Search

Abstract Glutaminase (GLS) hyperactivity was first described in 2019 in a patient with profound developmental delay and infantile cataract. Here, we describe a 4‐year‐old boy with GLS hyperactivity due to a de novo heterozygous missense variant in GLS, detected by trio whole exome sequencing. This boy also exhibits developmental delay without dysmorphic features, but does not have cataract. Additionally, he suffers from epilepsy with tonic clonic seizures. In line with the findings in the previously described patient with GLS hyperactivity, in vivo 3 T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of the brain revealed an increased glutamate/glutamine ratio. This increased ratio was also found in urine with UPLC‐MS/MS, however, inconsistently. This case indicates that the phenotypic spectrum evoked by GLS hyperactivity may include epilepsy. Clarifying this phenotypic spectrum is of importance for the prognosis and identification of these patients. The combination of phenotyping, genetic testing, and metabolic diagnostics with brain MRS and in urine is essential to identify new patients with GLS hyperactivity and to further extend the phenotypic spectrum of this disease.

Background/ObjectivesThe timely diagnosis of inherited metabolic disorders (IMD) is essential for initiating treatment, prognostication and genetic testing of relatives. Recognition of IMD in adults is difficult, because phenotypes are different from those in children and influenced by symptoms from acquired conditions. This systematic literature review aims to answer the following questions: (1) What is the diagnostic yield of exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS) for IMD in adults with unsolved phenotypes? (2) What characteristics do adult patients diagnosed with IMD through ES/GS have?MethodsA systematic search was conducted using the following search terms (simplified): “Whole exome sequencing (WES),” “Whole genome sequencing (WGS),” “IMD,” “diagnostics” and the 1,450 known metabolic genes derived from ICIMD. Data from 695 articles, including 27,702 patients, were analyzed using two different methods. First, the diagnostic yield for IMD in patients presenting with a similar phenotype was calculated. Secondly, the characteristics of patients diagnosed with IMD through ES/GS in adulthood were established.ResultsThe diagnostic yield of ES and/or GS for adult patients presenting with unexplained neurological symptoms is 11% and for those presenting with dyslipidemia, diabetes, auditory and cardiovascular symptoms 10, 9, 8 and 7%, respectively. IMD patients diagnosed in adulthood (n = 1,426), most frequently portray neurological symptoms (65%), specifically extrapyramidal/cerebellar symptoms (57%), intellectual disability/dementia/psychiatric symptoms (41%), pyramidal tract symptoms/myelopathy (37%), peripheral neuropathy (18%), and epileptic seizures (16%). The second most frequently observed symptoms were ophthalmological (21%). In 47% of the IMD diagnosed patients, symptoms from multiple organ systems were reported. On average, adult patients are diagnosed 15 years after first presenting symptoms. Disease-related abnormalities in metabolites in plasma, urine or cerebral spinal fluid were identified in 40% of all patients whom underwent metabolic screening. In 52% the diagnosis led to identification of affected family members with the same IMD.ConclusionES and/or GS is likely to yield an IMD diagnosis in adult patients presenting with an unexplained neurological phenotype, as well as in patients with a phenotype involving multiple organ systems. If a gene panel does not yield a conclusive diagnosis, it is worthwhile to analyze all known disease genes. Further prospective research is needed to establish the best diagnostic approach (type and sequence of metabolic and genetic test) in adult patients presenting with a wide range of symptoms, suspected of having an IMD.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021295156.

Abstract Background Reliable measurement of phenylalanine (Phe) is a prerequisite for adequate follow‐up of phenylketonuria (PKU) patients. However, previous studies have raised concerns on the intercomparability of plasma and dried blood spot (DBS) Phe results. In this study, we made an inventory of differences in (pre‐)analytical methodology used for Phe determination across Dutch laboratories, and compared DBS and plasma results. Methods Through an online questionnaire, we assessed (pre‐)analytical Phe measurement procedures of seven Dutch metabolic laboratories. To investigate the difference between plasma and DBS Phe, participating laboratories received simultaneously collected plasma‐DBS sets from 23 PKU patients. In parallel, 40 sample sets of DBS spotted from either venous blood or capillary fingerprick were analyzed. Results Our data show that there is no consistency on standard operating procedures for Phe measurement. The association of DBS to plasma Phe concentration exhibits substantial inter‐laboratory variation, ranging from a mean difference of −15.5% to +30.6% between plasma and DBS Phe concentrations. In addition, we found a mean difference of +5.8% in Phe concentration between capillary DBS and DBS prepared from venous blood. Conclusions The results of our study point to substantial (pre‐)analytical variation in Phe measurements, implicating that bloodspot Phe results should be interpreted with caution, especially when no correction factor is applied. To minimize variation, we advocate pre‐analytical standardization and analytical harmonization of Phe measurements, including consensus on application of a correction factor to adjust DBS Phe to plasma concentrations.