Search

Background: Frailty represents a complex clinical syndrome of decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Little is known regarding interaction between frailty status and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Our study aims to assess the prevalence of frailty and its impact on in-hospital adverse outcomes of patients aged = 75 years admitted for acute coronary syndromes. Methods: In this retrospective, single centre, observational study were included patients aged = 75 years admitted for acute coronary syndromes between January 2011 and December 2015. Frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria. The primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of re-infarction, stroke and major bleeding. Results: Of the 502 patients included, 126 were classified as frail. These patients were older (mean age 78±5.5 vs. 76.2±5.5 years; p=0.020), more often male (68.3%) and had a higher risk profile according to GRACE (151.4±18.8 vs. 132.1±16.8; p<0.001), TIMI (4.3±1 vs. 3.1±1; p<0.001) and CRUSADE (34.6±9.4 vs. 25.8±9.5; p<0.001) scores at admission. All-cause in-hospital mortality was significantly more frequent in frail patients (11.9% vs. 5.6%; p<0.001), as well as re-infarction (7.4% vs. 4.8%; p<0.001), stroke (8.7% vs. 0.5%; p=0.002) and major bleeding (7.9% vs. 1.6%; p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, frailty remained independently associated with the primary endpoint (OR 5.63, [2.05-10.35]; p<0.001). Conclusion: Frailty, identified by Fried criteria, is frequent in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes, and it is an independent prognostic predictor for in-hospital mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been growing as an alternative technique, not only in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) but also in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Cryoballoon ablation has demonstrated encouraging acute and mid-term results. However, data on long-term follow-up of CB-based PVI are scarce., Objective: We sought to examine efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of CBA in PAF and persistent AF in four Portuguese centers., Methods: All patients that were treated with the cryoballoon catheter according to routine practices with a second-generation 28-mm CB in four centers were included. This was a retrospective, non-randomized analysis. Patients were followed-up for >12 months and freedom from atrial arrhythmias (AA) was evaluated at the end of follow-up., Results: Four hundred and six patients (57.7±12.4 years, 66% men) participated. AF was paroxysmal in 326 patients (80.2%) and persistent in 80 (19.7%). The mean procedure time duration was 107.7±50.9 min, and the fluoroscopy time was 19.5±9.7 min. Procedural/periprocedural complications occurred in 30 cases (7.3%), being transient phrenic nerve palsy the most frequent incident (2 out of 3 complications). Anatomic variations of the PV were present in 16.1% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 22.0±15.0 months, 310 patients (76.3%) remained in stable sinus rhythm, with at least one AF episode recurrence documented in 98 cases (24.1%). The recurrence rate was 20.5% in the PAF group and 37.8% in the persistent AF group., Conclusion: In this multicenter experience, a single CBA procedure resulted in 75.9% freedom from AF at a 22-month follow-up. This technique was demonstrated to be a safe and effective option in experienced centers for the treatment of PAF and PersAF., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients presenting with occluded culprit artery (OCA) may be at higher risk for worse outcomes. We sought to compare in-hospital (IH) mortality between patients presenting with NSTEMI with and without OCA, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Methods: This retrospective analysis studied 14,037 patients enrolled in the Portuguese National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Three groups were defined: (A) STEMI (n = 8616); (B) OCA-NSTEMI (n = 1309); and (C) non-OCA NSTEMI (n = 4112). Baseline characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the risk of IH all-cause mortality across the prespecified groups., Results: Twenty-four percent of NSTEMI patients presented with OCA. The left circumflex artery was more frequently the culprit artery in group B (12.4% A vs 34.5% B vs 26.0% C; P<.001) and this group was also less likely to receive percutaneous revascularization (95.2% A vs 69.7% B vs 83.2% C; P<.001). The incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction was higher in group A and lower in group C (19.9% A vs 12.2% B vs 8.1% C; P<.001). The adjusted risk of IH mortality was significantly higher in group A when compared with group B (3.9% A vs 1.8% B; odds ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-4.07; P<.01) and in group B when compared with group C (1.8% B vs 0.9% C; odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.35; P=.02)., Conclusion: OCA-NSTEMI patients had worse IH outcomes than non-OCA NSTEMI patients and better IH outcomes than STEMI patients, suggesting the existence of a continuum of increased risk of IH mortality across these groups.

