Search

The objective of this study was to prospectively measure peri-diagnostic and surgical time intervals for patients with suspected colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Prospective eligible patients were referred to a regional hospital in Ottawa, Canada between February 2004 and February 2005 for diagnostic assessment of presumptive colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Chart abstractions were used to measure nine time intervals; the primary interval was the date of referral for diagnostic assessment to the date the patient was informed of the diagnosis. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) was assessed 5 days following the patient being informed of their diagnosis. The median (IQR) time for the primary interval was 71 (30-110), 37 (29-49), and 81 (56-100) days for colorectal, lung, and prostate patients, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis P=0.0001). This interval was significantly less for colorectal patients diagnosed with cancer than for those without cancer (median difference=59.0 days; Wilcoxon P=0.003). No differences in HRQL existed for patients with cancer and those without. Colorectal and prostate patients wait longer between referral for suspected cancer and being informed of their diagnosis than current recommendations. The shorter diagnostic intervals for colorectal patients with cancer suggest clinicians have an effective process for triaging patients referred for diagnostic assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Among cancer surgeries, patients requiring open radical cystectomy have the highest risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss during cardiac and orthopedic surgery, and it is possible that similar effects of TXA would be observed during radical cystectomy., Objective: To determine whether TXA, administered before incision and for the duration of radical cystectomy, reduced the number of RBC transfusions received by patients up to 30 days after surgery., Design, Setting, and Participants: The Tranexamic Acid During Cystectomy Trial (TACT) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial with enrollment between June 2013 and January 2021. This multicenter trial was conducted in 10 academic centers. A consecutive sample of patients was eligible if the patients had a planned open radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer., Intervention: Before incision, patients in the intervention arm received a loading dose of intravenous TXA, 10 mg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the surgery. In the control arm, patients received indistinguishable matching placebo., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was receipt of RBC transfusion up to 30 days after surgery., Results: A total of 386 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 33 did not meet eligibility. Of 353 randomized patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-75] years; 263 male [74.5%]), 344 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. RBC transfusion up to 30 days occurred in 64 of 173 patients (37.0%) in the TXA group and 64 of 171 patients (37.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.18). There were no differences in secondary outcomes among the TXA group vs placebo group including mean (SD) number of RBC units transfused (0.9 [1.5] U vs 1.1 [1.8] U; P = .43), estimated blood loss (927 [733] mL vs 963 [624] mL; P = .52), intraoperative transfusion (28.3% [49 of 173] vs 24.0% [41 of 171]; P = .08), or venous thromboembolic events (3.5% [6 of 173] vs 2.9% [5 of 171]; P = .57). Non-transfusion-related adverse events were similar between groups., Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that TXA did not reduce blood transfusion in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Based on this trial, routine use of TXA during open radical cystectomy is not recommended., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01869413.

Background Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) of the prostate is an alternative to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), with lower cost and increased accessibility. Studies investigating the positive predictive value (PPV) of bpMRI-directed compared with mpMRI-directed targeted biopsy are lacking in the literature. Purpose To compare the PPVs of bpMRI-directed and mpMRI-directed targeted prostate biopsies. Materials and Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated men who underwent bpMRI-directed or mpMRI-directed transrectal US (TRUS)-guided targeted prostate biopsy at a single institution from January 2015 to December 2022. The PPVs for any prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥2) were calculated for bpMRI and mpMRI using mixed-effects logistic regression modeling. Results A total of 1538 patients (mean age, 67 years ± 8 [SD]) with 1860 lesions underwent bpMRI-directed (55%, 849 of 1538) or mpMRI-directed (45%, 689 of 1538) prostate biopsy. When adjusted for the number of lesions and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, there was no difference in PPVs for any PCa or clinically significant PCa ( P = .61 and .97, respectively) with bpMRI-directed (55% [95% CI: 51, 59] and 34% [95% CI: 30, 38], respectively) or mpMRI-directed (56% [95% CI: 52, 61] and 34% [95% CI: 30, 39], respectively) TRUS-guided targeted biopsy. PPVs for any PCa and clinically significant PCa stratified according to clinical indication were as follows: biopsy-naive men, 64% (95% CI: 59, 69) and 43% (95% CI: 39, 48) for bpMRI, 67% (95% CI: 59, 75) and 51% (95% CI: 43, 59) for mpMRI ( P = .65 and .26, respectively); and active surveillance, 59% (95% CI: 49, 69) and 30% (95% CI: 22, 39) for bpMRI, 73% (95% CI: 65, 89) and 38% (95% CI: 31, 47) for mpMRI ( P = .04 and .23, respectively). Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in PPV for clinically significant PCa between bpMRI- and mpMRI-directed TRUS-guided targeted biopsy. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article .

