Search

Background: The site-of-disease microbiome and predicted metagenome were evaluated in a cross-sectional study involving people with presumptive tuberculous pericarditis. We also explored the interaction between C-reactive protein (CRP) and the microbiome., Methods: People with effusions requiring diagnostic pericardiocentesis (n=139) provided pericardial fluid for sequencing and blood for CRP measurement., Results: Pericardial fluid microbiota differed in β-diversity among people with definite (dTB, n=91), probable (pTB, n=25), and non- (nTB, n=23) tuberculous pericarditis. dTBs were Mycobacterium-, Lacticigenium-, and Kocuria-enriched vs. nTBs. HIV-positive dTBs were Mycobacterium-, Bifidobacterium-, Methylobacterium-, and Leptothrix-enriched vs. HIV-negative dTBs. HIV-positive dTBs on ART were Mycobacterium- and Bifidobacterium-depleted vs. those not on ART. dTBs exhibited enrichment in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) and mycobacterial metabolism pathways vs. nTBs. Additional non-pericardial involvement (pulmonary infiltrates) was associated with Mycobacterium-enrichment and Streptococcus-depletion. Mycobacterium reads were in 34 % (31/91) of dTBs, 8 % (2/25) of pTBs and 17 % (4/23) nTBs. People with CRP above (vs. below) the median value had different β-diversity (Pseudomonas-depleted). No correlation was found between enriched taxa in dTBs and CRP., Conclusions: Pericardial fluid microbial composition varies by tuberculosis status, HIV (and ART) status and dTBs are enriched in SCFA-associated taxa. The clinical significance, including mycobacterial reads in nTBs and pTBs, requires evaluation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data are available on the diagnostic accuracy of blood RNA biomarker signatures for extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). We addressed this question among people investigated for TB lymphadenitis and TB pericarditis, in Cape Town, South Africa., Methods: We enrolled 440 consecutive adults referred to a hospital for invasive sampling for presumptive TB lymphadenitis (n=300) or presumptive TB pericarditis (n=140). Samples from the site of disease underwent culture and/or molecular testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Mtb). Discrimination of patients with and without TB defined by microbiology or cytology reference standards was evaluated using seven previously reported blood RNA signatures by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and sensitivity/specificity at predefined thresholds, benchmarked against blood C-reactive protein (CRP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) target product profile (TPP) for a TB triage test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the best performing blood RNA signature and CRP., Results: Data from 374 patients for whom results were available from at least one microbiological test from the site of disease, and blood CRP and RNA measurements, were included. Using microbiological results as the reference standard in the primary analysis (N=204 with TB), performance was similar across lymphadenitis and pericarditis patients. In the pooled analysis of both cohorts, all RNA signatures had comparable discrimination with AUROC point estimates ranging 0.77-0.82, superior to that of CRP (0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.67). The best performing signature (Roe3) achieved an AUROC of 0.82 (0.77-0.86). At a predefined threshold of 2 standard deviations (Z2) above the mean of a healthy reference control group, this signature achieved 78% (72-83%) sensitivity and 69% (62-75%) specificity. In this setting, DCA revealed that Roe3 offered greater net benefit than other approaches for services aiming to reduce the number needed to investigate with confirmatory testing to <4 to identify each case of TB., Interpretation: RNA biomarkers show better accuracy and clinical utility than CRP to trigger confirmatory TB testing in patients with TB lymphadenitis and TB pericarditis, but still fall short of the WHO TPP for TB triage tests., Funding: South African MRC, EDCTP2, NIH/NIAID, Wellcome Trust, NIHR, Royal College of Physicians London., Research in Context: Evidence before this study: Blood RNA biomarker signatures and CRP measurements have emerged as potential triage tests for TB, but evidence is mostly limited to their performance in pulmonary TB. Microbiological diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) is made challenging by the need for invasive sampling to obtain tissue from the site of disease. This is compounded by lower sensitivity of confirmatory molecular tests for EPTB compared to their performance in pulmonary disease. We performed a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies of blood RNA biomarkers or CRP measurements for EPTB, which could mitigate the need for site-of-disease sampling for