiles alone as a screening test for this condition.