Search

Objectives: Early chest tube removal following cardiac surgery may be associated with an increased risk of pleural or pericardial effusions following cardiac surgery. This study compares the effects of two fast-track chest tube removal protocols regarding the risk of pleural or pericardial effusions, requirement of opioids, respiratory function, and postoperative complications. Design: Prospective non-blinded cluster-randomized study with alternating chest tube removal protocol in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Monthly changing allocation to scheduled chest tube removal on the day of surgery (Day 0) versus removal on the 1st postoperative day (Day 1) provided no air leakage and output < 200 mL within the last four hours. Results: A total of 527 patients were included in the study from September 1st 2020 until October 29th 2021 and randomly allocated to chest tube removal at day 0 (n = 255), and day 1 (n = 272). More than every fourth patient required drainage for pleural effusion with no significant difference between the groups. Earlier removal of chest tubes did not reduce requirement of analgesics, improve early respiratory function, or reduce postoperative complications. The study was halted for futility after halfway interim analysis showed insufficient promise of any treatment benefit. Conclusion: Fast-track protocols with chest tube removal within the first 24 h after cardiac surgery may be associated a high rate of pleural effusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery is a frequent complication associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation is suggested to preserve postoperative renal function. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of minimal invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation on early postoperative kidney function. Methods: Randomized controlled trail including 60 patients undergoing elective stand-alone coronary artery bypass graft surgery and allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either minimal invasive (n = 30) or conventional extracorporeal circulation (n = 30). Postoperative kidney injury was assessed by elevation of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a sensitive tubular injury biomarker. In addition, we assessed changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the incidence of acute kidney injury according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification. Results: We observed no differences between groups regarding increase of plasma NGAL (p = 0.31) or decline of eGFR (p = 0.82). In both groups, 6/30 patients developed acute kidney injury according to the AKIN classification, all regaining preoperative renal function within 30 days. Conclusion: Our findings challenge the superiority of minimal invasive compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation in terms of preservation of renal function following low-risk coronary surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft stenoses detected at early coronary angiography may be reversible and consequently prompt unnecessary graft revision. We aim to investigate the frequency, natural course, and clinical significance of internal mammary artery graft stenosis upon early angiography in patients undergoing hybrid myocardial revascularization., Methods: In this retrospective sub-study of the Coronary Hybrid Revascularization Study, we compared graft appearance, ie, stenosis degree and flow, on early (in-hospital) and scheduled follow-up coronary angiography after 1 year. We assessed the change in graft patency using the Fitzgibbon classification (grade A: unimpaired runoff; grade B > 50% stenosis; grade O: occlusion), as well as graft association with adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization) at up to 5-year follow-up., Results: We report clinical follow-up data for all 131 patients included in the Coronary Hybrid Revascularization Study. Change in graft patency was analyzed in 86 patients with satisfactory visualization of the LIMA graft on early and follow-up coronary angiography. All LIMA grafts were patent at discharge and follow-up. Twenty-seven of 37 (73%) grade B graft stenoses at early angiography resolved to grade A during follow-up of median 12 months (range, 8-83 months) after surgery. Angiographically significant graft stenoses at early coronary angiography were not associated with adverse clinical outcome up to 5-year follow-up., Conclusions: Our results suggest that the majority of clinically silent LIMA graft stenoses resolve during follow-up and are not associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Introduction: Post-operative pain following open heart surgery is a clinical challenge usually requiring significant amounts of opioids. Long-acting local infiltration anaesthesia may effectively reduce post-operative opioid consumption and improve recovery. The trial is a publicly funded, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of long-acting local infiltration anaesthesia in open heart surgery., Methods: Two Danish centres are planning to randomise 100 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting to treatment with long-acting infiltration anaesthesia or placebo. We compare an active solution of bupivacaine, adrenaline, clonidine and dexamethasone with saline placebo. The primary outcome measure is the accumulated opioid use within the first 24 post-operative hours. Secondary outcome measures include evaluation of respiratory function, patient-reported pain scores, mobilisation, opioid-associated side effects and long-term opioid consumption., Conclusion: This trial will define whether the use of long-acting infiltration anaesthesia during heart surgery may reduce acute and prolonged post-operative opioid consumption. Reduction of opioid-related adverse effects may improve recovery., Funding: The trial is supported by public grants (Dansk Selskab for Anæstesiologi og Intensiv Medicin: 40,000 DKK; Regionernes Medicin og Behandlingspulje 2022: 686,000 DKK). The work of I. S. Modrau is supported by an unrestricted grant from the Health Research Foundation of the Central Denmark Region., Trial Registration: EudraCT 2021-005886-41., (Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.)

Introduction: Anaemia is common after cardiac surgery and has a negative impact on rehabilitation and patient well-being. We aim to compare the efficacy of single, high-dose intravenous iron therapy versus oral iron supplementation to correct anaemia following open cardiac surgery., Methods: We present a randomised, active-control superiority trial. Adult patients with moderate anaemia (haemoglobin 5.0-6.8 mmol/l) on the first post-operative day after first-time, non-emergent cardiac surgery are eligible. After stratification by gender, 110 patients are randomised 1:1 to either single, high-dose intravenous iron therapy (20 mg/kg ferric derisomaltose) or oral iron supplementation (100 mg ferrous sulphate orally twice daily). The primary outcome measure at the four-week follow-up is the proportion of participants who are neither anaemic (haemoglobin less-than 8.1 mmol/l in men and less-than 7.5 mmol/l in women) nor have received allogeneic red blood cells since randomisation. Secondary outcome measures include changes in haemoglobin and iron biomarkers, exercise capacity, patient-reported outcome measures and cost of care at the four-week follow-up., Conclusion: The results of the PICS trial may fundamentally alter future management of anaemia following cardiac surgery., Funding: The study is supported by Aarhus University Hospital, an unrestricted research grant by Pharmacosmos A/S (Holbæk, Denmark) and an independent grant from the Health Research Foundation of the Central Denmark Region (ISM)., Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2020-001389-12; Clinical Trials ID: NCT04608539., (Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.)

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has in recent literature been described as an independently progressive disorder associated with a poor prognosis. Studies have emphasized the importance of a more proactive approach in treating TR in order to prevent progression of right ventricular dysfunction and ultimately right heart failure. These findings have renewed interest in surgical treatment for isolated TR whilst also fueling rapid advancements in transcatheter therapies, as argued in this review.