Search

Milnacipran is a dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, clinically used for the treatment of major depression or fibromyalgia. Currently, there are no studies reporting the pharmacokinetics (PK) of milnacipran after intraperitoneal (IP) injection, despite this being the primary administration route in numerous experimental studies using the drug. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the PK profile of IP-administered milnacipran in mice and compare it to the intravenous (IV) route. First a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to accurately quantify milnacipran in biological samples. The method was used to quantify milnacipran in blood and brain samples collected at various time-points post-administration. Non-compartmental and PK analyses were employed to determine key PK parameters. The maximum concentration (Cmax) of the drug in plasma was at 5 min after IP administration, whereas in the brain, it was at 60 min for both routes of administration. Curiously, the majority of PK parameters were similar irrespective of the administration route, and the bioavailability was 92.5% after the IP injection. These findings provide insight into milnacipran's absorption, distribution, and elimination characteristics in mice after IP administration for the first time and should be valuable for future pharmacological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Milnacipran is a typical serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has been shown to have analgesic effects in several pain models. However, its antihyperalgesic effect in cisplatin-induced neuropathy remains unknown. We examined the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) milnacipran on allodynia in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice. (2) Methods: Peripheral neuropathy was induced by injecting cisplatin (2.3 mg/kg/day, IP) six times, on every other day. Saline or milnacipran (10, 30, 50 mg/kg, IP) were then administered to the neuropathic mice. We examined mechanical allodynia using von Frey hairs at preadministration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 min and 24 h after drug administration. We also measured the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) to confirm the analgesic effects of milnacipran. (3) Results: For the milnacipran groups, the decreased paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimuli were significantly reversed when compared to the preadministration values and the values in the saline-injected control group (p < 0.0001). Milnacipran administration to cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice resulted in a significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: Milnacipran given via IP injection attenuates mechanical allodynia in mouse models of cisplatin-induced poly-neuropathic pain. These effects were confirmed by significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation in the DRG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) affect more than 10 million patients annually worldwide, causing long-term cognitive and psychosocial impairments. Frontal lobe TBIs commonly impair executive function, but laboratory models typically focus primarily on spatial learning and declarative memory. We implemented a multi-modal approach for clinically relevant cognitive-behavioral assessments of frontal lobe function in rats with TBI and assessed treatment benefits of the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, milnacipran (MLN). Two attentional set-shifting tasks (AST) evaluated cognitive flexibility via the rats' ability to locate food-based rewards by learning, unlearning, and relearning sequential rule sets with shifting salient cues. Adult male rats reached stable pre-injury operant AST (oAST) performance in 3–4 weeks, then were isoflurane-anesthetized, subjected to a unilateral frontal lobe controlled cortical impact (2.4 mm depth, 4 m/sec velocity) or Sham injury, and randomized to treatment conditions. Milnacipran (30 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (VEH; 10% ethanol in saline) was administered intraperitoneally via implanted osmotic minipumps (continuous infusions post-surgery, 60 μL/h). Rats had a 10-day recovery post-TBI/Sham before performing light/location-based oAST for 10 days and, subsequently, odor/media-based digging AST (dAST) on the last test day (26-27 days post-injury) before sacrifice. Both AST tests revealed significant deficits in TBI+VEH rats, seen as elevated total trials and errors (p < 0.05), which generally normalized in MLN-treated rats (p < 0.05). This first simultaneous dual AST assessment demonstrates oAST and dAST are sufficiently sensitive and robust to detect subtle attentional and cognitive flexibility executive impairments after frontal lobe TBI in rats. Chronic MLN administration shows promise for attenuation of post-TBI executive function deficits, thus meriting further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Milnacipran is a dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, clinically used for the treatment of major depression or fibromyalgia. Currently, there are no studies reporting the pharmacokinetics (PK) of milnacipran after intraperitoneal (IP) injection, despite this being the primary administration route in numerous experimental studies using the drug. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the PK profile of IP-administered milnacipran in mice and compare it to the intravenous (IV) route. First a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to accurately quantify milnacipran in biological samples. The method was used to quantify milnacipran in blood and brain samples collected at various time-points post-administration. Non-compartmental and PK analyses were employed to determine key PK parameters. The maximum concentration (Cmax) of the drug in plasma was at 5 min after IP administration, whereas in the brain, it was at 60 min for both routes of administration. Curiously, the majority of PK parameters were similar irrespective of the administration route, and the bioavailability was 92.5% after the IP injection. These findings provide insight into milnacipran’s absorption, distribution, and elimination characteristics in mice after IP administration for the first time and should be valuable for future pharmacological studies.

