Search

High fidelity generation of two-qubit gates is important for quantum computation, since such gates are components of popular universal sets of gates. Here we consider the problem of high fidelity generation of two-qubit C-NOT and C-PHASE (with a detailed study of C-Z) gates in presence of the environment. We consider the general situation when qubits are manipulated by coherent and incoherent controls; the latter is used to induce generally time-dependent decoherence rates. For estimating efficiency of optimization methods for high fidelity generation of these gates, we study quantum control landscapes which describe the behaviour of the fidelity as a function of the controls. For this, we generate and analyze the statistical distributions of best objective values obtained by incoherent GRadient Ascent Pulse Engineering (inGRAPE) approach. We also apply inGRAPE and stochastic zero-order method to numerically estimate minimal infidelity values. The results are different from the case of single-qubit gates and indicate a smooth trap-free behaviour of the fidelity., Comment: 35 pages, 6 figures

This article considers some control problems for closed and open two-level quantum systems. The closed system's dynamics is governed by the Schr\"odinger equation with coherent control. The open system's dynamics is governed by the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad master equation whose Hamiltonian depends on coherent control and superoperator of dissipation depends on incoherent control. For the closed system, we consider the problem for generation of the phase shift gate for some values of phases and final times for which numerically show that zero coherent control, which is a stationary point of the objective functional, is not optimal; it gives an example of subtle point for practical solving problems of quantum control. For the open system, in the two-stage method which was developed for generic N-level quantum systems in [Pechen A., Phys. Rev. A., 84, 042106 (2011)] for approximate generation of a target density matrix, here we consider the two-level systems for which modify the first ("incoherent") stage by numerically optimizing piecewise constant incoherent control instead of using constant incoherent control analytically computed using eigenvalues of the target density matrix. Exact analytical formulas are derived for the system's state evolution, the objective functions and their gradients for the modified first stage. These formulas are applied in the two-step gradient projection method. The numerical simulations show that the modified first stage's duration can be significantly less than the unmodified first stage's duration, but at the cost of optimization in the class of piecewise constant controls., Comment: minor stylistic changes

The article considers a two-level open quantum system, whose evolution is governed by the Gorini--Kossakowski--Lindblad--Sudarshan master equation with Hamiltonian and dissipation superoperator depending, correspondingly, on piecewise constant coherent and incoherent controls with constrained magnitudes. Additional constraints on controls' variations are also considered. The system is analyzed using Bloch parametrization of the system's density matrix. We adapt the section method for obtaining outer parallelepipedal and pointwise estimations of reachable and controllability sets in the Bloch ball via solving a number of problems for optimizing coherent and incoherent controls with respect to some objective criteria. The differential evolution and dual annealing optimization methods are used. The numerical results show how the reachable sets' estimations depend on distances between the system's initial states and the Bloch ball's center point, final times, constraints on controls' magnitudes and variations., Comment: International Conference on Quantum Technologies "MIPT (PhysTech) - QUANT 2020" (Moscow, Russia; September 7-11, 2020)

In this work, we consider the problem of ultrafast controlled generation of single-qubit phase shift quantum gates. Globally optimal control is a control which realizes the gate with maximal possible fidelity. Trap is a control which is optimal only locally but not globally. It was shown before that traps do not exist for controlled generation of arbitrary single-qubit quantum gates for sufficiently long times, as well as for fast control of quantum gates other than phase shift gates. Ultrafast generation of phase-shift gates was missed in the previous analysis. In this work we show, combining analytical and numerical optimization methods such as Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering (GRAPE), differential evolution, and dual annealing, that control landscape for ultrafast generation of phase shift gates is also free of traps. Mathematical analysis of quantum control landscapes, which aims to prove either absence or existence of traps for quantum control objective functionals, is an important topic in quantum control. In this work, we provide a rigorous analysis of quantum control landscapes for ultrafast generation of single-qubit quantum gates and show, combining analytical methods based on a sophisticated analysis of spectrum of the Hessian, and numerical optimization methods such as Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering (GRAPE), differential evolution, and dual annealing, that control landscape for ultrafast generation of phase shift gates is free of traps., Comment: 23 pages, 3 figures

The article considers a two-level open quantum system whose dynamics is driven by a combination of coherent and incoherent controls. Coherent control enters into the Hamiltonian part of the dynamics whereas incoherent control enters into the dissipative part. The goal is to find controls which move the system from an initial density matrix to a given target density matrix as fast as possible. To achieve this goal, we reformulate the optimal control problem in terms of controlled evolution in the Bloch ball and then apply Pontryagin maximum principle and gradient projection method to numerically find minimal time and optimal coherent and incoherent controls. General method is provided and several examples of initial and target states are explicitly considered., Comment: Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. (2019)