the diagnosis of TB. We searched PubMed up to 1 st August 2023, using the following criteria: "extrapulmonary [title/abstract] AND tuberculosis [title/abstract] AND biomarker [title/abstract]". Although extrapulmonary TB was included in several studies, none focused specifically on EPTB or included an adequate number of EPTB cases to provide precise estimates of test accuracy. Added value of this study: To the best of our knowledge, we report the first diagnostic accuracy study of blood RNA biomarkers and CRP for TB among people with EPTB syndromes. We examined the performance of seven previously identified blood RNA biomarkers as triage tests for TB lymphadenitis and TB pericarditis compared to a microbiology reference standard among people referred to hospital for invasive sampling in a high TB and HIV prevalence setting. Multiple blood RNA biomarkers showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to that previously reported for pulmonary TB in both EPTB disease cohorts, irrespective of HIV status. All seven blood RNA biomarkers showed superior diagnostic accuracy to CRP for both lymphadenitis and pericarditis, but failed to meet the combined >90% sensitivity and >70% specificity recommended for a blood-based diagnostic triage test by WHO. Nonetheless, in decision curve analysis, an approach of using the best performing blood RNA biomarker to trigger confirmatory microbiological testing showed superior clinical utility in clinical services seeking to reduce the number needed to test (using invasive confirmatory testing) to less than 4 for each EPTB case detected. If acceptable to undertake invasive testing in more than 4 people for each true case detected, then a test-all approach will provide greater net benefit in this TB/HIV hyperendemic setting. Implications of all the available evidence: Blood RNA biomarkers show some potential as diagnostic triage tests for TB lymphadenitis and TB pericarditis, but do not provide the level of accuracy for blood-based triage tests recommended by WHO for community-based tests. CRP has inferior diagnostic accuracy to blood RNA biomarkers and cannot be recommended for diagnostic triage among people with EPTB syndromes referred for invasive sampling.

Background: Lymphadenitis is the most common extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) manifestation. The microbiome is important to human health but uninvestigated in EPTB. We profiled the site-of-disease lymph node microbiome in tuberculosis lymphadenitis (TBL)., Methods: Fine-needle aspiration biopsies were collected from 158 pretreatment presumptive TBL patients in Cape Town, South Africa. 16S Illumina MiSeq rRNA gene sequencing was done., Results: We analysed 89 definite TBLs (dTBLs) and 61 non-TBLs (nTBLs), which had similar α- but different β-diversities (p= 0.001 ). Clustering identified five lymphotypes prior to TB status stratification: Mycobacterium- dominant , Prevotella- dominant and Streptococcus- dominant lymphotypes were more frequent in dTBLs whereas a Corynebacterium -dominant lymphotype and a fifth lymphotype (no dominant taxon) were more frequent in nTBLs. When restricted to dTBLs, clustering identified a Mycobacterium -dominant lymphotype with low α-diversity and non- Mycobacterium -dominated lymphotypes (termed Prevotella-Corynebacterium , Prevotella-Streptococcus ). The Mycobacterium dTBL lymphotype was associated with HIV-positivity and features characteristic of severe lymphadenitis (eg, larger nodes). dTBL microbial communities were enriched with potentially proinflammatory microbial short-chain fatty acid metabolic pathways (propanoate, butanoate) vs nTBLs. 11% (7/61) of nTBLs had Mycobacterium reads BLAST-confirmed as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex., Conclusions: TBL at the site-of-disease is not microbially homogeneous. Distinct microbial community clusters exist that, in our setting, are associated with different clinical characteristics, and immunomodulatory potentials. Non- Mycobacterium -dominated dTBL lymphotypes, which contain taxa potentially targeted by TB treatment, were associated with milder, potentially earlier stage disease. These investigations lay foundations for studying the microbiome's role in lymphatic TB. The long-term clinical significance of these lymphotypes requires prospective validation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Strengthening second-line drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) detection is a priority. GenoType MTBDRplus VER 2.0 performance is reduced with non-recommended ramp rate usage (temperature change speed between PCR cycles); however, ramp rate's effect on GenoType MTBDRsl VER 2.0 (MTBDRsl) performance, is unknown. Fifty-two Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-positive rifampicin-resistant smear-negative sputa and a Mycobacterium tuberculosis dilution