(1) Background: Milnacipran is a typical serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has been shown to have analgesic effects in several pain models. However, its antihyperalgesic effect in cisplatin-induced neuropathy remains unknown. We examined the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) milnacipran on allodynia in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice. (2) Methods: Peripheral neuropathy was induced by injecting cisplatin (2.3 mg/kg/day, IP) six times, on every other day. Saline or milnacipran (10, 30, 50 mg/kg, IP) were then administered to the neuropathic mice. We examined mechanical allodynia using von Frey hairs at preadministration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 min and 24 h after drug administration. We also measured the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) to confirm the analgesic effects of milnacipran. (3) Results: For the milnacipran groups, the decreased paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimuli were significantly reversed when compared to the preadministration values and the values in the saline-injected control group (p < 0.0001). Milnacipran administration to cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice resulted in a significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: Milnacipran given via IP injection attenuates mechanical allodynia in mouse models of cisplatin-induced poly-neuropathic pain. These effects were confirmed by significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation in the DRG.

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that causes neuronal plasticity and increased hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis of stress disorders. The change in metabolism is reportedly associated with inadequate response to antianxiety and antidepressant agents. Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of milnacipran antidepressants on anxiety-like behavior in mice with diabetes mellitus. Methods: Male ICR mice were divided into naive, stress, diabetes mellitus (DM), DM + stress groups to measure anxiety-like behavior. Diabetes mellitus was induced using alloxan, and electric footshock stress was used as a stressor for 14 consecutive days. Anxiety-like behavior was measured using the light-dark box (LDB) and elevated plus maze (EPM) test at days 0, 7 and 14. The antidepressant milnacipran (MIL) was given for 7 days, on days 8 to 14. On day 14, evaluation of anxiety-like behavior after administration of MIL was carried out in all groups using LDB and EPM tests. Results: The results showed that administration of milnacipran effectively ameliorated anxiety-like behavior in the non-DM, but not in the DM group, using the LDB test. A similar result was demonstrated in the EPM test showing the non-DM group's attenuation after milnacipran administration. Conclusion: The present results indicate that there is an inadequate attenuation of the anxiety-like behavior after treatment with milnacipran in diabetes conditions.

Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) inhibit the presynaptic neuronal uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine and prolong the effects of the monoamines in the synaptic cleft within the central nervous system, leading to increased postsynaptic receptor activation and neuronal activities. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors can have multiple clinical indications, including as the first-line agents for the management of depression and anxiety, and as analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain. The effects of reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin are often dose-dependent and agent-dependent. There are five FDA-approved serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran and sibutramine) currently being marketed in the United States. As the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the incidence and prevalence of anxiety and depression across the country, there are significantly increased prescriptions of these medications perioperatively. Thus, anesthesiologists are more likely than ever to have patients administered with these agents and scheduled for elective or emergency surgical procedures. A thorough understanding of these commonly prescribed serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and their interactions with commonly utilized anesthetic agents is paramount. There are two potentially increased risks related to the continuation of SNRIs through the perioperative period: intraoperative bleeding and serotonin syndrome. SNRIs have some off-label uses, more new indications, and ever-increasing new applications in perioperative practice. This article aims to review the commonly prescribed serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and the current clinical evidence regarding their considerations in perioperative anesthesia and analgesia.

