1. A 30-Year Worldwide Research Productivity of Scientific Publication in Full-Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
- Author
-
Yanting Liu, Vit Kotheeranurak, Javier Quillo-Olvera, Van Isseldyk Facundo, Sagar Sharma, Siravich Suvithayasiri, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Guang-Xun Lin, Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul, Hussam Jabri, Ashwinkumar Vasant Khandge, Rajendra B. Aher, Meng-Huang Wu, Angela Wing Hang Ho, Nang Man Raymond Wong, Lau Sun Wing, Kutbuddin Akbary, Kandarpkumar K. Patel, Boonserm Pakdeenit, Kuo Tai Chen, Yadhu K. Lokanath, Milin S. Jaiswal, Tsz King Suen, Ghazwan A. Hasan, Luigi Andrew Sabal, and Jin-Sung Kim
- Subjects
bibliometric analysis ,citation analysis ,spine ,spine surgery ,vosviewer ,citespace ,Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,RC346-429 - Abstract
Objective The ever-growing number of articles related to full-endoscopic spine surgery published in the last few decades presents a challenge which is perplexing and time-consuming in identifying the current research status. The study aims to identify and analyze the most cited works related to full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery, compare the articles published by different publishers and area, and show the current publication status of full-endoscopic research. Methods Using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, we analyzed the bibliometric data selected from the Web of Science database between 1992 and 2022. Spine has the highest H-index with the most-cited journal in the field of full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery. China ranked as the most productive country, whereas the most cited with high H-index papers came from South Korea. For the author analysis, Yeung AT, Ruetten S, Hoogland T, Ahn Y, Choi G, and Mayer HM were the most impactful authors in the global and local citations. The most productive organization is Wooridul Spine Hospital. Conclusion The bibliometric study showed a growing trend of research on full-endoscopic decompression spine surgery over the past 30 years. It has demonstrated that there is a significant increase in the number of authors, institutions, and internationally collaborated countries. However, the quality of studies is still low, and the lack of high-quality clinical evidence and the trend of general journal submissions has somewhat affected the quality of endoscopy journals in recent years.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF