87 results on '"Mitropoulou, C."'
Search Results
2. Dynamic shelter structure
- Author
-
Maden, F., primary, Ölmez, D., additional, Gür, Ş., additional, Uncu, M.Y., additional, and Mitropoulou, C., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study
- Author
-
Swen, J. J., van der Wouden, C. H., Manson, L. E., Abdullah-Koolmees, H., Blagec, K., Blagus, T., Bohringer, S., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Cecchin, E., Cheung, K. -C., Deneer, V. H., Dupui, M., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Jonsson, S., Joefield-Roka, C., Just, K. S., Karlsson, M. O., Konta, L., Koopmann, R., Kriek, M., Lehr, T., Mitropoulou, C., Rial-Sebbag, E., Rollinson, V., Roncato, R., Samwald, M., Schaeffeler, E., Skokou, M., Schwab, M., Steinberger, D., Stingl, J. C., Tremmel, R., Turner, R. M., van Rhenen, M. H., Davila Fajardo, C. L., Dolzan, V., Patrinos, G. P., Pirmohamed, M., Sunder-Plassmann, G., Toffoli, G., Guchelaar, H. -J., Buunk, A., Goossens, H., Baas, G., Algera, M., Schuil-Vlassak, E., Ambagts, T., De Hoog-Schouten, L., Musaafir, S., Bosch, R., Tjong, C., Steeman, S., Van der Plas, M., Baldew, G., Den Hollander, I., De Waal, Z., Heijn, A., Nelemans, L., Kouwen-Lubbers, K., Van Leeuwen, M., Hoogenboom, S., Van Doremalen, J., Ton, C., Beetstra, B., Meijs, V., Dikken, J., Dubero, D., Slager, M., Houben, T., Kanis, T., Overmars, W., Nijenhuis, M., Steffens, M., Bergs, I., Karamperis, K., Siamoglou, S., Ivantsik, O., Samiou, G. -C., Kordou, Z., Tsermpini, E., Ferentinos, P., Karaivazoglou, A., Rigas, G., Gerasimou, H., Voukelatou, G., Georgila, E., Tsermpini, E. E., Mendrinou, E., Chalikiopoulou, K., Kolliopoulou, A., Mitropoulos, K., Stratopoulos, A., Liopetas, I., Tsikrika, A., Barba, E., Emmanouil, G., Stamopoulou, T., Stathoulias, A., Giannopoulos, P., Kanellakis, F., Bartsakoulia, M., Katsila, T., Douzenis, A., Gourzis, F., Assimakopoulos, K., Bignucolo, A., Dal Cin, L., Comello, F., Mezzalira, S., Puglisi, F., Spina, M., Foltran, L., Guardascione, M., Buonadonna, A., Bartoletti, M., Corsetti, S., Ongaro, E., Da Ros, L., Bolzonello, S., Spazzapan, S., Freschi, A., Di Nardo, P., Palazzari, E., Navarria, F., Innocente, R., Berretta, M., D'Andrea, M., Angelini, F., Diraimo, T., Favaretto, A., Davila-Fajardo, C. L., Diaz-Villamarin, X., Martinez-Gonzalez, L. J., Antunez-Rodriguez, A., Moreno-Escobar, E., Fernandez-Gonzalez, A. E., Garcia-Navas, P., Bautista-Paves, A. B. P., Burillo-Gomez, F., Villegas-Rodriguez, I., Sanchez-Ramos, J. G., Antolinos-Perez, M. J., Rivera, R., Martinez-Huertas, S., Thomas-, J., Carazo, J. J., Yanez-Sanchez, M. I., Blancas-Lopez-Navajas, R., Garcia-Orta, B., Gonzalez-Astorga, C. J., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, F. J., Ruiz-Carazo, M., Lopez-Perez, I., Cano-Herrera, R., Herrera, T., Gil-Jimenez, Delgado-Urena, M. T., Trivino-Juarez, J. M., Campos-Velazquez, S., Alcantara-Espadafor, S., Moreno Aguilar, M. R., Ontiveros-Ortega, M. C., Carnerero-Cordoba, L., Guerrero-Jimenez, M., Legeren-Alvarez, M., Yelamos-Vargas, M., Castillo-Perez, I., Aomar-Millan, I., Anguita-Romero, M., Sanchez-Garcia, M. J., Sequero-Lopez, S., Faro-Miguez, N., Lopez-Fernandez, S., Leyva-Ferrer, R. N., Herrera-Gomez, N., Pertejo-Manzano, L., Perez-Gutierrez, E. M., Martin-de la Higuera, A. J., Plaza-Carrera, J., Baena-Garzon, F., Toledo-Frias, P., Cruz-Valero, I., Chacon-McWeeny, V., Gallardo-Sanchez, I., Arrebola, A., Guillen-Zafra, L., Ceballos-Torres, A., Guardia-Mancilla, P., Guirao-Arrabal, E., Canterero-Hinojosa, J., Velasco-Fuentes, S., Sanchez-Cano, D., Aguilar-Jaldo, M. D. P., Caballero-Borrego, J., Praznik, M., Slapsak, U., Voncina, B., Rajter, B., Skrinjar, A., Marjetic Ulcakar, A., Zidansek, A., Stegne Ignjatvic, T., Mazej Poredos, B., Vivod Pecnik, Z., Poplas Susic, T., Jutersek, M., Klen, J., Skoporc, J., Kotar, T., Petek Ster, M., Zvezdana Dernovsk, M., Mlinsek, G., Miklavcic, P., Plemenitas Iljes, A., Grasic Kuhar, C., Oblak, I., Strazisar, B., Strbac, D., Matos, E., Mencinger, M., Vrbnjak, M., Saje, M., Radovanovic, M., Jeras, K., Bukovec, L., Terzic, T., Minichmayr, I., Nanah, A., Nielsen, E., Zou, Y., Lauschke, V., Johansson, I., Zhou, Y., Nordling, A., Aigner, C., Dames-Ludwig, M., Monteforte, R., Sunder-Plassmann, R., Steinhauser, C., Sengoelge, G., Winnicki, W., Schmidt, A., Vasileios, F., Fontana, V., Hanson, A., Little, M., Hornby, R., Dello Russo, Cinzia, French, S., Hampson, J., Gumustekin, M., Anyfantis, G., Hampson, L., Lewis, D., Westhead, R., Prince, C., Rajasingam, A., Dello Russo C. (ORCID:0000-0002-2538-3832), Swen, J. J., van der Wouden, C. H., Manson, L. E., Abdullah-Koolmees, H., Blagec, K., Blagus, T., Bohringer, S., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Cecchin, E., Cheung, K. -C., Deneer, V. H., Dupui, M., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Jonsson, S., Joefield-Roka, C., Just, K. S., Karlsson, M. O., Konta, L., Koopmann, R., Kriek, M., Lehr, T., Mitropoulou, C., Rial-Sebbag, E., Rollinson, V., Roncato, R., Samwald, M., Schaeffeler, E., Skokou, M., Schwab, M., Steinberger, D., Stingl, J. C., Tremmel, R., Turner, R. M., van Rhenen, M. H., Davila Fajardo, C. L., Dolzan, V., Patrinos, G. P., Pirmohamed, M., Sunder-Plassmann, G., Toffoli, G., Guchelaar, H. -J., Buunk, A., Goossens, H., Baas, G., Algera, M., Schuil-Vlassak, E., Ambagts, T., De Hoog-Schouten, L., Musaafir, S., Bosch, R., Tjong, C., Steeman, S., Van der Plas, M., Baldew, G., Den Hollander, I., De Waal, Z., Heijn, A., Nelemans, L., Kouwen-Lubbers, K., Van Leeuwen, M., Hoogenboom, S., Van Doremalen, J., Ton, C., Beetstra, B., Meijs, V., Dikken, J., Dubero, D., Slager, M., Houben, T., Kanis, T., Overmars, W., Nijenhuis, M., Steffens, M., Bergs, I., Karamperis, K., Siamoglou, S., Ivantsik, O., Samiou, G. -C., Kordou, Z., Tsermpini, E., Ferentinos, P., Karaivazoglou, A., Rigas, G., Gerasimou, H., Voukelatou, G., Georgila, E., Tsermpini, E. E., Mendrinou, E., Chalikiopoulou, K., Kolliopoulou, A., Mitropoulos, K., Stratopoulos, A., Liopetas, I., Tsikrika, A., Barba, E., Emmanouil, G., Stamopoulou, T., Stathoulias, A., Giannopoulos, P., Kanellakis, F., Bartsakoulia, M., Katsila, T., Douzenis, A., Gourzis, F., Assimakopoulos, K., Bignucolo, A., Dal Cin, L., Comello, F., Mezzalira, S., Puglisi, F., Spina, M., Foltran, L., Guardascione, M., Buonadonna, A., Bartoletti, M., Corsetti, S., Ongaro, E., Da Ros, L., Bolzonello, S., Spazzapan, S., Freschi, A., Di Nardo, P., Palazzari, E., Navarria, F., Innocente, R., Berretta, M., D'Andrea, M., Angelini, F., Diraimo, T., Favaretto, A., Davila-Fajardo, C. L., Diaz-Villamarin, X., Martinez-Gonzalez, L. J., Antunez-Rodriguez, A., Moreno-Escobar, E., Fernandez-Gonzalez, A. E., Garcia-Navas, P., Bautista-Paves, A. B. P., Burillo-Gomez, F., Villegas-Rodriguez, I., Sanchez-Ramos, J. G., Antolinos-Perez, M. J., Rivera, R., Martinez-Huertas, S., Thomas-, J., Carazo, J. J., Yanez-Sanchez, M. I., Blancas-Lopez-Navajas, R., Garcia-Orta, B., Gonzalez-Astorga, C. J., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, F. J., Ruiz-Carazo, M., Lopez-Perez, I., Cano-Herrera, R., Herrera, T., Gil-Jimenez, Delgado-Urena, M. T., Trivino-Juarez, J. M., Campos-Velazquez, S., Alcantara-Espadafor, S., Moreno Aguilar, M. R., Ontiveros-Ortega, M. C., Carnerero-Cordoba, L., Guerrero-Jimenez, M., Legeren-Alvarez, M., Yelamos-Vargas, M., Castillo-Perez, I., Aomar-Millan, I., Anguita-Romero, M., Sanchez-Garcia, M. J., Sequero-Lopez, S., Faro-Miguez, N., Lopez-Fernandez, S., Leyva-Ferrer, R. N., Herrera-Gomez, N., Pertejo-Manzano, L., Perez-Gutierrez, E. M., Martin-de la Higuera, A. J., Plaza-Carrera, J., Baena-Garzon, F., Toledo-Frias, P., Cruz-Valero, I., Chacon-McWeeny, V., Gallardo-Sanchez, I., Arrebola, A., Guillen-Zafra, L., Ceballos-Torres, A., Guardia-Mancilla, P., Guirao-Arrabal, E., Canterero-Hinojosa, J., Velasco-Fuentes, S., Sanchez-Cano, D., Aguilar-Jaldo, M. D. P., Caballero-Borrego, J., Praznik, M., Slapsak, U., Voncina, B., Rajter, B., Skrinjar, A., Marjetic Ulcakar, A., Zidansek, A., Stegne Ignjatvic, T., Mazej Poredos, B., Vivod Pecnik, Z., Poplas Susic, T., Jutersek, M., Klen, J., Skoporc, J., Kotar, T., Petek Ster, M., Zvezdana Dernovsk, M., Mlinsek, G., Miklavcic, P., Plemenitas Iljes, A., Grasic Kuhar, C., Oblak, I., Strazisar, B., Strbac, D., Matos, E., Mencinger, M., Vrbnjak, M., Saje, M., Radovanovic, M., Jeras, K., Bukovec, L., Terzic, T., Minichmayr, I., Nanah, A., Nielsen, E., Zou, Y., Lauschke, V., Johansson, I., Zhou, Y., Nordling, A., Aigner, C., Dames-Ludwig, M., Monteforte, R., Sunder-Plassmann, R., Steinhauser, C., Sengoelge, G., Winnicki, W., Schmidt, A., Vasileios, F., Fontana, V., Hanson, A., Little, M., Hornby, R., Dello Russo, Cinzia, French, S., Hampson, J., Gumustekin, M., Anyfantis, G., Hampson, L., Lewis, D., Westhead, R., Prince, C., Rajasingam, A., and Dello Russo C. (ORCID:0000-0002-2538-3832)
- Abstract
Background: The benefit of pharmacogenetic testing before starting drug therapy has been well documented for several single gene–drug combinations. However, the clinical utility of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy using a pharmacogenetic panel has not been rigorously assessed. Methods: We conducted an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, crossover implementation study of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel in 18 hospitals, nine community health centres, and 28 community pharmacies in seven European countries (Austria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK). Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a first prescription for a drug clinically recommended in the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (ie, the index drug) as part of routine care were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included previous genetic testing for a gene relevant to the index drug, a planned duration of treatment of less than 7 consecutive days, and severe renal or liver insufficiency. All patients gave written informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants were genotyped for 50 germline variants in 12 genes, and those with an actionable variant (ie, a drug–gene interaction test result for which the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group [DPWG] recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) were treated according to DPWG recommendations. Patients in the control group received standard treatment. To prepare clinicians for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing, local teams were educated during a site-initiation visit and online educational material was made available. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions within the 12-week follow-up period. Analyses were irrespective of patient adherence to the DPWG guidelines. The primary analysis was done using a gatekeeping analysis, in which outcomes in people with an actionable drug–gene interaction in the study group versus the
- Published
- 2023
4. Measuring the Value of Pharmacogenomics Evidence
- Author
-
Patrinos, GP and Mitropoulou, C
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe: Design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium
- Author
-
van der Wouden, CH, CambonThomsen, A, Cecchin, E, Cheung, KC, DávilaFajardo, CL, Deneer, VH, Dolžan, V, IngelmanSundberg, M, Jönsson, S, Karlsson, MO, Kriek, M, Mitropoulou, C, Patrinos, GP, Pirmohamed, M, Samwald, M, Schaeffeler, E, Schwab, M, Steinberger, D, Stingl, J, SunderPlassmann, G, Toffoli, G, Turner, RM, van Rhenen, MH, Swen, JJ, and Guchelaar, HJ
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Editorial: Pharmacogenomics: From Bench to Bedside and Back Again
- Author
-
Shaman, JA, Bousman, CA, Mitropoulou, C, Padmanabhan, S, Shaman, JA, Bousman, CA, Mitropoulou, C, and Padmanabhan, S
- Published
- 2022
7. Systematic review of economic evaluation studies in psychiatric pharmacogenomics
- Author
-
Mitropoulou, C. Karamperis, K. Koromina, M. Papantoniou, P. and Skokou, M. Kanellakis, F. Mitropoulos, K. Vozikis, A.
- Published
- 2021
8. Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review
- Author
-
Karamperis, K. Koromina, M. Papantoniou, P. Skokou, M. Kanellakis, F. Mitropoulos, K. Vozikis, A. Müller, D.J. Patrinos, G.P. Mitropoulou, C.
- Abstract
Nowadays, many relevant drug–gene associations have been discovered, but pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided treatment needs to be cost-effective as well as clinically beneficial to be incorporated into standard health care. To address current challenges, this systematic review provides an update regarding previously published studies, which assessed the cost-effectiveness of PGx testing for the prescription of antidepressants and antipsychotics. From a total of 1159 studies initially identified by literature database querying, and after manual assessment and curation of all of them, a mere 18 studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 18 studies evaluations, 16 studies (88.89%) drew conclusions in favor of PGx testing, of which 9 (50%) genome-guided interventions were cost-effective and 7 (38.9%) were less costly compared to standard treatment based on cost analysis. More precisely, supportive evidence exists for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 drug–gene associations and for combinatorial PGx panels, but evidence is limited for many other drug–gene combinations. Amongst the limitations of the field are the unclear explanation of perspective and cost inputs, as well as the underreporting of study design elements, which can influence though the economic evaluation. Overall, the findings of this article demonstrate that although there is growing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of genome-guided interventions in psychiatric diseases, there is still a need for performing additional research on economic evaluations of PGx implementation with an emphasis on psychiatric disorders. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
- Published
- 2021
9. Economic evaluation of pharmacogenetics-guided interventions for cardiology
- Author
-
Mitropoulou, C, van Schaik, Ron, Vozikis, A, Cell biology, and Clinical Chemistry
- Published
- 2020
10. Systematic review of economic evaluation studies in psychiatric pharmacogenomics
- Author
-
Mitropoulou, C., primary, Karamperis, K., additional, Koromina, M., additional, Papantoniou, P., additional, Skokou, M., additional, Kanellakis, F., additional, Mitropoulos, K., additional, and Vozikis, A., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Parallel Computing in HP-OCP
- Author
-
Kazakis, G., primary, Sotiropoulos, S., additional, Kallioras, N., additional, Xynogalas, S., additional, Mitropoulou, C., additional, Chatzieleftheriou, S., additional, Damikoukas, S., additional, Tsakalis, P., additional, and Lagaros, N., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. High Performance Optimization Computing Platform
- Author
-
Sotiropoulos, S., primary, Kazakis, G., additional, Kallioras, N., additional, Xynogalas, S., additional, Mitropoulou, C., additional, Chatzieleftheriou, S., additional, Damikoukas, S., additional, Tsakalis, P., additional, and Lagaros, N., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Economic evaluation of pharmacogenetics-guided interventions for cardiology
- Author
-
Mitropoulou, C. (Christina) and Mitropoulou, C. (Christina)
- Published
- 2020
14. Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe: Design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium (vol 101, pg 341, 2017)
- Author
-
van der Wouden, CH, Cambon-Thomsen, A, Cecchin, E, Cheung, KC, Davila-Fajardo, CL, Deneer, VH, Dolzan, V, Ingelman-Sundberg, M, Jonsson, S, Karlsson, MO, Kriek, M, Mitropoulou, C, Patrinos, GP, Pirmohamed, M, Samwald, M, Schaeffeler, E, Schwab, M, Steinberger, D, Stingl, J, Sunder-Plassmann, G, Toffoli, G, Turner, RM, van Rhenen, MH, Swen, JJ, Guchelaar, H-J, and Pharmacogenomics, Ubiquitous
- Published
- 2017
15. Genomic Medicine Without Borders: Which Strategies Should Developing Countries Employ to Invest in Precision Medicine? A New Fast-Second Winner Strategy
- Author
-
Mitropoulos, K. Cooper, D.N. Mitropoulou, C. Agathos, S. Reichardt, J.K.V. Al-Maskari, F. Chantratita, W. Wonkam, A. Dandara, C. Katsila, T. Lopez-Correa, C. Ali, B.R. Patrinos, G.P.
- Abstract
Genomic medicine has greatly matured in terms of its technical capabilities, but the diffusion of genomic innovations worldwide faces significant barriers beyond mere access to technology. New global development strategies are sorely needed for biotechnologies such as genomics and their applications toward precision medicine without borders. Moreover, diffusion of genomic medicine globally cannot adhere to a "one-size-fits-all-countries" development strategy, in the same way that drug treatments should be customized. This begs a timely, difficult but crucial question: How should developing countries, and the resource-limited regions of developed countries, invest in genomic medicine? Although a full-scale investment in infrastructure from discovery to the translational implementation of genomic science is ideal, this may not always be feasible in all countries at all times. A simple "transplantation of genomics" from developed to developing countries is unlikely to be feasible. Nor should developing countries be seen as simple recipients and beneficiaries of genomic medicine developed elsewhere because important advances in genomic medicine have materialized in developing countries as well. There are several noteworthy examples of genomic medicine success stories involving resource-limited settings that are contextualized and described in this global genomic medicine innovation analysis. In addition, we outline here a new long-term development strategy for global genomic medicine in a way that recognizes the individual country's pressing public health priorities and disease burdens. We term this approach the "Fast-Second Winner" model of innovation that supports innovation commencing not only "upstream" of discovery science but also "mid-stream," building on emerging highly promising biomarker and diagnostic candidates from the global science discovery pipeline, based on the unique needs of each country. A mid-stream entry into innovation can enhance collective learning from other innovators' mistakes upstream in discovery science and boost the probability of success for translation and implementation when resources are limited. This à la carte model of global innovation and development strategy offers multiple entry points into the global genomics innovation ecosystem for developing countries, whether or not extensive and expensive discovery infrastructures are already in place. Ultimately, broadening our thinking beyond the linear model of innovation will help us to enable the vision and practice of genomics without borders in both developed and resource-limited settings. © 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
- Published
- 2017
16. Correction: A european spectrum of pharmacogenomic biomarkers: Implications for clinical pharmacogenomics (PLoS ONE (2016) 11:9 (e0162866) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162866)
- Author
-
Mizzi, C., Dalabira, E., Kumuthini, J., Dzimiri, N., Balogh, István, Başak, N., Böhm, R., Borg, J., Borgiani, P., Bozina, N., Bruckmueller, B., Burzynska, B., Carracedo, A., Cascorbi, I., Constantinou-Deltas, Constantinos D., Dolzan, V., Fenech, A., Grech, G., Kasiulevicius, V., Kádaši, D., Kučinskas, V., Khusnutdinova, E., Loukas, Y. L., Macek, M., Jr., Makukh, H., Mathijssen, R., Mitropoulos, K., Mitropoulou, C., Novelli, G., Papantoni, I., Pavlovic, S., Saglio, G., Setric, J., Stojiljkovic, M., Stubbs, A. P., Squassina, A., Torres, M., Turnovec, M., van Schaik, R. H., Voskarides, Konstantinos, Wakil, S. M., Werk, A., del Zompo, M., Zukic, B., Katsila, T., Ta Michael Lee, M., Motsinger-Rief, A., Mc Leod, H. L., van der Spek, P. J., Patrinos, G. P., and Constantinou-Deltas, Constantinos D. [0000-0001-5549-9169]
- Subjects
pharmacogenomics - Abstract
The thirty-Third author's name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Jadranka Sertić. © 2017 Mizzi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 12
- Published
- 2017
17. Correction: A european spectrum of pharmacogenomic biomarkers: Implications for clinical pharmacogenomics (PLoS ONE (2016) 11:9 (e0162866) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162866)
- Author
-
Mizzi, C. Dalabira, E. Kumuthini, J. Dzimiri, N. Balogh, I. Başak, N. Böhm, R. Borg, J. Borgiani, P. Bozina, N. Bruckmueller, B. Burzynska, B. Carracedo, A. Cascorbi, I. Deltas, C. Dolzan, V. Fenech, A. Grech, G. Kasiulevicius, V. Kádaši, D. Kučinskas, V. Khusnutdinova, E. Loukas, Y.L. Macek, M., Jr. Makukh, H. Mathijssen, R. Mitropoulos, K. Mitropoulou, C. Novelli, G. Papantoni, I. Pavlovic, S. Saglio, G. Setric, J. Stojiljkovic, M. Stubbs, A.P. Squassina, A. Torres, M. Turnovec, M. van Schaik, R.H. Voskarides, K. Wakil, S.M. Werk, A. del Zompo, M. Zukic, B. Katsila, T. Ta Michael Lee, M. Motsinger-Rief, A. Mc Leod, H.L. van der Spek, P.J. Patrinos, G.P.
- Abstract
The thirty-Third author's name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Jadranka Sertić. © 2017 Mizzi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Published
- 2017
18. Performance Ratio Based Resource Allocation Decision-Making in Genomic Medicine
- Author
-
Fragoulakis, V. Mitropoulou, C. Katelidou, D. Van Schaik, R.H. Maniadakis, N. Patrinos, G.P.
- Abstract
In modern healthcare systems, the available resources may influence the morbidity, mortality, and - consequently - the level of healthcare provided in every country. This is of particular interest in developing countries where the resources are limited and must be spent wisely to address social justice and the right for equal access in healthcare services by all the citizens in economically viable terms. In this light, the current allocation is, in practice, inefficient and rests mostly on each country's individual political and historical context and, thus, does not always incorporate decision-making enabled by economic models. In this study, we present a new economic model, specifically for resource allocation for genomic medicine, based on performance ratio, with potential applications in diverse healthcare sectors, which are particularly appealing for developing countries and low-resource environments. The model proposes a new method for resource allocation taking into account (1) the size of innovation of a new technology, (2) the relative effectiveness in comparison with social preferences, and (3) the cost of the technology, which permits the measurement of effectiveness to be determined differently in the context of a specific disease and then to be expressed in a relative form using a common performance ratio. The present work expands on previous work for innovation in economic models pertaining to genomic medicine and supports translational science. Copyright © 2017 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
- Published
- 2017
19. Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe: Design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium
- Author
-
Wouden, C.H. van der, Cambon-Thomsen, A., Cecchin, E., Cheung, K.C., Davila-Fajardo, C.L., Deneer, V.H., Dolzan, V., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Jonsson, S., Karlsson, M.O., Kriek, M., Mitropoulou, C., Patrinos, G.P., Pirmohamed, M., Samwald, M., Schaeffeler, E., Schwab, M., Steinberger, D., Stingl, J., Sunder-Plassmann, G., Toffoli, G., Turner, R.M., Rhenen, M. van, Swen, J.J., Guchelaar, H.J., and Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consor
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Research design ,Genotype ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,MEDLINE ,Pharmacogenomic Testing ,Bioinformatics ,030226 pharmacology & pharmacy ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Health care ,Medicine ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Prospective Studies ,Precision Medicine ,Pharmacology ,Medical education ,Cost–benefit analysis ,business.industry ,3. Good health ,Clinical trial ,Europe ,030104 developmental biology ,Treatment Outcome ,Research Design ,Pharmacogenomics ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Despite scientific and clinical advances in the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx), application into routine care remains limited. Opportunely, several implementation studies and programs have been initiated over recent years. This article presents an overview of these studies and identifies current research gaps. Importantly, one such gap is the undetermined collective clinical utility of implementing a panel of PGx-markers into routine care, because the evidence base is currently limited to specific, individual drug-gene pairs. The Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx) Consortium, which has been funded by the European Commission's Horizon-2020 program, aims to address this unmet need. In a prospective, block-randomized, controlled clinical study (PREemptive Pharmacogenomic testing for prevention of Adverse drug REactions [PREPARE]), pre-emptive genotyping of a panel of clinically relevant PGx-markers, for which guidelines are available, will be implemented across healthcare institutions in seven European countries. The impact on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be investigated. The program is unique in its multicenter, multigene, multidrug, multi-ethnic, and multihealthcare system approach.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. A brighter future for the implementation of pharmacogenomic testing
- Author
-
Wouden, C.H. van der, Swen, J.J., Samwald, M., Mitropoulou, C., Schwab, M., Guchelaar, H.J., and Ubiquitous-Pharmacogenomics
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Cytogenetics ,Pharmacogenomic Testing ,Computational biology ,Bioinformatics ,030226 pharmacology & pharmacy ,Human genetics ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Viewpoint ,Drug Therapy ,Pharmacogenetics ,Molecular genetics ,Genetics ,medicine ,Medical genetics ,Genetic Testing ,Public Health ,Precision Medicine ,business ,Dna diagnosis ,Genetics (clinical) - Abstract
Pharmacogenomics has been lauded as an important innovation in clinical medicine as a result of advances in genomic science. As one of the cornerstones in precision medicine, the vision to determine the right medication in the right dosage for the right treatment with the use of genetic information has not exactly materialised, and few genetic tests have been implemented as the standard of care in health systems worldwide. Here we review the findings from a SWOT analysis to examine the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats around the role of pharmacogenetics in public health and clinical health care, at the micro, meso and macro levels corresponding to the perspectives of the individuals (scientists, patients and physicians), the health-care institutions and the health systems, respectively.
