Search

The aim was to assess the influence of treatment, tumor stages and sites on the severity of dysphagia following treatment. Sequential modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in patients who complained of chronic dysphagia following treatment of their head and neck cancer. Patients were selected if they were cancer free at their last MBS and had 2 or more MBS studies. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1 to 7. Dysphagia grade was compared between the first and last MBS to assess its evolution. Between 1996 and 2005, 63 patients with chronic dysphagia underwent MBS to assess dysphagia severity for nutritional support. Twenty-one patients (33%) had improvement of their dysphagia. Two of these patients (3%) achieved normalization of the swallowing. Twenty-five patients (40%) had no change of the dysphagia severity. Dysphagia grade increased in 17 patients (27%). Analysis of patient characteristics did not show any significant difference between these three groups of patients. MBS is a useful tool to monitor dysphagia severity and to identify aspiration risk. Stages of disease and treatment modality do not seem to impact on the course of dysphagia.

Our aim was to identify risk factors for aspiration following concurrent chemoradiation for oropharyngeal cancer. 46 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma underwent concurrent chemoradiation at our institution. All patients underwent modified barium swallow to assess dysphagia severity and to determine the need for continued tube feedings after treatment. Dysphagia severity was graded as 1-7. There were 5 Grade 2, 11 Grade 3, 5 Grade 4, 5 Grade 5, 10 Grade 6 and 10 Grade 7 scores. 25 patients (54%) developed aspiration (5 trace, 20 severe). The aspiration rate for T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumours was 31% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in the aspiration rate between the base of the tongue and tonsillar carcinoma (p = 0.23). Despite anatomical organ preservation, most patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma had moderate to severe dysphagia after chemoradiation. Patients with large tumours had a significant risk of developing aspiration following treatment.

The aim of the study was to assess the aspiration risk following postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer. Thirty-seven patients had Modified Barium Swallow before and following treatment. Dysphagia severity was graded from 1 to 7. Before treatment there were sixteen grade 1, seventeen grade 2, three grade 3 and one grade 5. Following postoperative radiation, two patients had grade 1, eleven patients had grade 2, thirteen patients had grade 3, four patients had grade 4, four patients had grade 5, one patients had grade 6, and two patients had grade 7. Nineteen percent (7/37) of the patients developed aspiration (grade 5-7). Aspiration is life-threatening and may develop for all tumor sites and stages.

Our aim was to assess the influence of age, co-morbidity factors and tumour characteristics on dysphagia severity in the diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in patients at diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1 to 7 of increasing severity. Between 2000 and 2006, 236 patients with dysphagia underwent MBS at diagnosis of their head and neck cancer. 82 patients were scored as Grade 1, 88 as Grade 2, 29 as Grade 3, 15 as Grade 4, 9 as Grade 5, 5 as Grade 6, and 8 as Grade 7. Grade 3-7 dysphagia occurred in 20% and 31% of patients with T1-T2 and T3-T4 tumours, respectively (p = 0.004). Corresponding values for N0-N1 and N2-N3 tumours were 20% and 39%, respectively (p = 0.002). The percentage of patients with Grade 3-7 dysphagia was 5%, 29%, 33% and 52% for oral cavity, laryngeal, oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal tumours, respectively, (p = 0.002). Age and co-morbidity factors (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular diseases and arthritis) did not appear to have an impact on swallowing in this limited retrospective study. Patients with locally advanced stages (T3-T4, N2-N3) are at risk of severe dysphagia. Patients with oral cavity tumours appear to be less at risk of dysphagia than those with tumours in different anatomic locations. The role of age and co-morbidity factors should be investigated in future prospective studies.