Introduction and Objectives: Key sex differences have been explored in multiple cardiac conditions. However, sex impact in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy outcome is unclear. We aimed to characterize sex impact in overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in a nationwide hypertrophic cardiomyopathy registry., Methods: We analyzed 1042 adult patients, 429 (41%) women, from a national registry of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with mean age at diagnosis 53±16 years and a mean follow-up of 65±75 months. At baseline, women were older (56±16 vs 51±15 years; P <.001), more symptomatic (56.4%, vs 51.7%; P <.001) and had more heart failure (42.0% vs 24.2%. P <.001), diastolic dysfunction (75.2% vs 64.1% P=.001), moderate/severe mitral regurgitation (33.4% vs 21.7%; P=.003), and higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels (920 [366-2412] mg/dL vs 487 [170-1087] mg/dL; P <.001). Women underwent fewer stress tests and cardiac magnetic resonance., Results: Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed higher overall (8.4% vs 5.0%; P=.026) and CV mortality (5.5% vs 2.2%; P=.004) in women. Cox proportional hazard regression showed that female sex was an independent predictor of overall (HR, 2.05; 95%CI, 1.11-3.78; P=.021) and CV mortality (HR, 3.16; 95%CI, 1.25-7.99; P=.015). Women had more heart failure-related death (2.6% vs 0.8%, P=.024). Despite similar sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk, women received fewer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (10.9% vs 15.6%; P=.032) and, in patients without cardioverter-defibrillators, SCD occurred more commonly in women (1.8% vs 0.4%; P=.031)., Conclusions: In this nationwide registry, female sex was an independent predictor of overall and CV-related death, with more heart failure-related death. Despite similar SCD risk, women were undertreated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. These data highlight the need for an improved clinical approach in women with HCM., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a mainstay for myocardial infarction (MI) therapy. However, in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA), clear recommendations are lacking in the literature. This study aims to identify the cases in which DAPT is currently prescribed at discharge for MINOCA., Methods: The authors analyzed a cohort of patients from a multicenter national registry enrolling patients who suffered their first MI between 2010 and 2017, and underwent coronary angiography revealing absence of stenosis ≥50%. Individual antithrombotic therapy was identified. A logistic regression analysis was applied to search for predictors of DAPT., Results: From a total of 16 237 patients analyzed, 709 (4.4%) were categorized as MINOCA. Mean age was 64±13 years, 46.3% (n=409) were females. 390 (55.0%) of MINOCA patients were discharged on DAPT. Males (OR 1.67, CI 95 [1.05-2.38], p=0.027), active smokers (OR=1.82, CI 95 [1.05-3.16], p=0.033), previous percutaneous intervention (OR 3.18, CI 95 [1.48-6.81], p=0.003), ST elevation MI (OR 2.70, CI 95 [1.59-4.76], p<0.001) and sinus rhythm at admission (OR=3.94, CI 95 [2.07-7.48], p<0.001) were independent predictors of DAPT use., Conclusion: In this nationwide registry, DAPT was prescribed at discharge in 55% of MINOCA patients. Beyond sinus rhythm, the variables presented as independent predictors for DAPT use identify subgroups of patients who are classified as more prone to thrombotic events. The issue of how to handle antithrombotic agents in MINOCA patients is a topic open for discussion., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Limitations have been pointed out in the clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death (SCD) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), which is recommended for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. The aim of this study was to determine the SCD risk of the HCM patients enrolled in a Portuguese nationwide registry and to develop a new SCD risk prediction model applicable to our population., Methods and Results: The cohort consisted of 1022 patients (mean age 53.2±16.4 years, 59% male) enrolled in a Portuguese national HCM registry. During the follow-up period (median five years), 19 patients (1.9%) died suddenly or had aborted SCD or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock therapy. Through a Cox proportional hazards model, four variables were independently associated with SCD or equivalent: unexplained Syncope, Heart failure signs, Interventricular septum thickness ≥19 mm and FragmenTed QRS complex. These predictors were included in the SHIFT model and individual risk probabilities of SCD at five years were estimated. This model was internally validated using bootstrapping. The C-index of the SHIFT model was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83) and the C-index of the ESC model (performed in a subgroup of 349 HCM patients) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81) (p=0.246)., Conclusion: The SHIFT model may potentially provide prognostic value and contribute to the clinical decision-making process for ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with mid-range ejection fraction (40-49%) are in focus due to the newly defined entity of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. Acute coronary