Objective: To illustrate how experts efficiently navigate a "slowing down moment" to obtain optimal surgical outcomes using the neurovascular bundle sparing during a robotic prostatectomy as a case study., Design: A series of semistructured interviews with four expert uro-oncologists were completed using a cognitive task analysis methodology. Cognitive task analysis, CTA, refers to the interview and extraction of a general body of knowledge. Each interview participant completed four 1 to 2-hour semistructured CTA interviews. The interview data were then deconstructed, coded, and analyzed using a grounded theory analysis to produce a CTA-grid for a robotic prostatectomy for each surgeon, with headings of: surgical steps, simplification maneuvers, visual cues, error/complication recognition, and error/complication management and avoidance., Setting: The study took place at an academic teaching hospital located in an urban center in Canada., Participants: Four expert uro-oncologists participated in the study., Results: Visual cues, landmarks, common pitfalls, and technique were identified as the 4 key components of the decision-making happening during a slowing down moment in the neurovascular bundle sparing during a robotic prostatectomy., Conclusion: The data obtained from the CTA is novel information identifying patterns and cues that expert surgeons use to inform their surgical decision-making and avoid errors. This decision-making knowledge of visual cues, landmarks, common pitfalls and techniques is also generalizable for other surgical subspecialties. Surgeon educators, surgical teaching programs and trainees looking to improve their decision-making skills could use these components to guide their educational strategies., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The management of prostate cancer (PCa) is rapidly evolving. Treatment and diagnostic options grow annually, however, high-level evidence for the use of new therapeutics and diagnostics is lacking. In November 2022, the Genitourinary Research Consortium held its 3 rd Canadian Consensus Forum (CCF3) to provide guidance on key controversial areas for management of PCa., Methods: A steering committee of eight multidisciplinary physicians identified topics for discussion and adapted questions from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022 for CCF3. Questions focused on management of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC); use of novel imaging, germline testing, and genomic profiling; and areas of non-consensus from CCF2. Fifty-eight questions were voted on during a live forum, with threshold for "consensus agreement" set at 75%., Results: The voting panel consisted of 26 physicians: 13 urologists/uro-oncologists, nine medical oncologists, and four radiation oncologists. Consensus was reached for 32 of 58 questions (one ad-hoc). Consensus was seen in the use of local treatment, to not use metastasis-directed therapy for low-volume mCSPC, and to use triplet therapy for synchronous high-volume mCSPC (low prostate-specific antigen). Consensus was also reached on sufficiency of conventional imaging to manage disease, use of germline testing and genomic profiling for metastatic disease, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for BRCA-positive prostate cancer., Conclusions: CCF3 identified consensus agreement and provides guidance on >30 practice scenarios related to management of PCa and nine areas of controversy, which represent opportunities for research and education to improve patient care. Consensus initiatives provide valuable guidance on areas of controversy as clinicians await high-level evidence.

