Search

Sepsis is a common cause of death. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services severe sepsis/septic shock (SEP-1) bundle is focused on improving sepsis outcomes, but it is unknown which quality improvement (QI) practices are associated with SEP-1 compliance and reduced sepsis mortality. The objectives of this study were to compare sepsis QI practices in SEP-1 reporting and nonreporting hospitals and to measure the association between sepsis QI processes, SEP-1 performance, and sepsis mortality.This study linked survey data on QI practices from Iowa hospitals to SEP-1 performance data and mortality. Characteristics of hospitals and sepsis QI practices were compared by SEP-1 reporting status. Univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression estimated the association of QI practices with SEP-1 performance and observed-to-expected sepsis mortality ratios.One hundred percent of Iowa's 118 hospitals completed the survey. SEP-1 reporting hospitals were more likely to have sepsis QI practices, including reporting sepsis quality to providers (64% versus 38%, P = 0.026) and using the case review process to develop sepsis care plans (87% versus 64%, P = 0.013). Sepsis QI practices were not associated with increased SEP-1 scores. A sepsis registry was associated with decreased odds of being in the bottom quartile of sepsis mortality (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.96, P = 0.041), and presence of a sepsis committee was associated with lower hospital-specific mortality (observed-to-expected ratio, -0.11; 95% confidence interval, -0.20 to 0.01).Hospitals reporting SEP-1 compliance conduct more sepsis QI practices. Most QI practices are not associated with increased SEP-1 performance or decreased sepsis mortality. Future work could explore how to implement these performance improvement practices in hospitals not reporting SEP-1 compliance.

Objectives Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac dysrhythmia in the United States. Our aim was to determine if a novel protocol for management of atrial fibrillation was feasible to implement in an emergency department (ED). Interviews were conducted with ED physicians and physician assistants to identify themes in relation to the clinical use and impleon of the protocol. Methods A novel protocol was developed by a multi-disciplinary team and implemented in an academic ED. The protocol used cardiac computed tomography (CT) to rule out left atrial thrombus in patients with greater than 12 h of symptoms and high risk of thromboembolism, or any patient with greater than 48 h of symptoms. Patients who underwent cardiac CT or electrical cardioversion were followed up at 30 days via telephone to monitor for recurrence or adverse thromboembolic events. Providers were interviewed to identify themes regarding protocol usage, barriers to its use, and future changes to increase utilization. Results Patients with atrial fibrillation in the ED were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-nine patients were treated using the protocol. Seven patients (24%) underwent cardiac CT prior to electrical cardioversion. Cardioversion success rate was 83%, with 69% of patients discharged home. Thirty-day follow-up was completed on 25 patients (86%). Six patients (24%) had reoccurrence of atrial fibrillation requiring subsequent cardioversion. No patients experienced stroke or thromboembolic event. Interviews were conducted with 14 providers. Usage barriers included time, availability, and additional work-up. Six subthemes were identified for future changes including EMR order set, frequent reminders, increased education, increased awareness, activation energy, and EMR pop-ups. Conclusion The Iowa Less Aggressive Protocol is a novel treatment protocol for the ED management of atrial fibrillation that was feasible to implement and use. Providers viewed the protocol favorably and identified areas of improvement for future use.

Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944 .

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that provider-to-provider tele-emergency department (tele-ED) care is associated with more 28-day hospital-free days and improved Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guideline adherence in rural emergency departments (EDs).MethodsMulticenter (n=23), propensity-matched, cohort study using medical records of sepsis patients from rural hospitals in a well-established, on-demand, rural video tele-ED network in the upper Midwest between August 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was 28-day hospital-free days, with secondary outcomes of 28-day in-hospital mortality and SSC guideline adherence.ResultsA total of 1,191 patients were included in the analysis, with tele-ED used for 326 (27%). Tele-ED cases were more likely to be transferred to another hospital (88% vs. 8%, difference 79%, 95% CI 75–83%). After matching and regression adjustment, tele-ED cases did not have more 28-day hospital-free days (difference 0.80 days longer for non-tele-ED, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.87]–2.47) or 28-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.61, 95% CI 0.74-3.57). Adherence with both the SSC 3-hour bundle (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.24– 2.70) and complete bundle (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.15–4.41) were similar. An a priori–defined subgroup analysis of patients treated by advanced practice providers suggested that the mortality was lower in the cohort with tele-ED use (aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.90) despite no significant difference in complete SSC bundle adherence (aOR 2.48, 95% CI 0.45–13.76).ConclusionsRural ED patients treated with provider-to-provider tele-ED care in a mature network appear to have similar clinical outcomes to those treated without.