- Published
- 2016
21. A European spectrum of pharmacogenomic biomarkers: Implications for clinical pharmacogenomics
- Author
-
Mizzi, C., Dalabira, E., Kumuthini, J., Dzimiri, N., Balogh, István, Başak, N., Böhm, R., Borg, J., Borgiani, P., Bozina, N., Bruckmueller, H., Burzynska, B., Carracedo, A., Cascorbi, I., Constantinou-Deltas, Constantinos D., Dolzan, V., Fenech, A., Grech, G., Kasiulevicius, V., Kádaši, L., Kučinskas, V., Khusnutdinova, E., Loukas, Y. L., Macek, M., Makukh, H., Mathijssen, R., Mitropoulos, K., Mitropoulou, C., Novelli, G., Papantoni, I., Pavlovic, S., Saglio, G., Setric, J., Stojiljkovic, M., Stubbs, A. P., Squassina, A., Torres, M., Turnovec, M., Van Schaik, R. H., Voskarides, Konstantinos, Wakil, S. M., Werk, A., Zompo, M. D., Zukic, B., Katsila, T., Lee, M. T. M., Motsinger-Rief, A., Leod, H. L. M., Van Der Spek, P. J., Patrinos, G. P., Constantinou-Deltas, Constantinos D. [0000-0001-5549-9169], Pathology, Medical Oncology, and Clinical Chemistry
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Genetics and Molecular Biology (all) ,Anticoagulants ,Cluster Analysis ,Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 ,Ethnic Groups ,Europe ,Humans ,Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases ,Warfarin ,Genetic Markers ,Pharmacogenetics ,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all) ,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all) ,genotype ,lcsh:Medicine ,Toxicology ,Pathology and Laboratory Medicine ,Bioinformatics ,anticoagulant agent ,Biochemistry ,human experiment ,ethnic group ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Drugs -- Effectiveness ,genetics ,TPMT gene ,lcsh:Science ,pharmacogenetics ,Multidisciplinary ,cytochrome P450 2C9 ,biology ,Pharmaceutics ,VKORC1 protein, human ,Drugs ,Orvostudományok ,Genomics ,biological marker ,3. Good health ,CYP2C9 gene ,Biomarker (medicine) ,VKORC1 ,genetic marker ,Research Article ,Biotechnology ,Genotyping ,Pharmacogenomic Testing ,CYP2C19 ,gene frequency ,Klinikai orvostudományok ,Research and Analysis Methods ,European ,Article ,CYP3A5 gene ,medication therapy management ,SLCO1B1 gene ,vitamin K epoxide reductase ,CYP2C19 gene ,03 medical and health sciences ,Dose Prediction Methods ,Genomic Medicine ,Drug Therapy ,Genetics ,controlled study ,human ,normal human ,Molecular Biology Techniques ,gene ,Molecular Biology ,Allele frequency ,Pharmacology ,pharmacogenomics ,Pharmacogenomics ,genetic composition ,biomarkers ,allele frequency ,European populations ,Toxicity ,lcsh:R ,Biology and Life Sciences ,warfarin ,030104 developmental biology ,Settore MED/03 - Genetica Medica ,biology.protein ,lcsh:Q ,VKORC1 gene ,SLCO1B1 ,Biomarkers ,cluster analysis - Abstract
Acknowledgments: The Euro-PGx project was partly funded by European grant (RD-Connect; FP7-305444) and the Golden Helix Foundation and encouraged by the Genomic Medicine Alliance Pharmacogenomics Working group. The Lithuanian segment of the project was supported by the LITGEN project (VP1-3.1-ŠMM-07-K-01-013), funded by the European Social Fund under the Global Grant Measure. The Czech segment of the project was supported by 00064203, LN14073, LM2015091, NF-CZ11-PDP-3-003-2014 and CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24022OPPK grants to MM. JK was funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund Award NHGRI Grant Number U41HG006941. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interests., Pharmacogenomics aims to correlate inter-individual differences of drug efficacy and/or toxicity with the underlying genetic composition, particularly in genes encoding for protein factors and enzymes involved in drug metabolism and transport. In several European populations, particularly in countries with lower income, information related to the prevalence of pharmacogenomic biomarkers is incomplete or lacking. Here, we have implemented the microattribution approach to assess the pharmacogenomic biomarkers allelic spectrum in 18 European populations, mostly from developing European countries, by analyzing 1,931 pharmacogenomics biomarkers in 231 genes. Our data show significant interpopulation pharmacogenomic biomarker allele frequency differences, particularly in 7 clinically actionable pharmacogenomic biomarkers in 7 European populations, affecting drug efficacy and/or toxicity of 51 medication treatment modalities. These data also reflect on the differences observed in the prevalence of high-risk genotypes in these populations, as far as common markers in the CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, VKORC1, SLCO1B1 and TPMT pharmacogenes are concerned. Also, our data demonstrate notable differences in predicted genotype-based warfarin dosing among these populations. Our findings can be exploited not only to develop guidelines for medical prioritization, but most importantly to facilitate integration of pharmacogenomics and to support pre-emptive pharmacogenomic testing. This may subsequently contribute towards significant cost-savings in the overall healthcare expenditure in the participating countries, where pharmacogenomics implementation proves to be cost-effective., The Euro-PGx project was partly funded by European grant (RD-Connect; FP7-305444) and the Golden Helix Foundation and encouraged by the Genomic Medicine Alliance Pharmacogenomics Working group. The Lithuanian segment of the project was supported by the LITGEN project (VP1- 3.1-ŠMM-07-K-01-013), funded by the European Social Fund under the Global Grant Measure. The Czech segment of the project was supported by 00064203, LN14073, LM2015091, NF-CZ11-PDP-3-003-2014 and CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24022OPPK grants to MM. JK was funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund Award NHGRI Grant Number U41HG006941. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript., peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2016
22. Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe : Design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium
- Author
-
van der Wouden, C. H., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Cecchin, E., Cheung, K. C., Davila-Fajardo, C. L., Deneer, V. H., Dolzan, V., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Jönsson, Siv, Karlsson, Mats O., Kriek, M., Mitropoulou, C., Patrinos, G. P., Pirmohamed, M., Samwald, M., Schaeffeler, E., Schwab, M., Steinberger, D., Stingl, J., Sunder-Plassmann, G., Toffoli, G., Turner, R. M., Van Rhenen, Mh, Swen, J. J., Guchelaar, H-J, van der Wouden, C. H., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Cecchin, E., Cheung, K. C., Davila-Fajardo, C. L., Deneer, V. H., Dolzan, V., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Jönsson, Siv, Karlsson, Mats O., Kriek, M., Mitropoulou, C., Patrinos, G. P., Pirmohamed, M., Samwald, M., Schaeffeler, E., Schwab, M., Steinberger, D., Stingl, J., Sunder-Plassmann, G., Toffoli, G., Turner, R. M., Van Rhenen, Mh, Swen, J. J., and Guchelaar, H-J
- Abstract
Despite scientific and clinical advances in the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx), application into routine care remains limited. Opportunely, several implementation studies and programs have been initiated over recent years. This article presents an overview of these studies and identifies current research gaps. Importantly, one such gap is the undetermined collective clinical utility of implementing a panel of PGx-markers into routine care, because the evidence base is currently limited to specific, individual drug-gene pairs. The Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx) Consortium, which has been funded by the European Commission's Horizon-2020 program, aims to address this unmet need. In a prospective, block-randomized, controlled clinical study (PREemptive Pharmacogenomic testing for prevention of Adverse drug REactions [PREPARE]), pre-emptive genotyping of a panel of clinically relevant PGx-markers, for which guidelines are available, will be implemented across healthcare institutions in seven European countries. The impact on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be investigated. The program is unique in its multicenter, multigene, multidrug, multi-ethnic, and multi-healthcare system approach.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Expanded national database collection and data coverage in the FINDbase worldwide database for clinically relevant genomic variation allele frequencies
- Author
-
Viennas, E. (Emmanouil), Komianou, A. (Angeliki), Mizzi, C. (Clint), Stojiljkovic, M. (Maja), Mitropoulou, C. (Christina), Muilu, J. (Juha), Vihinen, M. (Mauno), Grypioti, P. (Panagiota), Papadaki, S. (Styliani), Pavlidis, C. (Cristiana), Zukic, B. (Branka), Katsila, T. (Theodora), Spek, P.J. (Peter) van der, Pavlovic, S. (Sonja), Tzimas, G. (Giannis), Patrinos, G.P. (George), Viennas, E. (Emmanouil), Komianou, A. (Angeliki), Mizzi, C. (Clint), Stojiljkovic, M. (Maja), Mitropoulou, C. (Christina), Muilu, J. (Juha), Vihinen, M. (Mauno), Grypioti, P. (Panagiota), Papadaki, S. (Styliani), Pavlidis, C. (Cristiana), Zukic, B. (Branka), Katsila, T. (Theodora), Spek, P.J. (Peter) van der, Pavlovic, S. (Sonja), Tzimas, G. (Giannis), and Patrinos, G.P. (George)
- Abstract
FINDbase (http://www.findbase.org) is a comprehensive data repository that records the prevalence of clinically relevant genomic variants in various populations worldwide, such as pathogenic variants leadingmostly tomonogenic disorders and pharmacogenomics biomarkers. The database also records the incidence of rare genetic diseases in various populations, all in well-distinct data modules. Here, we report extensive data content updates in all data modules, with direct implications to clinical pharmacogenomics. Also, we report significant new developments in FINDbase, namely (i) the release of a new version of the ETHNOS software that catalyzes development curation of national/ethnic genetic databases, (ii) the migration of all FINDbase data content into 90 distinct national/ethnicmutation databases, all built around Microsoft's PivotViewer (http://www.getpivot.com) software (iii) new data visualization tools and (iv) the interrelation of FINDbase with DruGeVar database with direct implications in clinical pharmacogenomics. The abovementioned updates further enhance the impact of FINDbase, as a key resource for Genomic Medicine applications.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Expanded national database collection and data coverage in the FINDbase worldwide database for clinically relevant genomic variation allele frequencies
- Author
-
Viennas, E, Komianou, A, Mizzi, Clint, Stojiljkovic, M, Mitropoulou, C, Muilu, J, Vihinen, M, Grypioti, P, Papadaki, S, Pavlidis, C, Zukic, B, Katsila, T, van der Spek, Peter, Pavlovic, S, Tzimas, G, Patrinos, George, Viennas, E, Komianou, A, Mizzi, Clint, Stojiljkovic, M, Mitropoulou, C, Muilu, J, Vihinen, M, Grypioti, P, Papadaki, S, Pavlidis, C, Zukic, B, Katsila, T, van der Spek, Peter, Pavlovic, S, Tzimas, G, and Patrinos, George
- Published
- 2017
25. A European spectrum of pharmacogenomic biomarkers: Implications for clinical pharmacogenomics
- Author
-