Objective: To assess if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can replace measured GFR (mGFR) in partial nephrectomy (PN) trials, using data from a randomised clinical trial., Patients and Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the renal hypothermia trial. Patients underwent mGFR with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) plasma clearance preoperatively and 1 year after PN. The eGFR was calculated using the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equations incorporating age and sex, with and without race: 2009 eGFRcr(ASR) and 2009 eGFRcr(AS), and the 2021 equation that only incorporates age and sex: 2021 eGFRcr(AS). Performance was evaluated by determining the median bias, precision (interquartile range [IQR] of median bias), and accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 30% of mGFR)., Results: Overall, 183 patients were included. Pre- and postoperative median bias and precision were similar between the 2009 eGFRcr(ASR) (-0.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.2 to 1.7, IQR 18.8; and -2.9, 95% CI -5.1 to -1.5, IQR 15, respectively) and 2009 eGFRcr(AS) (-0.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI -2.4 to 1.5, IQR 18.8; and -3.0, 95% CI -5.7 to -1.7, IQR 15.0, respectively). Bias and precision were worse for the 2021 eGFRcr(AS) (-8.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI -10.9 to -6.3, IQR 24.7; and -12.0, 95% CI -15.8 to -8.9, IQR 23.5, respectively). Similarly, pre- and postoperative accuracy was >90% for the 2009 eGFRcr(ASR) and 2009 eGFRcr(AS) equations . Accuracy was 78.6% preoperatively and 66.5% postoperatively for 2021 eGFRcr(AS)., Conclusion: The 2009 eGFRcr(AS) can accurately estimate GFR in PN trials and could be used instead of mGFR to reduce cost and patient burden., (© 2023 BJU International.)

Introduction: In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the identification of an alteration in genes associated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) has implications for prognostication, optimization of therapy, and familial risk mitigation. The aim of this study was to assess the genomic testing landscape of PCa in Canada and to recommend an approach to offering germline and tumor testing for HRR-associated genes., Methods: The Canadian Genitourinary Research Consortium (GURC) administered a cross-sectional survey to a largely academic, multidisciplinary group of investigators across 22 GURC sites between January and June 2022., Results: Thirty-eight investigators from all 22 sites responded to the survey. Germline genetic testing was initiated by 34%, while 45% required a referral to a genetic specialist. Most investigators (82%) reported that both germline and tumor testing were needed, with 92% currently offering germline and 72% offering tissue testing to patients with advanced PCa. The most cited reasons for not offering testing were an access gap (50%), uncertainties around who to test and which genes to test, (33%) and interpreting results (17%). A majority reported that patients with advanced PCa (74-80%) should be tested, with few investigators testing patients with localized disease except when there is a family history of PCa (45-55%)., Conclusions: Canadian physicians with academic subspecialist backgrounds in genitourinary malignancies recognize the benefits of both germline and somatic testing in PCa; however, there are challenges in accessing testing across practices and specialties. An algorithm to reduce uncertainty for providers when ordering genetic testing for patients with PCa is proposed.

Introduction: We aimed to determine the yield of second-round magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion biopsy and factors that may predict eventual clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis., Methods: From 2013 to 2021, 85 men underwent second-round MRI-US fusion biopsy of 92 lesions (47.8% [44/92] peripheral zone and 52.2% [48/92] transition zone). Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), size/location of lesions, ADC value, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), and PRECISE scores were recorded and compared to histopathological diagnosis (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade-group 1 PCa, CS PCa=ISUP grade group ≥2 PCa) using logistic regression., Results: Mean patient age, PSA, and PSAD were 64±7 years, 8.5±7.0 ng/ml, and 0.17±0.11, respectively. Results from first-round targeted biopsy were 63% (58/92) negative and 37% (34/92) clinically insignificant (grade group 1) PCa. Overall, second-round targeted biopsy identified 25% (23/92) CS PCa (grade group 2, n=19; grade group 3, n=4). Considering only lesions with initial negative targeted-biopsy results (n=58), 21% (12/58; grade group 2, n=8; grade group 3, n=4) CS PCa and 13 grade group 1 PCa were diagnosed at second-round biopsy. There was no difference in PSA (p=0.564), size (p=0.595), location (p=0.293), or PI-RADS score (p=0.342) of lesions by eventual CS PCa diagnosis. PSAD (0.2±1.4 vs. 0.16±0.10, p=0.167), ADC (0.748±0.199 vs. 0.833±0.257, p=0.151), and PRECISE score (p<0.01) showed a trend towards association or association with eventual CS PCa diagnosis., Conclusions: Repeat second-round targeted MRI-US fusion biopsy yielded CS PCa diagnosis in the targeted biopsy specimen in approximately 20% of patients in our study. PRECISE score may be a useful marker to help predict which patients require second-round biopsy.

