Search

BackgroundCurrent data on the association between tumor size, subtype, and metastases, and thresholds for intervention, for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), are largely based on single-center nephrectomy registries that may under-represent those presenting with metastatic disease.ObjectiveWe sought to assess tumor size and histologic subtype in relation to metastatic status at presentation for patients with RCC.Design setting and participantsUsing Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry data, we identified patients with a diagnosis of RCC made between 2004 and 2019, and a known size of primary tumor. We used nodal and metastatic TNM staging to assess metastatic disease at presentation.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisWe report the proportion of metastatic disease across varying tumor sizes for clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), and chromophobe (chRCC) RCC. We also examine sarcomatoid RCC and RCC with sarcomatoid features (sarcRCC). Logistic regression models were used to model the likelihood of metastatic disease for each histologic subtype.Results and limitationsOf 181 096 RCC patients included, 23 829 had metastatic disease. For any RCC, metastatic rates of 3.6%, 13.1%, 30.3%, and 45.1% were observed for tumors ≤4, 4-≤7, 7-≤10, and >10 cm, respectively. Metastatic rates of chRCC were low at even large sizes, 11.0% at >10 cm. In contrast, sarcRCC had high metastatic rates at all sizes, 27.1% at ≤4 cm. Metastatic rates for ccRCC and pRCC increased steadily above 3 cm. For any RCC and each evaluated subtype, tumor size was found to be associated with metastatic disease on logistic regression (p

Objective Patient and Methods Results Conclusion To assess the distribution of key mutations across tumour sizes in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and secondarily to examine the prognostic impact of aggressive mutations in smaller ccRCCs.The distribution of mutations (VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1 and CDKN2A loss) across tumour sizes was assessed in 1039 ccRCCs treated with nephrectomy in cohorts obtained from the Tracking Cancer Evolution (TRACERx), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Cancer Genomics of the Kidney (CAGEKID) projects. Logistic regression was used to model the presence of each mutation against size. In our secondary analysis, we assessed a subset of ccRCCs ≤7 cm for associations of key aggressive mutations (SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss) with metastasis, invasive disease and overall survival, while controlling for size. A subset of localised tumours ≤7 cm was also used to assess associations with recurrence after nephrectomy.On logistic regression, each 1‐cm increase in tumour size was associated with aggressive mutations, SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss, at odds ratios (ORs) of 1.09, 1.10 and 1.19 (P < 0.001), whereas no significant association was observed between tumour size and PBRM1 (OR 1.02; P = 0.23). VHL was mildly negatively associated with a 1‐cm increase in size (OR 0.95; P = 0.01). Among tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 and CDKN2A loss were associated with metastatic disease at ORs of 3.86 and 3.84 (P < 0.05) while controlling for tumour size. CDKN2A loss was associated with worse overall survival, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.19 (P = 0.03). Among localised tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 was associated with worse recurrence‐free survival (HR 2.00; P = 0.03).Large and small ccRCCs are genomically different. Aggressive mutations, namely, SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss, are rarely observed in small ccRCCs and are observed more frequently in larger tumours. However, when present in tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 mutations and CDKN2A loss were still independently associated with invasive disease, metastasis, worse survival, and recurrence after resection, after controlling for size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]