Mizzi, C. (Clint), Dalabira, E. (Eleni), Kumuthini, J. (Judit), Dzimiri, N. (Nduna), Balogh, I. (Istvan), Başak, N. (Nazli), Böhm, R. (Ruwen), Borg, J. (Joseph), Borgiani, P. (P.), Bozina, N. (Nada), Bruckmueller, H. (Henrike), Burzynska, B. (Beata), Carracedo, A. (Angel), Cascorbi, I. (Ingolf), Deltas, C. (Constantinos), Dolzan, V. (Vita), Fenech, A. (Anthony), Grech, G. (Godfrey), Kasiulevicius, V. (Vytautas), Kádaši, L. (Ludevít), Kučinskas, V. (Vaidutis), Khusnutdinova, E.K. (Elza), Loukas, Y.L. (Yiannis L.), Macek, M. (Milan), Makukh, H. (Halyna), Mathijssen, A.H.J. (Ron), Mitropoulos, K. (Konstantinos), Mitropoulou, C. (Christina), Novelli, G. (Giuseppe), Papantoni, I. (Ioanna), Pavlovic, S. (Sonja), Saglio, G., Setric, J. (Jadranka), Stojiljkovic, M. (Maja), Stubbs, A.P. (Andrew), Squassini, A. (Alessio), Torres, M. (Maria), Turnovec, M. (Marek), Schaik, R.H.N. (Ron) van, Voskarides, K. (Konstantinos), Wakil, S.M. (Salma M.), Werk, A. (Anneke), Zompo, M.D. (Maria Del), Zukic, B. (Branka), Katsila, T. (Theodora), Lee, M.T.M. (M. T M), Motsinger-Rief, A. (Alison), Leod, H.L.M. (Howard L. Mc), Spek, P.J. (Peter) van der, Patrinos, G.P. (George), Mizzi, C. (Clint), Dalabira, E. (Eleni), Kumuthini, J. (Judit), Dzimiri, N. (Nduna), Balogh, I. (Istvan), Başak, N. (Nazli), Böhm, R. (Ruwen), Borg, J. (Joseph), Borgiani, P. (P.), Bozina, N. (Nada), Bruckmueller, H. (Henrike), Burzynska, B. (Beata), Carracedo, A. (Angel), Cascorbi, I. (Ingolf), Deltas, C. (Constantinos), Dolzan, V. (Vita), Fenech, A. (Anthony), Grech, G. (Godfrey), Kasiulevicius, V. (Vytautas), Kádaši, L. (Ludevít), Kučinskas, V. (Vaidutis), Khusnutdinova, E.K. (Elza), Loukas, Y.L. (Yiannis L.), Macek, M. (Milan), Makukh, H. (Halyna), Mathijssen, A.H.J. (Ron), Mitropoulos, K. (Konstantinos), Mitropoulou, C. (Christina), Novelli, G. (Giuseppe), Papantoni, I. (Ioanna), Pavlovic, S. (Sonja), Saglio, G., Setric, J. (Jadranka), Stojiljkovic, M. (Maja), Stubbs, A.P. (Andrew), Squassini, A. (Alessio), Torres, M. (Maria), Turnovec, M. (Marek), Schaik, R.H.N. (Ron) van, Voskarides, K. (Konstantinos), Wakil, S.M. (Salma M.), Werk, A. (Anneke), Zompo, M.D. (Maria Del), Zukic, B. (Branka), Katsila, T. (Theodora), Lee, M.T.M. (M. T M), Motsinger-Rief, A. (Alison), Leod, H.L.M. (Howard L. Mc), Spek, P.J. (Peter) van der, and Patrinos, G.P. (George)
- Abstract
Pharmacogenomics aims to correlate inter-individual differences of drug efficacy and/or toxicity with the underlying genetic composition, particularly in genes encoding for protein factors and enzymes involved in drug metabolism and transport. In several European populations, particularly in countries with lower income, information related to the prevalence of pharmacogenomic biomarkers is incomplete or lacking. Here, we have implemented the microattribution approach to assess the pharmacogenomic biomarkers allelic spectrum in 18 European populations, mostly from developing European countries, by analyzing 1,931 pharmacogenomics biomarkers in 231 genes. Our data show significant interpopulation pharmacogenomic biomarker allele frequency differences, particularly in 7 clinically actionable pharmacogenomic biomarkers in 7 European populations, affecting drug efficacy and/or toxicity of 51 medication treatment modalities. These data also reflect on the differences observed in the prevalence of high-risk genotypes in these populations, as far as common markers in the CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, VKORC1, SLCO1B1 and TPMT pharmacogenes are concerned. Also, our data demonstrate notable differences in predicted genotype-based warfarin dosing among these populations. Our findings can be exploited not only to develop guidelines for medical prioritization, but most importantly to facilitate integration of pharmacogenomics and to support pre-emptive pharmacogenomic testing. This may subsequently contribute towards significant cost-savings in the overall healthcare expenditure in the participating countries, where pharmacogenomics implementation proves to be cost-effective.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. A European Spectrum of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers: Implications for Clinical Pharmacogenomics
- Author
-
Mizzi, Clint, Dalabira, E, Kumuthini, J, Dzimiri, N, Balogh, I, Basak, N, Bohm, R, Borg, J, Borgiani, P, Bozina, N, Bruckmueller, H, Burzynska, B, Carracedo, A, Cascorbi, I, Deltas, C, Dolzan, V, Fenech, A, Grech, G, Kasiulevicius, V, Kadasi, L, Kucinskas, V, Khusnutdinova, E, Loukas, Y L, Macek, M, Makukh, H, Mathijssen, Ron, Mitropoulos, K, Mitropoulou, C, Novelli, G, Papantoni, I, Pavlovic, S, Saglio, G, Setric, J, Stojiljkovic, M, Stubbs, Andrew, Squassina, A, Torres, M, Turnovec, M, van Schaik, Ron, Voskarides, K, Wakil, S M, Werk, A, Del Zompo, M, Zukic, B, Katsila, T, Lee, MTM, Motsinger-Rief, A, Mc Leod, H L, van der Spek, Peter, Patrinos, George, Mizzi, Clint, Dalabira, E, Kumuthini, J, Dzimiri, N, Balogh, I, Basak, N, Bohm, R, Borg, J, Borgiani, P, Bozina, N, Bruckmueller, H, Burzynska, B, Carracedo, A, Cascorbi, I, Deltas, C, Dolzan, V, Fenech, A, Grech, G, Kasiulevicius, V, Kadasi, L, Kucinskas, V, Khusnutdinova, E, Loukas, Y L, Macek, M, Makukh, H, Mathijssen, Ron, Mitropoulos, K, Mitropoulou, C, Novelli, G, Papantoni, I, Pavlovic, S, Saglio, G, Setric, J, Stojiljkovic, M, Stubbs, Andrew, Squassina, A, Torres, M, Turnovec, M, van Schaik, Ron, Voskarides, K, Wakil, S M, Werk, A, Del Zompo, M, Zukic, B, Katsila, T, Lee, MTM, Motsinger-Rief, A, Mc Leod, H L, van der Spek, Peter, and Patrinos, George
- Published
- 2016
27. Key challenges for next-generation pharmacogenomics
- Author
-
Kampourakis, K, Vayena, E, Mitropoulou, C, van Schaik, Ron, Cooper, DN, Borg, Joseph, Patrinos, GP, Cell biology, and Clinical Chemistry
- Published
- 2014
28. Relevance of pharmacogenomics for developing countries in Europe: Implementation in the Maltese population
- Author
-
Mitropoulou, C., Grech, G., Fenech, A. G., Borg, J., Mitropoulos, K., Athanassios Vozikis, and Patrinos, G. P.
- Subjects
Pharmacogenomics -- Malta ,Pharmacogenomics -- Developing countries ,Single nucleotide polymorphisms - Abstract
Pharmacogenomics is a promising new discipline that can realize personalized treatment for patients suffering from many common diseases, particularly those with multiple treatment modalities. Recent advances in the deciphering of the human genome sequence and high throughput genotyping technology have led to the reduction of the overall genotyping costs and enabled the inclusion of genotype-related dosing recommendations into drug package inserts, hence allowing the integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical practice. Although, pharmacogenomics gradually assumes an integral part in mainstream medical practice in developed countries, many countries, particularly from the developing world, still do not have access either to the knowledge or the resources to individualize drug treatment. The PharmacoGenetics for Every Nation Initiative (PGENI) aims to fill in this gap, by making pharmacogenomics globally applicable, not only by defining population-specific pharmacogenomic marker frequency profiles and formulating country-specific recommendations for drug efficacy and safety but also by increasing general public and healthcare professionals’ awareness over pharmacogenomics and genomic medicine. This article highlights the PGENI activities in Europe and its implementation in the Maltese population, in an effort to make pharmacogenomics readily applicable in European healthcare systems., peer-reviewed
29. CORRIGENDUM: Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe: Design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium.
- Author
-
van der Wouden, CH, Cambon‐Thomsen, A, Cecchin, E, Cheung, KC, Dávila‐Fajardo, CL, Deneer, VH, Dolžan, V, Ingelman‐Sundberg, M, Jönsson, S, Karlsson, MO, Kriek, M, Mitropoulou, C, Patrinos, GP, Pirmohamed, M, Samwald, M, Schaeffeler, E, Schwab, M, Steinberger, D, Stingl, J, and Sunder‐Plassmann, G
- Subjects
PHARMACOGENOMICS ,CONSORTIA - Abstract
A correction is presented to the article "Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe: Design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium" which appeared in the previous issue.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Meta-analysis of genomic variants in power and endurance sports to decode the impact of genomics on athletic performance and success.
- Author
-
Psatha A, Al-Mahayri ZN, Mitropoulou C, and Patrinos GP
- Subjects
- Humans, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A genetics, Athletes, Sports, Genetic Variation genetics, Athletic Performance, Physical Endurance genetics, Actinin genetics, Genomics
- Abstract
Association between genomic variants and athletic performance has seen a high degree of controversy, as there is often conflicting data as far as the association of genomic variants with endurance, speed and strength is concerned. Here, findings from a thorough meta-analysis from 4228 articles exploring the association of genomic variants with athletic performance in power and endurance sports are summarized, aiming to confirm or overrule the association of genetic variants with athletic performance of all types. From the 4228 articles, only 107 were eligible for further analysis, including 37 different genes. From these, there were 21 articles for the ACE gene, 29 articles for the ACTN3 gene and 8 articles for both the ACE and ACTN3 genes, including 54,382 subjects in total, from which 11,501 were endurance and power athletes and 42,881 control subjects. These data show that there is no statistically significant association between genomic variants and athletic performance either for endurance or power sports, underlying the fact that it is highly risky and even unethical to make such genetic testing services for athletic performance available to the general public. Overall, a strict regulatory monitoring should be exercised by health and other legislative authorities to protect the public from such services from an emerging discipline that still lacks the necessary scientific evidence and subsequent regulatory approval., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Cost-effectiveness analysis of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in solid organ transplantation using real-world data.
- Author
-
Deininger KM, Anderson HD, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C, and Aquilante CL
- Subjects
- Humans, Graft Rejection genetics, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Graft Rejection economics, United States, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Tacrolimus economics, Tacrolimus administration & dosage, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A genetics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Immunosuppressive Agents economics, Immunosuppressive Agents administration & dosage, Immunosuppressive Agents adverse effects, Genotype, Organ Transplantation economics
- Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant recipients relative to standard of care (SOC) tacrolimus dosing, from a US healthcare payer perspective. We developed decision-tree models to compare economic and clinical outcomes between CYP3A5 genotype-guided and SOC tacrolimus therapy in the first six months post-transplant. We derived inputs for CYP3A5 phenotype frequencies and physician use of genotype test results to inform clinical care from literature; tacrolimus exposure [high vs low tacrolimus time in therapeutic range using the Rosendaal algorithm (TAC TTR-Rosendaal)] and outcomes (incidences of acute tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, acute cellular rejection, and death) from real-world data; and costs from the Medicare Fee Schedule and literature. We calculated cost per avoided event and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the results to changes in inputs. Incremental costs per avoided event for CYP3A5 genotype-guided vs SOC tacrolimus dosing were $176,667 for kidney recipients, $364,000 for liver recipients, $12,982 for heart recipients, and $93,333 for lung recipients. The likelihood of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing leading to cost-savings was 19.8% in kidney, 32.3% in liver, 51.8% in heart, and 54.1% in lung transplant recipients. Physician use of genotype results to guide clinical care and the proportion of patients with a high TAC TTR-Rosendaal were key parameters driving the cost-effectiveness of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus therapy. Relative to SOC, CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing resulted in a slightly greater benefit at a higher cost. Further economic evaluations examining intermediary outcomes (e.g., dose modifications) are needed, particularly in populations with higher frequencies of CYP3A5 expressers., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Cost-utility analysis of pharmacogenomics-guided tacrolimus treatment in Austrian kidney transplant recipients participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study.