Background Healthcare delivery science education (HDSE) is increasingly needed by physicians balancing clinical care, practice management, and leadership responsibilities in their daily lives. However, most practicing physicians have received little HDSE in undergraduate through residency training. The purpose of this study is to 1) quantify the perception of the need for HDSE and interest in HDSE among a diverse sample of physicians, and 2) determine if perspectives on HDSE vary by specialty, rurality, and years in practice. Methods Using a cross-sectional, single state, mailed questionnaire, we surveyed 170 physicians about their perspectives on HDSE and interest in an HDSE program. Descriptive statistics and a multivariable logistic regression are presented. Results Among the 70.5% of responding eligible physicians, 75% of physicians had less HDSE than they would like and 90% were interested in obtaining more HDSE. Thirty-five percent of physicians were interested in joining the described HDSE program. The most prevalent barriers to obtaining HDSE were a lack of time and existing programs. Physician perspectives were similar across specialties, years in practice, and rurality. Conclusion There is a high unmet need for HDSE among physicians. Diverse and innovative HDSE programming needs to be developed to meet this need. Programming should be developed not only for physicians but also for undergraduate through residency training programs.

Background Pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport can be associated with benefits following pediatric injury. However, many pediatric trauma patients do not use EMS. The objective of this study was to elucidate guardians’ decision factors for pre-hospital transport for children after injury. Methods This is a multi-methods study of pediatric trauma patients (≤14 years) and their guardians presenting to the ED of a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center via both EMS and non-EMS modalities. Demographic information and injury characteristics were collected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and qualitative codes were identified and assigned into themes. Results (Quantitative): Of the 29 child-guardian pairs, five participants initially presented by EMS, 18 were admitted, and the majority (66%) sustained mild injuries. Guardians’ assessment of their child's injury severity did not correlate with Injury Severity Score (ISS). Neither EMS status (did or did not use EMS to transport to first hospital) nor rurality status of participants’ place of residence were associated with disparate management in any of the three scenarios. (Qualitative) Five themes emerged, which informed guardians’ transport decisions: Factors Related to the Nature of the Patient's Injury, Guardian Attributes and Prior Experiences, Access and Availability of EMS, Perceived Risks and Benefits of EMS and Hospital, and Collaborative Decision-Making. Injury characteristics and contextual factors, like perceived EMS response times and advice from family or medical providers, were considered in choices about EMS utilization and hospital selection. Despite the view that EMS response times were important in determining what to do following injury, both EMS and non-EMS users were largely unfamiliar with the capabilities of EMS in their area. Finally, guardians described cost to be a theoretical risk of EMS use, and a few cited this as a factor contributing to their decision-making. Conclusions Guardians used a variety of considerations to make transport decisions, including the five themes identified above. Future studies could explore modalities to disseminate information about pre-hospital decision-making for guardians and determine the relationship between EMS utilization and patient outcomes.

