Search

Background: Palbociclib might be less effective than ribociclib in HR+/HER2- and HER2-enriched BC. This hypothesis is currently being tested in the HARMONIA prospective phase III clinical trial (NCT05207709). Here, we evaluated the downstream biological effects of both drugs using cell lines and patient tumor samples. Methods: Three HR+ BC cell lines (i.e., MCF7, T47D and BT474) were treated at 2 different dose levels of palbociclib or ribociclib (i.e., 100 nM and 500 nM) +/- fulvestrant (1 nM) for 72 hours (h). PAM50 gene signatures were determined on the nCounter, as well as phosphorylation of RB (p-RB) by Western Blot and senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity by FACS. In vitro experiments were performed in triplicates. PAM50 gene signatures were obtained from 49 paired baseline versus week-2 samples and 49 paired baseline versus surgery samples of the CORALLEEN phase II study (Prat, Lancet Oncol. 2020), which treated 49 women with PAM50 Luminal B HR+/HER2- early BC with neoadjuvant ribociclib (600 mg daily) plus endocrine therapy (ET). PAM50 signature scores were also evaluated in publicly available data from 23 paired baseline versus week-2 samples and 16 paired baseline versus surgery samples of the NEOPALANA phase II trial (Ma, Clin Cancer Res. 2017) which treated 50 patients with HR+/HER2- early BC with palbociclib (125 mg daily) plus anastrozole. Changes in PAM50 signatures upon CDK4/6i were determined by paired t-tests and significant analysis of microarray (SAM). Results: Across all cell lines, both palbociclib and ribociclib statistically significantly reduced p-RB at 72h with both doses (i.e., 100 and 500 nM) compared to non-treated cells (p< 0.001). Senescence was also observed at 72h with both doses. Both drugs +/- ET significantly increased the Luminal A signature and decreased Luminal B and proliferation signatures with both doses. However, the HER2-enriched signature was only significantly reduced when both CDK4/6 inhibitors were given at 500 nM. In tumor samples from the CORALLEEN and NEOPALANA phase II studies, a similar change in PAM50 biology was observed with both drugs, namely an increase in Luminal A signature and a decrease in Luminal B and proliferation signatures after 2 weeks of treatment and at surgery. At 2 weeks of treatment, the HER2-enriched signature was significantly decreased in both studies with ribociclib (p< 0.001) and palbociclib (p< 0.001). However, the decrease in the HER2-enriched signature was only observed in surgical samples of patients treated with ribociclib (p< 0.001), but not palbociclib (p=0.194). A difference in sample size could explain this result. Nevertheless, in CORALLEEN, the median number of days between the last dose of ribociclib and surgery was 13.1 days (range: 1-78). In NEOPALANA, the median number of days between the last dose of palbociclib and surgery was 29 days (range: 8-49), except for 8 patients who received additional 10-12 days of palbociclib immediately before surgery (Ma, Clin Cancer Res. 2017). In patients who underwent surgery at 8 days or before, the HER2-enriched signature was significantly decreased for both ribociclib (p< 0.001) and palbociclib (p=0.013). Interestingly, in patients that underwent surgery after >8 days from the last dose, a significant reduction of the HER2-enriched signature was only observed with ribociclib (p< 0.001), but not with palbociclib (p=0.500). Conclusions: Both palbociclib and ribociclib have similar effects on PAM50 biology when given at the same dose. However, in clinical practice, palbociclib is given at a lower dose than ribociclib, and although HER2-enriched signature is significantly decreased in tumors after 2 weeks of CDK4/6i+ET, this effect is only maintained at later time points with ribociclib, indicating a dose-dependent efficacy of CDK4/6i in this biologically aggressive subtype. Citation Format: Natàlia Lorman-Carbó, Olga Martínez-Sáez, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Patricia Galván, Nuria Chic, Barbara Adamo, Maria Vidal, Montserrat Muñoz, Charles M. Perou, Joaquín Gavilá, Tomás Pascual, Aleix Prat, Fara Brasó-Maristany. Dissecting the biological activity of different CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-16.