syndromes are a major aetiology for heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. We aim to evaluate which therapeutic decisions are associated with inhospital survival benefit in post-acute coronary syndrome patients categorised according to the ejection fraction., Methods and Results: The authors analysed a cohort of a multicentre national registry enrolling acute coronary syndrome patients between 2010 and 2016, classified according to their ejection fraction before hospital discharge. Patients with previously known heart failure or with no ejection fraction evaluation were excluded. A total of 9429 patients were included and categorised in three groups: (a) ejection fraction of 50% or greater ( n =6113, 65%); (b) ejection fraction of 40-49% ( n =1926, 20%); and (c) ejection fraction less than 40% ( n =1390, 15%). The primary endpoint was inhospital mortality. To eliminate confounding factors, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted, including acute coronary syndrome type, baseline characteristics, pharmacological treatment, clinical data, laboratory data and coronary anatomy when known. The overall inhospital mortality was 2.8% ( n =263): 0.9% ( n =53) in group 1, 2.4% ( n =37) in group 2 and 11.4% ( n =159) in group 3. After multivariate analysis, an invasive strategy had a positive impact in all groups, inhospital beta-blocker administration had a positive impact for groups 2 and 3, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and spironolactone had a positive impact on group 3., Conclusion: Post-acute coronary syndrome mid-range ejection fraction patients represent an intermediate risk group in which beta-blocker administration was associated with inhospital survival benefit. An invasive strategy was a survival predictor for all groups, regardless of ejection fraction category.

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous entity often overlooked in contemporary medicine. We aim to determine MINOCA differential characteristics, the main etiologies, and prognostic outcomes., Patients and Methods: We carried out a retrospective longitudinal analysis including 1047 patients with MI, from 1 January 2011 to 1 January 2016, subjected to coronary angiography and classified according to the presence [MI and obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD)] or absence (MINOCA) of any coronary stenosis of at least 50%. Studied data included clinical, demographic, laboratorial, and angiographic features. The median follow-up duration was 35 (interquartile range: 25) months. Mortality was the primary endpoint. To identify MINOCA underlying etiologies, only the final diagnosis obtained according to the European Society of Cardiology proposed algorithm was accepted. To determine MINOCA predictors, multivariate analysis with logistic regression was carried out., Results: The mean age of the patients was 66.3±13.4 years; 319 (30.5%) patients were women. The MINOCA group included 114 (10.8%) patients. The underlying final diagnosis in the MINOCA group was obtained in 78 (68.4%) patients. The total mortality rate was 8.8% (n=10) in the MINOCA group versus 17.7% (n=165) in the MICAD group, P=0.018. After multivariate analysis, age [odds ratio (OR)=1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.07, P<0.001], female sex (OR=3.91, 95% CI: 2.53-6.06, P<0.001), no previous tobacco use (OR=3.41, 95% CI: 1.68-3.90, P=0.001), atrial fibrillation (OR=3.62, 95% CI: 1.56-8.40, P=0.003), no previous AMI (OR=6.85, 95% CI: 1.65-28.5, P=0.008), and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis (OR=5.36, 95% CI: 2.62-10.96, P<0.001) remained independent predictors of MINOCA., Conclusion: MINOCA represents a challenging group of heterogeneous patients whose clinical characteristics contrast with classical cardiovascular risk factors. Despite lower mortality than MICAD, the commonly attributed low-risk classification for MINOCA may be erroneous.

Coronary artery disease rarely manifests itself in the first decades of life, which explains why this population is underrepresented in clinical studies. The mechanisms and natural history of the disease seem to differ between this population and older patients. Recent studies suggest a more rapid disease progression in youth, presenting more unstable atherosclerotic plaques, although this correlation has yet to be proven. In this paper, we present the case of a 41-year-old man who presented with a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, with percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit lesion (70-90% lesion at bifurcation of the circumflex artery with the first marginal obtuse artery and a sub-occlusive lesion of the ramus intermedius). There was also a non-significant lesion (estimated at 30%) located in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Ten days after discharge, the patient suffered another non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. The coronary angiography revealed a surprising sub-occlusive lesion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Regarding this case, the authors reviewed the literature on the pathophysiology of rapidly progressive coronary artery disease and the approach for non-significant lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome, especially in the younger population., (Copyright © 2017 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)