- Author
-
Fragoulakis V, Koufaki MI, Joefield-Roka C, Sunder-Plassmann G, and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Humans, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Pharmacogenetics methods, Austria, Transplant Recipients, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Tacrolimus therapeutic use, Kidney Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health issue. Kidney failure patients may undergo a kidney transplantation (KTX) and prescribed an immunosuppressant medication i.e., tacrolimus. Tacrolimus' efficacy and toxicity varies among patients. This study investigates the cost-utility of pharmacogenomics (PGx) guided tacrolimus treatment compared to the conventional approach in Austrian patients undergone KTX, participating in the PREPARE UPGx study. Treatment's effectiveness was determined by mean survival, and utility values were based on a Visual Analog Scale score. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio was also calculated. PGx-guided treatment arm was found to be cost-effective, resulting in reduced cost (3902 euros less), 6% less hospitalization days and lower risk of adverse drug events compared to the control arm. The PGx-guided arm showed a mean 0.900 QALYs (95% CI: 0.862-0.936) versus 0.851 QALYs (95% CI: 0.814-0.885) in the other arm. In conclusion, PGx-guided tacrolimus treatment represents a cost-saving option in the Austrian healthcare setting., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Clinical implementation of preemptive pharmacogenomics in psychiatry.
- Author
-
Skokou M, Karamperis K, Koufaki MI, Tsermpini EE, Pandi MT, Siamoglou S, Ferentinos P, Bartsakoulia M, Katsila T, Mitropoulou C, and Patrinos GP
- Subjects
- Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Depressive Disorder, Major drug therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major genetics, Psychiatry, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions etiology
- Abstract
Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds promise to revolutionize modern healthcare. Although there are several prospective clinical studies in oncology and cardiology, demonstrating a beneficial effect of PGx-guided treatment in reducing adverse drug reactions, there are very few such studies in psychiatry, none of which spans across all main psychiatric indications, namely schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. In this study we aim to investigate the clinical effectiveness of PGx-guided treatment (occurrence of adverse drug reactions, hospitalisations and re-admissions, polypharmacy) and perform a cost analysis of the intervention., Methods: We report our findings from a multicenter, large-scale, prospective study of pre-emptive genome-guided treatment named as PREemptive Pharmacogenomic testing for preventing Adverse drug REactions (PREPARE) in a large cohort of psychiatric patients (n = 1076) suffering from schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder., Findings: We show that patients with an actionable phenotype belonging to the PGx-guided arm (n = 25) present with 34.1% less adverse drug reactions compared to patients belonging to the control arm (n = 36), 41.2% less hospitalisations (n = 110 in the PGx-guided arm versus n = 187 in the control arm) and 40.5% less re-admissions (n = 19 in the PGx-guided arm versus n = 32 in the control arm), less duration of initial hospitalisations (n = 3305 total days of hospitalisation in the PGx-guided arm from 110 patients, versus n = 6517 in the control arm from 187 patients) and duration of hospitalisation upon readmission (n = 579 total days of hospitalisation upon readmission in the PGx-guided arm, derived from 19 patients, versus n = 928 in the control arm, from 32 patients respectively). It was also shown that in the vast majority of the cases, there was less drug dose administrated per drug in the PGx-guided arm compared to the control arm and less polypharmacy (n = 124 patients prescribed with at least 4 psychiatric drugs in the PGx-guided arm versus n = 143 in the control arm) and smaller average number of co-administered psychiatric drugs (2.19 in the PGx-guided arm versus 2.48 in the control arm. Furthermore, less deaths were reported in the PGx-guided arm (n = 1) compared with the control arm (n = 9). Most importantly, we observed a 48.5% reduction of treatment costs in the PGx-guided arm with a reciprocal slight increase of the quality of life of patients suffering from major depressive disorder (0.935 versus 0.925 QALYs in the PGx-guided and control arm, respectively)., Interpretation: While only a small proportion (∼25%) of the entire study sample had an actionable genotype, PGx-guided treatment can have a beneficial effect in psychiatric patients with a reciprocal reduction of treatment costs. Although some of these findings did not remain significant when all patients were considered, our data indicate that genome-guided psychiatric treatment may be successfully integrated in mainstream healthcare., Funding: European Union Horizon 2020., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Assessing the utility of measurement methods applied in economic evaluations of pharmacogenomics applications.
- Author
-
Fragoulakis V, Koufaki MI, Tzerefou K, Koufou K, Patrinos GP, and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Humans, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Pharmacogenetics methods, Pharmacogenomic Testing
- Abstract
An increasing number of economic evaluations are published annually investigating the economic effectiveness of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing. This work was designed to provide a comprehensive summary of the available utility methods used in cost-effectiveness/cost-utility analysis studies of PGx interventions. A comprehensive review was conducted to identify economic analysis studies using a utility valuation method for PGx testing. A total of 82 studies met the inclusion criteria. A majority of studies were from the USA and used the EuroQol-5D questionnaire, as the utility valuation method. Cardiovascular disorders was the most studied therapeutic area while discrete-choice studies mainly focused on patients' willingness to undergo PGx testing. Future research in applying other methodologies in PGx economic evaluation studies would improve the current research environment and provide better results.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Cost-utility analysis and cross-country comparison of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment in colorectal cancer patients participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study.
- Author
-
Fragoulakis V, Roncato R, Bignucolo A, Patrinos GP, Toffoli G, Cecchin E, and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Humans, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Prospective Studies, State Medicine, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pharmacogenetics, Colorectal Neoplasms drug therapy, Colorectal Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Objectives: A cost-utility analysis was conducted to evaluate pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided treatment compared to the standard-of-care intervention among patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Italy., Methods: Data derived from a prospective, open-label, block randomized clinical trial, as a part of the largest PGx study worldwide (355 patients in both arms) were used. Mortality was used as the primary health outcome to estimate life years (LYs) gained in treatment arms within a survival analysis context. PGx-guided treatment was based on established drug-gene interactions between capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan with DPYD and/or UGT1A1 genomic variants. Utility values for the calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) was based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Missing data were imputed via the Multiple Imputation method and linear interpolation, when possible, while censored cost data were corrected via the Replace-From-The-Right algorithm. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated for QALYs. Raw data were bootstrapped 5000 times in order to produce 95% Confidence Intervals based on non-parametric percentile method and to construct a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Cost differences for study groups were investigated via a generalized linear regression model analysis. Total therapy cost per patient reflected all resources expended in the management of any adverse events, including medications, diagnostics tests, devices, surgeries, the utilization of intensive care units, and wards., Results: The total cost of the study arm was estimated at €380 (∼ US$416; 95%CI: 195-596) compared to €565 (∼ US$655; 95%CI: 340-724) of control arm while the mean survival in study arm was estimated at 1.58 (+0.25) LYs vs 1.50 (+0.26) (Log Rank test, X2 = 4.219, df=1, p-value=0.04). No statistically significant difference was found in QALYs. ICER was estimated at €13418 (∼ US$14695) per QALY, while the acceptability curve indicated that when the willingness-to-pay was under €5000 (∼ US$5476), the probability of PGx being cost-effective overcame 70%. The most frequent adverse drug event in both groups was neutropenia of severity grade 3 and 4, accounting for 82.6% of total events in the study arm and 65.0% in the control arm. Apart from study arm, smoking status, Body-Mass-Index and Cumulative Actionability were also significant predictors of total cost. Subgroup analysis conducted in actionable patients (7.9% of total patients) indicated that PGx-guided treatment was a dominant option over its comparator with a probability greater than 92%. In addition, a critical literature review was conducted, and these findings are in line with those reported in other European countries., Conclusion: PGx-guided treatment strategy may represent a cost-saving option compared to the existing conventional therapeutic approach for colorectal cancer patient management in the National Health Service of Italy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:GEORGE P. PATRINOS reports administrative support was provided by University of Patras., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Economic evaluation of pharmacogenomic-guided antiplatelet treatment in Spanish patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study.
- Author
-
Koufaki MI, Fragoulakis V, Díaz-Villamarín X, Karamperis K, Vozikis A, Swen JJ, Dávila-Fajardo CL, Vasileiou KZ, Patrinos GP, and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Humans, Clopidogrel therapeutic use, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors adverse effects, Pharmacogenetics, Acute Coronary Syndrome drug therapy, Acute Coronary Syndrome genetics
- Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases and especially Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) constitute a major health issue impacting millions of patients worldwide. Being a leading cause of death and hospital admissions in many European countries including Spain, it accounts for enormous amounts of healthcare expenditures for its management. Clopidogrel is one of the oldest antiplatelet medications used as standard of care in ACS., Methods: In this study, we performed an economic evaluation study to estimate whether a genome-guided clopidogrel treatment is cost-effective compared to conventional one in a large cohort of 243 individuals of Spanish origin suffering from ACS and treated with clopidogrel. Data were derived from the U-PGx PREPARE clinical trial. Effectiveness was measured as survival of individuals while study data on safety and efficacy, as well as on resource utilization associated with each adverse drug reaction were used to measure costs to treat these adverse drug reactions. A generalized linear regression model was used to estimate cost differences for both study groups., Results: Based on our findings, PGx-guided treatment group is cost-effective. PGx-guided treatment demonstrated to have 50% less hospital admissions, reduced emergency visits and almost 13% less ADRs compared to the non-PGx approach with mean QALY 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.10) versus 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.09) for the control group, while life years for both groups were 1.24 (95% CI, 1.20-1.26) and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.19-1.26), respectively. The mean total cost of PGx-guided treatment was 50% less expensive than conventional therapy with clopidogrel [€883 (95% UI, €316-€1582), compared to €1,755 (95% UI, €765-€2949)]., Conclusion: These findings suggest that PGx-guided clopidogrel treatment represents a cost-effective option for patients suffering from ACS in the Spanish healthcare setting., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study.