Background Within HR+/HER2- disease, patients with non-luminal subtypes of breast cancer (HER2-enriched [HER2-E] and Basal-like) have poorer prognosis than those with luminal subtypes, may be more sensitive to chemotherapy, and have higher expression of immune-related genes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Here, we report the interim efficacy and safety data of the TATEN trial (NCT04251169), the first study designed to evaluate pembrolizumab and paclitaxel in HR+/HER2-negative, PAM50 non-luminal, metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods TATEN is a single-arm, multicenter phase II study evaluating pembrolizumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with HR+/HER2-, PAM50 non-luminal, MBC. Key inclusion criteria include progression to prior CDK4/6 inhibitors, presence of measurable disease by RECIST V1.1, no prior chemotherapy for MBC, and ECOG 0-1. Patients receive pembrolizumab at 200 mg every 3 weeks (on D1 of each 21-day cycle, beginning at cycle 1) in combination with weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2, beginning at cycle 2. The primary endpoint is to evaluate overall response rate (ORR), defined as the rate of complete (CR) and partial response (PR) according to RECIST V1.1. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + stable disease >24 weeks), progression free survival, overall survival, safety, and predictive biomarkers. Tumor samples collected during advanced/metastatic disease are mandatory to assess PAM50 and other translational endpoints. This study had a planned interim analysis after 15 patients were evaluable for ORR based on a Simon’s two stage design with 80% power and a type I error rate of 0.05. Stage I of the trial would be considered successful if at least 6 patients achieved a PR and/or CR. In that case, the trial would recruit up to 46 evaluable patients for a target ORR ≥ 41. Here we report results from the patients who received at least one dose of combination treatment and had a first, post-baseline, tumor assessment according to RECIST v1.1 (evaluable population). Results From July 2020 to December 2021, 119 patients were screened, and 25 PAM50 non-luminal tumors were identified (21%). From these, 17 (68%) patients were recruited, and 15 were evaluable for primary endpoint. Two patients discontinued the trial before the first dose of pembrolizumab and paclitaxel, because of clinical progressive disease (PD). Baseline patient characteristics were as follows: median age 53 years (range: 40-77), ECOG 0 52.9%, de novo MBC at diagnosis 29.4%, and visceral disease 64.7% (including 53.3% with liver metastasis). Ten patients had received paclitaxel treatment in the adjuvant setting. Regarding PAM50 intrinsic subtype, two patients had basal-like and 13 HER2-E tumors. At the time of data cut-off (May 17,2022), 8 patients (53.3%) had stopped their treatment because of PD and 2 (13.3%) due to toxicity. Five patients (33.3%) were still on treatment. The ORR was 53.3 % (8 of 15, 95% CI 26.6-78.7), meeting the pre-specified ORR for the first stage of the trial. The CBR was 86.6% (13 of 15, 95%CI 59.5-98.34), and median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 5.6 – 10.2). Overall, all patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade, while 53.3% of patients experienced grade 3 TRAEs. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs were reported in the evaluable population. Correlative analysis including gene expression analysis and centralized TILs scoring and PD-L1 IHC will be presented. Conclusions The first stage of TATEN combining pembrolizumab with paclitaxel after progression to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with HR+/HER2-negative, PAM50 non-luminal MBC met its pre-specified endpoint. Completion of the stage II part of the trial with the inclusion of up to 46 patients is warranted to assess the activity of this combination in this group of patients. Correlative studies to find predictive biomarkers of response to this regimen are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. This study was funded by MSD. Citation Format: Aleix Prat, Tomás Pascual, Montserrat Muñoz, Cristina Hernando, Silvia Vazquez, Salvador Blanch, Manuel Alva, Mafalda Oliveira, Esther Sanfeliu, Lorea Villanueva, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Nuria Chic, Eva Ciruelos. TATEN TRIAL (SOLTI-1716) Targeting non-Luminal disease by PAM50 with pembrolizumab + paclitaxel in Hormone Receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): interim analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-02.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer (BC) is a highly prevalent and heterogeneous disease, entailing different so-called intrinsic subtypes (IS) according to gene expression, namely Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-Enriched (HER2E) and Basal-like, as well as a normal breast-like group. The HER2E is still a poorly understood entity, which needs further biologic characterization to improve therapeutic management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (pts) treated at Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain) over 18 years with a diagnosis of metastatic BC, with available matched primary and metastatic tumor samples for gene expression analyses were retrospectively recruited. Using the nCounter® Breast Cancer 360 panel, we studied the expression of 776 genes pertaining to different tumor and immune pathway-related signatures, with a focus on HER2E vs. non-HER2E tumors. Significant changes were considered at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 5%. Main clinicopathological features were also compared. IS changes from primary to metastatic disease were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-one pts with paired tumor samples were included. Briefly, primary tumors were 67.0% hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-), 14.8% were HER2-positive (HER2+) and 18.2% were triple-negative (TNBC). IS distribution in primary tumors was the following: 25 Luminal A (28%), 22 Luminal B (24%), 24 HER2E (26%), 12 Basal-like (13%), and 8 Normal-like (9%). In contrast, IS distribution in metastatic tumors was the following: 13 Luminal A (14%), 22 Luminal B (24%), 34 HER2-E (37%), 16 Basal-like (18%), and 6 Normal-like (7%). The HER2E disease proved to be a relatively stable subtype, with 16 (66.7%) tumors not changing IS in the transition to metastatic disease (p=0.078). Particularly, within HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and TNBC, 8/12 (66.7%), 8/10 (80.0%) and 1/2 (50.0%) tumors remained HER2E. Conversely, an overall significant switch from Luminal to non-Luminal tumors at the metastatic progression was observed (p=0.031), with 14/19 (73.7%) new non-Luminal BC being HER2E. When considering all primary and metastatic tumors, HER2E were observed to be less frequently estrogen receptor (ER) positive than non-HER2E tumors (55.8% vs. 78.7%; p=0.002), with lower mean progesterone receptor (PR) levels (15.3% vs. 25.8%; p=0.027). Compared to the other subtypes (as a group), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (ROR-P) was higher for HER2E tumors (59.1 vs. 41.7; p < 0.001), which were also more frequently HER2+ (36.5% vs. 5.8%) and less likely HR+/HER2- (50.0% vs. 73.6%) and TNBC (13.5% vs. 20.7%), compared to non-HER2E (p < 0.001). No significant differences in grade, TILs, Ki67 and histotype were observed. Overall, 140/776 genes were significantly downregulated in HER2E vs. non-HER2E tumors, including genes related to cell adhesion, migration, DNA damage repair, apoptosis, estrogen signalling pathway, senescence. Conversely, 178/776 genes were significantly upregulated, including the tyrosine-kinase receptor FGFR4, genes involved in nuclear activity, DNA transcription regulation, MAP-kinase signaling pathways, proliferation, cytokine response, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell cycle progression, and immune-related genes such as CD274 (PD-L1 gene). DISCUSSION: A switch towards more aggressive IS from primary to advanced disease was observed, with an increase in HER2E prevalence. HER2E tumors, which tend to maintain their IS at the metastatic disease, showed upregulation of genes related to proliferation, survival and EMT, coherently with their well-known worse prognosis. FGFR4 and CD274 upregulation, along with downregulation of genes involved in DNA damage repair suggest these tumors might benefit from targeted therapeutic approaches. Genomic higher risk was not convoyed by consistent clinicopathological features, except for lower PR levels and HER2 overexpression at IHC. Further characterization according to primary/metastatic and HR status is ongoing. Intrinsic subtype distribution across primary and metastatic breast tumors Citation Format: Francisco Javier Muñoz-Carrillo, Laia Paré, Benedetta Conte, Adela Rodríguez, Patricia Galván, Esther Sanfeliu, Blanca González-Farré, Claudette Falato, Isabel Garcia-Fructuoso, Barbara Adamo, Nuria Chic, Olga Martínez-Sáez, Tomás Pascual, Reinaldo Moreno, Montserrat Muñoz, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Aleix Prat, Francesco Schettini, Maria Vidal. Clinico-Pathological and Molecular Characterization of HER2-Enriched Breast Tumors Independently of HER2 Status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-23-16.