Purpose Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital deaths. Inter-hospital transfer is frequent in sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Some sepsis patients undergo two inter-hospital transfers (double transfer). This study assessed the (1) prevalence, (2) associated risk factors, (3) associated mortality, and (4) hospital length-of-stay and costs of double-transfer of sepsis patients. Materials and methods Retrospective cohort study using 2005–2014 administrative claims data in Iowa. Multivariable generalized estimating equations adjusted for potential confounding variables, with a primary outcome of mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay and costs. Hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios estimated hospital costs. Hospitals were categorized into quintiles based on sepsis-volume. Results Of 15,182 sepsis subjects, there were 45.2% non-transfers and 2.1% double-transfers. Double-transfers had worse mortality than non-transfers but not single-transfers. Of the non-transfers, 44.9% presented to a top sepsis-volume hospital compared to 22.8% of double-transfers and 25.1% of single-transfers. After transfer from first to second hospital, 93.4% of the single-transfers and 92.2% of the double-transfers were at a top sepsis-volume hospital. Double-transfers had longer length-of-stay and more in total hospital costs than single-transfers. Conclusions Double-transfer occurs in 2.1% of Iowa sepsis patients. Double-transfers had similar mortality and increased length of stay and costs compared to single-transfers.

Author(s): Negaard, Matthew; Vakkalanka, Priyanka; Whipple, M Terese; Hogrefe, Christopher; Swanson, Morgan B; Harland, Karisa K; Mathiasen, Ross; Van Heukelom, Jon; Thomsen, Timothy W; Mohr, Nicholas M | Abstract: Introduction: Distal forearm fractures (DFF) account for 1.5% of emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. Clinicians frequently obtain imaging above/below the location of injury to rule out additional injuries. We sought to determine the incidence of associated proximal fractures (APF) in the setting of DFF and to evaluate the imaging practices in a nationally representative sample of EDs.Methods: We queried the 2013 National Emergency Department Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnostic codes for DFF and APF. Current Procedural Technology codes identified associated imaging studies. We calculated national estimates using a weighted analysis of patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with APF and imaging practices. An analysis of costs estimated the financial impact of additional imaging in patients with DFF using Medicare reimbursement to approximate costs according to the 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.Results: In 2013, an estimated 297,755 ED visits (weighted) were associated with a DFF, of which 1.6% (4836 cases) had an APF. The incidence of APF was lower among females (odds ratio [OR] (0.76); 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.91) but higher in metropolitan teaching hospitals compared to metropolitan non-teaching hospitals (OR [2.39]; 95% CI, 1.43-3.99) and Level 1 trauma centers (OR [3.9]; 95%, 1.91-7.96) compared to non-trauma centers. Approximately 40% (n = 117,948) of those with only DFF received non-wrist radiographs and 19% (n = 55,236) underwent non-wrist/non-forearm imaging. Factors independently associated with additional imaging included gender, payer, patient and hospital rurality, hospital region, teaching status, ownership, and trauma center level. Nearly $3.6 million (2018 U.S. dollars) was spent on the aforementioned additional imaging.Conclusion: Despite the frequency of proximal imaging in patients with DFF, the incidence of APF was low. Further study to identify risk factors for APF based on mechanism and physical examination factors may result in reduced imaging and decreased avoidable healthcare spending.

ObjectiveSepsis is a common cause of death in hospitalized patients. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Bundle (SEP-1) is an evidence-based early management bundle focused on improving sepsis outcomes. It is unknown which quality improvement (QI) practices are associated with SEP-1 compliance and if those practices reduce sepsis mortality. The objectives of this study were to compare sepsis QI practices in SEP-1 reporting and non-reporting hospitals and to measure the association between specific elements of sepsis QI processes and SEP-1 performance and hospital-specific risk-adjusted sepsis mortality.Design, Setting, and PatientsThis mixed methods study linked telephone survey data on QI practices from Iowa hospitals to SEP-1 performance data and risk-adjusted mortality from statewide all-payer administrative claims database. The survey assessed sepsis QI practices in eight categories. Characteristics of hospitals and sepsis QI practices were compared by SEP-1 reporting status. Univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression estimated the association of QI practices with hospital SEP-1 performance and observed-to-expected sepsis mortality ratios.InterventionsNoneMeasurements and Main ResultsAll 118 Iowa hospitals completed the survey (100% response rate). SEP-1 reporting hospitals were more likely to have sepsis QI practices, including reporting sepsis quality to providers (64% vs. 38%, p = 0.026) and using the case review process to develop sepsis care plans (87% vs. 64%, p = 0.013). Sepsis QI practices were not associated with increased SEP-1 scores. Two were associated with reduced mortality: having a sepsis committee β= -0.11, p = 0.036) and using case review results for sepsis care plans (β= -0.10, p = 0.049).ConclusionsHospitals reporting SEP-1 compliance to CMS conduct more sepsis QI practices. Most QI practices are not associated with increased SEP-1 performance or decreased sepsis mortality. Future work could explore how to implement these performance improvement practices in hospitals not reporting SEP-1 compliance.