Objective: To evaluate the risk and outcome of pharyngoesophageal stenosis in patients who complained of dysphagia following radiation for head and neck cancer., Design: Retrospective study., Setting: Veterans Administration hospital., Patients: Patients who complained of persistent dysphagia following radiation alone or combined with surgery or chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. Patients were selected if they were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. All patients had modified barium swallow (MBS) and an endoscopic examination for initial evaluation of their dysphagia. Traditional barium swallow was requested when there was a suspicion of pharyngoesophageal stenosis on MBS., Results: Two hundred twenty-two patients underwent MBS for evaluation of dysphagia posttreatment. Traditional barium swallow confirmed the diagnosis of pharyngeal (n = 2) or esophageal (n = 14) stenosis in 16 patients. Eight patients had esophageal stenosis on endoscopic examination. All patients underwent dilatation for relief of their dysphagia. The number of dilatations performed was, respectively, one in 12 patients, two in 4 patients, three in 3 patients, four in 3 patients, five in one patient, and six in one patient., Conclusion: Pharyngeal and/or cervical esophageal stenosis may be the cause of dysphagia following radiation for head and neck cancer. Esophageal dilatations often offer temporary relief of the dysphagia.

Objective: We assessed the rate of aspiration following radiation for non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer., Design: Retrospective study., Setting: Veterans Administration Hospital., Patients: Thirty-three patients who underwent radiation for head and neck cancer. Modified barium swallow was performed prior to and following treatment to assess the persistence of dysphagia and aspiration risk. All patients were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. Dysphagia severity was graded from 1 to 7., Results: Preradiation baseline dysphagia was observed as follows: 10 grade 1, 14 grade 2, 9 grade 3, and 1 grade 4. Following radiation, at a median follow-up of 3 months, nine patients had grade 1, eight patients had grade 2, six patients had grade 3, two patients had grade 4, three patients had grade 5, two patients had grade 6, and three patients had grade 7. Overall, 24% (8 of 33) of the patients developed aspiration (grades 5-7). Fifteen percent (5 of 33) of the patients had severe aspiration (grades 6-7) requiring tube feedings. All patients who developed severe aspiration continued to require tube feedings more than 1 year following treatment completion., Conclusion: Aspiration is a significant source of morbidity following radiation for non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer. Aspiration may develop for all tumour stages or sites. Diagnostic studies such as modified barium swallow should be included in future prospective head and neck cancer studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration because of its often silent nature.

Background: Dysphagia and aspiration are long-term complications with life-threatening consequences following treatment of head and neck cancer. We would like to assess the prevalence of aspiration in patients with long-term persistence of dysphagia (1 year or more) following treatment for head and neck cancer and to identify potential risk factors of aspiration., Methods: Modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in cancer-free patients who complained of dysphagia following treatment for head and neck cancer. The severity of the dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1-7., Results: Between 1992 and 2004, 74 patients with dysphagia underwent MBS 12-152 months following treatment (median 29 months). There were 2 grade 1, 22 grade 3, 21 grade 4, 11 grade 5, 7 grade 6, and 11 grade 7 cases. Twenty-nine patients (39%) had long-term aspiration at a median follow-up of 25 months (range 12-82). Eighteen patients (24%) required permanent gastrostomy because of severe aspiration. Type of treatment and disease stage did not seem to influence long-term aspiration risk., Conclusion: Patients with long-term dysphagia after treatment for head and neck cancer are at risk of aspiration. MBS should be performed to identify these patients., (Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Unlabelled: The aim of the present study was to assess dysphagia severity following postoperative radiation for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer., Patients and Methods: Eighteen patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma had undergone postoperative radiation. There were eight base of tongue, eight tonsils, and two soft palate carcinomas. All the patients had undergone modified barium swallow (MBS) to assess the persistence of dysphagia (more than one month) post-treatment. All the patients were cancer-free at the time of the swallowing study. Dysphagia severity was graded as 1-7., Results: At a median follow-up of 12 months, there were three grade 2, four grade 3, two grade 4, five grade 5, two grade 6, and two grade 7. Only three patients (17%) had normal swallow post-treatment. Six patients (33%) had mild to moderate dysphagia (grade 3-4). Nine patients (50%) developed aspiration (grade 5-7). Among the patients who developed aspiration, four (22%) required tube feeding for severe aspiration., Conclusion: Long-term (more than one year) dysphagia following postoperative radiation for oropharyngeal cancer may be symptomatic of permanent damage to the swallowing mechanism. Evaluation of patients who complain of persistence of dysphagia a year or more following treatment should include MBS, because of the increased risk of aspiration.