Purpose: In hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC), it is imperative to identify patients who respond poorly to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and to discover therapeutic targets to reverse this resistance. Non-luminal breast cancer subtype and high levels of CCNE1 are candidate biomarkers in this setting, but further validation is needed. Experimental Design: We performed mRNA gene expression profiling and correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) on 455 tumor samples included in the phase III PEARL study, which assigned patients with HR+/HER2− MBC to receive palbociclib+endocrine therapy (ET) versus capecitabine. Estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2− breast cancer cell lines were used to generate and characterize resistance to palbociclib+ET. Results: Non-luminal subtype was more prevalent in metastatic (14%) than in primary tumor samples (4%). Patients with non-luminal tumors had median PFS of 2.4 months with palbociclib+ET and 9.3 months with capecitabine; HR 4.16, adjusted P value < 0.0001. Tumors with high CCNE1 expression (above median) also had worse median PFS with palbociclib+ET (6.2 months) than with capecitabine (9.3 months); HR 1.55, adjusted P value = 0.0036. In patients refractory to palbociclib+ET (PFS in the lower quartile), we found higher levels of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). In an independent data set (PALOMA3), tumors with high PLK1 show worse median PFS than those with low PLK1 expression under palbociclib+ET treatment. In ER+/HER2− cell line models, we show that PLK1 inhibition reverses resistance to palbociclib+ET. Conclusions: We confirm the association of non-luminal subtype and CCNE1 with resistance to CDK4/6i+ET in HR+ MBC. High levels of PLK1 mRNA identify patients with poor response to palbociclib, suggesting PLK1 could also play a role in the setting of resistance to CDK4/6i.