Kristin Weeks,1,2 Morgan Swanson,1,2 Amanda Manorot,3 Gabriel Conley,4,5 Joseph Nellis,6 Mary Charlton,2 Alan Reed7 1Medical Scientist Training Program, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 2Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 4Medical Training Program, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 5Department of Business, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 6Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; 7Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USACorrespondence: Alan ReedDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, SE 427 GH, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USATel +1 319-356-0537Email alan-reed@uiowa.edu We appreciated the letter to the editor from Chandran et al offering their perspectiveson the educational commitments required to learn and apply HDSE conceptsin practice. In response, we must stress the importance of taking into account theintended learner of our study program. The track we described in our manuscriptintroduces 12 core topic areas of HDSE and allocates time for the practicedapplication of these concepts. We acknowledge that this track on its own may beinsufficient for physician administrators, who likely need a mastery level of knowledgefor their scope of practice. However, we feel that this fundamental trainingprovides an indispensable and beneficial opportunity for established physicians withlimited prior didactic HDSE experiences to realize concepts and identify areas topursue greater depth of knowledge. View the original paper by Weeks and colleagues A Letter to the Editor has been published for this article.

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a time-sensitive condition. Meeting guideline-recommended time metrics for these patients can be challenging in rural emergency departments (EDs). Telemedicine has been shown to improve the quality and timeliness of emergency care in rural areas. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of telemedicine on the timeliness of emergency AMI care for patients presenting to rural EDs with chest pain. Methods: A prospective cohort study, conducted in six telemedicine networks, identified ED patients presenting with chest pain from November 2015 through December 2017. Primary exposure was telemedicine consultation during the ED visit. The primary outcome was time-to-electrocardiogram (ECG). For eligible AMI patients, secondary outcomes included: (1) fibrinolysis administered and (2) time-to-fibrinolysis. Analyses for multivariable models were conducted by using logistic regression, clustered at the hospital level. Results: Overall, 1,220 patients presenting with chest pain were included in the study cohort (27.1% received telemedicine). Time-to-ECG was, on average, 0.39 times (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 to -0.52) faster for telemedicine cases. Among eligible patients, telemedicine was associated with higher odds of fibrinolysis administration (adjusted odds ratio 7.17, 95% CI 2.48-20.49). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with cardiac arrest, time-to-fibrinolysis administration did not differ when telemedicine was used. Discussion: In telemedicine networks, telemedicine consultation during the ED visit was associated with improved timeliness of ECG evaluation and increased use of fibrinolytic reperfusion therapy for rural AMI patients. Future work should focus on the impact of telemedicine consultation on patient-centered outcomes.