Context: Bladder cancer is the fourth-most-common cancer in males in the U.S., who develop about 90% of the high-grade, carcinoma in situ (CIS) of non-muscle involved disease (NMIBC). Smoking and occupational carcinogens are well-known causes. For females without known risk factors, bladder cancer can be regarded as a sentinel environmental cancer. It's also one of the costliest to treat due to its high rate of recurrence. No treatment innovations have occurred in nearly two decades; intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), an agent in short supply globally, or Mitomycin-C (MIT-C) is effective in about 60% of cases. Cases refractory to BCG and MIT-C often undergo cystectomy, a procedure with numerous impacts on life styles and potential complications. The recent completion of a small Phase I trial of mistletoe in cancer patients that have exhausted known treatments at Johns Hopkins provides corroboration of its safety, with 25 % showing no disease progression., Objective: The study examined the benefits of pharmacologic ascorbate (PA) and mistletoe for a nonsmoking female patient with an environmental history of NMIBC refractory to BCG, in a non-smoking female with exposures in childhood and early adult life to several known carcinogens, including ultrafine particulate air pollution, benzene, toluene, and other organic solvents, aromatic amines and engine exhausts, and possibly arsenic in water., Design: The research team performed an integrative oncology case study on pharmacologic ascorbate (PA) and mistletoe, both agents shown to activate NK cells, enhance growth and maturation of T-cells, and induce dose-dependent pro-apoptotic cell death, suggesting shared and potentially synergistic mechanisms., Setting: The study began at the University of Ottawa Medical Center in Canada with treatment continuing over six years at St. Johns Hospital Center in Jackson, Wyoming, and George Washington University Medical Center for Integrative Medicine, with surgical, cytological, and pathological evaluations at University of California San Francisco Medical Center., Participant: The patient in the case study was a 76-year-old, well-nourished, athletic, nonsmoking female with high-grade CIS of the bladder. Her cancer was considered to be a sentinel environmental cancer., Intervention: Intravenous pharmacologic ascorbate (PA) and subcutaneous mistletoe (three times weekly) and intravenous and intravesical mistletoe (once weekly) were employed for an 8-week induction treatment, using a dose-escalation protocol as detailed below. Maintenance therapy was carried out with the same protocol for three weeks every three months for two years., Results: The patient has experienced a cancer-free outcome following 78 months of treatments that incorporated intravesical, intravenous, and subcutaneous mistletoe; intravenous PA; a program of selected nutraceuticals; exercise; and other supplementary treatments., Conclusions: This study is the first reported instance of combined treatments to achieve complete remission for high-grade NMIBC refractory to BCG and MIT-C, using intravesical, subcutaneous, and intravenous mistletoe and intravenous PA. It includes pharmacological information on possible mechanisms. In light of the global shortage of BCG, the high proportion of cases refractory to BCG and MIT-C, the unproven use of costly off-label pharmaceuticals, such as gemcitabine, and the relative cost-effectiveness of mistletoe and PA, clinicians should give serious consideration to employing these combined functional medicine treatments for BCG- and MIT-C-refractory NMIBC. Further research is needed with additional patients that can advance our understanding, including standardization of methods for systematically evaluating combined therapies-blinded and non-blinded, nomenclature regarding mistletoe preparation, doses, concentrations, regimes of administration, lengths of treatment, targeted cancer types, and other aspects.