In advanced HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, the new antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan is more effective compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). However, trastuzumab deruxtecan can have considerable toxicities, and the right treatment sequence is unknown. Biomarkers to guide the use of anti-HER2 therapies beyond HER2 status are needed. Here, we evaluated if preestablished levels of ERBB2 mRNA expression according to the HER2DX standardized assay are associated with response and survival following T-DM1. In ERBB2 low, medium, and high groups, the overall response rate was 0%, 29%, and 56%, respectively (P

In the phase II CORALLEEN trial, patients with PAM50 luminal B early breast cancer (EBC) were randomised to neoadjuvant ribociclib plus letrozole (R + L) or chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes. Results from the primary efficacy analysis showed a similar proportion of patients with response at surgery in both groups. How health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes with R + L compare with chemotherapy in EBC setting is still unknown. Here, we report the results of the HRQoL analysis from the CORALLEEN study.A total of 106 women were randomised 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant R + L (n = 52) or chemotherapy (n = 54). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using two questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23. Change from baseline in the global health status, functional, and symptom scales was analysed using linear mixed-effect models, and between-treatment differences were estimated along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).At baseline, the overall questionnaire available rate was 94.3%, and patient-reported outcomes were similar between treatment groups. At the end of the study treatment (24 weeks), patients receiving R + L showed better global health status scores with a between-treatment difference of 17.7 points (95% CI 9.2-26.2; p-valuelt;0.001). The R + L group also presented numerically better outcomes in all functional and symptom scales. The larger between-treatment differences in symptom severity were found in fatigue (-28.9; 95% CI -38.5 to -19.3), appetite loss (-23; 95% CI -34.9 to -11.2) and systematic therapy side-effects (-11.4; 95% CI -18.3 to -4.6).Neoadjuvant R + L was associated with better HRQoL outcomes compared with chemotherapy in patients with luminal B EBC.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03248427.

Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy and hormonotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been shown to reduce the risk of local recurrence. To predict the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor relapse (IBTR) after BCS, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) developed a nomogram to analyze local recurrence (LR) risk in our cohort and to assess its external validation. Methods: A historical cohort study using data from 296 patients treated for DCIS at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona was carried out. Patients who had had a mastectomy were excluded from the analysis. Results: The mean age was 58 years (42–75), and the median follow-up time was 10.64 years. The overall local relapse rate was 13.04% (27 patients) during the study period. Actuarial 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were 5.8 and 12.9%, respectively. The external validation of the MSKCC nomogram was performed using a multivariate logistic regression analysis on a total of 207 patients, which did not reach statistical significance in the studied population for predicting LR (p = 0.10). The expression of estrogen receptors was significantly associated with a decreased risk of LR (OR: 0.25; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In our series, the LR rate was 13.4%, which was in accordance with the published series. The MSKCC nomogram did not accurately predict the IBTR in this Spanish cohort of patients treated for DCIS (p = 0.10).

Purpose:In hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC), it is imperative to identify patients who respond poorly to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and to discover therapeutic targets to reverse this resistance. Non-luminal breast cancer subtype and high levels of CCNE1 are candidate biomarkers in this setting, but further validation is needed.Experimental Design:We performed mRNA gene expression profiling and correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) on 455 tumor samples included in the phase III PEARL study, which assigned patients with HR+/HER2− MBC to receive palbociclib+endocrine therapy (ET) versus capecitabine. Estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2− breast cancer cell lines were used to generate and characterize resistance to palbociclib+ET.Results:Non-luminal subtype was more prevalent in metastatic (14%) than in primary tumor samples (4%). Patients with non-luminal tumors had median PFS of 2.4 months with palbociclib+ET and 9.3 months with capecitabine; HR 4.16, adjusted P value < 0.0001. Tumors with high CCNE1 expression (above median) also had worse median PFS with palbociclib+ET (6.2 months) than with capecitabine (9.3 months); HR 1.55, adjusted P value = 0.0036. In patients refractory to palbociclib+ET (PFS in the lower quartile), we found higher levels of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). In an independent data set (PALOMA3), tumors with high PLK1 show worse median PFS than those with low PLK1 expression under palbociclib+ET treatment. In ER+/HER2− cell line models, we show that PLK1 inhibition reverses resistance to palbociclib+ET.Conclusions:We confirm the association of non-luminal subtype and CCNE1 with resistance to CDK4/6i+ET in HR+ MBC. High levels of PLK1 mRNA identify patients with poor response to palbociclib, suggesting PLK1 could also play a role in the setting of resistance to CDK4/6i.

