Search

This study aimed to investigate deformity patterns that cause clinical impairments and determine the acceptable range of deformity in the treatment of forearm diaphyseal fractures. A three‐dimensional (3D) deformity analysis based on computed bone models was performed on 39 patients with malunited diaphyseal both‐bone forearm fractures to investigate the 3D deformity patterns of the radius and ulna at the fracture location and the relationship between 3D deformity and clinical impairments. Clinical impairments were evaluated using forearm motion deficit. Cutoff values of forearm deformities were calculated by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis using the deformity angle and the limited forearm rotation range of motion (less than 50° of pronation or supination) resulting in activities of daily living (ADL) impairment as variables. The extension, varus, and pronation deformities most commonly occurred in the radius, whereas the extension deformity was commonly observed in the ulna. A positive correlation was observed between pronation deficit and extension deformity of the radius (R = 0.41) and between supination deficit and pronation deformity of the ulna (R = 0.44). In contrast, a negative correlation was observed between pronation deficit and pronation deformity of the radius (R = −0.44) and between pronation deficit and pronation deformity of the ulna (R = −0.51). To minimize ADL impairment, radial extension deformity should be <18.4°, radial rotation deformity <12.8°, and ulnar rotation deformity <16.6°. The deformities in the sagittal and axial planes of the radius and in the axial plane of the ulna were responsible for the limited forearm rotation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The goals of this study are to describe the reoperation rates in patients who underwent Wilson osteotomy compared with patients who underwent carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty for early-stage arthritis and to evaluate the factors influencing the patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Retrospectively, 52 patients who underwent surgery for stage I/II osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal were identified, consisting of 17 (33%) patients who underwent Wilson osteotomy and 35 (67%) who underwent carpometacarpal arthroplasty. A total of 28 (55%) patients completed the outcome questionnaires, consisting of 11 (39%) patients who underwent Wilson osteotomy and 17 (61%) patients who underwent carpometacarpal arthroplasty. We performed a multivariable linear regression model to identify factors associated with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain intensity at final follow-up. Results: Among the patients who underwent CMC arthroplasty, 2 had a reoperation. Among the patients who underwent Wilson osteotomy, 3 had a reoperation. Among the patients who completed the outcome questionnaires, the median quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 10 and the median NRS Pain Intensity score was 0. In multivariable analysis, the postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI) was independently associated with higher postoperative NRS pain scores. Conclusion: In younger patients with stage I/II CMC osteoarthritis, Wilson osteotomy may be a reasonable alternative to CMC arthroplasty. Outcomes were similar between both groups at mid-term follow-up, with only a slightly higher pain score in the osteotomy group. In patients with stage I/II carpometacarpal osteoarthritis, the PROMIS PI is the main factor indicating successful outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]