Search

Objectives: With the emergence of several effective combination therapies, information on their effects at the primary site will be crucial for planning future cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). The present study focused exclusively on changes in primary tumor sizes following treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and investigated the clinical factors associated with a good response in primary tumors. Methods and materials: We retrospectively assessed 27 patients diagnosed with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who started treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Changes in tumor sizes at the primary site were described using waterfall and spider plots, respectively. We analyzed the correlation of tumor shrinkage between primary and metastatic site. The parameters analyzed between responders and non-responders according to primary tumor sizes were International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk scores, peripheral blood markers, and CRP. Results: The median age and follow-up period were 66 years and 9.3 months, respectively. The median IMDC risk score was 3 (range: 1-6). Nineteen patients were diagnosed with clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) and 8 patients with non-ccRCC. Among ccRCC patients, 9 (47.4%) achieved a significant response with a maximum reduction of 30% or more in the size of the primary tumor from baseline within 4 months, while 3 (37.5%) out of 8 patients with non-ccRCC achieved a significant response. Shrinkage of the primary tumor correlated with the metastatic tumors in both ccRCC and non-ccRCC cases. Of note, 6 patients underwent CN and no viable tumor cells were detected in the surgical specimens of 3 patients whose primary tumors shrank by approximately 50%-60% with a reduction to 4 cm or less. Among ccRCC patients, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio were slightly lower in responders than in non-responders (P = 0.0944 and P = 0.0691). The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly lower in

Objectives: During the past 2 decades, in order to improve perioperative and ontological outcomes, a minimally invasive approach, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and an enhanced postoperative recovery program after surgery have been introduced into routine clinical practice of radical cystectomy (RC). Our aim was to examine the differences in clinical practice and postoperative complications after RC by comparing our previous and current cohorts. Materials and methods: A retrospective multi-institutional study. We collected all complications within 90 days after surgery between 2011 and 2017 (current cohort), and categorized them according to a standardized methodology. Then, we compared the outcomes with those in our previous study (previous cohort, 1997-2010). A multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to determine predictors of complications in the current cohort. Results: A total of 838 patients were newly collected (current cohort), and 919 from the previous cohort were included in the subsequent analyses. In the current cohort, the rate of performing NAC was significantly higher (13% vs. 4%, respectively, P < 0.0001), and 26% (222/ 838) underwent laparoscopic RC (LRC, without robotic assistance: n = 210, with robotic assistance: n = 12). There was no significant difference in the overall complication [69% (580/838) vs. 68% (629/919), respectively, P = 0.7284] or major complication (Grades 3-5) [25% (211/838) vs. 22% (201/919), respectively, P = 0.1022] rates between the 2 cohorts. In both cohorts, the most frequent categories were infectious, gastrointestinal, wound-related, and genitourinary. In the current cohort, the performance status (odds ratio, OR = 2.11, P = 0.0013) and operative time (OR = 1.003, P = 0.0016) remained significant predictors of major complications. NAC was not associated with any or major complications. Conclusions: Surgical complications related to RC still remain significant problems, despite the recent improvements in s

Objective To clarify the prognostic impact of local radiotherapy on metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated by systemic chemotherapy. Methods Of the 228 metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with systemic chemotherapy, 97 received radiotherapy mainly to metastatic sites. In patients for whom the purpose of radiotherapy was not specified, more than 50 Gy irradiation was considered to be for disease consolidation for survival analysis, while less than 50 Gy was categorized as palliation. According to the Kaplan-Meier method, we analysed overall survival from the initiation of treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma until death or the last follow-up, using the log-rank test to assess the significance of differences. The Cox model was applied for prognostic factor analysis. Results Overall, there was no significant difference in survival between patients with and those without radiotherapy (P = 0.1532). When analysing the patients undergoing consolidative radiotherapy separately, these 25 patients showed significantly longer survival than the 72 patients with palliative radiotherapy (P = 0.0047), with a 3-year overall survival of 43.3%. Of the present cohort, 22 underwent metastasectomy for disease consolidation, and there was no overlapping case between the metastasectomy cohort and cohort receiving consolidative radiotherapy. After controlling for four independent prognostic factors (sex, performance status, haemoglobin level and number of organs with metastasis) in our previous study, radiotherapy for disease consolidation showed a marginal value (hazard ratio = 0.666, P = 0.0966), while metastasectomy remained significant (hazard ratio = 0.358, P = 0.0006). Conclusions In the selected patients, long-term disease control could be achieved after consolidative radiotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma disease. Our observations suggest that local ablative therapy (surgery or radiotherapy) could facilitate long-term disease control. Howev

Objectives To develop a wet laboratory training model for learning core laparoscopic surgical skills and evaluating learners' competency level outside the operating room. Methods Participants completed three tasks (task 1: tissue dissection around the aorta; task 2: tissue dissection and division of the renal artery; task 3: renal parenchymal closure). Each performance was video recorded and subsequently evaluated by two experts, according to the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills and task-specific metrics that we developed (Assessment Sheet of Laparoscopic Skills in Wet Lab score). Mean scores were used for analyses. The subjective mental workload was also assessed (NASA Task Load Index). Results The 54 participants included 32 urologists, eight young trainees and 14 medical students. A total of 13 participants were categorized as experts (>= 50 laparoscopic surgeries), eight as intermediates (10-49) and 33 as novices (0-9). There were significant differences in the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills and Assessment Sheet of Laparoscopic Skills in Wet Lab scores among the three groups in all three tasks. Higher NASA Task Load Index scores were observed in novices, and there were significant differences in tasks 1 (Kruskal-Wallis test,P = 0.0004) and 2 (P = 0.0002), and marginal differences in task 3 (P = 0.0745) among the three groups. Conclusions Our training model has good construct validity, and differences in the NASA Task Load Index score reflect previous laparoscopic surgical experiences. Our findings show the ability to assess both laparoscopic surgical skills and mental workloads, which could help educators comprehend trainees' level outside the operating room. Given the decreasing opportunity to carry out pure laparoscopic surgeries because of the dissemination of robotic surgery, especially in urology, our model can offer practical training opportunities.