Search

We aimed to explore the differences in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy utilization for advanced melanoma by examining patient and neighborhood characteristics. We performed a retrospective cohort study using a deidentified, random sample of SEER-Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with stage III or stage IV melanoma (2011-2017). Our primary outcome was initiation of ICI immunotherapy (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab) after stage III or stage IV melanoma diagnosis. We analyzed ICI usage with multivariable logistic regression. After analyzing the entire 2011-2017 cohort, we conducted a secondary analysis in which we separately analyzed the 2011-2014 and 2015-2017 cohorts to assess possible differences over time. We included 3531 beneficiaries, with mean follow-up of 2.1 (SD = 2.0) years. Higher likelihood of ICI usage was associated with male sex (OR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-1.42) and higher density of medical oncologists (OR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.04). Lower likelihood of ICI usage was associated with older age group and Charlson comorbidity score (score ≥2; OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.86). These associations were diminished in more recent years (no association with sex, medical oncologist density, Charlson comorbidity score, and association with only the oldest age group in years 2015-2017). We found significant sex- and age-related differences in initiation among SEER-Medicare beneficiaries with stage III or stage IV melanoma, which appear to be improving over time.

Some antihypertensive medications are photosensitizing. The implications for skin cancer risk remain unclear because results from prior studies are inconsistent and as new evidence is published. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between antihypertensives and common skin cancers (cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma) and to evaluate dose-response relationships. Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria, and 42 could be meta analyzed. Increased risks were seen for basal cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (relative risk [RR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.22), diuretics (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10), and thiazides (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.16); for squamous cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01-1.14), diuretics (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17-1.43), and thiazides (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15-1.61); and for melanoma in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.14), calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03-1.12), and thiazides (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02-1.17). The quality of evidence was low or very low. We observed evidence for dose-response for thiazides with basal cell carcinoma; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with squamous cell carcinoma; and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with melanoma. Our meta-analysis supports a potential causal association between some antihypertensives, particularly diuretics, and skin cancer risk.

This article discusses a study published in the British Journal of Dermatology that examines the risk of melanoma in patients with a history of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), with a specific focus on skin of color patients. The study analyzed Medicare claims data from 2009 to 2018 and found that skin of color patients with KC had a higher risk of melanoma compared to patients with seborrhoeic keratosis (SK). The research emphasizes the importance of including skin of color patients in skin cancer studies and calls for further research in this population. Another aspect of the study examined the association between actinic keratosis (AK) and melanoma in Medicare patients aged 65 and older. The study found that a history of AK was associated with an 85% increased risk of melanoma in skin of color patients. However, the absolute risks of melanoma in this group were still low, at less than 1% at 5 years. The study acknowledges limitations, such as the use of claims data and the exclusion of certain patient categories. Overall, the study highlights the increased risk of melanoma in skin of color patients with a history of AK. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Hiatal hernia repair is associated with substantial recurrence of both hiatal hernia and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). While small randomized controlled trials demonstrate limited differences in outcomes with use of mesh or fundoplication type, uncertainty remains. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical treatment of hiatal hernias between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Patients with mesh and with suture-only repair were compared, and partial versus complete fundoplication was compared. Primary outcomes were hernia recurrence and occurrence of postoperative GER symptoms and dysphagia. Multivariable regression was performed to assess the effect of each intervention on clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 453 patients from four sites were followed for a median (IQR) of 17 (13) months. On multivariate analysis, mesh had no impact on hernia recurrence (odds ratio 0.993, 95% CI: 0.53–1.87, p = 0.982), and fundoplication type did not impact recurrence of postoperative GER symptoms (complete: odds ratio 0.607, 95% CI: 0.33–1.12, p = 0.112) or dysphagia (complete: odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI: 0.56–2.43, p = 0.677). Conclusion: During hiatal hernia repair, mesh and fundoplication type do not appear to have substantial impact on GER symptoms, dysphagia, or hernia recurrence. This multicenter study provides real-world evidence to support the findings of small RCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: In the Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial, which found antibiotics to be noninferior, approximately half of participants randomized to receive antibiotics had outpatient management with hospital discharge within 24 hours. If outpatient management is safe, it could increase convenience and decrease health care use and costs., Objective: To assess the use and safety of outpatient management of acute appendicitis., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study, which is a secondary analysis of the CODA trial, included 776 adults with imaging-confirmed appendicitis who received antibiotics at 25 US hospitals from May 1, 2016, to February 28, 2020., Exposures: Participants randomized to antibiotics (intravenous then oral) could be discharged from the emergency department based on clinician judgment and prespecified criteria (hemodynamically stable, afebrile, oral intake tolerated, pain controlled, and follow-up confirmed). Outpatient management and hospitalization were defined as discharge within or after 24 hours, respectively., Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes compared among patients receiving outpatient vs inpatient care included serious adverse events (SAEs), appendectomies, health care encounters, satisfaction, missed workdays at 7 days, and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) score at 30 days. In addition, appendectomy incidence among outpatients and inpatients, unadjusted and adjusted for illness severity, was compared., Results: Among 776 antibiotic-randomized participants, 42 (5.4%) underwent appendectomy within 24 hours and 8 (1.0%) did not receive their first antibiotic dose within 24 hours, leaving 726 (93.6%) comprising the study population (median age, 36 years; range, 18-86 years; 462 [63.6%] male; 437 [60.2%] White). Of these participants, 335 (46.1%; site range, 0-89.2%) were discharged within 24 hours, and 391 (53.9%) were discharged after 24 hours. Over 7 days, SAEs occurred in 0.9 (95% CI, 0.2-2.6) per 100 outpatients and 1.3 (95% CI, 0.4-2.9) per 100 inpatients; in the appendicolith subgroup, SAEs occurred in 2.3 (95% CI, 0.3-8.2) per 100 outpatients vs 2.8 (95% CI, 0.6-7.9) per 100 inpatients. During this period, appendectomy occurred in 9.9% (95% CI, 6.9%-13.7%) of outpatients and 14.1% (95% CI, 10.8%-18.0%) of inpatients; adjusted analysis demonstrated a similar difference in incidence (-4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.7 to 0.6). At 30 days, appendectomies occurred in 12.6% (95% CI, 9.1%-16.7%) of outpatients and 19.0% (95% CI, 15.1%-23.4%) of inpatients. Outpatients missed fewer workdays (2.6 days; 95% CI, 2.3-2.9 days) than did inpatients (3.8 days; 95% CI, 3.4-4.3 days) and had similar frequency of return health care visits and high satisfaction and EQ-5D scores., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings support that outpatient antibiotic management is safe for selected adults with acute appendicitis, with no greater risk of complications or appendectomy than hospital care, and should be included in shared decision-making discussions of patient preferences for outcomes associated with nonoperative and operative care., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.