Background: Prompt defibrillation is a first line treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) due to a shockable rhythm, with epinephrine recommended only when defibrillation is ineffective. However, empirical data regarding epinephrine prior to first defibrillation for shockable IHCA and its association with survival are unavailable. Methods: Using 2000-2018 Get with the Guidelines Resuscitation data, we identified adults ( > 18 years) with an index IHCA due to an initial shockable rhythm. We conducted a time-dependent propensity-matched analysis to evaluate the association of epinephrine prior to first defibrillation with survival to discharge and acute resuscitation survival (i.e., return of spontaneous circulation for > 20 minutes). Results: Among 34,688 subjects, 10,057 (29.0%) received epinephrine before defibrillation. Median age was 67 years in both groups. Compared to defibrillation first, patients in the epinephrine first group were less likely to have myocardial infarction or heart failure, but more likely to have renal failure, sepsis and pneumonia, be located in an intensive care unit, and already receiving mechanical ventilation (P Conclusions: Despite a strong emphasis on prompt defibrillation in current guidelines, nearly 1 in 3 patients with IHCA due to a shockable rhythm received epinephrine prior to first defibrillation. Epinephrine before defibrillation was associated with worse survival outcomes. Although delays in defibrillation were more common in the early epinephrine group, early epinephrine remained associated with worse outcomes even in patients who received prompt defibrillation.

Kristin Weeks,1,2 Morgan Swanson,1,2 Amanda Manorot,3 Gabriel Conley,4,5 Joseph Nellis,6 Mary Charlton,2 Alan Reed7 1Medical Scientist Training Program, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 2Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 4Medical Training Program, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 5Department of Business, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 6Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; 7Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USACorrespondence: Alan ReedDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, SE 427 GH, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USATel +1 319-356-0537Email alan-reed@uiowa.eduIntroduction: Healthcare Delivery Science Education (HDSE) covers important aspects of the business of medicine, including, operations management, managerial accounting, entrepreneurship, finance, marketing, negotiations, e-health and policy/advocacy. We need to investigate and understand practicing physicians’ viewpoints on HDSE in order to inform interventions capable of preventing the double loss phenomena and improving medical and continuing medical education opportunities in HDSE. This qualitative study aims to provide a rich, contextualized understanding of the HDSE experiences and interests of physicians practicing in a rural state through the intensive study of particular cases.Materials and Methods: We interviewed 18 practicing physicians from a rural, Midwestern state over the telephone about their viewpoints on past experiences obtaining HDSE, interest in HDSE, barriers to pursuing HDSE, and interest in an example HDSE certificate program.Results: Salient themes in our study were that physicians were interested in HDSE and believed HDSE could lead to improved patient care and practice efficiency. However, many of the respondents had not received longitudinal, diversified, didactic or practical HDSE. Time limited many physicians from pursuing HDSE opportunities. Many physicians in the study were interested in the example HDSE certificate program.Discussion and Conclusions: Physicians in our qualitative study were interested in obtaining HDSE and had not received diversified, didactic HDSE in the past. Our research suggests innovative HDSE programs will likely be utilized and pursued if they are developed.Keywords: healthcare delivery science, rural, management, continuing medical education, healthcare leadership

PURPOSE Early recognition and prompt prehospital care is a cornerstone of acute stroke treatment. Residents of rural areas have worse access to stroke services than urban residents. The purpose of this study was to (1) describe US trends in rural-urban stroke mortality and (2) identify possible factors associated with rural-urban stroke case-fatality disparities. METHODS This study was a nationwide retrospective cohort study of stroke admissions. The primary exposure was rurality of patient's residence. The primary outcome was death during hospital encounter. The secondary outcome was discharge to a care facility or home healthcare. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions estimated the odds of mortality by subject rurality among stroke subjects. FINDINGS Rural stroke subjects had higher mortality than nonrural counterparts (18.6% rural vs 16.9% nonrural). After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, patient rurality was associated with increased odds of mortality (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06-1.15; P < .001). For the secondary outcome of discharge to home, rural stroke subjects were less likely to be discharged to a care facility than nonrural stroke visits (aOR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97; P < .001). Results were similar after adjusting for thrombolytics administration and transfer status. CONCLUSIONS Rural stroke patients have higher mortality than their urban counterparts likely due to their increased burden of chronic disease, lower health literacy, and reduced access to prompt prehospital care. There may be an opportunity for emergency medical services systems to assist in increasing stroke awareness for both patients and clinicians and to establish response patterns to expedite emergency care.