Introduction: Patients with advanced bladder cancer receiving chemotherapy have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, we hypothesized these patients were not routinely offered thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to characterize practice patterns and perceptions of Canadian urologic and medical oncologists, and to identify research needs regarding thromboprophylaxis for patients with bladder cancer., Methods: An online survey was distributed to Canadian urologic and medical oncologists who manage advanced bladder cancer. The survey explored physician opinions regarding VTE rates, risk stratification scores, thromboprophylaxis use in different treatment settings, and interest in clinical trials., Results: Seventy physicians were invited and 36 (51%) completed the survey, including 20 (56%) urologic oncologists and 16 (44%) medical oncologists. Most respondents (35; 97%) believed that exposure to platinum chemotherapy increases VTE risk. For patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 34 (94%) respondents estimated the risk of VTE to be 10% or higher, yet 25 (69%) indicated they do not routinely recommend thromboprophylaxis. Physicians frequently (10; 40%) defer the decision to another physician, while eight (32%) believe there is not enough evidence to guide best management. Similar responses were obtained for metastatic patients. Almost all (94%) respondents were interested in participating in a thromboprophylaxis trial for patients with bladder cancer., Conclusions: Patients with bladder cancer receiving chemotherapy in Canada are not routinely offered thromboprophylaxis. We found strong interest among Canadian oncologists to participate in clinical trials examining this topic.

Introduction: There is limited evidence to inform thromboprophylaxis use for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery in bladder cancer. We sought to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. We also assessed if the Khorana score was associated with VTE risk., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive patients who received a radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at The Ottawa Hospital between January 2016 and August 2020. Demographic information, chemotherapy data, operative characteristics, VTE and bleeding outcomes were collected from the start of treatment to 90 days postoperative. A Khorana score was calculated for each patient who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome for this study was the incidence of VTE from the time the patient started treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy until 90 days post-cystectomy. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for VTE during neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Results: Among 181 radical cystectomy cases during the study period, 123 had muscle-invasive disease and 72 (39.8%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eighteen (25.0%) patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy developed a VTE from the start of chemotherapy to 90 days postoperative. Thirteen of the 18 VTEs (72%) occurred while the patient was receiving chemotherapy. In multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with a significantly increased risk of VTE was treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Relative risk (RR) 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-8.02; P = 0.02). A higher Khorana score was not associated with an increased risk of VTE in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.08-1.28, P = 0.11). One (1.4%) patient had a major bleeding event during neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusions: Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy are at very high-risk of VTE. Prospective studies that assess the benefits and harms of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this population are needed., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To describe patterns of practice of PSA testing and imaging for Ontario men receiving continuous ADT for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, population-based study of administrative health data from 2008 to 2019. Men 65 years and older receiving continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with documented CRPC were included. An administrative proxy definition was applied to capture patients with nmCRPC and excluded those with metastatic disease. Patients were indexed upon progression to CRPC and were followed until death or end of study period to assess frequency of monitoring with PSA tests and conventional imaging. A 2-year look-back window was used to assess patterns of care leading up to CRPC as well as baseline covariates., Results: At a median follow-up of 40.1 months, 944 patients with nmCRPC were identified. Their median time from initiation of continuous ADT to CRPC was 26.0 months. 