The effectiveness of the cough reflex in patients who aspirated following radiation for head and neck cancer was evaluated in 89 patients (49 chemoradiation, 33 postoperative radiation, and 7 radiation alone). All patients had modified barium swallow because of dysphagia. The cough reflex was graded as present and effective, ineffective, intermittently effective, or absent. All patients were cancer-free at the time of the swallowing study. The cough reflex was present and effective in 46 patients (52%), ineffective in 17 patients (19%), and absent in 26 patients (29%) on initial investigation. Among the 43 patients who had ineffective or absent cough reflex, their treatment was chemoradiation (26), postoperative radiation (13), and radiation alone (4). In 30 patients who had sequential modified barium swallow, the cough reflex was constantly effective, ineffective, or intermittently effective in 12 (40%), 13 (43%), and 5 (17%) patients, respectively. The cough reflex was frequently ineffective or absent in patients who aspirated following radiation for head and neck cancer. Cough may also be intermittently ineffective to protect the airways following radiation.

This study examines the efficacy of swallowing therapy in cancer-free patients who developed aspiration following treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer. The records of 41 patients who underwent swallowing therapy for aspiration were reviewed. All patients were cancer free at a median follow-up of 25 months (6-150 months). Their treatment were respectively chemoradiation (24), and postoperative radiation (17). All patients had two or more modified barium swallow (MBS). Dysphagia severity was graded from 1 to 7. Dysphagia grade was compared before and following swallowing therapy. Before swallowing therapy, there were 16 grade 5 (trace aspiration), and 25 grade 6-7 (severe aspiration). In the chemoradiation group, there were nine grade 5, five grade 6, and 10 grade 7. Corresponding numbers for the postoperative group were: seven grade 5, seven grade 6, and three grade 7. Following swallowing therapy, there were six grade 3, seven grade 4, 10 grade 5, six grade 6, and 12 grade 7. In the chemoradiation group, there were four grade 3, three grade 4, four grade 5, five grade 6, and eight grade 7. In the postoperative group, there were two grade 3, four grade 4, six grade 5, one grade 6, and four grade 7. Overall, 13 patients (32%) had improvement of their dysphagia severity. Seven of them were in the chemoradiation group (29%), and six (35%) were in the postoperative group. Among 25 patients who presented with grade 6-7 aspiration, only nine (36%) improved to grade 5 or less. Four of them (27%) were in the chemoradiation group, and five (29%) were in the postoperative group. Swallowing therapy is effective to improve dysphagia severity and reduce the need for tube feedings. However, a significant number of patients still suffered from chronic severe aspiration. New strategies must be devised to improve their outcome.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the aspiration rate following nonsurgical therapy, i.e. chemoradiation or radiation alone for laryngeal cancer. Modified barium swallow was performed in 43 patients who complained of dysphagia following chemoradiation (n = 22) or radiation alone (n = 21) for laryngeal cancer. Patients were selected if they were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1-7. Patients were grouped according to the dysphagia severity: no aspiration (grade 1-4), and severe (grade 5-7). Mean and median dysphagia grades were 4.4/5 and 3.5/3 for chemoradiation and radiation, respectively. Aspiration occurred in 12 patients (54%) of the chemoradiation group and 7 (33%) of the radiation alone group (p = 0.13). There was a higher proportion of patients with large tumor (T3-T4) in the chemoradiation group (64%) compared to the radiation group (5%) (p = 0.0001). Aspiration is a significant source of morbidity in patients treated for laryngeal cancer with chemoradiation or radiation alone. Aspiration occurred in both groups. Although the observed difference in aspiration rates did not achieve statistical significance, the higher aspiration rate in the chemoradiation group may be due to a higher proportion of large tumors, to the additional toxic effect of chemotherapy, or to the small number of patients in both groups. Diagnostic studies such as modified barium swallow should be part of future laryngeal cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration as it may be silent.

Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate dysphagia severity following chemoradiation and postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer, and particularly the aspiration risk because of its potential life-threatening consequence., Materials and Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the modified barium swallow (MBS) results in 110 patients who complained of dysphagia following chemoradiation (57) and postoperative radiation (53) of their head and neck cancer. Patients were selected if they were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1-7. Patients were grouped according to the dysphagia severity: mild (grades 2-3), moderate (grades 4-5), and severe (grades 6-7)., Results: Mean and median dysphagia grades were 4.84/5 and 4.12/4 for chemoradiation and postoperative radiation respectively. The mean difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p=0.02). Mild dysphagia occurred in 13 patients (22%) of the chemoradiation group and 17 (32%) of the postoperative group. Corresponding number for the moderate group was 25 (43%) and 25 (48%), respectively. Severe dysphagia was significant in the chemoradiation group (34%) compared to the postoperative group (19%). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.29). There was a higher proportion of patients with large tumor (T3-T4) in the chemoradiation group who developed severe dysphagia., Conclusion: Dysphagia remained a significant morbidity of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer. Dysphagia may be more severe in the chemoradiation group because of the higher proportion of patients with large tumor, the high radiation dose, and a high number of oropharyngeal tumors. Aspiration occurred in both groups. Diagnostic studies such as MBS should be part of future head and neck cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration, as it may be silent.

Background and Purpose: We would like to assess the prevalence of aspiration before and following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer., Patients and Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) in 63 patients who underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer. MBS was performed prior to treatment to determine the need for immediate gastrostomy tube placement. MBS was repeated following treatment to assess the safety of oral feeding prior to removal of tube feeding. All patients were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. No patient had surgery. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1-7. Tube feedings were continued if patients were diagnosed to have severe aspiration (grade 6-7) or continued weight loss. Patients with abnormal swallow (grade 3-7) received swallowing therapy following MBS., Results: Before treatment, there were 18 grade 1, 18 grade 2, 9 grade 3, 8 grade 4, 3 grade 5, 3 grade 6, and 4 grade 7. Following chemoradiation, at a median follow-up of 2 months (1-10 months), one patient had grade 1, eight patients had grade 2, nine patients had grade 3, eight patients had grade 4, 13 patients had grade 5, seven patients had grade 6, and 11 patients had grade 7. Six patients died from aspiration pneumonia (one before, three during, and two post-treatment), and did not have the second MBS. Overall, 37/63 (59%) patients developed aspiration, six of them (9%) fatal. If we excluded the 10 patients who had severe aspiration at diagnosis and the six patients who died from pneumonia, the prevalence of severe aspiration was 33% (21/63)., Conclusions: Aspiration remained a significant morbidity following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Its prevalence is underreported in the literature because of its often silent nature. Diagnostic studies such as MBS should be part of future head and neck cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration, and for rehabilitation.

We would like to assess the evolution of chronic dysphagia (1 year or more) following treatment for head and neck cancer. Modified barium swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in cancer-free patients who complained of dysphagia following treatment for head and neck cancer. The severity of the dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1-7. Each patient had at least 2 MBS. Severity of dysphagia was compared between the first and last MBS study to determine whether the swallowing dysfunction had returned to normal. Patients with complaint of dysphagia and normal MBS also underwent a regular barium swallow to assess the structural integrity of the pharynx and esophagus. Between 1996 and 2001, 25 patients with dysphagia underwent repeat MBS following treatment. Swallowing dysfunction did not return to normal in the majority of the patients. At a median time of 26 months following treatment (range 15-82 months), only two patient (8%) had normalization of the swallowing. The severity of dysphagia decreased in eight patients (32%), remained unchanged in 12 patients (48%), and worsened in five patients (20%). Eight patients (32%) still had aspiration problems at 12-83 months following treatment. Six patients (24%) required dilation because of pharyngeal stenosis. Three patients who required dilation had improvement of the dysphagia severity. Chronic dysphagia is a relentless process possibly due to excessive scarring. Patients with chronic dysphagia are at risk of malnutrition, and aspiration. Management of chronic dysphagia requires a team approach with nutritional support, psychological counseling, dilation, and tube feedings when indicated.