Depression is a common psychological disease with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, the involvement of synaptic plasticity in the pathogenesis of depression has shed light on the direction of developing novel antidepressants. Levomilnacipran is a newly approved medication for the treatment of adult major depressive disorder. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying its antidepressant-like effects have yet to be illuminated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of levomilnacipran in regulating synaptic plasticity and explore the possible molecular mechanisms of its antidepressant effects using a rat model of depression induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The results demonstrated that levomilnacipran (30 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly ameliorated depression-like behaviors in rats, alleviated the dysregulation of synaptic plasticity, and suppressed neuroinflammation within hippocampus induced by LPS-treatment. Levomilnacipran increased the expression of postsynaptic dense 95 (PSD-95) and synaptophysin (Syn) and reversed the imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines within hippocampus of depressed rats. Additionally, levomilnacipran elevated expression level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), accompanied by increased tyrosine kinase B (TrkB), phosphorylated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-Akt), and phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR). Taken together, these results suggest that levomilnacipran may exert antidepressant effects via upregulating BDNF/TrkB mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway to improve synaptic plasticity. These findings reveal potential mechanisms for the antidepressant effects of levomilnacipran and offer new insights into the treatments for depression., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Currently, in various world regions, the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders due to the impact of coronavirus infection is repeatedly increased compared to that in previous years. Among the predictors of their development during the pandemic, there are COVID-19 symptoms, a history of mental disorders, as well as restrictive measures, and financial losses.The paper describes three clinical cases of depressive disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the depiction of the anamnesis, somatic and mental status, the patholopsychogical qualification of the condition, and the justification of a therapy regimen. The multifactorial stressor effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has provoked an exacerbation of depression in a male patient with a history of affective disorder; the development of a nosogenic depressive reaction of demoralization in a female patient with coronavirus pneumonia; the worsening of somatization dysthymia in a female patient of involutional age. The timely recognition of depression and its treatment with currently available antidepressants have contributed to the achievement of high-quality remission, the increase of stress resistance, and the improvement of quality of life in the patients.

Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) inhibit the presynaptic neuronal uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine and prolong the effects of the monoamines in the synaptic cleft within the central nervous system, leading to increased postsynaptic receptor activation and neuronal activities. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors can have multiple clinical indications, including as the first-line agents for the management of depression and anxiety, and as analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain. The effects of reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin are often dose-dependent and agent-dependent. There are five FDA-approved serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran and sibutramine) currently being marketed in the United States. As the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the incidence and prevalence of anxiety and depression across the country, there are significantly increased prescriptions of these medications perioperatively. Thus, anesthesiologists are more likely than ever to have patients administered with these agents and scheduled for elective or emergency surgical procedures. A thorough understanding of these commonly prescribed serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and their interactions with commonly utilized anesthetic agents is paramount. There are two potentially increased risks related to the continuation of SNRIs through the perioperative period: intraoperative bleeding and serotonin syndrome. SNRIs have some off-label uses, more new indications, and ever-increasing new applications in perioperative practice. This article aims to review the commonly prescribed serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and the current clinical evidence regarding their considerations in perioperative anesthesia and analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of psychotropic agents such as fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, milnacipran, and fluphenazine on dopamine formation from p-tyramine catalysed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6.2 (Arg296Cys;Ser486Thr), CYP2D6.10 (Pro34Ser;Ser486Thr), and CYP2D6.39 (Ser486Thr) were compared with the effects on dopamine formation from p-tyramine by CYP2D6.1. Michaelis constants (Km) and maximal velocity (kcat) values for dopamine formation and inhibition constants (Ki) of the psychotropic agents were determined. For CYP2D6.39, the kcat values for fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and milnacipran, but not for paroxetine and fluphenazine, gradually increased with increasing concentrations, indicating activation of the catalysed reaction. Fluphenazine competitively inhibited dopamine formation catalysed by all variants, with a higher Ki value for CYP2D6.10. Among the three compounds that have a trifluoromethyl group in their chemical structure, only fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, as well as milnacipran that does not have this group, decreased Km values and/or increased kcat values for dopamine formation, suggesting that the group may not be essential for the activation. These findings indicate that substitution of amino acids at positions 34 and 486 can affect the affinity (Km) and enzymatic activity (kcat), respectively, for milnacipran and that the effect of substitution of arginine to cysteine at the 296th position on the activation would be effector dependent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)-induced apathy syndrome occurs in 5–20% of patients taking these drugs.Objective: to investigate the possibility and advantages of switching patients with SSRI-induced apathy to treatment with a SSRI and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 105 depressive patients without psychotic symptoms, who were observed to develop symptoms of SSRI-induced apathy during SSRI antidepressant monotherapy for at least 6 months. The patients were randomized to groups: 1) 35 patients were switched to milnacipran (Ixel 50–100 mg/day) with simultaneous antidepressant replacement; 2) 35 patients were prescribed milnacipran with a 2-week gradual discontinuation of the previous SSRI; 3) 35 patients were switched to combined therapy with milnacipran 50–100 mg/day and sulpiride (Eglonyl 50 mg/day). The latter was prescribed to test the hypothesis for the benefits of combined correction of SSRI-induced apathy syndrome. The duration of the investigation was 3 months. Changes in the condition of the patients were assessed during their visits before and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after changing therapy. The efficiency of antidepressant therapy was studied using the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scale; the changes in the severity of asthenic manifestations were examined according to a subjective asthenia assessment (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)). The UKU side effect rating scale was used to verify side effects.Results and discussion. A significant (p

