Search

Copyright of Retos: Nuevas Perspectivas de Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación is the property of Federacion Espanola de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educacion Fisica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Cardiorespiratory coupling (CRC) is a physiological phenomenon that reflects the mutual interaction between the cardiac and respiratory control systems. It is mainly associated with efferent vagal activity from the central autonomic network. Few studies have explored the autonomic changes of CRC in preeclampsia, a critical obstetric complication related to possible autonomic dysfunctions and inflammatory disturbances. This study examined the autonomic mechanisms of CRC in women with severe and moderate preeclampsia and healthy controls by applying nonlinear methods based on information theory, such as mutual information (MI) and Renyi's mutual information (RMI) and the linear and nonlinear analysis of the Pulse-Respiration Quotient (PRQ). Methods: We studied three groups of parturient women in the third trimester of pregnancy with a clinical diagnosis of preeclampsia without severe symptoms (P, 38.5 ± 1.4 weeks of pregnancy, n=19), preeclampsia with severe symptoms (SP, 37.5 ± 0.9 weeks of pregnancy, n=22), and normotensive control women (C, 39.1 ± 1.3 weeks of pregnancy, n=20). 10-minutes of abdominal electrocardiograms (ECG) and respiratory signals (RESP) were recorded in all the participants. Subsequently, we obtained the maternal beat-to-beat (RR) and breath-tobreath (BB) time series from ECG and RESP, respectively. The CRC between RR and BB was quantified by nonlinear methods based on information theory, such as MI and RMI, along with the analysis of the novel index of PRQ. Subsequently, we computed the mean PRQ (mPRQ) and the normalized permutation entropy (nPermEn_PRQ) from the PRQ time series generated from BB and RR. In addition, we examined the vagal activity in the three groups by the logarithm of the median of the distribution of the absolute values of successive RR differences (logRSA). Results: The MI and RMI values were significantly lower (p<0.05) in the preeclamptic groups compared to the control group. However, no significant differences were found between the preeclamptic groups. The logRSA and nPermEn_PRQ indices were significantly lower (p<0.05) in SP compared to C and P. Conclusion: Our data suggest that parturient women with severe and mild preeclampsia may manifest an altered cardiorespiratory coupling compared with normotensive control women. Disrupted CRC in severe preeclampsia could be associated with vagal withdrawal and less complex cardiorespiratory dynamics. The difference in vagal activity between the preeclamptic groups may suggest a further reduction in vagal activity associated with the severity of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte is the property of Redprint Editora Ltda. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of CES Medicina is the property of Universidad CES and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)