Descriptive analysis of extreme responders subpopulation, according to clinical characteristics and tumor subtype

Evaluation of volasertib effects on tumor spheroid growth and on the activation of signal transduction pathways in PalboR and FPR cells

Table

Supplementary Data

Biological changes that occur during metastatic progression of breast cancer are still incompletely characterized. In this study, we compared intrinsic molecular subtypes and gene expression in 123 paired primary and metastatic tissues from breast cancer patients. Intrinsic subtype was identified using a PAM50 classifier and χ2 tests determined the differences in variable distribution. The rate of subtype conversion was 0% in basal-like tumors, 23.1% in HER2-enriched (HER2-E) tumors, 30.0% in luminal B tumors, and 55.3% in luminal A tumors. In 40.2% of cases, luminal A tumors converted to luminal B tumors, whereas in 14.3% of cases luminal A and B tumors converted to HER2-E tumors. We identified 47 genes that were expressed differentially in metastatic versus primary disease. Metastatic tumors were enriched for proliferation-related and migration-related genes and diminished for luminal-related genes. Expression of proliferation-related genes were better at predicting overall survival in metastatic disease (OSmet) when analyzed in metastatic tissue rather than primary tissue. In contrast, a basal-like gene expression signature was better at predicting OSmet in primary disease compared with metastatic tissue. We observed correlations between time to tumor relapse and the magnitude of changes of proliferation, luminal B, or HER2-E signatures in metastatic versus primary disease. Although the intrinsic subtype was largely maintained during metastatic progression, luminal/HER2-negative tumors acquired a luminal B or HER2-E profile during metastatic progression, likely reflecting tumor evolution or acquisition of estrogen independence. Overall, our analysis revealed the value of stratifying gene expression by both cancer subtype and tissue type, providing clinicians more refined tools to evaluate prognosis and treatment. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2213–21. ©2017 AACR.

Figure

Supplemental Methods, Tables and Figures Tables Table S1. CES association with chemotherapy sensitivity (measured as pCR) in the MDACC-based dataset. Table S2. CES association with chemotherapy sensitivity (measured as Residual Cancer Burden [RCB]) in the MDACC-based dataset. Model A. Table S3. CES association with chemotherapy sensitivity (measured as Residual Cancer Burden [RCB]) in the MDACC-based dataset. Model B. Table S4. Univariate association of CES and various signatures with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S5. Association of CES and PAM50 Proliferation Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S6. Association of CES and CHEMOPRED Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S7. Association of CES and the proliferation component of the Genomic Health Index (GHI; OncotypeDX Recurrence Score) with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2- negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S8. Association of CES and Genomic Grade Index (GGI) Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S9. Association of CES and SET index Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S10. Association of CES and RCBPRED Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S11. Association of CES and DLDA30 Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S12. Association of CES and ROR-P Signature with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease from the MDACC-based dataset. Table S13. Association of CES and Ki67 by IHC with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease of the Malaga cohort. 7 Table S14. Association of CES and PAM50 ROR with chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2-negative disease of the Malaga cohort. Table S15. CES association with endocrine sensitivity in the Marsden dataset (n=103). Table S16. CES association with endocrine sensitivity in the Marsden dataset within HER2-negative disease (n=89). Figures Fig. S1. Association of CES with Miller-Payne following chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- negative disease from the Malaga-based cohort. Fig. S2. CES association with endocrine sensitivity in the Edinburgh dataset (n=120). (A) Tumor volume changes of each patient and response classification. (B) Association of CES and other variables with response (defined as at least 70% reduction by 90 days) in the overall population. (C) Association of CES and other variables with response within HER2-negative disease. Fig. S3. Association of CES with pCR in the combined dataset from the MDACC- and Malaga-based cohorts.

