1. How Well Can Anaesthetists Discriminate Pulse Oximeter Tones?
- Author
-
R. W. Morris and Mohacsi Pj
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Auditory signal ,Middle Aged ,Audiology ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Feedback ,Oxygen ,Pitch Discrimination ,Pulse oximetry ,Sound ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Anesthesiology ,Anesthesia ,medicine ,Humans ,Oximetry ,Patient simulation ,Saturation (chemistry) ,business - Abstract
The ability of experienced anaesthetists to discern oxygen saturation by listening to the tones of a Datex AS3 pulse oximeter was examined. Five-second samples were recorded using a high fidelity patient simulator and replayed singly and in pairs. Whilst the lower saturations were generally recognized as lower, the perceived range was greatly compressed. Median perceived estimates for 70% saturation was 89%, for 80% was 93% and for 94% was 94%. When comparing pairs of samples, the direction of the difference was correctly discerned by 70% of anaesthetists for differences of 2%, rising to 95% for differences of greater than 8% oxygen saturation. The magnitude of the difference was consistently underestimated. With an actual difference of 20%, the median estimate was 5%. The results indicate that while qualitative estimate changes in oxygen saturation are moderately reliable, quantitative estimation is severely limited by a compromised perceived scale. This may lead to underestimation of the severity if the auditory signal is relied on in isolation. A non-linear (musical) scale may prove more appropriate and should be investigated. Testing experienced anaesthetists demonstrated that most could detect the direction, but not the magnitude of a change in saturation by listening to the change in pitch of a Datex AS3 pulse oximeter tone.
- Published
- 2005