Search

Your search keyword '"Moody, Lesley"' showing total 174 results
Start Over Author "Moody, Lesley"
174 results on '"Moody, Lesley"'

2. TOward a comPrehensive supportive Care intervention for Older men with metastatic Prostate cancer (TOPCOP3): A pilot randomized controlled trial and process evaluation

Author

Alibhai, Shabbir M.H., Puts, Martine, Jin, Rana, Godhwani, Kian, Antonio, Maryjo, Abdallah, Soha, Feng, Gregory, Krzyzanowska, Monika K., Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Enrique, Papadopoulos, Efthymios, Mach, Calvin, Nasiri, Ferozah, Sridhar, Srikala S., Glicksman, Rachel, Moody, Lesley, Bender, Jacqueline, Clarke, Hance, Matthew, Andrew, McIntosh, Dennis, Klass, Winston, and Emmenegger, Urban

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Virtual Cancer Care Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient and Staff Perspectives and Recommendations

Author

Abdelmutti, Nazek, primary, Powis, Melanie, additional, Macedo, Alyssa, additional, Liu, Zhihui, additional, Bender, Jackie L., additional, Papadakos, Janet, additional, Hack, Saidah, additional, Rajnish, Nikki, additional, Rana, Palwasha, additional, Kittuppanantharajah, Shay, additional, Lovas, Mike, additional, Melwani, Sheena, additional, Moody, Lesley, additional, Elliot, Mary, additional, Ashfaq, Iqra, additional, Avery, Lisa, additional, Mohammed, Hiba, additional, Berlin, Alejandro, additional, and Krzyzanowska, Monika K., additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Patient Priorities Concerning Treatment Decisions for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors Identified by Discrete Choice Experiments.

Author

Anaka, Matthew, Chan, David, Pattison, Sharon, Thawer, Alia, Franco, Bryan, Moody, Lesley, Jackson, Christopher, Segelov, Eva, and Singh, Simron

Subjects
CANCER patient psychology, PATIENT decision making, ANTINEOPLASTIC agents, PATIENTS' attitudes, NEUROENDOCRINE tumors, DECISION making, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, SOMATOSTATIN, RESEARCH funding, PROGRESSION-free survival, ADVERSE health care events
Abstract

Background Patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have multiple treatment options. Ideally, treatment decisions are shared between physician and patient; however, previous studies suggest that oncologists and patients place different value on treatment attributes such as adverse event (AE) rates. High-quality information on NET patient treatment preferences may facilitate patient-centered decision making by helping clinicians understand patient priorities. Methods This study used 2 discrete choice experiments (DCE) to elicit preferences of NET patients regarding advanced midgut and pancreatic NET (pNET) treatments. The DCEs used the "potentially all pairwise rankings of all possible alternatives" (PAPRIKA) method. The primary objective was to determine relative utility rankings for treatment attributes, including progression-free survival (PFS), treatment modality, and AE rates. Ranking of attribute profiles matching specific treatments was also determined. Levels for treatment attributes were obtained from randomized clinical trial data of NET treatments. Results One hundred and 10 participants completed the midgut NET DCE, and 132 completed the pNET DCE. Longer PFS was the highest ranked treatment attribute in 64.5% of participants in the midgut NET DCE, and in 59% in the pNET DCE. Approximately, 40% of participants in both scenarios prioritized lower AE rates or less invasive treatment modalities over PFS. Ranking of treatment profiles in the midgut NET scenario identified 60.9% of participants favoring peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and 30.0% somatostatin analogue dose escalation. Conclusion NET patients have heterogeneous priorities when choosing between treatment options based on the results of 2 independent DCEs. These results highlight the importance of shared decision making for NET patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Addressing challenges in telephone triage for outpatient oncology care: A data-centred digital routing solution.

Author

Lovas, Mike, primary, Krzyzanowska, Monika K., additional, Somji, Faiza, additional, Devonish, Shayla, additional, Spiro, Grace, additional, Truong, Tran, additional, Lane, Kelly, additional, Badzynski, Adam, additional, Wolf, Susan, additional, Tymoshyk, Iryna, additional, Macedo, Alyssa, additional, Dozois, Graham, additional, Bravo, Ana, additional, Julius, Anet, additional, Moody, Lesley, additional, Kooner, Simranjit, additional, Melwani, Sheena, additional, and Berlin, Alejandro, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Psychological aspects of additional procedures following breast reconstruction