Purpose:We do not yet have validated biomarkers to predict response and outcome within hormone receptor–positive/HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) breast cancer. The PAM50-based chemo-endocrine score (CES) predicts chemo-endocrine sensitivity in hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer. Here, we evaluate the relationship of CES with response and survival in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer.Experimental Design:Intrinsic subtype and clinicopathologic data were obtained from seven studies in which patients were treated with HER2-targeted therapy either with endocrine therapy (ET) or with chemotherapy (CTX). CES was evaluated as a continuous variable and categorically from low to high scores [CES-C (chemo-sensitive), CES-U (uncertain), and CES-E (endocrine-sensitive)]. We first analyzed each dataset individually, and then all combined. Multivariable analyses were used to test CES association with pathologic complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS).Results:A total of 457 patients were included (112 with ET and 345 with CTX). In the combined cohort, CES-C, CES-U, and CES-E were identified in 60%, 23%, and 17% of the patients, respectively. High CES (i.e., CES-E) was associated with a lower probability of achieving pCR independently of clinical characteristics, therapy, intrinsic subtype, and study (adjusted OR = 0.42; P = 0.016). A total of 295 patients were analyzed for DFS with a median follow-up of 66 months. High CES was also associated with better DFS (adjusted HR, 0.174; P = 0.003) independently of pCR, clinical characteristics and intrinsic subtype. In patients with residual disease, the adjusted DFS HR of CES was 0.160 (P = 0.012).Conclusions:In HER2+/HR+ breast cancer, CES is useful for predicting chemo-endocrine sensitivity and provides additional prognostication beyond intrinsic subtype and clinicopathologic characteristics.

Purpose: Hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer is clinically and biologically heterogeneous, and subgroups with different prognostic and treatment sensitivities need to be identified.Experimental Design: Research-based PAM50 subtyping and expression of additional genes was performed on 63 patients with HR+/HER2− disease randomly assigned to neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy in a phase II trial. The biology associated with treatment response was used to derive a PAM50-based chemoendocrine score (CES). CES's predictive ability was evaluated in 4 independent neoadjuvant data sets (n = 675) and 4 adjuvant data sets (n = 1,505). The association of CES, intrinsic biology, and PAM50 risk of relapse (ROR) was explored across 6,007 tumors.Results: Most genes associated with endocrine sensitivity were also found associated with chemotherapy resistance. In the chemotherapy test/validation data sets, CES was independently associated with pathologic complete response (pCR), even after adjusting for intrinsic subtype. pCR rates of the CES endocrine–sensitive (CES-E), uncertain (CES-U), and chemotherapy-sensitive (CES-C) groups in both data sets combined were 25%, 11%, and 2%, respectively. In the endocrine test/validation data sets, CES was independently associated with response. Compared with ROR, >90% of ROR-low and ROR-high tumors were identified as CES-E and CES-C, respectively; however, each CES group represented >25% of ROR-intermediate disease. In terms of survival outcome, CES-C was associated with poor relapse-free survival in patients with ROR-intermediate disease treated with either adjuvant endocrine therapy only or no adjuvant systemic therapy, but not in patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy.Conclusions: CES is a genomic signature capable of estimating chemoendocrine sensitivity in HR+ breast cancer beyond intrinsic subtype and risk of relapse. Clin Cancer Res; 23(12); 3035–44. ©2016 AACR.

Purpose: To assess the usability and preferences of the contents of mHealth software developed for breast cancer patients as a tool to obtain patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), improve the patient’s knowledge about the disease and its side effects, increase adherence to treatment, and facilitate communication with the doctor. Intervention: an mHealth tool called the Xemio app provides side effect tracking, social calendars, and a personalized and trusted disease information platform to deliver evidence-based advice and education for breast cancer patients. Method: A qualitative research study using semi-structured focus groups was conducted and evaluated. This involved a group interview and a cognitive walking test using Android devices, with the participation of breast cancer survivors. Results: The ability to track side effects and the availability of reliable content were the main benefits of using the application. The ease of use and the method of interaction were the primary concerns; however, all participants agreed that the application would be beneficial to users. Finally, participants expressed their expectations of being informed by their healthcare providers about the launch of the Xemio app. Conclusion: Participants perceived the need for reliable health information and its benefits through an mHealth app. Therefore, applications for breast cancer patients must be designed with accessibility as a key consideration.

The Epi-GEICAM study comprises 1017 invasive BC cases matched with controls of similar age (49 +/- 9 years) and residence. Diet and OO consumption were collected through a validated food frequency questionnaire. 75% of women referred OO, common (refined) or virgin, as the main fat source. Using conditional logistic regression models, we compared different scenarios of type and frequency of OO consumption, using as reference those women not always using OO for the three culinary practices (seasoning, cooking, and frying) and adding = 2 tbsps. of OO per day during meals (adjusted OR, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.03; P = 0.07). Potential benefits from OO consumption, at least as regards the protection provided for BC, could be mostly conferred with VOO, and when its consumption is high.