series were tested at a manufacturer-recommended (2.2°C/second) or suboptimal (4.0°C/second) ramp rate. M. tuberculosis-complex-DNA positivity, indeterminates, fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable-resistance accuracy, banding differences, and, separately, inter-reader variability were assessed. Five (39%) of 13 re-surveyed laboratories did not use the manufacturer-recommended ramp rate. On sputum, 2.2°C/second improved indeterminates versus 4.0°C/second (0 of 52 versus 7 of 51; P = 0.006), incorrect drug-class diagnostic calls (0 of 104 versus 6 of 102; P = 0.013), and incorrect banding calls (0 of 1300 versus 54 of 1275; P < 0.001). Similarly, 2.2°C/second improved valid results [(52 of 52 versus 41 of 51; +21% (P = 0.001)] and banding call inter-reader variability [34 of 1300 (3%) versus 52 of 1300 (4%); P = 0.030]. At the suboptimal ramp rate, false-resistance and false-susceptible calls resulted from wild-type band absence rather than mutant band appearance, resulting in misclassification of moxifloxacin resistance level from high-to-low. Suboptimal ramp rate contributes to poor MTBDRsl performance. Laboratories must ensure that the manufacturer-recommended ramp rate is used., (Copyright © 2022 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tuberculosis lymphadenitis (TBL) is the most common extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) manifestation. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) is a World Health Organization-endorsed diagnostic test, but performance data for TBL, including on noninvasive specimens, are limited. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens (FNABs) from outpatients (≥18 years) with presumptive TBL ( n  = 135) underwent (i) routine Xpert MTB/RIF testing (later with Ultra once programmatically available), (ii) MGIT 960 culture (if Xpert or Ultra negative or rifampicin resistant), and (iii) study Ultra testing. Concentrated paired urine specimens underwent Ultra testing. Primary analyses used a microbiological reference standard (MRS). In a head-to-head comparison ( n  = 92) of an FNAB study Ultra and Xpert, Ultra had increased sensitivity (91% [95% confidence interval: 79, 98] versus 72% [57, 84]; P  = 0.016) and decreased specificity (76% [61, 87] versus 93% [82, 99]; P  = 0.020) and diagnosed patients not on treatment. Neither HIV nor alternative reference standards affected sensitivity and specificity. In patients with both routine and study Ultra tests, the latter detected more cases (+20% [0, 42]; P  = 0.034), and false-negative study Ultra results were more inhibited than true-positive results. Study Ultra false positives had less mycobacterial DNA than true positives (trace-positive proportions, 59% [13/22] versus 12% [5/51]; P  < 0.001). "Trace" exclusion or recategorization removed potential benefits offered over Xpert. Urine Ultra tests had low sensitivity (18% [7, 35]). Ultra testing on FNABs is highly sensitive and detects more TBL than Xpert (Ultra still missed some cases due in part to inhibition). Patients with FNAB Ultra-positive "trace" results, most of whom will be culture negative, may require additional clinical investigation. Urine Ultra testing could reduce the number of patients needing invasive sampling.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. Follow-on drug susceptibility testing (DST) requires additional sputum. Extract from the diamond-shaped chamber of the cartridge (dCE) of Ultra's predecessor, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), is useful for MTBDRsl-based DST but this is unexplored with Ultra. Furthermore, whether CE from non-diamond compartments is useful, the performance of FluoroType MTBDR (FT) on  CE, and rpoB cross-contamination risk associated with the extraction procedure are unknown. We tested MTBDRsl, MTBDRplus, and FT on CEs from chambers from cartridges (Ultra, Xpert) tested on bacilli dilution series. MTBDRsl on Ultra dCE on TB-positive sputa (n = 40) was also evaluated and, separately, rpoB amplicon cross-contamination risk . MTBDRsl on Ultra dCE from dilutions ≥10 3 CFU/ml (C Tmin <25, >"low semi-quantitation") detected fluoroquinolone (FQ) and second-line injectable (SLID) susceptibility and resistance correctly (some SLIDs-indeterminate). At the same threshold (at which ~85% of Ultra-positives in our setting would be eligible), 35/35 (100%) FQ and 34/35 (97%) SLID results from Ultra dCE were concordant with sputa results. Tests on other chambers were unfeasible. No tubes open during 20 batched extractions had FT-detected rpoB cross-contamination. False-positive Ultra rpoB results was observed when dCE dilutions ≤10 -3 were re-tested. MTBDRsl on Ultra dCE is concordant with isolate results. rpoB amplicon cross-contamination is unlikely. These data mitigate additional specimen collection for second-line DST and cross-contamination concerns.