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) presents a significant psychosocial burden, and there is an unmet need for additional treatment options in pediatric patients. Here, we report the results of two phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran extended release in children and adolescents with MDD. Methods: In the first study, LVM-MD-11, patients aged 12-17 years received daily doses of levomilnacipran 40 mg ( n  = 134), levomilnacipran 80 mg ( n  = 138), fluoxetine 20 mg ( n  = 134), or placebo ( n  = 141). In the second study, LVM-MD-14, patients aged 7-17 years received levomilnacipran 40 to 80 mg ( n  = 166), fluoxetine 20 mg ( n  = 166), or placebo ( n  = 160) daily. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were changes in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score, respectively. Results: In LVM-MD-11, there were no significant differences in change in CDRS-R total score between patients treated daily with placebo (least squares mean [LSM] change in CDRS-R total score -22.9) versus levomilnacipran 40 mg (-23.3; p  = 0.8035) or 80 mg (-22.6; p  = 0.8681). Similarly, in LVM-MD-14, there were no significant differences in LSM change in CDRS-R total score with placebo (-21.3) versus levomilnacipran 40 to 80 mg daily (-23.0; p  = 0.2215). There were also no significant differences between the fluoxetine and placebo groups in either study for changes in CDRS-R total score. Changes in CGI-S score were not significant between placebo and levomilnacipran 40 to 80 mg daily or between placebo and fluoxetine. Levomilnacipran was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: The high placebo response in this study prevented the detection of an effect of levomilnacipran in children and adolescents. Clinical Trial Registration numbers: NCT02431806 and NCT03569475.

Cataplexy is a sudden drop of antigravity-muscle tone triggered most often by positive emotional factors, which is one of the major symptoms of narcolepsy. Cataplexy has been treated pharmacologically, most often with tricyclic antidepressants. Even though tricyclic antidepressants are effective in reducing sleep paralysis and hypnagogic hallucinations, they even enhance daytime sleepiness, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension. We assessed the anticataplectic effect of milnacipran, an SNRI, on human and canine narcolepsy. We also assessed the effect of milnacipran on REM sleep suppression in nocturnal sleep. Ten human patients with narcolepsy–cataplexy who changed medication from clomipramine to milnacipran due to side effects were enrolled. The change in the frequency of cataplexy and side effects before and after drug replacement was investigated. To assess milnacipran's depressant effect on REM sleep, we performed nocturnal polysomnography examinations twice on each eight healthy adult subjects who were administered with milnacipran or placebo. In the study on canine narcolepsy, four genetically narcoleptic Doberman pinschers were enrolled. The food-elicited cataplexy test was used to assess the anticataplectic effect of milnacipran. Milnacipran significantly reduced cataplexy from 9.3 to 5.5 episodes per month in human patients without much side effects. The percentage of REM sleep significantly decreased (p = 0.042) in the subjects with milnacipran (17.5 ± 1.7%) compared to subjects with placebo (21.5 ± 2.3%). Milnacipran also significantly reduced cataplexy dose-dependently in the study on canine narcolepsy. Milnacipran reduced cataplexy in human patients and REM sleep in healthy human subjects. Our study contributes further to previously reported role of adrenergic uptake inhibition in cataplexy. This compound had less side effect than those of tricyclic antidepressant, clomipramine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]