Background.Patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC) are mainly treated with therapies that target estrogen receptor (ER) signaling to impair tumor cell proliferation. Several drugs targeting the ER pathway are currently used in the clinical practice including aromatase inhibitors (AI) that limit the production of estradiol, selective ER modulators (SERMs) that compete with estradiol for binding ER, and selective ER degraders (SERDs) that induce ER degradation. Despite the availability of these drugs, finding new ET remains a clinical unmet need since some patients do not initially respond to these treatments or become resistant to available endocrine agents. Elacestrant is an orally bioavailable drug that acts as SERD in breast tissue promoting degradation of ER and inhibiting breast cancer cell proliferation. Several clinical studies have confirmed the tolerable safety profile of elacestrant in BC (Bardia A et al. ASCO, 2021) and a phase III trial investigating elacestrant versus standard ET in metastatic BC patients is ongoing for patients treated with at least 1 prior ET and a CDK4/6 inhibitor for advanced BC (EMERALD; NCT03778931). In this study, we aim to investigate the biological effect of elacestrant on cell proliferation in patients with ER+/HER2- resectable BC. Study design. ELIPSE is prospective, multicenter, single-arm, window-of-opportunity study designed to evaluate the biological effect of elacestrant in treatment naïve patients with ER+/HER2- resectable BC. The study population consists of postmenopausal women with clinically negative axillary lymph node (cN0) and whose primary tumors are≥ 1.5 cm by ultrasound with Ki67 ≥10% locally assessed. Patients will receive 400 mg of elacestrant in monotherapy orally, once a day, continuously. After 4 weeks of treatment, surgery will be performed in accordance with local practice. Two biopsies of the same lesion will be obtained as mandatory: a baseline sample and a surgical sample (tumor core-biopsy is permitted if surgery is not performed after 4 weeks of treatment). Plasma samples for biomarkers will be collected at baseline, surgery and end of study visit. The primary objective is to evaluate the Complete Cell Cycle Arrest rate (defined as Ki67 ≤ 2.7%) by central assessment after 4 weeks of elacestrant therapy. Secondary endpoints include:. 1) safety,. 2) correlation of biological activity determined by changes in: Ki67 as a continuous variable, intrinsic PAM50 subtypes, proliferative signatures, tumor cellularity and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CelTIL, Nuciforo P et al., Ann Oncol, 2018) in tumor samples taken before and at the end of treatment, and. 3) analysis of ctDNA dynamics after treatment. As of July 2021, 7 patients have been enrolled in 4 sites in Spain. NCT04797728. Acknowledgement. This study is financially supported by Radius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Citation Format: María Vidal, Montserrat Muñoz, Mireia Margeli, Xavier González, Kepa Amillano, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Fernando Salvador, Tomás Pascual, Aleix Prat, Meritxell Bellet. Solti-1905. Elacestrant in preoperative setting, a window of opportunity study (ELIPSE trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-07.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains an incurable disease and is the cause of nearly all deaths related to BC. Next-generation sequencing technologies are allowing the application of personalized targeted molecular therapies, thereby improving outcomes in breast cancer patients. However, they are not routinely used in the clinic and their cost could be a cause of disparity. One strategy to overcome the barriers of implementing NGS in the clinic is to promote the active participation of patients with mBC in the management of their disease and offering free access to these tests. With this in mind, we designed HOPE (SOLTI-1903), a Spanish real-world study where patients lead their inclusion, participation, and follow-up through a digital tool (DT) that guides them in every step of the journey. The ultimate objective of HOPE is to gather real-world data on the utilization of molecular information in the management of mBC and to empower these patients. TRIAL DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with locally advanced or mBC can be included. Basic demographic data, disease characteristics, treatment history and quality of life data are collected by patients through a DT. The study is complemented by a patient empowerment program including informative workshops and precision medicine video-tutorials. Patients are encouraged to involve their physicians in HOPE. A total of 600 patients will be included in Spain. PATIENT JOURNEY: Once patients request participation through the DT, a dedicated team in SOLTI assists them in the subsequent steps while validating that eligibility criteria are met according to patient-provided data. Then, patients receive instructions from SOLTI’s team to attend the nearest partner local laboratory, where they sign the study informed consent form. A metastatic (preferably) or primary archival tumor sample is requested from the patient’s reference hospital and analyzed by FoundationOne®CDx. Patients that are in progression or not receiving active systemic chemo- or radiotherapy undergo a blood draw to receive a Guardant360 analysis. These two NGS tests are offered to all patients, and the blood test is performed even if no tissue is available. The results from the molecular analyses are regularly reviewed by a Molecular Advisory Board (MAB). The MAB, based on its joint experience in clinical oncology, genomics, bioethics, and pathology, may add some advice to these reports via DT, making comments about detected molecular alterations and adding further recommendations for specific treatment options or available CT with targeted therapies and/or additional genetic tests such as germline validation of potentially significant findings. From that moment, patients are requested to record their disease evolution in the DT every 3 months for 2 years. The primary objective is to assess the real-world clinical practice integrating molecular profiling in the Standard of Care management of patients with mBC connected through a DT. Secondary objectives include to i) describe the genetic mutational profile of mBC, ii) estimate the enrollment rate in CT of patients engaged in a patient-centered strategy for molecular tumor assessment, iii) assessing Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival and Quality of Life status among patients enrolled in CT according to the tumor’s genomic profile and iv) evaluate the logistic feasibility of the study. Recruitment started on October 2020. By June 2021, 362 patients had been enrolled. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This study is sponsored by SOLTI and financially supported by Novartis and three non-profit organizations: Asociación Cáncer de Mama Metastásico, Asociación Saray and Fundación Actitud frente al Cáncer. Roche and Guardant Health provide their tests for all patients. Citation Format: Ana Casas, Eva Ciruelos, Mafalda Oliveira, Cristina Saura, Meritxell Bellet, Sonia Pernas, Joaquín Gavilá, Montserrat Muñoz, Maria Vidal, Blanca González-Farré, Juan M. Cejalvo, Rafael López, Ana Vivancos, Marcos Malumbres, Javier Salvador Bofill, Isabel Blancas, Emilio Alba, Valentina Boni, Susana De la Cruz, Elena Galve, Antonia Perelló, Mireia Margelí, Meritxell Soler, Rubén Olivera-Salguero, Helena Masanas, Rosa Olmos, Marga Forns, Pilar Fernández Pascual, Elia Seguí, Tomas Pascual, Aleix Prat. Solti-1903 HOPE: Real-world clinical practice study to assess the impact of using genomic data on the next treatment decision making-choice in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Spain [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-06-01.