Background: Historically, it has been assumed that the Emergency Department (ED) is a place for maximally aggressive care and that Emergency Medicine Providers (EMPs) are biased towards life-prolonging care. However, emphasis on early recognition of code status preferences is increasingly making the ED a venue for code status discussions (CSDs). In 2018, our hospital implemented a policy requiring EMPs to place a code status order (CSO) for all patients admitted through the ED. We hypothesized that if EMPs enter CSDs with a bias toward life-prolonging care, or if the venue of the ED biases CSDs towards life-prolonging care, then we would observe a decrease in the percentage of patients selecting DNR status following our institution’s aforementioned CSO mandate. Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of rates of DNR orders placed for patients admitted through our ED comparing six-month periods before and after the implementation of the above policy. Results: Using quality improvement data, we identified patients admitted through the ED during pre (n=7,858) and post (n=8,069) study periods. We observed the following: after implementation DNR preference identified prior to hospital admission from the ED increased from 0.4% to 5.3% (relative risk (RR) 12.5; 95% CI: 5.2-29.9), defining CS in the ED setting at the time of admission increased from 2.4% to 98.6% (p Discussion: Our results suggest that the ED can be an appropriate venue for CSDs.

Background Emergency department utilization and crowding is increasing, putting additional pressure on emergency medicine (EM) residency programs to train efficient residents who can meet these demands. Specific practices associated with resident efficiency have yet to be identified. The objective of this study was to identify practices associated with enhanced efficiency in EM residents. Methods A mixed-methods study design was utilized to identify behaviors associated with resident efficiency. In Stage 1, eight EM faculty provided 61 efficiency behaviors during semistructured interviews, which were prioritized into eight behaviors by independent ranking. A total of 31 behaviors were tested, including additions from previous literature and the study team. In Stage 2, two 4-hour observations during separate shifts of 27 EM residents were performed to record minute-by-minute timing and frequency of each behavior. In Stage 3, the association between resident efficiency and each of the behaviors was estimated using multivariable regression models adjusted for training year and clustered on resident. The primary efficiency outcome was 6-month average relative value units/hour. A sensitivity analysis was performed using patients/hour. Results Seven practices were positively associated with efficiency: average patient load, taking initial patient history with nurse present (number/hour, number/new patient), running the board (number/hour), conversations with other care team members (number/hour, % time), dictation use (number/hour, % time), smartphone text communication (number/hour, % time), and nonwork tasks (number/hour). Three practices were negatively associated with efficiency: visits to patient room (number/patient), conversations with attending physicians (% time), and reviewing electronic medical record (number/hour). Conclusion Several discrete behaviors were found to be associated with enhanced resident efficiency. These results can be utilized by EM residency programs to improve resident education and inform evaluations by providing specific, evidence-based practices for residents to develop and improve upon throughout training.

Introduction Sepsis is a life-threatening emergency. Together, early recognition and intervention decreases mortality. Protocol-based resuscitation in the emergency department (ED) has improved survival in sepsis patients, but guideline-adherent care is less common in low-volume EDs. This study examined the association between provider-to-provider telemedicine and adherence with sepsis bundle components in rural community hospitals. Methods This is a prospective cohort study of adults presenting with sepsis or septic shock in community EDs participating in rural telemedicine networks. The primary outcome was adherence to four sepsis bundle requirements: lactate measurement within 3 hours, blood culture before antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequate fluid resuscitation. Multivariable generalized estimating equations estimated the association between telemedicine and adherence. Results In this cohort ( n = 655), 5.6% of subjects received ED telemedicine consults. The telemedicine group was more likely to be male and have a higher severity of illness. After adjusting for severity and chief complaint, total sepsis bundle adherence was higher in the telemedicine group compared with the non-telemedicine group (aOR 17.27 [95%CI 6.64–44.90], p Discussion Telemedicine patients were more likely to receive initial blood lactate measurement, timely broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequate fluid resuscitation. In rural, community EDs, telemedicine may improve sepsis care and potentially reduce disparities in sepsis outcomes at low-volume facilities. Future work should identify specific components of telemedicine-augmented care that improve performance with sepsis quality indicators.

