Search

BACKGROUND: We studied the effect of antirejection therapy on intragraft cytokine mRNA expression. METHODS: Therapy consisted of three doses of 1 gm of intravenous methylprednisolone. We determined its effect on intragraft mRNA expression of immunoregulatory (interleukin-2, interleukin-4) and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha), and the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (p55 chain) in endomyocardial biopsy specimens from cardiac allograft recipients. RESULTS: By reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction methods, we detected mRNA transcription for interleukin-2 in 56% of the pretreatment endomyocardial biopsy specimens (n = 16), for interleukin-4 in 31%, and for interleukin-6 in 56% of the specimens, and interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha were constitutively expressed. Individual cytokine mRNA profiles were not helpful in differentiating between rejections that proved to be methylprednisolone resistant (n = 9) or methylprednisolone sensitive (n = 7). After successful antirejection therapy, the overall intragraft mRNA expression was downregulated. None of the posttreatment endomyocardial biopsy specimens taken from six patients with methylprednisolone-sensitive rejections expressed the interleukin-2 gene, in contrast to 88% of the endomyocardial biopsy specimens obtained from eight patients with methylprednisolone-resistant rejections (p = 0.005). Moreover, intragraft interleukin-4 and interleukin-6 mRNA transcripts were hardly detectable (both 17%) in methylprednisolone-reversible rejections, but in ongoing rejections interleukin-4 mRNA expression was found in 62% (p = 0.14), and interleukin-6 was found in 88% of the endomyocardial biopsy specimens (p = 0.03). Semiquantitative analysis showed that the intragraft interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-1 beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha mRNA levels were lower in posttreatment endomyocardial biopsy specimens from methylprednisolone-reversible rejections than in endomyocardial biopsy specimens from methylprednisolone-irreversible rejections (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the efficacy of antirejection therapy with methylprednisolone is reflected in intragraft cytokine mRNA profiles.

The value of pulsed-wave transmitral Doppler for the diagnosis of moderate acute rejection was examined in a total of 347 Doppler recordings obtained in 32 consecutive cardiac allograft recipients. Serial Doppler examinations (median, 11 per patient; range, 1 to 23) were performed simultaneously with endomyocardial biopsies from the first week after heart transplantation to a follow-up of 186 days (median; range, 10 to 395 days after transplantation). Pulsed-wave transmitral Doppler did not allow noninvasive diagnosis of moderate acute rejection in individual patients. Peak filling rate normalized for mitral stroke volume, early diastolic velocity, and mean diastolic velocity were significantly increased, whereas diastolic filling period was decreased during moderate acute rejection compared to other biopsy classes. The wide overlap of measurements in individual recipients with or without rejection may be due, however, to a variety of hemodynamic factors after transplantation affecting diastolic function, which are superimposed on the restrictive left ventricular filling pattern caused by persistent mild acute rejection and left ventricular hypertrophy. These hemodynamic factors include pulmonary hypertension, perioperative ischemia, reperfusion injury, and changes in both blood pressure and loading conditions caused by hypertension and its treatment. Differences between studies with regard to the detection of moderate acute rejection by transmitral Doppler may be caused by chance, because most studies were relatively small. Differences in methods, patient selection, duration of follow-up, prevalence of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, and differences in antihypertensive drug regimens may also play a role. Furthermore differences in the incidence of mild acute rejection, its treatment, and the type of maintenance immunosuppressive regimen used may have influenced the outcome of these studies considerably.