Background.Patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC) are usually treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) as first line treatment. The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy has demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and, more recently, overall survival (OS). However, there is a 20% of patients who do not benefit from these drugs and those who respond eventually progress to the treatment, for whom no standard treatment exists. The information provided by the intrinsic subtypes (PAM50) highlight the potential value of BC molecular classification as a prognosis and predictive marker. Within HR+/HER2- disease, patients with non-luminal subtypes (HER2-enriched and Basal-like) present poorer prognosis than those with luminal subtypes, may be more sensitive to chemotherapy, and have higher expression of immune-related genes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Recently, immunotherapy has been approved for treating metastatic triple negative (TN) BC and several trials evaluating the action of immune checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing both in TN and in HR+/HER2- BC. TATEN study aims to evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in metastatic HR+/HER2-negative, PAM50 non-luminal BC.Study design. TATEN is an open-label, single arm, multicenter phase II study evaluating pembrolizumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PAM50 non-luminal HR+/HER2- BC who had recurrence or progression after therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy. Tumor samples collected during advanced/metastatic disease are mandatory. No prior chemotherapy for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic BC is permitted. Eligible patients will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, beginning in Cycle 1) in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 administered at days 1, 8, 15 of each 21-day cycle beginning at cycle 2. The primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate ORR according to RECIST V1.1. The study will use a Simon’s 2-stage design and will include up to 46 evaluable patients. If 6 or more responses are observed in up to 15 patients in the first stage, the trial will continue to the second stage and 31 additional patients may be evaluated for a total of 46 evaluable patients. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 19 or more responses are observed. Tumor assessments will be performed every 9 weeks. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (CBR), PFS, duration of response (DoR), time to response (TtR), OS, as well as the correlation of clinical benefit (ORR, PFS) with PD1 mRNA expression and early dynamic changes in ctDNA after 1 cycle of pembrolizumab (collection of blood samples at Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1 and end of treatment are mandatory). Safety and tolerability of the combination will also be assessed. Exploratory objectives include to determine ORR, PFS, DoR and TtR based on iRECIST and to identify predictive biomarkers of response to pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel. As of July 2021, 10 patients have been enrolled in 7 sites in Spain. Clinical trial identification: NCT04251169. Acknowledgements:This study is financially supported by MSD Citation Format: Eva Ciruelos, Montserrat Muñoz, Mafalda Oliveira, Nuria Chic, Cristina Hernando, Juan Antonio Viruzuela, Silvia Vázquez, Salvador Blanch, Laia Paré, Fernando Salvador, Patricia Villagrasa, Tomás Pascual, Aleix Prat. Solti-1716. Targeting with pembrolizumab + paclitaxel non-luminal by PAM50 hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients who have progressed on or after CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment (TATEN trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-17-01.