Author

Moody, Lesley Ann

Subjects
618.190592, Medicine
Abstract

Aims: The main objective of this research was to compare psychological distress (anxiety and depression) and body image dissatisfaction (BID) between two groups of women: those who had undergone breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer (BR) and those who had undergone breast reconstruction and additional procedures (BR-AP). Furthermore, the study aimed to explore the possible reasons why women might undergo additional procedures following breast reconstruction. Method: A cross-sectional retrospective design was employed and data was collected at one time period only. Ninety seven patients were recruited (69.3% of the total patient cohort) who attended prearranged clinic appointments between August 2006 and February 2007 at a regional Breast Care Unit. Results: The prevalence of anxiety and depression was higher in the BR-AP group compared to the BR group. This difference was not significant for anxiety, however it was approaching statistical significance for depression (p = 0.09). The BR-AP group had a significantly higher BID than the BR group (p = 0.045). There was some evidence that undergoing additional procedures predicted depression (p = 0.060) and BID (p = 0.045). Conclusions: Undergoing additional procedures following breast reconstruction may not lead to a positive psychological outcome in terms of anxiety, depression and body image dissatisfaction. In view of the cost that undergoing these procedures presents to the NHS, coupled with the assumption that they offer psychological benefits, further research that prospectively examines psychological aspects of women seeking additional procedures is strongly recommended. Knowledge gained from such research is likely to assist in the pre-operative assessment of these women.

Published
2007

27. Additional file 3 of Hospital capacity for patient engagement in planning and improving health services: a cross-sectional survey

Author

Gagliardi, Anna R., Martinez, Juan Pablo Diaz, G. Ross Baker, Moody, Lesley, Kerseri Scane, Urquhart, Robin, and Wodchis, Walter P.

Abstract

Additional file 3. PE service delivery by engagement mode hospital type. PE in service delivery activities by engagement mode and hospital type. Table showing summary statistics.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Additional file 2 of Hospital capacity for patient engagement in planning and improving health services: a cross-sectional survey

Author

Gagliardi, Anna R., Martinez, Juan Pablo Diaz, G. Ross Baker, Moody, Lesley, Kerseri Scane, Urquhart, Robin, and Wodchis, Walter P.

Abstract

Additional file 2. Evaluation quality improvement by engagement mode hospital type. PE in evaluation/quality improvement activities by engagement mode and hospital type. Table showing summary statistics.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. Implementation and Outcomes of Virtual Care Across a Tertiary Cancer Center During COVID-19

Author

Berlin, Alejandro, primary, Lovas, Mike, additional, Truong, Tran, additional, Melwani, Sheena, additional, Liu, Justin, additional, Liu, Zhihui Amy, additional, Badzynski, Adam, additional, Carpenter, Mary Beth, additional, Virtanen, Carl, additional, Morley, Lyndon, additional, Bhattacharyya, Onil, additional, Escaf, Marnie, additional, Moody, Lesley, additional, Goldfarb, Avi, additional, Brzozowski, Luke, additional, Cafazzo, Joseph, additional, Chua, Melvin L. K., additional, Stewart, A. Keith, additional, and Krzyzanowska, Monika K., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

32. Improving the quality of self-management support in ambulatory cancer care: a mixed-method study of organisational and clinician readiness, barriers and enablers for tailoring of implementation strategies to multisites

Author

Howell, Doris, primary, Powis, Melanie, additional, Kirkby, Ryan, additional, Amernic, Heidi, additional, Moody, Lesley, additional, Bryant-Lukosius, Denise, additional, O'Brien, Mary Ann, additional, Rask, Sara, additional, and Krzyzanowska, Monika, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. Practical innovation: Advanced practice nurses in cancer care

Author

Campbell, Colleen, primary, Nowell, Allyson, additional, Karagheusian, Karen, additional, Giroux, Janet, additional, Kiteley, Catherine, additional, Martelli, Lorraine, additional, McQuestion, Maurene, additional, Quinn, Maureen, additional, Rowe Samadhin, Yvonne P., additional, Touw, Melissa, additional, and Moody, Lesley, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Innovation pratique : infirmières en pratique avancée et soins du cancer

Author

Campbell, Colleen, primary, Nowell, Allyson, additional, Karagheusian, Karen, additional, Giroux, Janet, additional, Kiteley, Catherine, additional, Martelli, Lorraine, additional, McQuestion, Maurene, additional, Quinn, Maureen, additional, Rowe Samadhin, Yvonne P., additional, Touw, Melissa, additional, and Moody, Lesley, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. Improving the quality of self-management support in ambulatory cancer care: a mixed-method study of organisational and clinician readiness, barriers and enablers for tailoring of implementation strategies to multisites.

