20 results on '"Mobil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co. (669 F.2d 366 (6th Cir. 1981))"'
Search Results
2. Tender offer defensive tactics and the business judgment rule.
3. Anti-takeover actions and defenses: business judgment or breach of duty?
4. Defensive responses to tender offers and the Williams Act's prohibition against manipulation.
5. Tender offer defenses: the need for national guidelines in light of Mobil.
6. Section 14(e) of the Williams Act: can there be manipulation with full disclosure or was the Mobil court running on empty?
7. Defensive responses to tender offers and the Williams Act's prohibition against manipulation.
8. Corporations - mergers -'lock-up' enjoined under Section 14(e) of Securities Exchange Act.
9. Marathon revisited: a review of the post-Marathon cases involving defensive responses to tender offers alleged to be manipulative despite the absence of deception.
10. Tender offeror's right to injunctive relief recognized.
11. Swallowing the key to lock-up options.
12. Using the 'lock-up' to defend against a hostile tender offer - when is it manipulative?
13. Tender offers, lock-ups and the Williams Act: a critical analysis of Mobil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co.
14. The future of lock-ups after Mobil v. Marathon.
15. Tender offer defensive tactics and the business judgment rule.
16. Lock-up options: toward a state law standard.
17. Target board abuse of defensive tactics: can federal law be mobilized to overcome the business judgment rule?
18. Securities - lock-up options employed by target corporations as a defensive technique to unwanted take-overs
19. Courts struggle to define 'manipulative' practices
20. Courts struggle with 'manipulative' practices.
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.