Search

The drum agglomeration of two different crushed copper ores (I and II) has been optimized using Taguchi's L16(45) orthogonal array design to determine the optimum conditions for maximizing the average agglomerate size and minimizing the amount of fines. The effects of controllable operating factors including moisture content (ore I: 9.6–11.1%; ore II: 12.8–14%), retention time (2–4 min), drum speed (15–45% critical), drum load (ore I: 13–32%; ore II: 6–24%) and acid concentration (6.5–90 g/L) on the performance of the agglomeration process were studied. For ore I, the maximum average agglomerate size and minimum percent fines (−1 mm) occurred under the conditions: drum load (22.75%), moisture (10.35%), time (4 min), drum speed (30% critical), and acid concentration (41 g/L), whereas for ore II, the same conditions occurred under the drum load (18%), moisture (13%), time (3 min), drum speed (30% critical), and acid concentration (30 g/L). Under the conditions studied for ore I, the most effective parameter for maximizing average agglomerate size and minimizing the amount of fines was found to be drum load. For ore I, time and acid concentration had a measurable effect on maximizing average agglomerate size, whereas moisture had a statistically significant effect on minimizing the amount of fines. For ore II, the most effective parameter for maximizing average agglomerate size and minimizing the amount of fines was found to be acid concentration. Time had a measurable effect on maximizing average agglomerate size, whereas the other variables did not affect the responses significantly for ore II. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

An update is presented to the paper “Recent trends in the processing of enargite concentrates” by Safarzadeh, Moats, and Miller (2014). Publications which were not included in the initial review paper, primarily to avoid redundancy, are presented and discussed here. Thus, roasting, atmospheric acidic and alkaline leaching, the dissolution of enargite in low-melting point salts, bioleaching, and pressure leaching are presented. For the first time, the modified phase stability (Kellogg) diagram and the Eh-pH diagram for the Cu-As-S system including sinnerite (Cu6As4S9) have been established. According to the results from different treatment options discussed in our earlier review and also in this paper, it is evident that the most recent research activities for the treatment of enargite concentrates are centered around roasting, alkaline sulfide leaching, and high temperature pressure oxidation. Taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of the mentioned processing options, and the numerous preliminary experiments performed, the acid bake-leach process has been identified and is being studied at the University of Utah. It has been found that enargite transforms to water-soluble copper sulfate, arsenic trioxide and elemental sulfur by sulfuric acid baking of enargite at 200°C, with less than 1% of the arsenic being released to the gas phase. This process strategy provides a new possibility for the treatment of enargite concentrates. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The copper industry is witnessing great interest in the development and utilization of copper-arsenic deposits. While most plants tend to use traditional processing technologies, the depletion of conventional copper ores has created competition for designing and implementing new process alternatives for the treatment of copper-arsenic ores containing minerals such as enargite, luzonite, and tennantite. Nevertheless, the downstream processing of high-arsenic copper concentrates represents a significant metallurgical challenge in terms of both arsenic separation and also its stabilization in an environmentally benign form that fulfills the current and future environmental policies. Smelters are subject to penalties on high arsenic-bearing copper concentrates. While reductive roasting can drive-off the arsenic from enargite concentrates to an acceptable level suitable for smelting (<0.5 wt.%), this option has generally been viewed as unacceptable due to environmental conflicts and the lack of a market for arsenic trioxide. The lack of a suitable pyrometallurgical option has led to several proposed hydrometallurgical treatments of enargite concentrates. Hydrometallurgical options include either selective arsenic dissolution to produce a clean copper concentrate or collective leaching of copper and arsenic. Both options with various conditions and lixiviants are discussed and evaluated. In this review, alkaline sulfide leach (ASL), sulfate- and chloride-based leach systems, high temperature pressure oxidation (HTPOX), sodium hypochlorite leach, bio-leach/oxidation, nitrogen species catalyzed pressure oxidation, Cominco Engineering Services Limited, Intec, HydroCopper™ and Fluobor® processes are outlined. Pyrometallurgical process strategies have also been briefly reviewed. Among all processing options, ASL, HTPOX, Fluobor® and reductive roasting processes are given special attention with specific flowsheets for enargite concentrates discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]