Unlabelled: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate chronic dysphagia (lasting 3 or more months) following treatment for head and neck cancer. Since dysphagia is a common sequela post therapy in cancer survivors, it may be helpful for the clinician to be aware of the persistence of dysphagia as well as its usual severity. Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) examinations were performed in cancer-free patients who complained of dysphagia following treatment for head and neck cancer. The severity of the dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1 to 7. Each patient had sequential MBS and underwent swallowing therapy in between. The severity of dysphagia was compared between the first and last MBS study to determine whether the swallowing function had returned to normal., Results: Between 1996 and 2004, 12 patients with dysphagia underwent repeated MBS following treatment. Swallowing function did not return to normal in all patients. At a median time of 29 months following treatment (range 8 to 94 months), the severity of dysphagia decreased in 8 patients (67%), remained unchanged in 3 patients (25%) and worsened in 1 patient (8%). Chronic dysphagia following treatment is unlikely to resolve with time despite rehabilitation therapy. Excessive scarring following treatment may be responsible for the persistence and severity of dysphagia. Physicians should be aware of the long-term effects of dysphagia on patient nutrition and psychological well-being.

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) associated with dysphagia after head-and-neck cancer treatment., Methods and Materials: Of a total population of 104, a retrospective analysis of 73 patients who complained of dysphagia after primary radiotherapy (RT), chemoradiotherapy, and postoperative RT for head-and-neck malignancies were evaluated. All patients underwent a modified barium swallow examination to assess the severity of dysphagia, graded on a scale of 1-7. QOL was evaluated by the University of Washington (UW) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaires. The QOL scores obtained were compared with those from the 31 patients who were free of dysphagia after treatment. The QOL scores were also graded according to the dysphagia severity., Results: The UW and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scores were reduced and elevated, respectively, in the dysphagia group compared with the no dysphagia group (p = 0.0005). The UW scores were also substantially lower among patients with moderate-to-severe (Grade 4-7) compared with no or mild (Grade 2-3) dysphagia (p = 0.0005). The corresponding Hospital Anxiety (p = 0.005) and Depression (p = 0.0001) scores were also greater for the moderate-to-severe group. The UW QOL subscale scores showed a statistically significant decrease for swallowing (p = 0.00005), speech (p = 0.0005), recreation/entertainment (p = 0.0005), disfigurement (p = 0.0006), activity (p = 0.005), eating (p = 0.002), shoulder disability (p = 0.006), and pain (p = 0.004)., Conclusion: Dysphagia is a significant morbidity of head-and-neck cancer treatment, and the severity of dysphagia correlated with a compromised QOL, anxiety, and depression. Patients with moderate-to-severe dysphagia require a team approach involving nutritional support, physical therapy, speech rehabilitation, pain management, and psychological counseling.

Background: To assess the prevalence, severity and morbidity of dysphagia following concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck malignancies were evaluated for their ability to resume oral feeding following treatment. Modified barium swallow (MBS) studies were performed if the patients complained of dysphagia or if there was clinical suspicion of aspiration. The severity of dysphagia was graded on a scale of 1-7. If significant abnormalities were found, swallowing studies were repeated until resolution of dysphagia., Results: Between March 1999 and May 2002, 55 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. Aspiration pneumonia was observed in eight patients, three during treatment and five following treatment. Five patients died from pneumonia. Two patients developed respiratory failure requiring intubation as a complication of pneumonia. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 6-48 months), 25 patients (45%) developed severe dysphagia requiring prolonged tube feedings for more than 3 months (22 patients) or repeated dilatations (three patients). Among 33 patients who underwent MBS following treatment, 12 patients (36%) had silent aspiration (grade 6-7 dysphagia). Thirteen patients (39%) developed grade 4-5 dysphagia which required prolonged enteral nutritional support to supplement their oral intake. Most patients had severe weight loss (0-21 kg) during treatment, likely due in part to mucositis in the orodigestive tube., Conclusions: Dysphagia is a common, debilitating and potentially life-threatening sequela of concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck malignancy. Physicians should be aware that the clinical manifestations of aspiration may be unreliable and insidious, because of the depressed cough reflex. Modified and traditional barium swallows should be performed following treatment to assess the safety of oral feeding and the structural integrity of the pharynx and esophagus. Patients with severe dysphagia may benefit from rehabilitation. Tube feeding should be continued for those with aspiration.