Search

Animal production intensification puts pressure on resources, leads to environmental impacts, animal welfare and biodiversity issues. Livestock products provide key components of the human diet and contribute to rural territories through ecosystem services such as nutrient and biomass recycling. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is key to assess environmental impacts in livestock systems and products. A harmonization of LCA methods is necessary to improve evaluations in these areas as LCA still lacks accuracy and robustness in addressing sustainability across livestock systems and products. Here, a participatory harmonization approach was applied to provide a framework to evaluate LCAs of current and future livestock systems. A total of 29 workshops with targeted discussions among 21 LCA experts were organised, together with two anonymous surveys to harmonise evaluation criteria. First, key research topics for improving LCAs of livestock systems were identified as follows: i) Food, feed, fuel and biomaterial competition, crop-livestock interaction and the circular economy; ii) Biodiversity; iii) Animal welfare; iv) Nutrition; v) GHG emissions. Next, general evaluation criteria were identified for livestock focussed LCA methods, considering livestock systems characteristics: Transparency and Reproducibility, Completeness, Fairness and Acceptance, Robustness and Accuracy. Evaluation criteria specific to each key topic were also identified. This participatory method was successful in narrowing down general and specific evaluation criteria through targeted discussion. Moreover, this study provided a holistic participatory framework for the evaluation of LCA methods addressing the impacts of livestock systems across a range of key topics which can be further used for other sectors.

This paper investigates how pig housing relates to diversity and circularity of farms and how this influences the capacity of European organic pig producers to cope with economic, legislation, labour and climate-related shocks. It identifies resilience strategies of pig producers in Europe by analysing resilience capacity and attributes to different shocks, namely input and output price shocks, disease outbreaks, climate change, legislation change and labour fluctuations. Based on narratives of 18 pig producers, this paper finds three resilience strategies: an efficiency-based strategy, a nutrient substitution strategy and a farm diversification strategy. Non-resiliency is mostly found among the producers with an all-year outdoor production system following the nutrient substitution strategy related to low feed self-sufficiency. The producers follow an efficiency-based strategy when they cannot accumulate reserves sufficient to cope with shocks. Non-resilience among the farm diversification strategy is related to direct marketing that is labour intensive requires the ability to pay decent wages. To increase the resilience of pig producers in Europe, policies should recognise that these different strategies exist and tailor policies differently for different types of producers.

The spatial level of a landscape is highly relevant for assessing and implementing circularity in food and agricultural systems (FAS). Contrary to focussing on the field or farm level, analyses on the landscape level allow relevant ecosystem dynamics as well as landscape wide feed and manure flows to be captured. At the same time, and opposed to the national and global level, a focus on landscapes allows to acknowledge local dissimilarities. Even though various reviews approach the topic of assessing agricultural landscapes, there is no systematic overview on how they take aspects of circular FAS into account.

Die Landwirtschaft erfüllt für die Gesellschaft wichtige wirtschaftliche, soziokulturelle und ökologische Funktionen. Gleichwohl hat sie starke negative Auswirkungen auf den Zustand der Ökosysteme. Daran konnte auch die Ökologisierung der Agrarpolitik seit Anfang der 1990er Jahre nicht prinzipiell etwas ändern. Aufgrund der großen Bedeutung von Grünland für die Landwirtschaft in der Schweiz (60 % der landwirtschaftlichen Nutzfläche) und Österreich (40 %) ist die Rolle der Wiederkäuer für eine ökologisch nachhaltige Agrar- und Ernährungspolitik besonders wichtig. Vor diesem Hintergrund haben wir analysiert, inwieweit standortgerechte, graslandbasierte regenerative Milch- und Rindfleischsysteme, die den Wettbewerb zwischen Lebens- und Futtermittelproduktion minimieren, zu einer ökologisch nachhaltigen Landnutzung beitragen können, ohne dabei die regionalen Ökosystemgrenzen zu überschreiten (Stolze et al. 2019).

In spite of the considerable potential contribution of neglected and underutilised crops to climate resilience, food security and nutrition; widespread adoption of these crops remains a challenge. Uptake is inhibited by poor economic performance due to low yields, compounded further by various social factors. Using farm survey data and aggregated time-series data from four states in southern India, this study examines factors influencing productivity in finger millet cultivation. A farm-level yield gap analysis is complemented by an analysis of total factor productivity (TFP) growth between 1999 and 2014 to better understand the role of research and innovation. Results suggest that there is considerable potential for improved growing practices to achieve better yields, but also education levels and technical support emerge as crucial factors for boosting finger millet productivity. The TFP analysis indicates a moderate level of growth, with a high variability and conflicting trends between states, suggesting a need to invest more in research and development, extension and infrastructure. Sustained productivity gains will require research efforts that respond to the needs expressed by farmers and that finger millet forms part of an overall strategy for sustainable intensification.