60.7% of patients had their PSA measured twice or fewer in the year prior to index, and 70.7% patients did not receive any imaging in the year following progression to CRPC. Throughout the study period, 921/944 (97.6%) patients with CRPC progressed to high-risk (HR-CRPC) with PSA doubling time ≤ 10 months, of which more than half received fewer than three PSA tests in the year prior to developing HR-CRPC, and 30.9% received no imaging in the subsequent year., Conclusion: PSA testing and imaging studies are underutilized in a real-world setting for the management of nmCRPC, including those at high risk of developing metastatic disease. Infrequent monitoring impedes proper risk stratification, disease staging and detection of treatment failure and/or metastases, thereby delaying the necessary treatment intensification with life-prolonging therapies. Adherence to guideline recommendations and the importance of timely staging should be reinforced to optimize patient outcomes., Competing Interests: SM: Honoraria (Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, Sanofi); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Sanofi, TerSera). CJDW: Consulting or Advisory role: (Janssen Oncology). RLY: Honoraria (Janssen); Consulting or Advisory role (Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi); Speakers' Bureau (Amgen, Celgene, Janssen); Research Funding (Sanofi). NSB: Honoraria (Astellas Pharma, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer); Consulting or Advisory role (Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche Canada); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Eisai). IC: Honoraria (Abbvie, Ferring, Janssen); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (TerSera). RJH: Honoraria (Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen); Research Funding (Bayer, Janssen); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Janssen). RF: Honoraria (Bayer, Merck, Pfizer); Consulting or Advisory role (Bayer, Janssen, Novartis Canada Pharmaceuticals Inc, Pfizer); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Janssen). CF: Honoraria (Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer); Consulting or Advisory role (AstraZeneca, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche); Speakers' Bureau (Janssen); Research Funding (Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics). GTG: Honoraria: (Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, Merck); Consulting or Advisory role (Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, Merck); Expert Testimony (Janssen); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Janssen). SCM: Consulting or Advisory role (Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, TerSera). CM: Consulting or Advisory role (Amgen, AbbVie, Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, TerSera, Knight, Verity, Sanofi). TN: Honoraria (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, TerSera); Consulting or Advisory role (Abbvie, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, TerSera); Research Funding (Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Sanofi, TerSera); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, TerSera). KN: Consulting or Advisory role (AstraZeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Ipsen, anssen Oncology, Merck, Pfizer, Roche Canada, Sanofi); Speakers' Bureau (Merck). RR: Advisory role and Honoraria (AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ferring, Janssen and Sanofi). SJH: Honoraria (Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs Inc, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Merck); Consulting or Advisory role (Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche Canada); Research Funding (Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Janssen Oncology, Merck, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, SignalChem); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses (Eisai). FS: Honoraria (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Myovant Sciences, Pfizer, Sanofi); Consulting or Advisory role (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Janssen Oncology, Myovant Sciences, Pfizer, Sanofi); Research Funding (Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, Sanofi). AZ: Employee of Janssen. BO: Employee of Janssen. KFYC: Employee of Janssen. BS: Honoraria (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, Knight Pharmaceuticals, TerSera); Consulting or Advisory role (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, Knight Pharmaceuticals, TerSera); Speakers' Bureau (Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Janssen, Knight Pharmaceuticals, TerSera); Research Funding (Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Merck)., (© 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.)

Background: Management of advanced prostate cancer has evolved rapidly with the availability of multiple systemic treatments such as androgen-receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs), taxane-based chemotherapy, radium-223, and other approaches. However, limited data exists on real-world treatment selection and clinical outcomes. This study examines the utilization and survival impact of these therapies in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the real-world setting of Ontario, Canada., Methods: This study was a retrospective, longitudinal, population-based study of administrative claims data between January 2016 and April 2020. Men ≥ 66 years with mCRPC receiving advanced treatment were included. Patients were indexed on the day they initiated mCRPC treatment and followed up until death or end of study period to assess treatment and survival. Multinomial regression was used to model the association between baseline covariates, treatment and survival., Results: Median age was 75 years among the 944 mCRPC patients who received life-prolonging therapies during this time period. Over 90% of patients used an ARAT as a first-line therapy, and 71.5% received only first-line therapy before death or censoring. Of patients that received two or more lines, over 80% received subsequent therapy with a different mechanism of action. Median overall survival was 18.9 months., Conclusions: ARATs have become the predominant first-line systemic treatment option for mCRPC patients in recent years. Notably, the majority of patients received only a single line of life-prolonging therapy after developing mCRPC. In keeping with the recognized efficacy-effectiveness gap, real-world outcomes in this cohort appear poorer than in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)