Search

Background: Patients' consent to being part of medical education is often taken for granted, both in primary and secondary care. Formal consent procedures are not used routinely during teaching and patients are not always aware of teaching activities., Objective: To investigate patients' attitudes and expectations on issues of consent regarding participation in teaching in general practice, and the influence of a student's presence on the consultation., Methods: The study took place in 46 teaching practices during the sixth year clinical internship in family medicine. Patients completed questionnaires at the end of 10 consecutive eligible consultations. The questionnaire contained data on the willingness to participate in teaching, the preferred consent procedure and the effects of the student's presence. The doctors were asked to estimate the sociodemographic level in their clinic area., Results: A total of 375 questionnaires were returned; the response rate was not affected by the clinic's sociodemographic level. Overall, 67% of the patients had come into contact with students in the past; 3.2% of the participants objected to the presence of a student during the consultation; 15% would insist on advance notification of the presence of a student, and another 13.9% would request it; 4% stated that the presence of students had a detrimental influence on the physical examination and history; and 33.6% would refuse to be examined by a student without the doctor's presence., Conclusion: Most patients agreed to have a student present during the consultation; some would like prior notification; a minority refused the student's presence. A large minority would refuse to be examined without the tutor's presence. Our findings need to be taken into account when planning clinical clerkships.

Background: The consultation is the pivot of clinical teaching in ambulatory care. It is therefore essential that students observe the consultation. The students' presence itself influences the consultation and also requires the patients' consent. Moreover the introduction in Israel of the "Patients' Rights Act" in 1996 has made us more acutely aware of the place of the patient in teaching especially with regard to the consent to be part of the teaching process., Aim: This study was undertaken in order to investigate how tutors in family medicine perceive changes in the consultation caused by the presence of students., Methods: An anonymous physician questionnaire was distributed on the first day of the 6th year clinical clerkship in family medicine. The questions pertained to perceived influence on length and content of the consultation. In addition physician and patient background information was gathered; and the physicians were asked to estimate the patients' willingness to be part of the teaching process., Results: 46 tutors in family medicine participated, 70% of whom were female. Sixty four percent of the doctors thought that the student's presence had an influence on the consultation. Ninety one percent thought that it increased consultation length, especially of the physical part (93%). More than half thought that the student's presence might interfere with asking intimate questions. The majority held the opinion that the patient's gender and socioeconomic background were inconsequential. Ninety two percent of physicians estimated that 5% or less of the patients would refuse the presence of a student., In Conclusion: Tutors in family medicine think that the presence of a student affects the consultation. Those involved in and responsible for teaching should take this into account. Further research of these changes with objective measurements is needed.

Background and Objectives: During February 1998, there was heightened tension in the Persian Gulf area. Iraq's ruler, Saddam Hussein, threatened Israeli citizens with the use of biological weapons. This study observed the use of health care services by patients visiting our clinics during this period., Methods: During the period of February 17, 1998, through March 1, 1998, 12 family physicians classified all clinic visits as "related" or "unrelated" to the crisis. The participating clinics were situated in (A) high-risk and (B) low-risk areas, according to their location as related to missile hits during the 1991 Gulf War., Results: A total of 1,841 visits were recorded during the crisis period (February 17-23). There were 934 visits in Area A and 907 in Area B. Overall, 194 visits related to the crisis were recorded, of which 155 were in Area A. The rate of crisis-related visits was higher in Area A (16.6% versus 3.4%). There were more visits for authorizations for special masks (8.2% versus .8%), requests for information (3.9% versus 1.3%), and tranquilizers (2.1% versus .5%). In the period subsequent to the agreement reached on February 24, crisis-related visits declined sharply in both areas., Conclusions: During the crisis, there was an increase in visits related to the threat of biological warfare. The phenomenon was more pronounced in areas that had sustained missile hits during the 1991 Gulf War.

Rural areas of Israel are organized into small villages that attract physicians by offering inexpensive accommodation and the promise of a high quality of life. However, conflicts often arise in the relationship between the village residents and the doctor, leading to dissatisfaction and physician turnover. In order to examine the issues, we conducted a qualitative study of rural physicians using a group interviewing technique, called focus groups. The sample consisted of 46 physicians, aged between 35 and 45, of whom 60% were male. In the focus groups, the physicians mainly discussed issues of unclear boundaries between private life and physician roles, exaggerated expectations on the part of community members, difficulties with teamwork, the impact of the physician's family, work satisfaction, and burnout. Recommendations for physicians considering rural practice include making a careful and studied choice of a village before making a final decision, setting both clear professional limits and an overall time limit for service, allowing for mistakes, and organizing Balint-type physician support groups.