Among emergency department (ED) mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) patients, we sought to compare mortality and healthcare utilization by ED discharge disposition and inpatient bed request status.A retrospective cohort study of 492 patients was conducted at a single University ED. We reviewed three groups of MHSA patients including ED patients that were admitted, ED patients with a bed request that were discharged from the ED, and ED patients with no bed request that were discharged from the ED. We identified main outcomes as ED return visit, re-hospitalization and mortality within 12months based on chart review and reference from the National Death Index.The average age of patients presenting was 30.5 (SD16.4) years and 251 (51.0%) were female patients. Of these patients, 216 (43.9%) presented with mood disorder and 93 (18.9%) with self-harm. The most common reason for discharge from the ED after an admission request was placed was from stabilization of the patient (n=138). An ED revisit within 12months was significantly higher among patients discharged who had a bed request in place prior to departure (54.0%, p0.001), than those discharged from the ED (40.9%) or admitted to inpatient care (30.5%). The rate of suicide attempt and death did not show statistical significance (p=0.55 and p=0.88).MHSA patients who were discharged from ED after bed requests were placed were at greater risk for return visits to the ED. This implicates that these patients require outpatient planning to prevent further avoidable healthcare utilization.

Objective To determine the association between potentially avoidable transfers (PATs) and emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness scores and the score's associated components. Study design This cross-sectional study linked the 2012 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment with individual encounter data from California's statewide ED and inpatient databases during the years 2011-2013. A probabilistic linkage, followed by deterministic heuristics, linked pre-transfer and post-transfer encounters. Applying previously published definitions, a transferred child was considered a PAT if they were discharged within one day from the ED or inpatient care and had no specialized procedures. Analyses were stratified by injured and non-injured children. We compared PATs with necessary transfers using mixed-effects logistic regression models with random intercepts for hospital and adjustment for patient and hospital covariates. Results After linkage, there were 6675 injured children (27% PATs) and 18 793 non-injured children (14% PATs) who presented to 283 hospitals. In unadjusted analyses, a ten-point increase in pediatric readiness was associated with lower odds of PATs in both injured (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96) and non-injured children (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.93). In adjusted analyses, a similar association was detected in injured patients (aOR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98) and was not detected in non-injured patients (aOR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00). Components associated with decreased PATs included having a nurse pediatric emergency care coordinator and a quality improvement plan. Conclusions Hospital ED pediatric readiness is associated with lower odds of a PAT. Certain pediatric readiness components are modifiable risk factors that EDs could target to reduce PATs.

Introduction Telemedicine can improve access to emergency stroke care in rural areas, but the benefit of telemedicine across different types and models of telemedicine networks is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (a) identify the impact of telemedicine on emergency department (ED) stroke care, (b) identify if telemedicine impact varied by network and (c) describe the variation in process outcomes by telemedicine across EDs. Methods A prospective cohort study identified stroke patients in four telemedicine networks between November 2015 and December 2017. Primary exposure was telemedicine consultation during ED evaluation. Outcomes included: (a) interpretation of computed tomography (CT) of the head within 45 minutes and (b) time to administer tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). An interaction term tested for differences in telemedicine effect on stroke care by network and hospital. Results Of the 932 stroke subjects, 36% received telemedicine consults. For subjects with a last known well time within two hours of ED arrival (27.9%), recommended CT interpretation within 45 minutes was met for 66.8%. Telemedicine was associated with higher odds of timely head CT interpretation (adjusted odds ratio = 3.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69–5.46). The magnitude of the association between telemedicine and time to interpret a CT of the head differed between telemedicine networks (interaction term p = 0.033). Among eligible patients, telemedicine was associated with faster time to administer tPA (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.81; 95% CI 1.31–2.50). Discussion Telemedicine consultation during the ED encounter decreased the time to interpret at CT of the head among stroke patients, with differing magnitudes of benefit across telemedicine networks. The effect of heterogeneity of telestroke affects across different networks should be explored in future analyses.