Author

Howell, Doris, Powis, Melanie, Kirkby, Ryan, Amernic, Heidi, Moody, Lesley, Bryant-Lukosius, Denise, O'Brien, Mary Ann, Rask, Sara, and Krzyzanowska, Monika

Subjects
ONCOLOGY nursing, HEALTH services administrators, OUTPATIENT medical care, SPECIALTY hospitals, FOCUS groups, NURSES' attitudes, SELF-management (Psychology), ATTITUDE (Psychology), RESEARCH methodology, HEALTH facility administration, DIETITIANS' attitudes, ATTITUDES of medical personnel, CHANGE, MEDICAL personnel, INTERVIEWING, PHYSICIANS' attitudes, HUMAN services programs, CANCER treatment, PHARMACISTS, ORGANIZATIONAL change, QUALITY assurance, QUESTIONNAIRES, SOCIAL worker attitudes, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, RESEARCH funding, THEMATIC analysis, CANCER patient medical care, CORPORATE culture, ONCOLOGISTS
Abstract

Introduction Improving the quality of self-management support (SMS) for treatment-related toxicities is a priority in cancer care. Successful implementation of SMS programmes depends on tailoring implementation strategies to organisational readiness factors and barriers/enablers, however, a systematic process for this is lacking. In this formative phase of our implementation-effectiveness trial, Self-Management and Activation to Reduce Treatment-Related Toxicities, we evaluated readiness based on constructs in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and developed a process for mapping implementation strategies to local contexts. Methods In this convergent mixed-method study, surveys and interviews were used to assess readiness and barriers/enablers for SMS among stakeholders in 3 disease site groups at 3 regional cancer centres (RCCs) in Ontario, Canada. Median survey responses were classified as a barrier, enabler or neutral based on a priori cut-off values. Barriers/enablers at each centre were mapped to CFIR and then inputted into the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change Strategy Matching Tool V.1.0 (CFIR-ERIC) to identify centrespecific implementation strategies. Qualitative data were separately analysed and themes mapped to CFIR constructs to provide a deeper understanding of barriers/enablers. Results SMS in most of the RCCs was not systematically delivered, yet most stakeholders (n=78; respondent rate=50%) valued SMS. For centre 1, 7 barriers/12 enablers were identified, 14 barriers/9 enablers for centre 2 and 11 barriers/5 enablers for centre 3. Of the total 46 strategies identified, 30 (65%) were common across centres as core implementation strategies and 5 tailored implementation recommendations were identified for centres 1 and 3, and 4 for centre 2. Conclusions The CFIR and CFIR-ERIC were valuable tools for tailoring SMS implementation to readiness and barriers/enablers, whereas NPT helped to clarify the clinical work of implementation. Our approach to tailoring of implementation strategies may have relevance for other studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

45. Patterns of Symptoms Burden in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes

Author

Hallet, Julie, primary, Davis, Laura E., additional, Mahar, Alyson L., additional, Law, Calvin H.L., additional, Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie, additional, Bubis, Lev D., additional, Singh, Simron, additional, Myrehaug, Sten, additional, Zhao, Haoyu, additional, Beyfuss, Kaitlyn, additional, Moody, Lesley, additional, and Coburn, Natalie G., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Symptom burden at the end of life for neuroendocrine tumors: A population-based analysis of patient-reported outcomes.

Author

Hallet, Julie I., primary, Davis, Laura, additional, Mahar, Alyson L., additional, Law, Calvin, additional, Bubis, Lev, additional, Isenberg-Grzeda, Elie, additional, Singh, Simron, additional, Myrehaug, Sten, additional, Zhao, Haoyu, additional, Beyfuss, Kaitlyn, additional, Moody, Lesley, additional, and Coburn, Natalie G., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF A REAL-TIME PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCE MEASURE.

Author

Moody, Lesley, Benn, Sarah, Ieraci, Luciano, Green, Esther, Ingale, Saurabh, Hurwitz, Gillian, Kraetschmer, Nancy M., Bridge, Erica, and Singh, Simron

Subjects
MEDICAL care, EXPLORATORY factor analysis, SURVEYS, CRONBACH'S alpha, STATISTICAL reliability
Abstract

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) capture the patient’s view about his or her experience while receiving care across the continuum of care. Your Voice Matters (YVM), a real-time electronic PREM tool, was developed to measure the patient experience in the outpatient cancer setting and to drive quality improvements in the cancer system. This study describes the development and validation of YVM, a real-time electronic PREM tool in cancer services. Cognitive interviewing was conducted with patient and family advisors for both the French (n = 3) and English (n = 5) versions of the YVM tool. YVM was administered through five Regional Cancer Centers (RCCs) between April and August 2015. Shapley value regression used overall experience-dependent variables to determine core items and items eligible for removal from YVM. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure. Internal consistency reliabilities were calculated using Cronbach’s alpha. A total of 557 YVM tools were completed by cancer patients in the treatment phase. Shapley value regression identified five lower scoring items for removal. Exploratory factor analysis showed that a 27-item, five-factor structure reflected the underlying patient experience dimensions in the cancer treatment visit. Cronbach’s alpha of 0.827 for all items suggested good internal consistency. YVM is a validated tool for measuring the experience of cancer patients during the treatment phase through the visit trajectory in real time. YVM will help drive improvements based on patients’ preferences and needs, and will provide robust patient experience data for cancer care delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results