- Author
-
Swen JJ, van der Wouden CH, Manson LE, Abdullah-Koolmees H, Blagec K, Blagus T, Böhringer S, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cecchin E, Cheung KC, Deneer VH, Dupui M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Jonsson S, Joefield-Roka C, Just KS, Karlsson MO, Konta L, Koopmann R, Kriek M, Lehr T, Mitropoulou C, Rial-Sebbag E, Rollinson V, Roncato R, Samwald M, Schaeffeler E, Skokou M, Schwab M, Steinberger D, Stingl JC, Tremmel R, Turner RM, van Rhenen MH, Dávila Fajardo CL, Dolžan V, Patrinos GP, Pirmohamed M, Sunder-Plassmann G, Toffoli G, and Guchelaar HJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Genetic Testing, Genotype, Drug Combinations, Treatment Outcome, Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: The benefit of pharmacogenetic testing before starting drug therapy has been well documented for several single gene-drug combinations. However, the clinical utility of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy using a pharmacogenetic panel has not been rigorously assessed., Methods: We conducted an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, crossover implementation study of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel in 18 hospitals, nine community health centres, and 28 community pharmacies in seven European countries (Austria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK). Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a first prescription for a drug clinically recommended in the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (ie, the index drug) as part of routine care were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included previous genetic testing for a gene relevant to the index drug, a planned duration of treatment of less than 7 consecutive days, and severe renal or liver insufficiency. All patients gave written informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants were genotyped for 50 germline variants in 12 genes, and those with an actionable variant (ie, a drug-gene interaction test result for which the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group [DPWG] recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) were treated according to DPWG recommendations. Patients in the control group received standard treatment. To prepare clinicians for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing, local teams were educated during a site-initiation visit and online educational material was made available. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions within the 12-week follow-up period. Analyses were irrespective of patient adherence to the DPWG guidelines. The primary analysis was done using a gatekeeping analysis, in which outcomes in people with an actionable drug-gene interaction in the study group versus the control group were compared, and only if the difference was statistically significant was an analysis done that included all of the patients in the study. Outcomes were compared between the study and control groups, both for patients with an actionable drug-gene interaction test result (ie, a result for which the DPWG recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) and for all patients who received at least one dose of index drug. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03093818 and is closed to new participants., Findings: Between March 7, 2017, and June 30, 2020, 41 696 patients were assessed for eligibility and 6944 (51·4 % female, 48·6% male; 97·7% self-reported European, Mediterranean, or Middle Eastern ethnicity) were enrolled and assigned to receive genotype-guided drug treatment (n=3342) or standard care (n=3602). 99 patients (52 [1·6%] of the study group and 47 [1·3%] of the control group) withdrew consent after group assignment. 652 participants (367 [11·0%] in the study group and 285 [7·9%] in the control group) were lost to follow-up. In patients with an actionable test result for the index drug (n=1558), a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction occurred in 152 (21·0%) of 725 patients in the study group and 231 (27·7%) of 833 patients in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·54-0·91]; p=0·0075), whereas for all patients, the incidence was 628 (21·5%) of 2923 patients in the study group and 934 (28·6%) of 3270 patients in the control group (OR 0·70 [95% CI 0·61-0·79]; p <0·0001)., Interpretation: Genotype-guided treatment using a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions and was feasible across diverse European health-care system organisations and settings. Large-scale implementation could help to make drug therapy increasingly safe., Funding: European Union Horizon 2020., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MP received partnership funding from the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Pharmacology Training Scheme (cofunded by MRC, Roche, Union Chimique Belge [UCB] Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Novartis); a PhD studentship jointly funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and AstraZeneca; unrestricted educational grant support for the UK Pharmacogenetics and Stratified Medicine Network from Bristol Myers Squibb; and human leucocyte antigen genotyping panel with MC Diagnostics but does not benefit financially from this, outside of the submitted work. JCS received speaker honoraria from Novartis for lectures on CYP2C9 pharmacogenetics and siponimod metabolism, outside of the submitted work. MS was partly supported by the Robert Bosch Stiftung and German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany's Excellence Strategy (EXC 2180—390900677); and outside of the submitted work received support from Green Cross WellBeing, Gilead Sciences, Robert Bosch, CORAT Therapeutics, and Agena Bioscience. ES was partly supported by the Robert Bosch Stiftung and the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany's Excellence Strategy (EXC 2180—390900677). RT was partly supported by the Robert Bosch Stiftung. MK received research funding from Bayer and Roche, educational grants from Novartis and Servier, and consultancy fees from Pharmetheus, outside of the submitted work. SJ received consultancy fees from Pharmetheus, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Development of an optimized and generic cost-utility model for analyzing genome-guided treatment data.
- Author
-
Pandi MT, Koromina M, Vonitsanos G, van der Spek PJ, Patrinos GP, and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Reproducibility of Results
- Abstract
Economic evaluation is an integral component of informed public health decision-making in personalized medicine. However, performing economic evaluation assessments often requires specialized knowledge, expertise, and significant resources. To this end, developing generic models can significantly assist towards providing the necessary evidence for the cost-effectiveness of genome-guided therapeutic interventions, compared to the traditional drug treatment modalities. Here, we report a generic cost-utility analysis model, developed in R, which encompasses essential economic evaluation steps. Specifically, critical steps towards a comprehensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were incorporated in our model, while also providing an easy-to-use graphical user interface, which allows even non-experts in the field to produce a fully comprehensive cost-utility analysis report. To further demonstrate the model's reproducibility, two sets of data were assessed, one stemming from in-house clinical data and one based on previously published data. By implementing the generic model presented herein, we show that the model produces results in complete concordance with the traditionally performed cost-utility analysis for both datasets. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential of generic models to provide useful economic evidence for personalized medicine interventions., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Editorial: Pharmacogenomics: From Bench to Bedside and Back Again.
- Author
-
Shaman JA, Bousman CA, Mitropoulou C, and Padmanabhan S
- Abstract
Competing Interests: JS is Chief Science Officer at Coriell Life Sciences. CB is the Founder and equity holder in Sequence2Script Inc. CM is the managing director of the Golden Helix Foundation. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Horizon Scanning: Teaching Genomics and Personalized Medicine in the Digital Age.
- Author
-
Patrinos GP and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Artificial Intelligence, Genomics, Humans, Pandemics, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Precision Medicine
- Abstract
Digital transformation is currently impacting not only health care but also education curricula for medicine and life sciences. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the deployment of digital technologies such as the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence in diverse fields of biomedicine. Genomics and related fields of inquiry such as pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine have been making important progress over the past decades. However, the genomics knowledge of health care professionals and other stakeholders in society is not commensurate with the current state of progress in these scientific fields. The rise of digital health offers unprecedented opportunities both for health care professionals and the general public to expand their genomics literacy and education. This expert review offers an analysis of the bottlenecks that affect and issues that need to be addressed to catalyze genomics and personalized medicine education in the digital era. In addition, we summarize and critically discuss the various educational and awareness opportunities that presently exist to catalyze the delivery of genomics knowledge in ways closely attuned to the emerging field of digital health.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Conference report: inaugural Pharmacogenomics Access & Reimbursement Symposium.
- Author
-
Rogers SL, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C, Formea CM, Shawn Jones J, and Brown BG
- Subjects
- Health Policy, Humans, Precision Medicine economics, Precision Medicine methods, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Health Services Accessibility economics, Health Services Accessibility organization & administration, Pharmacogenetics economics, Pharmacogenetics organization & administration, Reimbursement Mechanisms economics, Reimbursement Mechanisms organization & administration
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Adoption of Pharmacogenomic Testing: A Marketing Perspective.
- Author
-
Koufaki MI, Karamperis K, Vitsa P, Vasileiou K, Patrinos GP, and Mitropoulou C
- Abstract
Pharmacogenomics is becoming an important part of clinical practice and it is considered one of the basic pillars of personalised medicine. However, the rate of pharmacogenomics adoption is still low in many healthcare systems, especially in low- or middle-income countries. The low level of awareness of healthcare specialists could be a potential reason due to which pharmacogenomics application is still in a premature stage but there are several other barriers that impede the aforementioned process, including the lack of the proper promotion of pharmacogenomic testing among interested stakeholders, such as healthcare professionals and biomedical scientists. In this study, we outline the available marketing theories and innovation that are applied to personalized medicine interventions that would catalyze the adoption of pharmacogenomic testing services in clinical practice. We also present the current ethical and legal framework about genomic data and propose ways to tackle the main concerns mentioned in the literature and to improve the marketing perspective of PGx., Competing Interests: Authors KK and CM were employed by the company The Golden Helix Foundation. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Koufaki, Karamperis, Vitsa, Vasileiou, Patrinos and Mitropoulou.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotyping for HLA-B*15:02 in Indonesian patients with epilepsy using a generic model.
- Author
-
Yuliwulandari R, Shin JG, Kristin E, Suyatna FD, Prahasto ID, Prayuni K, Mahasirimongkol S, Cavallari LH, Mitropoulou C, Patrinos GP, Hao J, Williams MS, and Snyder SR
- Subjects
- Adult, Alleles, Anticonvulsants adverse effects, Anticonvulsants therapeutic use, Carbamazepine adverse effects, Carbamazepine therapeutic use, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Epilepsy drug therapy, Female, Genetic Testing methods, Genotype, Humans, Indonesia, Male, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Risk Factors, Asian People genetics, Epilepsy genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease genetics, HLA-B15 Antigen genetics, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome genetics
- Abstract
Carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are strongly associated with the HLA-B*15:02 allele. Screening HLA-B*15:02 before CBZ administration might prevent CBZ-induced SJS/TEN by enabling clinicians to prescribe alternative therapy for positive patients. Similar to other Southeastern Asian countries, HLA-B*15:02 is highly prevalent in Indonesia. Therefore, we assessed the economic value of HLA-B*15:02 screening before CBZ prescription to patients with epilepsy in Indonesia. A generic cost-effectiveness model and decision support tool, developed to enable users to perform an initial cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare provider/payer perspective, were used to assess the value of HLA-B*15:02 genotyping. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adopting universal HLA-B*15:02 screening was 656,444,671 Indonesian Rupiah (IDR)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for patients compared with 2,634,975,574 IDR/QALY gained for providing valproic acid (alternative drug) without screening. Thus, neither HLA-B*15:02 screening nor substitution with VPA meets the Indonesian threshold for cost effectiveness. However, the improved outcomes with this test in other Asian countries may inform the desirability of implementation in Indonesia even with suboptimal cost-effectiveness., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Karamperis K, Koromina M, Papantoniou P, Skokou M, Kanellakis F, Mitropoulos K, Vozikis A, Müller DJ, Patrinos GP, and Mitropoulou C
- Subjects
- Antipsychotic Agents therapeutic use, Cost-Benefit Analysis economics, Humans, Mental Disorders drug therapy, Pharmacogenetics methods, Antipsychotic Agents economics, Mental Disorders economics, Mental Disorders genetics, Pharmacogenetics economics
- Abstract
Nowadays, many relevant drug-gene associations have been discovered, but pharmacogenomics (PGx)-guided treatment needs to be cost-effective as well as clinically beneficial to be incorporated into standard health care. To address current challenges, this systematic review provides an update regarding previously published studies, which assessed the cost-effectiveness of PGx testing for the prescription of antidepressants and antipsychotics. From a total of 1159 studies initially identified by literature database querying, and after manual assessment and curation of all of them, a mere 18 studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 18 studies evaluations, 16 studies (88.89%) drew conclusions in favor of PGx testing, of which 9 (50%) genome-guided interventions were cost-effective and 7 (38.9%) were less costly compared to standard treatment based on cost analysis. More precisely, supportive evidence exists for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 drug-gene associations and for combinatorial PGx panels, but evidence is limited for many other drug-gene combinations. Amongst the limitations of the field are the unclear explanation of perspective and cost inputs, as well as the underreporting of study design elements, which can influence though the economic evaluation. Overall, the findings of this article demonstrate that although there is growing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of genome-guided interventions in psychiatric diseases, there is still a need for performing additional research on economic evaluations of PGx implementation with an emphasis on psychiatric disorders., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Ethics and equity in rare disease research and healthcare.
- Author
-
Koromina M, Fanaras V, Baynam G, Mitropoulou C, and Patrinos GP
- Subjects
- Delivery of Health Care, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Genomics, Rare Diseases genetics
- Abstract
Rapid advances in next-generation sequencing technology, particularly whole exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing, have greatly affected our understanding of genetic variation underlying rare genetic diseases. Herein, we describe ethical principles of guiding consent and sharing of genomics research data. We also discuss ethical dilemmas in rare diseases research and patient recruitment policies and address bioethical and societal aspects influencing the ethical framework for genetic testing. Moreover, we focus on addressing ethical issues surrounding research in low- and middle-income countries. Overall, this perspective aims to address key aspects and issues for building proper ethical frameworks, when conducting research involving genomics data with a particular emphasis on rare diseases and genetics testing.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Genome-based therapeutic interventions for β-type hemoglobinopathies.
- Author
-
Karamperis K, Tsoumpeli MT, Kounelis F, Koromina M, Mitropoulou C, Moutinho C, and Patrinos GP
- Subjects
- Anemia, Sickle Cell genetics, Gene Editing methods, Genetic Therapy trends, Hemoglobinopathies blood, Hemoglobinopathies genetics, Humans, beta-Globins therapeutic use, beta-Thalassemia genetics, Anemia, Sickle Cell therapy, Hemoglobinopathies therapy, beta-Globins genetics, beta-Thalassemia therapy
- Abstract
For decades, various strategies have been proposed to solve the enigma of hemoglobinopathies, especially severe cases. However, most of them seem to be lagging in terms of effectiveness and safety. So far, the most prevalent and promising treatment options for patients with β-types hemoglobinopathies, among others, predominantly include drug treatment and gene therapy. Despite the significant improvements of such interventions to the patient's quality of life, a variable response has been demonstrated among different groups of patients and populations. This is essentially due to the complexity of the disease and other genetic factors. In recent years, a more in-depth understanding of the molecular basis of the β-type hemoglobinopathies has led to significant upgrades to the current technologies, as well as the addition of new ones attempting to elucidate these barriers. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to shed light on pharmacogenomics, gene addition, and genome editing technologies, and consequently, their potential use as direct and indirect genome-based interventions, in different strategies, referring to drug and gene therapy. Furthermore, all the latest progress, updates, and scientific achievements for patients with β-type hemoglobinopathies will be described in detail.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Inaugural Pharmacogenomics Access and Reimbursement Symposium.
- Author
-
Rogers SL, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C, Formea CM, Jones JS, and Brown BG
- Subjects
- District of Columbia, Health Personnel economics, Health Personnel trends, Health Services Accessibility economics, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement economics, Medical Assistance economics, Pharmacogenetics economics, Precision Medicine economics, Precision Medicine trends, Technology Assessment, Biomedical economics, Technology Assessment, Biomedical trends, Congresses as Topic trends, Health Services Accessibility trends, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement trends, Medical Assistance trends, Pharmacogenetics trends
- Abstract
The Pharmacogenomics Access & Reimbursement Symposium, a landmark event presented by the Golden Helix Foundation and the Pharmacogenomics Access & Reimbursement Coalition, was a 1-day interactive meeting comprised of plenary keynotes from thought leaders across healthcare that focused on value-based strategies to improve patient access to personalized medicine. Stakeholders including patients, healthcare providers, industry, government agencies, payer organizations, health systems and health policy organizations convened to define opportunities to improve patient access to personalized medicine through best practices, successful reimbursement models, high quality economic evaluations and strategic alignment. Session topics included health technology assessment, health economics, health policy and value-based payment models and innovation.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Attitudes and Awareness Toward Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine Adoption Among Health Sciences Trainees: Experience from Greece and Lessons for Europe.
- Author
-
Siamoglou S, Koromina M, Politopoulou K, Samiou CG, Papadopoulou G, Balasopoulou A, Kanavos A, Mitropoulou C, Patrinos GP, and Vasileiou K
- Subjects
- Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Pharmacogenetics methods, Precision Medicine methods
- Abstract
The increasing incorporation of genomics in clinical practice underscores the need to improve genomics knowledge and familiarity among future health care providers. To this end, it is important to consider both the "push" and the "pull" factors that shape or determine the transition of new personalized medicine (PM) discoveries to clinical practice. One of the pull factors involves the attitudes, values, and education of the user communities such as patients, physicians, and scientists who are poised to use the PM diagnostics. Among the push factors are often health scientists who contribute to PM science and development efforts. Seen in this light, health sciences trainees represent both the push and pull factors, not to mention the next generation of stakeholders and innovation actors who will make PM a reality in mainstream medical practice in the future. Τhis study aimed at investigating and comparing awareness and attitudes (ethical and other) on pharmacogenomics (PGx) and PM adoption among undergraduate students from the school of health sciences and other students. A convenience sample was used in this survey in two groups of students: 205 students from the School of Health Sciences and 141 students from other schools (e.g., biology, computer engineering, and business administration) of the University of Patras, Greece, and mostly at undergraduate education level. We observed that despite the relatively low level of awareness about genetics, PGx, and relevant notions, both groups of students were very optimistic about the genetic testing usefulness and professed their positive anticipations about PGx on disease management. Thus, health sciences students and those in other faculties appeared to be avid proponents of genetics testing and in favor of public endorsement of the concepts of individually tailored medicine. This case study in Greece is one of the first studies on perceptions and attitudes toward PGx testing and PM in Southern Europe. Of importance, the study informs the prospects and challenges on the push and pull factors of PM innovation while offering potential lessons for future PM curriculum needs in health sciences in other countries in Europe.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Prevalence of pharmacogenomic variants in 100 pharmacogenes among Southeast Asian populations under the collaboration of the Southeast Asian Pharmacogenomics Research Network (SEAPharm).
- Author
-
Runcharoen C, Fukunaga K, Sensorn I, Iemwimangsa N, Klumsathian S, Tong H, Vo NS, Le L, Hlaing TM, Thant M, Zain SM, Mohamed Z, Pung YF, Capule F, Nevado J Jr, Silao CL, Al-Mahayri ZN, Ali BR, Yuliwulandari R, Prayuni K, Zahroh H, Noor DAM, Xangsayarath P, Xayavong D, Kounnavong S, Sayasone S, Kordou Z, Liopetas I, Tsikrika A, Tsermpini EE, Koromina M, Mitropoulou C, Patrinos GP, Kesornsit A, Charoenyingwattana A, Wattanapokayakit S, Mahasirimongkol S, Mushiroda T, and Chantratita W
- Abstract
Pharmacogenomics can enhance the outcome of treatment by adopting pharmacogenomic testing to maximize drug efficacy and lower the risk of serious adverse events. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a cost-effective technology for genotyping several pharmacogenomic loci at once, thereby increasing publicly available data. A panel of 100 pharmacogenes among Southeast Asian (SEA) populations was resequenced using the NGS platform under the collaboration of the Southeast Asian Pharmacogenomics Research Network (SEAPharm). Here, we present the frequencies of pharmacogenomic variants and the comparison of these pharmacogenomic variants among different SEA populations and other populations used as controls. We investigated the different types of pharmacogenomic variants, especially those that may have a functional impact. Our results provide substantial genetic variations at 100 pharmacogenomic loci among SEA populations that may contribute to interpopulation variability in drug response phenotypes. Correspondingly, this study provides basic information for further pharmacogenomic investigations in SEA populations.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Catalyzing clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine interventions in Africa.
- Author
-
Mathuba B, Koromina M, Mitropoulou C, and Patrinos GP
- Subjects
- Africa, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Genetic Testing, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Humans, Policy, Pharmacogenetics trends, Precision Medicine trends
- Abstract
Pharmacogenomics is considered to be the low-hanging fruit in the tree of genomic medicine with numerous examples of its successful implementation in the clinic. In this perspective, we provide details about the potential clinical application of pharmacogenomics in African populations by using relevant drug cases and high-throughput genomics approaches; involving numerous countries and stakeholders; and most importantly exploiting the existing knowledge of respective large-scale initiatives. We emphasize on the necessity of constructing appropriate frameworks for government policies in African countries. We also provide input about different initiatives in the field of genomics medicine implementation in Africa, not only for their potential for synergy and collaboration among them, but also as models for replication in other regions worldwide, aiming for healthcare improvement.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.