Background: Access to specialized medical care is often limited in rural emergency departments (EDs). Specialist consultation through telemedicine services could help increase access in low-resource areas. Introduction: The objective of this study was to better understand providers' perceptions of the anticipated impact of telemedicine in rural Midwestern EDs. The secondary objective was to understand differences in the perception of rural and academic providers in their views of the utility of telemedicine. Materials and Methods: We conducted a survey of medical providers including physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners at five rural Midwestern critical access hospitals and within six departments at a university medical center in the same region. The survey addressed opinions on telemedicine, including how often it would be used and the potential to improve patient care and reduce transfers. Results: Specialties of high perceived utility to rural providers include psychiatry, cardiology, and neurology; whereas academic providers viewed services in psychiatry, pediatric critical care, and neurology to be of the most potential value. Academic and rural providers have differing opinions on the anticipated frequency of telemedicine use (p < 0.001) and prevention of inter-hospital transfers (p = 0.023). There were significant differences in perceived value by specialty. Conclusion: There is a high demand for telemedicine consultation services in rural Midwestern hospitals, particularly in psychiatry, cardiology, and neurology. Overall, academic providers view telemedicine services as more valuable within their specialty than do rural providers. Further research should be done to investigate individualization of telehealth services based on regional needs and how disparate opinions predict telemedicine utilization.

Study objective The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that balanced crystalloids improve quality of recovery more than normal saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) in stable emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary outcomes measured differences in health care use. Methods A single-site, participant- and evaluator-blinded, 2-arm parallel allocation (1:1), comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial allocated adults receiving intravenous fluids in the ED before discharge to receive 2 L of lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline solution. The primary outcome was symptom scores measured by the validated Quality of Recovery–40 instrument (scores 40 to 200) 24 hours after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and medication compliance. Results Participants (N=157) were enrolled and follow-up was analyzed for 94 (follow-up rate of 60%) with intention-to-treat methodology. There was no difference in postenrollment Quality of Recovery–40 scores between normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution groups (mean difference 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] –6.8 to 11.6). Although preenrollment scores were higher in the lactated Ringer's solution group (mean difference 10.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 19.0), adjusting for presurvey imbalances did not change the primary outcome (adjusted difference –3.9; 95% CI –12.9 to 5.2). There were no differences in return to ED (mean difference 7.5%; 95% CI –8.7% to 23.8%), prescriptions filled (mean difference 22.2%; 95% CI –3.3% to 47.6%), or seeking care from another provider (mean difference –2.0%; 95% CI –19.9% to 15.9%) at 7 days. Conclusion Normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution were associated with similar 24-hour recovery scores and 7-day health care use in stable ED patients. These results supplement those of recent trials by informing fluid choice for stable ED patients.

BackgroundTo assess clinical and epidemiological trends of severe sepsis.MethodsEcological study of patients presenting to the emergency department with severe sepsis or septic shock between 2005 and 2013. Patients were identified using the state-wide hospital administrative database. Key outcomes included incidence rates (IRs) and mortality rates (per 1000 population) by age and medically underserved areas (MUAs), sepsis case fatality rate (deaths per 100 sepsis cases), and proportions of transfer and comorbidities.ResultsThere were 154 019 sepsis cases identified. In 2005, 85+ yo in non-MUAs had a 44% increase in IR compared with those in MUAs, and this difference rose to 74% by 2013. Mortality rates were 1.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.8) times greater among 85+ yo in non-MUAs. Mortality rates increased by 1.8% annually, while the sepsis case fatality rate decreased by 7.7%. The proportion of transfer among sepsis cases decreased by 2.1% per year (3.8% in non-MUAs, 0.7% in MUAs).ConclusionsSepsis incidence varies geographically, and access to healthcare is one proposed mechanism that may explain heterogeneity. Over time, we may be capturing higher acuity sepsis cases with better recognition and management, as well as observing differential diagnostic coding documentation by location.