Search

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate characteristics of autoimmunity in individuals who have a type 2 diagnosis and are relatives of children with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Pre‐diagnosis samples (median 17 months before onset) from relatives who were later diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were measured for autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase 65 (GADA), islet antigen‐2 (IA‐2A), zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) and insulin (IAA) as well as the type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (GRS2). Associations between islet autoantibodies, insulin treatment and GRS2 were analysed using Fisher's exact and t‐tests. Results: Among 226 relatives (64% men; mean age at sampling 41 years; mean age 54 years at diagnosis), 32 (14%) were islet autoantibody‐positive for at least one autoantibody more than a decade before diagnosis. Approximately half of these (n = 15) were treated with insulin. GADA‐positivity was higher in insulin‐treated relatives than in non‐insulin‐treated relatives (12/18 [67%] vs. 6/18 [33%], p < 0.001). IAA‐positivity was observed in 13/32 (41%) of relatives with autoantibodies. GRS2 scores were increased in autoantibody‐positive relatives (p = 0.032), but there was no clear evidence for a difference according to treatment (p = 0.072). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of measuring islet autoantibodies, including IAA, in relatives of people with type 1 diabetes to avoid misdiagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Some childhood type 1 diabetes cases are islet autoantibody negative at diagnosis. Potential explanations include misdiagnosis of genetic forms of diabetes or insufficient islet autoantibody testing. Many NHS laboratories offer combinations of three autoantibody markers. We sought to determine the benefit of testing for additional islet autoantibodies, including insulin (IAA) and tetraspanin 7 (TSPAN7A). Methods: Radiobinding assays (RBAs) were used to test for four islet autoantibodies in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (n = 486; 54.1% male; median age 10.4 years [range 0.7–18.0]; median duration 1 day [range −183 to 14]). Islet autoantibody negative children were tested for TSPAN7A using a luminescence‐based test. Where available, islet cell antibody (ICA) and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) data were considered. Results: Using three autoantibody markers, 21/486 (4.3%) children were autoantibody negative. Testing for IAA classified a further 9/21 (42.9%) children as autoantibody positive. Of the remaining 12 (2.5%) autoantibody negative children, all were TPAN7A negative, seven were ICA negative and one was positive for the protective variant DQB1*0602. One was subsequently diagnosed with Maturity Onset of Diabetes in the Young, but follow‐up was not available in all cases. Conclusions: Using highly sensitive assays, testing for three autoantibodies fails to detect islet autoimmunity in approximately 1/20 children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Testing for IAA in children <5 years and GADA in those >10 years was the most effective strategy for detecting islet autoimmunity. The ability to test for all islet autoantibodies should inform clinical decisions and make screening for monogenic diabetes more cost‐effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The only strategy to select individuals at increased risk for type 1 diabetes for primary prevention trials is through genetic risk assessment. While genome-wide association studies have identified more than 40 loci associated with type 1 diabetes, the single most important genetic determinants lie within the human leucocyte antigen gene family on chromosome 6.In this chapter we describe a protocol for a straightforward, cheap strategy to determine HLA class II mediated risk of type 1 diabetes. This method has proved robust for genotyping whole-genome-amplified DNA as well as DNA extracted directly from human tissues.